• news
  • THURSDAY NOVEMBER 8 2007 9:00 AM

Finally, Toddlers Get Access To Date Rape Drugs And Lead



It is a great time to be a kid. When I was young, my parents didn’t buy me date rape drugs as a present for Christmas, which means I couldn’t fall into a coma and wake up with no memory of what happened. Life sucked like that. We did have lead, but it was mostly in paint, not in toys, backpacks and dishes. Now lead is blowing up big time and it’s everywhere.

Yesterday we learned that a popular toy named Aqua Dots contains little beads that, if ingested, turn into “hydroxy butyrate,” a date rape drug.


Scientists say a chemical coating on the beads, when ingested, metabolizes into the so-called date rape drug gamma hydroxy butyrate. When eaten, the compound — made from common and easily available ingredients — can induce unconsciousness, seizures, drowsiness, coma and death.


It’s called teaching kids how to party young.

The toy is also very popular in Australia, where it is called “Bindeez,” because they are weird. It was named toy of the year at some Australian toy function. But they also like the boomerang, so whatever.


The two U.S. children who swallowed Aqua Dot beads went into nonresponsive comas. A 20-month-old has recovered completely while the other child, whose age was not known, has been released from a hospital after five days and is recovering, he said.


Aqua Dots is a very hot toy for Christmas. I think China’s plan is to kill us with shoddy products, so obviously we should bomb them.


Meanwhile, a separate recall was announced for 405,000 children's products made in China, most of them toy cars, because of dangerous levels of lead.


Exactly when does this end? Are the Chinese going to spray cyanide on lollipops?

The recalled products include:


Duck Family Collectable Wind-Up Toy, Dizzy Ducks Music Box, "Robot 2000" collectable tin robot and Winnie-the-Pooh Spinning Top and "Big Red"


Great, I've been rubbing "Big Red" on my balls daily for about a year. Lead is especially harmful to young children and can cause brain damage. Brains are sort of important. Putting lead paint on the surface of toys that kids love to shove in their mouth and up their anuses is a pretty bad idea. Last year Mattel recalled 21 million Chinese toys.

Now Consumer Reports is recommending people immediately stop using a variety of products.


Our lab tests detected lead at widely varying levels in samples of dishware, jewelry, glue stick caps, vinyl backpacks, children's ceramic tea sets and other toys and items not on any federal recall list.


Some of the items Consumer Reports listed have not even been included in recalls.


Consumers Union said some of the products it tested included a Fisher-Price blood pressure cuff from a toy medical kit, caps from seven Elmer's Glue Sticks and some duck-shaped backpacks.

The caps were on glue sticks decorated with cartoon characters and were all orange colored.


Huh, I wonder if any caps didn’t end up in a kid’s mouth?

Consumer Reports used lead testing kits that people can buy for home use. After a positive result, they did more testing in a lab. It’s obviously great to have a private business telling us which products we should avoid, but wouldn’t it be even better if our government stopped these products before they reached little Timmy and he sucked on them for 2 years, turning him into a moron? If only we had an agency called the Consumer Product Safety Commission, none of this would happen, right? Well, not in our “Business get to do whatever it wants" world.


The chief of the Consumer Product Safety Commission and her predecessor have taken dozens of trips at the expense of the toy, appliance and children's furniture industries and others they regulate, according to internal records obtained by The Washington Post. Some of the trips were sponsored by lobbying groups and lawyers representing the makers of products linked to consumer hazards.


Mmm, smell that? It’s the Ron Paul no government world. Ask that baby how it feels about no regulation after it wakes up from its coma. The CPSC has chosen a brilliant path of allowing businesses to impose “voluntary” standards and not to take legal action against companies that refuse to recall dangerous products. They work for you!

Bush’s choices to lead the CPSC have been, as expected, business folk. Current director Nord was a corporate lawyer for Kodak and previous director Stratton created a foundation, which advocates limited government and supports free-market economic principles. Yay! Ron Paul 08!

Not surprisingly, the CPSC is now blatantly disregarding governmental regulations. But, hey, what agency under Bush isn't?


Government-wide travel regulations state that officials from agencies such as the CPSC should not accept money for travel from nonfederal sources if the payments "would cause a reasonable person . . . to question the integrity of agency programs or operations."


And make no mistake about it, this is something we can lay at the feet of our terrible president. Under Clinton, the chairman of the CPSC only traveled at the expense of the agency or a media organization that wanted the chairman there to announce a recall.

The great thing about CPSC is that under Bush the agency seems to have taken a new role: Actually helping businesses to harm people.


The records also detail several trips that were paid for by lawyers who represent manufacturers in product liability lawsuits.

Nord accepted more than $2,000 in travel and accommodations from the Defense Research Institute to attend its meeting in New Orleans on "product litigation trends," according to her report. The institute is made up of more than 20,000 corporate defense lawyers. In 2004, Stratton attended the group's meeting in Barcelona, at a cost to the group of $915 for his hotel room.


The guys who worked under Clinton were a bit shocked.


