Democratic Healthcare Plans = Horseshit
THURSDAY DECEMBER 27 2007 9:00 AM
Submitted by FearTheReaper. Edited By erin_broadley.
TAGS: Universal Healthcare, Insurance, Clinton, Edwards, Obama

Those of you who think the Democratic presidential candidates will solve the healthcare crisis in any way are horribly wrong. The current plans of Hillary Clinton, John Edwards and Barack Obama will actually make the situation worse. The three candidate's plans are similar in that they do not provide universal health care, but rather universal health insurance. One hint that they are bad plans is that the insurance companies are all for them.
The Republicans would like the free market to take over and fix the problem because we all know that business, when allowed to run free, always benefits the common man. That is why unions formed, because the common man was treated so well.
But enough about those corporate whores, let’s talk about the other corporate whores. The Clinton and Edwards proposals both contain a mandate, which would force healthy individuals to buy insurance in order to put more money into the system to cover the sick. How great does that sound?
Mandates force patients to sign up for expensive, wasteful, for-profit insurance products without guaranteeing care or protecting them from cost increases.
Edwards' plan is completely retarded. He wants to go with mandated insurance with an option between public and private care. That way, private insurance companies can bounce the really sick and keep the healthy, so public insurance can pick up the tab for high-risk patients. The idea that we can regulate or hope private insurance companies will do the right thing is about as smart as the free market plan. Wait, it is the free market plan, except worse.
Hillary's plan is retardeder than Edwards'. It is exactly the same as Nixon’s proposed plan on 1974. Wait? Did I just write that? Yes, I did.
Even before Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton unveiled her new healthcare plan, Republicans attacked it as socialized medicine. They neglected to mention, however, that her plan bears a striking resemblance to changes that were proposed in 1974 -- by the late President Richard M. Nixon.
But hey, Nixon would have been considered a liberal by today's standards. Hillary's plan is also exactly like Mitt Romney's plan. And it is like John Edwards’ plan, except she decided to leave out any sort of enforcement mechanism for mandated insurance. That would make it, uh, not mandated. Although, Edwards' creepy enforcement ideas makes Hillary's non-enforcement look pretty good.
Edwards’ plan will collect back premiums by using collection agencies and garnishing wages. So he will make you buy health insurance, then send collection agencies after you when you don’t. I wonder how much money collection agencies have given to his campaign?
Families who lose coverage will be expected to enroll in another plan or be assigned one. For the few people who refuse to pay, the government will help collect back premiums with interest and collection costs by using tools like the ones it uses for student loans and taxes, including collection agencies and wage garnishment.
Sorry, but the whole thing sounds creepy to me, as well as a regulation nightmare.
Obama makes sure he falls to the right of Clinton and Edwards on just about every issue and healthcare is no different. He has been spending his days bagging on universal healthcare, much like the Republicans. Not surprisingly, his universal health insurance plan is more half-assed than his opponents’ plans.
Obama’s plan only mandates insurance for kids. But under his plan, healthy people could choose not to buy insurance and then sign up for it later when they became sick. How awesome is that? This would result in higher premiums for everyone else.
Still, I’d take no mandates over mandates. Obama’s is the only plan that doesn’t bend over completely for the insurance companies, but it falls very short of taking care of the problem.
All three plans fall way short and will lead to a massive payday for insurance companies. You know, the very companies whose bullshit policies have led us to this very point. Any plan that does not address the simple point that for profit health care does not work will only make the problem worse.
Individual mandates are a step backward…Insurance companies support individual mandate plans because they guarantee them more customers, revenues, and influence over medical decision-making. What’s not for them to like?”
Right now Dennis Kucinich is the only candidate with a decent plan: Universal single-payer, not-for-profit health care system. Until the profit is taken out of health care expect more of the same.

















PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
Colinism
Atlanta, GA
July 2005
DEC 27, 2007 09:18 AM
flabajaba2213
Bristol, RI
July 2006
DEC 27, 2007 09:32 AM
Toku666
Columbus, OH
May 2004
DEC 27, 2007 09:52 AM
OctEgon
Tustin, CA
July 2005
DEC 27, 2007 10:09 AM
Johnny_Flapjacks
Williamsport, PA
September 2006
DEC 27, 2007 10:13 AM
CategoryError
Delta, BC
September 2006
DEC 27, 2007 10:15 AM
DownNeck
Bloomfield, NJ
March 2006
DEC 27, 2007 10:23 AM
geo35
Minneapolis, MN
January 2003
DEC 27, 2007 10:31 AM
Colinism
Atlanta, GA
July 2005
DEC 27, 2007 10:44 AM
srw134
Morrisville, NC
July 2007
DEC 27, 2007 10:46 AM
AmbientLight
Huntington Beach, CA
March 2005
DEC 27, 2007 10:48 AM
Colinism
Atlanta, GA
July 2005
DEC 27, 2007 10:55 AM
freshprncebelair
Ellicott City, MD
June 2004
DEC 27, 2007 11:40 AM
401kboy
Woodbridge, NJ
May 2007
DEC 27, 2007 11:55 AM
Subrosa
San Francisco, CA
July 2004
DEC 27, 2007 12:44 PM
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5