• news
  • SUNDAY DECEMBER 16 2007 9:00 AM

Dear Democrats, Your Congressional Leaders Suck Balls



A couple of days ago I wrote an amazing article about Nancy Pelosi being unworthy of her position as Speaker of the House. Today I will address why Harry Reid is an incompetent, spineless piece of shit who is unworthy of his position as Senate Majority Leader. Grow some balls Dems and kick spineless grandpa to the curb.

On Monday, the Nevada moron will bring a new FISA bill to the floor of the Senate that will help the Bush administration get the telecom industry immunity and surveillance oversight protections. At the same time he will be taking an action that he assured concerned Democrats that he would not take. Nice work, liar.

Harry could have brought two bills to the floor. One did not give the telecom companies a free pass for illegally spying on Americans. The other, written by Jay “I got millions from the telecoms” Rockefeller (horrible nickname) and Dick Cheney (horrible monster), gives the companies immunity from civil lawsuits for committing CRIMES.

Reid has pulled a fast one by making the Senate Intelligence Committee bill the "base bill." That means to remove amnesty and increase oversight would require 60 votes, which is impossible. Reid has been telling people for weeks that he would not bring the bill to the floor as a “base bill.” Every Democratic presidential candidate and 14 Senators have demanded that the other bill be the base bill. He is a fucking liar and no better than the Bush administration for pulling such a move.

But that is not even the most disgusting aspect of this move. Reid is screwing over Chris Dodd, who put a hold on the amnesty bill. He is refusing to honor that hold. Understand that Reid honors holds for Republicans constantly, like the Emmit Till Bill, which would authorize $10-million annually over 10 years to rejuvenate prosecutions of pre-1970 civil rights murders.

Now, that bill is not important enough to override a hold. But giving the telecoms immunity from their crimes is very important.

Dodd was forced to fly back to DC on Friday to filibuster. You may be wondering why, because I just wrote that the vote would take place on Monday. Well, Harry the devious made sure the filibuster would take place over the weekend with slimy schedule maneuvers. So, Dodd will filibuster in front of an empty chamber, when reporters are gone and other Senators are enjoying their weekend. Then when the Senate returns on Monday, Harry will push for a cloture vote. This is absolutely disgusting behavior from a Democratic leader.

Understand this Democrats: Your leadership is doing everything it can to give Bush and Cheney the FISA bill they want. It gives the telecoms total immunity for criminal acts and limits oversight on an illegal program. The Democrats are putting their energy into making sure their opponents win and The Constitution is used like toilet paper.

And for those tools out there, who think this is about keeping America safer, you are shockingly naïve.


To detect narcotics trafficking, for example, the government has been collecting the phone records of thousands of Americans and others inside the United States who call people in Latin America


Wow, what a surprise. The Bush administration was abusing their already abusive system. How completely in character of them.


In a separate N.S.A. project, executives at a Denver phone carrier, Qwest, refused in early 2001 to give the agency access to their most localized communications switches, which primarily carry domestic calls, according to people aware of the request, which has not been previously reported. They say the arrangement could have permitted neighborhood-by-neighborhood surveillance of phone traffic without a court order, which alarmed them.


Early 2001. When was 9/11 again? Why should I believe this program was not used against political opponents? Why should companies who aided this blatantly illegal program be spared from lawsuits? But most importantly, why the fuck is the Democratic Senate Majority Leader giving aid to people who have undermined The Constitution?

What is it about November 2006 that you did not understand, Harry? The American people quite simply handed the Democrats a stunning victory so they would curb the abuses by Bush and company. You have taken that mandate and turned it into a pile of shame. Please explain to me how those on the opposite side of the aisle would be doing this in any way differently. They would not. You are a coward and possibly the most useless Majority Leader I have ever seen. Your hideous acts demoralize your base and drive people from your party. In essence, Harry, you are the Democratic Karl Rove. You and your kind are why I am not and never will be a Democrat. Although, there is a guy who would make a great Senate Majority Leader. He's the guy who is filibustering this bill: Chris Dodd. You can send Chris Dodd a bit of support here.

