BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH

Since Hollywood writers like myself went on strike this week, I thought I would share with you the biggest Asshole Fuckface studio heads of the week. They are inherently Asshole Fuckfaces, but during a strike we can shine a light on their hideous acts of greed and inhumanity.

Studio fat cats Les Moonves and Peter Chernin are Asshole Fuckfaces of the highest order. Chernin is just a straight up douchebag because he works for Fox. Moonves is best known for the brilliant move of losing Howard Stern to satellite and being a failed actor. (Maybe if he had been able to get a job here and there and actually received residuals, we wouldn’t have to deal with his cunty moves at the negotiating table). Anyway, Les and Pete managed to pull a move so deceitful and idiotic, that it may prolong the strike far longer than anyone could have ever anticipated.

Les and Pete “deliberately duped” the Guild by making a backchannel deal and then pulling out of it at the last minute. On Sunday, the two told WGA negotiators that if writers gave up DVD residual demands, then the studios would give a little on Internet downloads. Since that is what the WGA is after, the negotiators went for it. When the WGA arrived at 10 am Sunday morning, they took their 4 cents DVD increase demand off the table. The studio heads then went off to discuss how to respond.

Eleven hours later they returned. Eleven fucking hours. Coincidentally, eleven hours later is exactly what time the strike was supposed to begin on the East coast. Here was their answer:


We are not going to make any concessions on the Internet…and we would like to ask if you guys would suspend the strike starting at midnight in the East. Are the pickets starting?


Uh, what? The Guild made a back channel agreement (the way all negotiations are handled in Hollywood), took a massive demand off the table and then you told them to fuck off and now you are asking them to suspend the strike? How big off assholes can you be? Oh, it turns out they can be bigger assholes.

The timing just happened to coincide with the news cycle. The studio heads fired off a press release claiming they were making progress but the WGA refused to call off the strike. (Because all writers are banging away at midnight on a Sunday) The WGA was completely shocked and was not prepared to send out a press release, so the next day it appeared that the WGA had fucked the negotiations by being stubborn. In reality, they had Les Moonves’ fist crammed up their assholes.


As a spitting mad WGA leader put it to me today: “All I can say is, if someone calls me and says, “You do X, and I do Y” and that someone doesn’t do it, then I’ve been lied to and I’ve been played. It’s a complete betrayal. I just don’t know what the studios’ game is.”


Had the producers actually responded to the WGA’s removal of the DVD demand, then the strike could have been called off. A deal at that point could have been days away. That is what happens when you actually negotiate. Now the WGA refuses to meet until the producers offer something.

In the meantime, as you watch your favorite shows die off and thousands lose their jobs, remember two names: Les Moonves and Peter Chernin. They are top notch Asshole Fuckfaces.

The studios obviously are attempting to break the union, thinking they would split us when we were told that the negotiating committee had removed DVDs and gotten nothing in return. The problem is they use press releases to make their points. Hey grandpa, there’s this new thing called the “Internet” and on the “Internet” there are bloggers, reporters and email getting the real story out. So you keep at it with your “press releases,” by the time we read them, we already know the real story.

Next up, there are the little guys, toiling away behind the scenes and some of them manage to be tremendous Asshole Fuckfaces.

On day one of the Writers Strike, a very nice man I know was run over by an Asshole Fuckface who works at one of the studio lots.


Just minutes into the strike, the labor unrest has turned violent at one picket line: A writer for "Talkshow With Spike Feresten" was struck by a sedan trying to cross the picket line at Sunset-Gower Studios early this morning, witnesses said. The writer, identified as Tom Johnson, suffered a leg injury and was taken away in a wheelchair by paramedics.


Now, that doesn’t sound that out of the ordinary; a guy gets hit by a car. Happens all the time. Maybe it was a mistake, right? Nope. After speaking to several of my friends who were working with Tom, it turns out the vehicular assault was deliberate. The driver pulled up in his amazing Honda Element, got out of his car and yelled:


If any of you get in my way I’m going to run you over.


He then got back in his car and floored it. There was no way for Tom to avoid the vehicle. (If you saw Tom you would quickly understand. He is far from athletic.) The car struck Tom and dragged him for a bit. The driver then attempted to drive away but other writers descended upon him and took away his keys. He was then escorted away by studio security.