Gilbert, the former CPSC executive director, called DRI's contribution toward Stratton's hotel bill in Spain "amazing."


But don’t worry, George Bush is going to protect us.


President George W. Bush on Tuesday proposed tougher inspection rules meant to keep dangerous food and other products out of the United States and said he wants broader power to recall food that is unsafe for U.S. consumers.


Maybe you shouldn’t put the people who spent their careers working for corporations in charge of agencies who fight for consumers against corporations, you fucking asshole.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next

Comments
Gringo

Gringo

Spokane, WA
May 2006

NOV 08, 2007 09:24 PM

abangyarudo said:
Yea but theres no such thing as American...


Bullshit. I've seen it on packages of cheese.

Bicycle_Samurai

Bicycle_Samurai

York, ON
September 2003

NOV 08, 2007 09:31 PM

I stand by what Homer Simpson said about eating toys.

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

NOV 08, 2007 09:36 PM

Chriztian said:
I love how two of the most intelligent responses have been from people in Ecuador and Japan.

americans control china, to get cheaper everything and the blame goes on china



oh you Americans with your heads stuck up in your own shit perspective, do us all a favour and go eat another toy.


If we didn't think Globalization was such a good thing and reward corporations who now carry nearly 100% foreign produced goods (Walmart) with our continued patronage we might not have these problems. Walmart forces its suppliers to provide the absolute lowest cost on items, or they will find them somewhere else. This in turn has an effect on all other products in the same category because they will lose sales to the walmart brand because it is cheaper and Americans will almost always buy the cheaper product.
We protect our corporations and give them tax breaks while they pay us shit, actively work against unionization, buy our politicians, and generally rape us. I seriously doubt China as a country is purposefully attempting to kill us. Its more like our own unbridled capitalist ambitions are.


Ordinarily I respect and generally agree with your posts, but blaming the United States for the excesses of Chinese capitalism is implausible, at best.

The Chinese have their own agendas, and make their own policies. Certainly, they don't do so in a vacuum, but neither are America or its corporations so omnipotent that all evil in the world can be traced directly back to them.

That's just a species of arrogance, actually.

People all over are greedy, exploitative, and intolerant. Americans may have more weight in the world than most, but they have no monopoly on those traits.

That being said, your actual comment is not inaccurate. American predatory capitalism is a socially (and ultimately economically) destructive force, for the reasons you observe. But your comment remains incomplete, because it leaves aside Chinese motives (and culpability) entirely. I'm not about to suggest that they're to destroy us - that's ludicrous, obviously. But they have their own version of predatory capitalism, for their own reasons (and if anything it's doing more damage to themselves than to their export markets).

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

NOV 08, 2007 09:49 PM

Zarth said:
I'm not about to suggest that they're to destroy us - that's ludicrous, obviously. But they have their own version of predatory capitalism, for their own reasons (and if anything it's doing more damage to themselves than to their export markets).

But, but, I thought the Chinese were dirty commies!

Khoakoneh

Khoakoneh

Japan
December 2003

NOV 08, 2007 10:18 PM



Well, that's what happens when you have no sense of humor and take something completely absurd as real. Good luck with that, it seems to be working so far.



tongue

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

NOV 08, 2007 11:01 PM

emotedcreations said:

Zarth said:
I'm not about to suggest that they're to destroy us - that's ludicrous, obviously. But they have their own version of predatory capitalism, for their own reasons (and if anything it's doing more damage to themselves than to their export markets).


But, but, I thought the Chinese were dirty commies!


That was before the Four Modernizations. Now they're dirty capitalists just like everybody else (except for the dirty Islamists and dirty socialists).

There are no dirty Commies anymore.

Except for me.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

NOV 08, 2007 11:12 PM

Zarth said:

emotedcreations said:

Zarth said:
I'm not about to suggest that they're to destroy us - that's ludicrous, obviously. But they have their own version of predatory capitalism, for their own reasons (and if anything it's doing more damage to themselves than to their export markets).


But, but, I thought the Chinese were dirty commies!


That was before the Four Modernizations. Now they're dirty capitalists just like everybody else (except for the dirty Islamists and dirty socialists).

There are no dirty Commies anymore.

Except for me.

And Castro. Or is he just a dirty socialist?

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

NOV 08, 2007 11:17 PM

emotedcreations said:

Zarth said:

emotedcreations said:

Zarth said:
I'm not about to suggest that they're to destroy us - that's ludicrous, obviously. But they have their own version of predatory capitalism, for their own reasons (and if anything it's doing more damage to themselves than to their export markets).


But, but, I thought the Chinese were dirty commies!


That was before the Four Modernizations. Now they're dirty capitalists just like everybody else (except for the dirty Islamists and dirty socialists).

There are no dirty Commies anymore.

Except for me.


And Castro. Or is he just a dirty socialist?


Actually I'm pretty sure he's a dirty Commie.

