• news
  • SUNDAY DECEMBER 9 2007 9:00 AM

We Had A Good Run, Didn’t We? So Long, America



Finally, the government is privitizing domestic spying. I feel so safe now. When I think of America, I usually envision large companies sifting through all of my information, my home and hopefully, my unmentionables. Thankfully, this dream is coming true. Up until this point, information from domestic spy satellites was only used by scientific agencies. After 9/11, the NSA was given powers that allowed it to monitor domestic communications without getting those pesky warrants. And now the Bush administration is blowing it out!


Under a proposal being reviewed by Congress, a National Applications Office will be established to coordinate how the Department of Homeland Security and domestic law enforcement and rescue agencies use imagery and communications intelligence picked up by U.S. spy satellites. If the plan goes forward, the NAO will create the legal mechanism for an unprecedented degree of domestic intelligence gathering that would make the United States one of the world's most closely monitored nations.


Sweet. Monitor the shit out of us. We used to have this stupid law that confined intelligence collection to foreign countries and battlefields. Not anymore. And let's make sure private companies are a huge part of it, because they never do anything wrong and have continually shown throughout history that they can be trusted.


The intelligence-sharing system to be managed by the NAO will rely heavily on private contractors, including Boeing, BAE Systems, L-3 Communications and Science Applications International Corporation.


Mmmmm, safety. Nothing makes me feel safer than knowing BAE Systems has my back. Also my front. And my unmentionables.

Last month all the private domestic spy companies went to the intelligence conference in San Antonio and lobbied intelligence officials, in a giant, disgusting, display of everything that is wrong with our country. But, hey, those companies are the ones who told the government that we needed to expand our domestic spying, so bravo.

A study group was put together by a couple of government agencies and they thought it would be a great idea to use former intelligence officers. Many of them just happened to be employed by private intelligence companies, like Booz Allen. Guess what crazy conclusion they came up with?


Not surprisingly, its contractor-advisers called for a major expansion in the domestic use of the spy satellites that they sell to the government. Since the end of the Cold War and particularly since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, they said, the "threats to the nation have changed, and there is a growing interest in making available the special capabilities of the intelligence community to all parts of the government, to include homeland security and law enforcement entities and on a higher priority basis."


Word. We think you should give us money to do stuff. Lots of stuff. Oh, did I mention we’re going to need lots of money? To do that stuff we said should be done? Thanks for asking. Hey, you know that thing I said we should be doing with that satellite? Turns out I can totally do that. And it will only cost millions of dollars. How weird is it that I am the guy who is able to do what I said needed to be done? For money?

The domestic spying contracts are worth billions of dollars and this is a brand new business. The new plan was revealed in August and caught some people off guard. Bennie G. Thompson, a Democratic member of Congress from Mississippi and the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee was surprised when he read about it in the Wall Street Journal.


There was no briefing, no hearing, and no phone call from anyone on your staff to any member of this committee of why, how or when satellite imagery would be shared with police and sheriffs' officers nationwide.


Well, that is probably because most Americans don’t want to be spied on. Duh. Actually, maybe I’m just being an alarmist and blowing this all out of proportion.


"It will terrify you if you really understand the capabilities of satellites," warned Jane Harman, a Democratic member of Congress from California. "Even if this program is well-designed and executed, someone somewhere else could hijack it.”


Oh.

So far the NAO has been delayed. It was supposed to kick off on October 1st, but annoying Congress members and civil rights hippies have been making noise. Of course, later we will learn that the Bush administration did not delay the program. And then when we try to investigate, we won’t be able to because all the information is “classified.” This entire program will always be classified, which is awesome, because it is watching us.


America is going forward, and as we do so, we must remain keenly aware of the threats to our country.

Those in authority should take appropriate precautions to protect our citizens. But we will not allow this enemy to win the war by changing our way of life or restricting our freedoms.

- George W. Bush, September 12, 2001.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 14

Next

Comments
Varuka_Salt

Varuka_Salt

I'm lost
October 2006

DEC 09, 2007 12:45 PM

freshprncebelair said:

varukasalt said:

freshprncebelair said:

varukasalt said:
How 'bout a virus that can only be defeated by thinking logically. That should thin the herd substantially.



There's a whole family of them, and they are called STDs



Right..'cause people that catch VD are stupid!!! That's exactly what I was saying! 'Cause, ya know, catching a disease and curing a disease are the EXACT SAME THING!! Great analogy!!!

Are there no limits to the depths of your genius?!?!?

Least offensive Nutjob 2008!!



You said "logically", not intelligent or stupid. Logically speaking, not having sex will prevent stds, and using a condom will prevent it almost as well.