Johnson's black tennis shoe was still lodged under the front passenger tire as he was taken away in an ambulance.



Tom spent the day in the hospital. He now has one leg that he cannot bend at all and another that is a complete swollen mess. Thankfully, neither leg was broken, but a lot of things can go wrong in a leg.

Not surprisingly, the driver was an editor. They are a mole-like people who spend hours in dark rooms in front of monitors and they hate writers. Why? Because we have a vision of how we want things and we tell them how to do it. They often think they know the right way and they are just as often, sadly mistaken. The fact that an editor ran over a writer will go down in editor folklore, told to their children and their children’s children.

Most surprising of all, the editor was not arrested. Apparently it is the policy of the Los Angeles Police Department not to arrest people who attack picketers. If any of the writers had attacked the driver after he ran over Tom, well, that would have led to an arrest. Which leads me to my next Asshole Fuckface: The WGA.

The Guild has been using Tom as a publicity piece. They made sure to mention him at a rally Friday in an attempt to appeal to the member’s unity. They have sent out emails explaining what happened and saying Tom made a great sacrifice. They have had members at all picket lines sign cards wishing him well. His attack is being used as a pawn in a game of chess. What the Guild has not done in this case is protect one of their own. They have not approached the mayor’s office, the District Attorney’s office or the police department to question why a man can run someone down after making a threat and not be arrested. A far as FearTheReaper is concerned, it is more than disgusting of the people who are supposed to be protecting him during this time.

Finally, every studio head gets the label of Asshole Fuckface.

The studios began firing assistants from shows two days into the strike. They made sure to tell every low wage employee they fired that it was the writer’s fault. On DAY 2. Yeah, the studios had lost so much money on DAY 2 that they had to let the people making the least amount of money go. Gotta stop that DAY 2 bleeding, and the only way to do it is by letting the guy who makes four hundred bucks a week go.

Classy move. It would be like me getting into an argument with another guy and then going and punching his baby, then telling the baby it’s his Dad’s fault. You chose to fire them, you rich Asshole Fuckfaces and it’s on your head.

Finally, I’d like to end with a January 2007 quote by Les, a man who today claims he doesn’t know how CBS will make money on the Internet.


You are going to see us making money from the same exact assets in three different ways. The first is traditional TV distribution. The second is by charging people to watch via the Internet and cell phones, and the third is by selling ads on those new distribution channels.


None of this week’s Asshole Fuckfaces will receive a prize because they have all the money.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 12

Next

punk

punk

Phoenix, AZ
January 2004

NOV 11, 2007 10:38 AM

It amazes me (no it doesn't) that business people are against the fair treatment of the people that work for them.

To me, it would seem that refusing to compensate your people fairly would be a bad thing and lead to...I don't know, strikes.

Snottlebocket

Snottlebocket

Netherlands
March 2004

NOV 11, 2007 10:57 AM

dingoes8 said:
These other people are losing their jobs because the studios are inflexible, greedy bastards. Anything that brings to light the fact that they're inflexible greedy bastards is not to blame.



I never said the unions exist to strike. The fact that the studio's are inflexible and are now firing personel was extremely predictable. So predictable infact that the unions said they were expecting it before hand...and went on to strike anyway.

I know what unions do and what they're trying to do here. But in the end we're talking about people who have an income, decide they're entitled to more than what they're currently getting, and proceed knowingly and wilingly with a course of action that robs other people of their income entirely. That's pretty scummy in my book.

I don't care what their intend is, they knew what was going to happen and they went on anyway.

MrKatos

MrKatos

Saint Louis, MO
September 2006

NOV 11, 2007 10:57 AM

Snottlebocket said:
What about all those people striking for more money



Christ. Once again, it is not more money, it is making sure that, when digital distribution of television and movies pulls ahead of and replaces hard copies such as video tapes and DVDs, the writers will get some money. Right now, the writers (and actors and directors and other people that make sure richer producers actually get a return on their investments) get nothing from digital distribution, just like what the studios were giving them when vhs and dvds started to replace syndication back in the 80s.

