BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH



It is very interesting to watch Democrats make the same mistake they made in 2000 and 2004. During both of those election campaigns, Democrats choose candidates who were so poor at debating that they ended up losing to the pathetic George Bush. Al Gore was so fucking boring and wooden that it was insane. Watching him lose the first debate to "barely able to speak sentences" Bush was startling. Then came John Kerry, who wouldn’t know a sound byte if it crawled into his anus and set up a Starbucks. (Who would? That doesn’t even make sense.) Anyway, Kerry is a blow hard. His inability to make points concisely was a disaster. But both suffered from one common, glaring problem: They were unlikable. After watching last night’s debate I can tell you the most unlikable person on the stage was the Democratic frontrunner, Hillary Clinton.

First I’ll run down the candidates and how they faired.

John Edwards was clearly the best candidate on the stage, from a debating perspective. He was very good with his answers and counter attacks. He was never ruffled, made his points with conviction and has a commanding stage presence. He is one cheesy motherfucker, though.

Edwards hit Clinton hard all night long, with jabs like this about Hillary's recent vote on Iran.


So the way do that was to vote yes on a resolution that looks like it was written literally by the neocons?


Joe Biden also came across very well. He was authoritative, made his points and was at times funny. He slammed Giuliani with a fantastic sound byte.


All Rudy Giuliani does is says the same thing over and over again, he uses ‘a noun, a verb and 9/11.’


Nicely done. Biden is one hell of a corporate whore and I would never vote for him, but you cannot disregard his likeability factor.

Chris Dodd. Dodd could play a president in a Hollywood movie. He just has that look. He sounded intelligent, clear and was very well spoken. Dodd is less likeable than others on the stage, which may be why he is in the position he is today because on the issues he is just what liberals are screaming about.

Bill Richardson. I think he was running for Secretary of State. He spent the entire evening running his diplomatic resume, at one point saying he had negotiated the release of six US soldiers remains from North Korea earlier this year. Congrats on getting those dead guys back! He also asked everyone to play nice and stop picking on Clinton, which was the most pathetic brown-nosing attempt to get a job I have ever seen. Richardson is a likable guy, though he seems more fit for someone you would want on your bowling team.

Barack Obama. About as likable as they come with a voice that commands attention, too bad there is nothing to back it up. Obama started off strong but then began to trail off as the debate went on, probably because he hits the same note over and over. Yeah, yeah, we all should get along. We get it. You are the great healer. Maybe he doesn’t realize this is the exact shit Bush was saying in 2000. For Democrats, after years of being shit on by the opposition, it is time to fight, but Obama wants to orchestrate a group hug.

In the Sunday New York Times, Obama was quoted saying that it was time to get tough with Clinton for acting like a Republican. During the debate, Russert asked him directly about that assertion. It was a softball question that should have been hit out of the park. Obama’s answer:


Some of this stuff gets over-hyped.


Nice. Try to find a way to appear weaker, because it is exactly what America is looking for right now. Obama went on to make a joke about boxing and how he is all for "big meaningful change." Fuck off.

Dennis Kucinich. He is very small. Small people don’t get elected to be the "leader of the free world." End of story. Oh, and he admitted to having seen a UFO years ago.


It was an unidentified flying object, okay. It's like, it's unidentified — I saw something.


Kucinich handled the question well and he brings up some very important points, but he is unelectable because he is a Hobbit.

Lastly, Hillary Clinton. Seriously, this is what you guys are going with? She could not have sounded more like a Republican. Her answers were broad, completely lacking details and there was no sign of leadership anywhere. She made it very clear that she does not like Bush and his policies and kept saying she would do the opposite. She’s going to “bring smart people together” to come up with ideas and whatnot. Super. Thanks for more of the same.

The inescapable reality of Clinton was highlighted at the end of the debate. Elliot Spitzer, governor of New York, is working on a controversial bill regarding giving illegal immigrants drivers licenses. Clinton had told a group of editors that the idea made sense, so Russert asked her about it. She blathered.