And feel free to call or email your Senator Democrats and let them know where you stand on the Majority Leader’s actions.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

Comments
Amenti

Amenti

Southington, CT
January 2006

DEC 16, 2007 12:30 PM

punk said:
I work in the telecom industry. This is dangerous legislation. It's possible to literally record and store every piece of communication that leaves your home. Phone, Internet access - all of it. Who you called, when you called them, what you talked about, what websites you visit, when you visit them, what you downloaded, what you submitted.

Even I can do that to a limited degree with the tools I carry, but thanks to legislation, that's illegal. And it should stay that way.

I'm going to write my local representatives, and I urge all of you to do the same.



I think you hit it right on, punk. It's not only unconstitutional, but the prospect of the government spying on our EVERY move is also extremely unsettling and scary....

and I, for one, think that this sort of legislation is hardly going to do a damn thing anyhow, except alienating Americans. whatever

Amenti

Amenti

Southington, CT
January 2006

DEC 16, 2007 12:31 PM

_kungfoo_

_kungfoo_

Los Angeles, CA
April 2005

DEC 16, 2007 12:56 PM

grazing_cattle said:

KUNGFOO said:
There is no clean slate possible, telecom immunity now set the stage for telecoms to claim this legislation as a defense against any future potential lawsuits. Which is why this particular piece of legislation is crucial.



Against any future potential lawsuits concerning a past offence? I can't imagine it referring to the possibility that this law will protect them if they break the law again.
I also think that your link about EFF just shows why we need these FISA law to be more strict as well as making warrants for wiretaps a little less accessible.



I don't say this to be a dick, as I fear that most people don't really understand the issue here, but...

This post shows an fundamental misunderstanding of what I have said, the argument, and a understanding of our legal system. To adequately respond, it would involve a lot of typing, and frankly, I'm not even sure you would completely comprehend it. In fact, I initially suspected you haven't either throughly read or comprehended the article, because there are two FISA bills (one without the immunity), which flies in the face of this earlier post:

grazing_cattle said:
FISA laws are outdated and desperately need to be updated and changed and with all change there is generally a little give and take. If the only payment for this change is amnesty to phone companies, I support it all the way.



And hell, if I really had the time today to type it all out, with proper references, I would. Maybe somebody else here would be willing to tackle it.

shapeshifter23

shapeshifter23

San Francisco, CA
September 2005

DEC 16, 2007 01:13 PM

401kboy said:
Why does this surprise anyone. The Dems and Repubs are simply two faces of the same party - the ruling party. Any public differences between the parties are just window dressing. They all serve their corporate overloads.



Agreed. But you must realize that it is part of FTR's job here to make sure we don't think too far outside the box.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

DEC 16, 2007 01:26 PM

shapeshifter23 said:

401kboy said:
Why does this surprise anyone. The Dems and Repubs are simply two faces of the same party - the ruling party. Any public differences between the parties are just window dressing. They all serve their corporate overloads.



Agreed. But you must realize that it is part of FTR's job here to make sure we don't think too far outside the box.



There is no box. Move along.

Quorthon_Seth

Quorthon_Seth

I'm lost
June 2007

DEC 16, 2007 04:44 PM

Of course they want the ability to wiretap anyone at any time.


They are sure that their candidate will be the one in charge next year so why wouldn't they want to have that control over the lowly plebes?


Democrats are no different than Republicans, all either one cares about it expanding and maintaining power for their own party.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

DEC 16, 2007 05:07 PM

Explain "base" bill. I don't really understand how it's different than any other bill. The cloture is what's going to fuck them assuming the majority of the Senate is going along with this (which is safe to assume?), but that's not really any different than the normal process. Does it mean it can't be amended or something? I've never heard that term before. Moreover, where is this in the House? Has it been passed already or is it starting in the Senate?

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
Thanks for doing my research for me. My lazy ass doesn't have the time at the moment.

Rafi

Rafi

Santa Monica, CA
January 2003

DEC 16, 2007 05:30 PM

FearTheReaper said:

shapeshifter23 said:

401kboy said:
Why does this surprise anyone. The Dems and Repubs are simply two faces of the same party - the ruling party. Any public differences between the parties are just window dressing. They all serve their corporate overloads.



Agreed. But you must realize that it is part of FTR's job here to make sure we don't think too far outside the box.