Priapos

Priapos

Water Valley, TX
October 2005

NOV 11, 2007 11:05 AM

While I frequently find union behavior idiotic, this I support.

Businesses exist to make money, and regrettably the law sometimes demands that executives and Boards of Directors do unethical things in the pursuit of the maximum profit (search Trustee). Why can't everyone learn to think long-term? Consumers, especially.

MrKatos

MrKatos

Saint Louis, MO
September 2006

NOV 11, 2007 11:06 AM

Snottlebocket said:
I know what unions do and what they're trying to do here. But in the end we're talking about people who have an income, decide they're entitled to more than what they're currently getting, and proceed knowingly and wilingly with a course of action that robs other people of their income entirely. That's pretty scummy in my book.

I don't care what their intend is, they knew what was going to happen and they went on anyway.



Hey Snotty, let's reframe your 'reasoning' a bit. It's not just writers after that 'extra money' after all. The producers and studio execs want (and currently hold) that extra money. And they have a set income, too. And they have made decisions forcing a strike, too. And they have actually made the conscious decision to rob the entire income of other people now so that writers (and actors and directors and what not) agree to get robbed of their incomes later, by quitting the strike and not negotiating any compensation related to digital distribution.
Think about all that extra money. Think of the income of your typical producer/studio exec vs a typical writer. Think of the regularity with which a studio exec/producer gets paid vs a writer. And then consider who deserves that extra money.

Chainlink

Chainlink

Christmas Island
August 2005

NOV 11, 2007 11:07 AM

attn_ho said:

smithers_jones said:

jpaul256 said:
Hi Everybody, I'm back for another ass whooping!





GIGGLEsnort



he he. biggrin

whatonearth

whatonearth

I'm lost
August 2007

NOV 11, 2007 11:17 AM

I really liked how you stood up for tom . thats too true frown

Vestril

Vestril

Coronado, CA
February 2003

NOV 11, 2007 11:23 AM

Snottlebocket said:

dingoes8 said:
These other people are losing their jobs because the studios are inflexible, greedy bastards. Anything that brings to light the fact that they're inflexible greedy bastards is not to blame.



I never said the unions exist to strike. The fact that the studio's are inflexible and are now firing personel was extremely predictable. So predictable infact that the unions said they were expecting it before hand...and went on to strike anyway.

I know what unions do and what they're trying to do here. But in the end we're talking about people who have an income, decide they're entitled to more than what they're currently getting, and proceed knowingly and wilingly with a course of action that robs other people of their income entirely. That's pretty scummy in my book.

I don't care what their intend is, they knew what was going to happen and they went on anyway.



Sorry, it's scummy for them to strike? It's not scummy of the rich fucks at the top of the food chain to not attempt to negotiate? It's not scummy of those same figuratively fat fuckheads to force the writers into this position? It's not scummy to deny your creative employees a share of a profitable portion of your enterprise? Congratulations on misidentifying the assholes.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

NOV 11, 2007 11:26 AM

Vestril said:

Snottlebocket said:

dingoes8 said:
These other people are losing their jobs because the studios are inflexible, greedy bastards. Anything that brings to light the fact that they're inflexible greedy bastards is not to blame.



I never said the unions exist to strike. The fact that the studio's are inflexible and are now firing personel was extremely predictable. So predictable infact that the unions said they were expecting it before hand...and went on to strike anyway.

I know what unions do and what they're trying to do here. But in the end we're talking about people who have an income, decide they're entitled to more than what they're currently getting, and proceed knowingly and wilingly with a course of action that robs other people of their income entirely. That's pretty scummy in my book.

I don't care what their intend is, they knew what was going to happen and they went on anyway.



Sorry, it's scummy for them to strike? It's not scummy of the rich fucks at the top of the food chain to not attempt to negotiate? It's not scummy of those same figuratively fat fuckheads to force the writers into this position? It's not scummy to deny your creative employees a share of a profitable portion of your enterprise? Congratulations on misidentifying the assholes.



No, you're no getting it. We KNEW what the studios response would be, so we are at fault. We should continue to take their rollbacks until we have nothing left, becuase if we don't - other people will be hurt.

LostLucy

LostLucy

USA
December 2006

NOV 11, 2007 11:43 AM

Wait a fucking minute....

