• news
  • SUNDAY DECEMBER 9 2007 9:00 AM

We Had A Good Run, Didn’t We? So Long, America



Finally, the government is privitizing domestic spying. I feel so safe now. When I think of America, I usually envision large companies sifting through all of my information, my home and hopefully, my unmentionables. Thankfully, this dream is coming true. Up until this point, information from domestic spy satellites was only used by scientific agencies. After 9/11, the NSA was given powers that allowed it to monitor domestic communications without getting those pesky warrants. And now the Bush administration is blowing it out!


Under a proposal being reviewed by Congress, a National Applications Office will be established to coordinate how the Department of Homeland Security and domestic law enforcement and rescue agencies use imagery and communications intelligence picked up by U.S. spy satellites. If the plan goes forward, the NAO will create the legal mechanism for an unprecedented degree of domestic intelligence gathering that would make the United States one of the world's most closely monitored nations.


Sweet. Monitor the shit out of us. We used to have this stupid law that confined intelligence collection to foreign countries and battlefields. Not anymore. And let's make sure private companies are a huge part of it, because they never do anything wrong and have continually shown throughout history that they can be trusted.


The intelligence-sharing system to be managed by the NAO will rely heavily on private contractors, including Boeing, BAE Systems, L-3 Communications and Science Applications International Corporation.


Mmmmm, safety. Nothing makes me feel safer than knowing BAE Systems has my back. Also my front. And my unmentionables.

Last month all the private domestic spy companies went to the intelligence conference in San Antonio and lobbied intelligence officials, in a giant, disgusting, display of everything that is wrong with our country. But, hey, those companies are the ones who told the government that we needed to expand our domestic spying, so bravo.

A study group was put together by a couple of government agencies and they thought it would be a great idea to use former intelligence officers. Many of them just happened to be employed by private intelligence companies, like Booz Allen. Guess what crazy conclusion they came up with?


Not surprisingly, its contractor-advisers called for a major expansion in the domestic use of the spy satellites that they sell to the government. Since the end of the Cold War and particularly since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, they said, the "threats to the nation have changed, and there is a growing interest in making available the special capabilities of the intelligence community to all parts of the government, to include homeland security and law enforcement entities and on a higher priority basis."


Word. We think you should give us money to do stuff. Lots of stuff. Oh, did I mention we’re going to need lots of money? To do that stuff we said should be done? Thanks for asking. Hey, you know that thing I said we should be doing with that satellite? Turns out I can totally do that. And it will only cost millions of dollars. How weird is it that I am the guy who is able to do what I said needed to be done? For money?

The domestic spying contracts are worth billions of dollars and this is a brand new business. The new plan was revealed in August and caught some people off guard. Bennie G. Thompson, a Democratic member of Congress from Mississippi and the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee was surprised when he read about it in the Wall Street Journal.


There was no briefing, no hearing, and no phone call from anyone on your staff to any member of this committee of why, how or when satellite imagery would be shared with police and sheriffs' officers nationwide.


Well, that is probably because most Americans don’t want to be spied on. Duh. Actually, maybe I’m just being an alarmist and blowing this all out of proportion.


"It will terrify you if you really understand the capabilities of satellites," warned Jane Harman, a Democratic member of Congress from California. "Even if this program is well-designed and executed, someone somewhere else could hijack it.”


Oh.

So far the NAO has been delayed. It was supposed to kick off on October 1st, but annoying Congress members and civil rights hippies have been making noise. Of course, later we will learn that the Bush administration did not delay the program. And then when we try to investigate, we won’t be able to because all the information is “classified.” This entire program will always be classified, which is awesome, because it is watching us.


America is going forward, and as we do so, we must remain keenly aware of the threats to our country.

Those in authority should take appropriate precautions to protect our citizens. But we will not allow this enemy to win the war by changing our way of life or restricting our freedoms.

- George W. Bush, September 12, 2001.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 14

Next

Comments
hightechrednech

hightechrednech

Las Cruces, NM
January 2006

DEC 09, 2007 03:56 PM

The worst part is that people aren't shocked anymore. If and when this does pass it will just be another nail in the coffin of the freedom that the generations of servicemembers have died to protect, both here and overseas. As for the plague we don't need one, we just need to stop treating ourselves with kid gloves. The time has come to returne to social darwinism. If you can't figure out that sticking a fork in the toaster will shock you then piss off, you don't need to metaphorically shit in the gene pool. Hell who knows where we would be if we had followed that idea all this time, GWB might have pulled a vending machine over on top of himself in high school rather that get that stupid stickman warning that sayd you may cause serious injury or death as this machi9ne may tip over and fall on you,

MegaSurge

MegaSurge

Portland, OR
March 2003

DEC 09, 2007 05:46 PM

Moonrabbit said:

michael9000000 said:
Aren't we being a bit over-dramatic here?