There is no box. Move along.



Also, people who use the phrase "think outside the box" are unequivocally the least likely people in the world to actually "think outside the box."

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

DEC 16, 2007 05:32 PM

The base bill needs 60 votes to be amended, which means it is not going to happen. Had he used the bill without immunity, then 60 votes would be needed to INCLUDE immunity and oversight.

It is something you would expect a Republican to do.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

DEC 16, 2007 07:16 PM

FearTheReaper said:
The base bill needs 60 votes to be amended, which means it is not going to happen. Had he used the bill without immunity, then 60 votes would be needed to INCLUDE immunity and oversight.

It is something you would expect a Republican to do.

Sweet. whatever

TheStatutoryApe

TheStatutoryApe

Huntington Beach, CA
November 2007

DEC 16, 2007 07:22 PM

I believe that the power under question is the ability to "tap" international calls originating in the US.
As far as immunity goes its to cover the companies in regards to what has already happened. Its not as if they now have the ability to wiretap peoples phones at will with out worry of prosecution. Essentially what they're saying is "We're not going to let you get fucked because you believed the guv when they told you what they were doing was legal."
The most likely reason for them chosing the version they did is because a main part of this is the use of ECHELON which the judiciary commitees version prohibits.
Expanding ECHELON's datamining to target international calls originating from the US is the only form of "illegal wiretapping" that has been uncovered as far as I know. Does anyone know of any that were targeting a single person or line?

shapeshifter23

shapeshifter23

San Francisco, CA
September 2005

DEC 16, 2007 07:59 PM

Rafi said:

FearTheReaper said:

shapeshifter23 said:

401kboy said:
Why does this surprise anyone. The Dems and Repubs are simply two faces of the same party - the ruling party. Any public differences between the parties are just window dressing. They all serve their corporate overloads.



Agreed. But you must realize that it is part of FTR's job here to make sure we don't think too far outside the box.



There is no box. Move along.



Also, people who use the phrase "think outside the box" are unequivocally the least likely people in the world to actually "think outside the box."



Worse it was able to me to roll a shoe to my dog and to have slept with an oyster.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

DEC 16, 2007 08:12 PM

TheStatutoryApe said:
"We're not going to let you get fucked because you believed the guv when they told you what they were doing was legal."

Ignorance of the law is not an excuse. Any lawyer will tell you that. Hell, common sense will tell you that. Otherwise the most common defense would be "I didn't know it was illegal." They broke the law--bottom line. This is ridiculous. The administration and Republicans are just trying to reward them for playing along. It's ridiculous.

scylis

scylis

USA
November 2004

DEC 16, 2007 09:42 PM

the war with Eastasia is a LIE! there is no war at all!

what? oh... sorry, guys. a little too early. i'll come back in about 14 years.

MotherWolf

MotherWolf

Congers, NY
November 2007

DEC 17, 2007 12:39 AM

I still find it hard to believe that people still get all pissy, with this MY party is better than yours bullshit. They both suck. If you haven't noticed the once great US of A has become a 2nd world country. Our dollar is in the shitter, our economy belongs to China and Mexico (just look at anything in your damn house I'll wager it's made in one of those two places)

Our country is dying people and it's separatism like this that is to blame. We have been divided into a country of whining, pathetic, pussies, and God forbid that the shit hits the fan because we don't even have the arms to defend ourselves, and our country, from it, whether it's from outside or within.

Don't blame the Republicans without blaming the Democrats also, or vice versa.

We lost our right to Bear Arms, thanks to both.
We lost our Right to Free Speech, thanks to Both (remember Tipper Gore and now Telecom)
We lost our industrial and manufacturing jobs, thanks to both.
Dems raise our taxes, Reps give us NAFTA.

The whole structure of this government and it's powers has been changed, and not for the better.

When the civil war starts, don't look for me, I'll be in the mountains, waiting for all the divided sheep to kick each others asses, then when I hear the call for revolution I'll make my way back down and join the New Americans, the ones that don't care about race or class or religion or gender or whatever the hell else we're divided by now, the ones who realize that only by being united do we stand a prayer in hell.

Long live the Revolution, may it one day grow the fuck up.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next