I don't know how to classify Kim Jong-Il, though. Technically he's a Stalinist, but I think he's actually just too damn weird to be considered an actual Commie. Commies aren't usually that weird.

artpie

artpie

Winston Salem, NC
December 2003

NOV 08, 2007 11:47 PM

now that's what I call a "Pinko"

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

NOV 09, 2007 12:14 AM

Zarth said:

emotedcreations said:

Zarth said:

emotedcreations said:

Zarth said:
I'm not about to suggest that they're to destroy us - that's ludicrous, obviously. But they have their own version of predatory capitalism, for their own reasons (and if anything it's doing more damage to themselves than to their export markets).


But, but, I thought the Chinese were dirty commies!


That was before the Four Modernizations. Now they're dirty capitalists just like everybody else (except for the dirty Islamists and dirty socialists).

There are no dirty Commies anymore.

Except for me.


And Castro. Or is he just a dirty socialist?


Actually I'm pretty sure he's a dirty Commie.

I don't know how to classify Kim Jong-Il, though. Technically he's a Stalinist, but I think he's actually just too damn weird to be considered an actual Commie. Commies aren't usually that weird.



Sweet, I guess I'm a dirty commie then. wink

PaulNikon

PaulNikon

Melbourne, FL
February 2003

NOV 09, 2007 01:10 AM

Communists.

Manimatr0n

Manimatr0n

Lubbock, TX
November 2007

NOV 09, 2007 01:32 AM

Cerwen said:

Shell_Shock said:
I have said it before and I will say it again:

CHINA IS NOT OUR FRIEND. puke



At least not until we merge into one country and start living in space ships while shooting guns and wondering where the grenades are...........



Greatest. Comment. Ever.

BatAttaK

BatAttaK

Tacoma, WA
OLD SKOOL

NOV 09, 2007 05:48 AM

syndeusys said:


btw, gbh which you and the associated press are identifying as a 'date rape' drug is taken recreationally, on purpose, and not with the intent of raping someone. the cases of drugging someone with gbh, roofies, or long island ice teas are absolutely henious, but they are few and far between.


While this is mostly correct the drug is GHB for Gamma HydroxyButyrate not GBH what the press also neglects to mention is that it isn't some awful destructive street drug but rather a pharmaceutical drug that has passed through the FDA and now goes by the name of Xyrem (sodium oxybate). While overdose can cause "coma" and the like it isn't a coma in the traditional sense as people don't stay in the "coma" but wake up after a few days they are just unresponsive while sleeping.



In all honesty...I don't think I would like to ingest GBH either. biggrin

strndniowa

strndniowa

Grimes, IA
May 2007

NOV 09, 2007 06:30 AM

Utter BS- my two year old ate some of those damn things- thank god he threw up...another note- they expand to five times their size when eaten puke
Why are all of the new toys that claim to be safe anything but...I mean outside of the lead/china thing, who the hell designs these things? I think my kids would be better off with a couple of old, rusty Tonka toys....
And sorry- the China thing is what we get for outsourcing damn near all manufacturing in the country overseas for the cheap labor... what happened to "Made in USA"...and how are Americans supposed to keep buying this cheap crap if they all just lost their job at Maytag/GM etc. because the plant just moved to China or Mexico...
We've got some problems here folks....and most of it goes back to corporate greed, and...Bush...

edith

edith

France
April 2006

NOV 09, 2007 06:59 AM

Poe said:

ColdRobot said:
While each of these toy recalls is upsetting and the topic of toy safety deserves to be discussed, why is parental responsibility NEVER considered in any of this? I have two girls under age 3, and there is no way in hell my child could consume several dozen of anything without my or my wife's knowledge. I'm sure the age recommendation on this toy was well over 20 months (which another paper reported the child's age as). Who of us didn't play with far more dangerous toys as kids? What toy ISN'T dangerous or even deadly when you swallow several dozen of them? You have to watch your kids -- it's a fact. Take the poison out of this toy and swallowing a ton of them is still dangerous...


The CPSC said a boy nearly 2 years old "swallowed several dozen beads. He became dizzy and vomited several times before slipping into a comatose state." The toddler was hospitalized and has since fully recovered, the commission added.



Uh oh... while I was writing this my child swallowed 9 Bratz-doll heads and now she's sick! I'm calling a lawyer...


Seriously, wtf. The Recommended Age on the box is 6 - 11 years. It's made of BEADS AND SMALL PARTS, whether they're toxic or not. So many fucking irresponsible idiot parents, and we're blaming China. whatever



um...you guys are both wrong in this case.

6-11 year olds put things in their mouth all the time. pretty much all kids suck and chew on those plastic perler beads (a similar product to this one). in fact i have too...because i know how they stick to the inside of your cheeks when you bite on them. human beings put stuff in their mouth all the time. how many adults chew up their pen caps?

and i don't know one parent who has managed to police every single thing a child has put into their mouth. you know...at the park there are rocks? sometimes buttons and small toy bits fall off? older kids have barbies with small shoes? a dime fell between the couch cushions?

gimme a break, it has nothing to do with bad parenting whatever when toys have toxins on them.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next