Ok, I guess I have to spell it out. Everyone gets infected, the act of thinking logically cures it. Now do you understand how my imaginary-impossible-never-gonna-happen-dumb-ass-reducing virus works? Sheesh!! whatever

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

DEC 09, 2007 12:52 PM

That does it! I'm going to start walking around naked and hopefully the glare off my fat naked ass will burn out their satelites!!! Or, alternativly, make those checking out the images quit their jobs.

bairdduvessa

bairdduvessa

Centerville, MA
April 2005

DEC 09, 2007 01:13 PM

i think new england should become its own naation

MrStitches

MrStitches

Brooklyn, NY
November 2003

DEC 09, 2007 01:13 PM

coyotemike said:
That does it! I'm going to start walking around naked and hopefully the glare off my fat naked ass will burn out their satelites!!! Or, alternativly, make those checking out the images quit their jobs.



Or they will just put the video up on a fetish website and use the proceeds to fund their shenanigans.

Varuka_Salt

Varuka_Salt

I'm lost
October 2006

DEC 09, 2007 01:21 PM

MrStitches said:

coyotemike said:
That does it! I'm going to start walking around naked and hopefully the glare off my fat naked ass will burn out their satelites!!! Or, alternativly, make those checking out the images quit their jobs.



Or they will just put the video up on a fetish website and use the proceeds to fund their shenanigans.



Evil shenanigans??

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

DEC 09, 2007 01:21 PM

MrStitches said:

coyotemike said:
That does it! I'm going to start walking around naked and hopefully the glare off my fat naked ass will burn out their satelites!!! Or, alternativly, make those checking out the images quit their jobs.



Or they will just put the video up on a fetish website and use the proceeds to fund their shenanigans.



I knew that copyright tattoo was a good idea!

photoline

photoline

Edmonton, AB
January 2005

DEC 09, 2007 01:41 PM

Roll on, January 2009!

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

DEC 09, 2007 01:47 PM

Priest_Sphinxter said:
Maybe I'm crazy, but honestly I trust private corporations with my privacy more than I do the government. At least with private companies, we can sue if they abuse that privacy or they can lose stock. It's far easier to take on private companies than the government.


Not when they're an arm of government. "Classified program, sir. Secret."


And while they lose a laptop now and then, private companies don't intentionally leak highly classified material about agents still in the field just to get back at their political rivals.


No; just their commercial rivals. Who just happen also to be involved in the same business (gosh!); spying on people.

And once you let the private corporations into government, they become political and they have political rivals. Duh...

Formus

Formus

Milwaukee, WI
May 2007

DEC 09, 2007 01:51 PM

Priest_Sphinxter said:
Maybe I'm crazy, but honestly I trust private corporations with my privacy more than I do the government. At least with private companies, we can sue if they abuse that privacy or they can lose stock. It's far easier to take on private companies than the government.


Since when can't you sue the government?

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

DEC 09, 2007 02:07 PM

It will be interesting to see how this gets past the whole constitution thing.

CourierNew

CourierNew

Denver, CO
December 2006

DEC 09, 2007 02:44 PM

bald_eagle said:
It's not like the Constitution has slowed W down much so far.




The Constitution is written on paper. And paper has this nasty habit of catching on fire.

Face it, most of the nation is worried too much over themselves to ever care about what is happening in the government.

CourierNew

CourierNew

Denver, CO
December 2006

DEC 09, 2007 02:45 PM

Still, we need a plague. Even if it is just in the United States. Our overpopulation issues have created this amazing diffusion of responsibility. Fewer people, less diffusion, and then people would have to start caring about what is happening in their government.

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

DEC 09, 2007 02:51 PM

bald_eagle said:
It's not like the Constitution has slowed W down much so far.



True but I have faith that after the next election and reshuffle of personnel there will be alot of scrolling back of this stuff as the constitutionality of it all is questioned.

scorp17yh

scorp17yh

Brookings, OR
November 2004

DEC 09, 2007 03:27 PM

Colinism said:

bald_eagle said:
It's not like the Constitution has slowed W down much so far.



True but I have faith that after the next election and reshuffle of personnel there will be alot of scrolling back of this stuff as the constitutionality of it all is questioned.




"whoever comes in after Bush will find out that the power resides in a parallel contractor economy"

Naomi Klein speaking with Will Dana of Rolling Stone about her new book
The Shock Doctrine

Mockingbird

Mockingbird

Chicago, IL
January 2006

DEC 09, 2007 03:51 PM

All_Sewn_Up said:

SnowScoundrel said:
We need a new plague.



A zombie apocalypse would do nicely.



I endorse this statement.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 14

Next