FearTheReaper said


Most surprising of all, the editor [who intentionally ran down a man with his car] was not arrested. Apparently it is the policy of the Los Angeles Police Department not to arrest people who attack picketers.



That is vehicular assault, which no local jurisdiction should be able to dismiss for any reason. That is simply unconscionable.

I'm sure he does not feel ready for the additional pain of trying to launch a civil lawsuit -- but what about friends making a huge stink with the media and all local politicians?


mad mad blackeyed puke

Cigarette

Cigarette

Cleveland, OH
April 2004

NOV 11, 2007 12:14 PM

Snottlebocket said:
What about all those people striking for more money that are costng rather a lot of people their jobs. (and probably more in the long run)

Frankly I can't think of anyone more disgusting in this whole strike business than the people striking for extra money, knowing full well it's going to end up hurting a lot of people that have nothing to do with their 'cause'.



What about the fact that a lot of people that are being hurt by this "cause" are in the same "union" that "is" currently striking in "New York"?

Cigarette

Cigarette

Cleveland, OH
April 2004

NOV 11, 2007 12:19 PM

And it's not like this strike isn't hitting writers just as hard as it is members of production crews. The writers are making just as much money right now as everyone who has gotten laid off: zero. Meanwhile, executives are still using $100 bills as jizz rags.

People suffering: writers, production crew, actors, etc.
No suffering: executives.

So who is probably to blame?

Snottlebocker, what yr suggesting is that if an industry can rig its system so that the only way a group of people can get the pay they deserve is at the expense of other workers, then we should blame the group of people who want their fair share and not the people rigging the game?

Drakyn

Drakyn

New Providence, NJ
September 2006

NOV 11, 2007 01:12 PM

Why Do Writer's Hate the Producers? Are they just jealous of Mel Brooks Talent?

jpaul256

jpaul256

Spring, TX
June 2006

NOV 11, 2007 01:51 PM

bald_eagle said:
I'll simply make the observation that the networks and periodicals are covering this. That kind of suggests that it's news.



As I stated in a previous post, I believe that the union is doing the right thing. My wish is their demands are eventually met. Moreover, it is my impression that the union negotiated in good faith in hopes of avoiding a strike. That same sense of good faith didn't seem to be reciprocated

And I am not arguing the fact that other news organizations are covering the strike. The strike is news. However, FTR's post is not a news piece. It is an op-ed piece written by someone who has a vested interest in how the world views the strike and how it is ultimately resolved.

Believe it or not, FTR's opinion doesn't count as news.

losttoapathy

losttoapathy

Olympia, WA
March 2003

NOV 11, 2007 01:59 PM

Maybe I'm the only one, but I get news here because I want some opinion. I am continually fascinated by what one person thinks of what's going on. And if they can muster to put some actual information into it. All the better. Maybe "haters" should go the opposite route and complain to CNN until it conforms a little more. Maybe they will send you a picture of gretta van sustern's tits and you can and you can masturbate to that, while reading the fair balanced reporting of giant multinational corporations with nothing to gain by "flavoring" their news.
Also I like to read news on here because people say fuck, and it makes me laugh.
Fuck.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 12

Next

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR by orbro

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR

There's like a half-hour of video here. You should do a vlog. More ...

Asshole Fuckface Roundup #74

Last Comment 4 HR

Parents who are accustomed to carrying guns around may not think anything of going into child-related... More ...

An Encounter With Jonathan Shaw's Narcisa

Last Comment 5 HR

thanx gurlz... u rrrrrule!! xx jonathan shaw and narcisa More ...

SuicideGirl: Bob

Bob

Terrible Woman's MySpace Alias Leads to Teen's Suicide.

Last Comment 20 HR

But, it's delivered poorly...really poorly. Unless, it's not a joke, in which case, it's a good place... More ...

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08 by Shalome

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08

Oh my fucking god. More ...

Filtering the Truth: Religion - Friend or Foe?

Last Comment 11/30/08

I'm just going to skip over the mass orgy that's going on and say my piece: I don't think religion is... More ...

SuicideGirls Interview: Bootsy Collins
SuicideGirls Interview: Exene Cervenka
SuicideGirls Interview: On the Vineyard with Maynard James Keenan