Not to sound paranoid here or anything. But that is the kind of attitude that lets things like this be put into place unchallenged.
They count on it being too inconvenient for us to stand up for ourselves.



Indeed. I'm so sick of people claiming that they have nothing to hide so let them spy on them. They're clueless idiots to be quite frank...uneducated in the history of how such invasion corrupts those in prior and in up oppressing us all. Benjamin Franklin said, "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.". There is a reason he said that...it's because he was no fool and knew the consequences of such a thing. But as long as people do nothing to tell Them we do not want such spying, then They will proceed. Frederick Douglass said, "If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning.". The summary is that those that expect freedom but do nothing for it have already lost it. Personally, I have been doing whatever I can against this crap since before 2000, mainly be be active with the
ACLU and EFF. It may not seem like much but it is a centralized voice that is already organized.

MegaSurge

MegaSurge

Portland, OR
March 2003

DEC 09, 2007 05:55 PM

Oz_the_Vamp said:
Uhh... if all these people are spying on all of us, then why the fuck didn't anyone stop the shootings in Omaha and Denver this week? Because, I mean... they had to know these people were going to commit these crimes, yet they did nothing. Oh wait, it's just like 9/11 all over again. I'll go crawl back into my coffin now.



They need to let more of this sort of thing happen so they can use all the tragedies as ammo for their case that we "need" this surveillance. Why do you think it's all so widely televised everywhere on the universal propaganda machine (otherwise known as TV)? The Truth, of course, is that none of this spying will stop those who really want to do whatever evil they want. It will merely oppress the rest of us. Frederick Douglass has a nice quote which is, "The life of a nation is secure only while the nation is honest, truthful, and virtuous.". This is someting that the government needs to work as well as the majority of the people. The hippie idealist in me has to wonder, "Why can't we all just get along?".
biggrin

MegaSurge

MegaSurge

Portland, OR
March 2003

DEC 09, 2007 06:08 PM

xazapdmytinu said:
Well, look at the bright side. with all that information to sift through it ought to create a lot of new jobs!



Wrong! The NSA has already worked with a private company and designed an artificial intelligence search engine to sift through the massive amount of audio, visual and electronic test data that it collects. (I believe they have since purchased the entire company and dismantled it's entity since I originally read about that gem.) No new jobs needed. The wonderful computers do all the core work of cataloguing, organizing, sifting and assembling complete reports for them. Isn't that super? wink

MegaSurge

MegaSurge

Portland, OR
March 2003

DEC 09, 2007 06:12 PM

Priest_Sphinxter said:
Maybe I'm crazy, but honestly I trust private corporations with my privacy more than I do the government. At least with private companies, we can sue if they abuse that privacy or they can lose stock. It's far easier to take on private companies than the government.

And while they lose a laptop now and then, private companies don't intentionally leak highly classified material about agents still in the field just to get back at their political rivals.



Apparently, you never read any Neal Stephenson or William Gibson. Have you at least worked for a Corp? I mean, they're pretty much evil. wink

code_red

code_red

Portland, OR
July 2005

DEC 09, 2007 06:27 PM

I'm pretty sure this is exactly how it went in "Children of Men"... minus the infertility thing.

I weep for this country... and start to pack my bag so I can move to Australia and claim political asylum.

goatinamoat

goatinamoat

New York, NY
March 2006

DEC 09, 2007 06:28 PM

MegaSurge said: Benjamin Franklin said, "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both."


Has to be one of the most misquoted things Franklin said.

The actual quote is
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.

And reasonable men can argue what is "essential".

shapeshifter23

shapeshifter23

San Francisco, CA
September 2005

DEC 09, 2007 06:34 PM

MegaSurge said:
Apparently, you never read any Neal Stephenson or William Gibson. Have you at least worked for a Corp? I mean, they're pretty much evil. wink



Corporations are not evil. They are simply
amoral.

Horrorflick

Horrorflick

Detroit, MI
February 2003

DEC 09, 2007 06:41 PM

I'll be dead soon. fuck everybody...

mattacme

mattacme

Calistoga, CA
February 2006

DEC 09, 2007 06:42 PM

I kissed the Constitution goodbye long ago.

We're fucked. Our beautiful Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights are a part of history now. The United States is now a second-tier nation and our freedoms have been truly and completely compromised, and all in the name of saving them.

Ha!

MegaSurge

MegaSurge

Portland, OR
March 2003

DEC 09, 2007 06:54 PM

shapeshifter23 said:

MegaSurge said:
Apparently, you never read any Neal Stephenson or William Gibson. Have you at least worked for a Corp? I mean, they're pretty much evil. wink



Corporations are not evil. They are simply
amoral.



True, true. The premise of the Corps are at least amoral. The evil comes in because those in power get corrupted by greed and what they do while in power creates that "evil". Evil is, of course, another matter of perception and opinion. The surmise is then that the amoral Corps become evil through greed corrupting those in power. I just skip to the chase and call them evil.

P.S. I enjoyed your other comments. Good show! wink

MegaSurge

MegaSurge

Portland, OR
March 2003

DEC 09, 2007 07:00 PM

goatinamoat said:

MegaSurge said: Benjamin Franklin said, "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both."


Has to be one of the most misquoted things Franklin said.

The actual quote is
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.

And reasonable men can argue what is "essential".



Thank you. I couldn't find the right quote and in haste used the version I found. I think that his use of the word "essential" is not in the context of which liberties may or may not be essential but rather that libery itself is essential.


P.S. Yikes! I had an entire sentence all messed up in that post. I guess I should pay more attention before submitting. I seemingly only have a short time to go back and edit the post.

meggle

meggle

Berkeley, CA
November 2002

DEC 09, 2007 07:28 PM

Splitting hairs on the Franklin quote: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

It's oft attributed to him, this quote on liberty and safety, either from 1755 or 1759. But, some researchers now believe it was from another diplomat (Richard Jackson) that had a book published by Franklin. Franklin claimed he didn't write it, too, in a private letter to David Hume saying Jackson was the author. Perhaps we'll never know. Whoa, the problems of historiography and primary sourcing...

He did say this one, though, in Poor Richard's Almanac, 1738- "Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power."

Anyway...Close enough, no matter who said it, it's worth hearing again. So, sorry for this entry!

michael9000000

michael9000000

New York, NY
July 2007

DEC 09, 2007 08:10 PM

varukasalt said:

michael9000000 said:
Aren't we being a bit over-dramatic here?



No, we're not. We're bending over and taking this shit, no dinner, no movie and no lube. Personally, not my favorite position. Perhaps you would be happier in North Korea, or Burma? Then you wouldn't have to worry about all this pesky "freedom" and "personal liberties" we keep blathering on about.



Who is the "we" you're talking about? I never ever worry about bending over for the government, no matter who's in office.

I'm not sure where your references to North Korea and Burma came from, so I'm just gonna leave them alone.

As far as all the "pesky 'freedom' and 'personal liberties' we keep blathering on about"... Last time I checked, we Americans are still free... unless they've declared martial law in Florida.

What personal liberty did you lose?

Here's the deal... there's a lot of dumb shit happening in the world of politics these days... no secret about that. However, it's never as bad as the media, political activists, and bloggers make it seem. Even when most conservatives talk about the 'defeatist liberal machine' I still don't buy it cuz the conservatives were just as bad when Clinton was in office. Do you remember when the whole Monica Lewinsky thing broke out. Holy shit! Maybe you weren't watching the same news I was, but the conservatives made it seem like the whole country was gonna implode in a massive hole of immorality. All of the huffing and puffing about the sanctity of the office of the President, and all that shit... and what did it amount to? Not much more than nothing, as far as I can see.

If you feel that strongly against what George Bush has done as president, I've got two pieces of good news for you:

1. George Bush cannot seek another term.

2. With each and every election, you have the chance to right whatever wrongs you perceive in the United States.

I just have a hard time believing that the country as a whole has any reason to feel that big brother is watching. I would actually feel bad for anyone who is that paranoid.

AmbientLight

AmbientLight

I'm lost
March 2005

DEC 09, 2007 08:12 PM

SnowScoundrel said:
We need a new plague.



We have one... it's called the Bush/Cheney Virus and it seems to be very pernicious!

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 14

Next