What Governor Spitzer is trying to do is fill the vacuum left by the failure of this administration to bring about comprehensive immigration reform. Illegal immigrants are on the roads and will get into accidents. It's a reality and we ought to have a system to handle it.


Great, now do you fucking support it or not? You actually can’t do a poll right in the middle of the debate, so you have to make a choice. An actual decision.

Chris Dodd stepped in and said he did not agree with the idea. At that point, Hillary the follower got worried that she might have actually said something of substance.


I just want to add; I did not say that it should be done.


Dodd responded that she had just said the plan made sense. Clinton then said that the plan contained three different types of licenses. (Which was the compromise, not the original bill that she was asked about.) Clinton then accused them of playing “Gotcha” with her.

Today her campaign said she totally supports the bill.

Get used to moments like this being a common sight if Democrats choose Clinton. She is not and has never been a good debater. Her inability to give an opinion that she believes in without consulting a poll will devastate her, just as it devastated Gore. It is one of the reasons she comes across as unlikable. Standing up for what you believe in is a very attractive quality and Clinton does not seem to be able to do it.

Hillary Clinton also arrived at this stage in a very different way than the other candidates. All the other Democrats in last night’s debate started their careers winning little elections, making their way up the ranks until they achieved rather impressive victories. Barring Kucinich, that means a body of people wanted to be represented by that particular candidate and chose them. It happened again and again, until they reached a higher office. Likeability is an inherent factor in that equation. Sometimes unlikable people squeak through, like Gore and Kerry, and for whatever reason Democrats are incredibly attracted to them as presidential candidates. I offer the following as proof:


    Kerry
    Gore
    Dukakis
    Mondale


Talk about charisma! That's like lightening in a bottle, right there. Hillary is more of the same.

Hillary came to the scene as the wife of a president and from there jumped directly to the Senate. That means she came in with a massive war chest for her New York campaign and had a name that people loved. She ran against Republican fill-in candidates, who entered the race after the original GOP candidates dropped out late. Basically, she won races that were tailor made for a victory and has not proven yet that she can beat a politically savvy, likable candidate. Does she have the smarts? Absolutely. But I think we’ve seen with Gore and Kerry that smarts do not mean shit. They were both beaten by a likable retard. Hillary is certainly intelligent, capable and corrupt enough to take over the job. She’s just not likeable enough.


Former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, the Republican front-runner, leads New York Sen. Hillary Clinton by a razor-thin 45 - 43 percent, but voters say 58 - 37 percent that President George W. Bush's low approval ratings will make it difficult for any Republican to be elected President, according to a Quinnipiac University national poll released today.

Giuliani's lead reverses a 46 - 43 percent Sen. Clinton lead in an August 15 poll by the independent Quinnipiac University, but Giuliani was up 49 - 40 percent May 3.


Look at that, voters don't want a Republican, but in a head to head, they don't really want Hillary either. She has the two perfect qualities that could lead to a loss: She is unlikable and she represents the right wing of the Democratic party. Why not just vote for a Republican instead of a Democrat who is acting like a Republican? At least he will seem like a nice person.

Get used to polls like this. The Democrats are about to elect the only candidate who could possibly lose.

I think my feminist wife put it best:


I was hoping the first woman to have a shot at being president would be someone great, but she's no better than the ones with dicks.


Actually, she's worse.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next

Toku666

Toku666

Columbus, OH
May 2004

NOV 03, 2007 01:36 AM

fountainofdreams said:
I don't want to see them asked about evolution. The wrong answer might destroy any esteem I hold for them right now.

Also, I think that choosing people for such an isolated issue is probably not the best thing. It's somewhat hypocritical to complain about a politician throwing around abortion and stem-cell research, while complaining about them not talking about evolution.



I don't want to see them asked about it, either. It was merely a follow-up to my point about Repub talking points somehow dominating the Dem candidate debate.

It was simply the best example of a blatantly pandering question devoid of any actual political substance that would not cross party lines in pre-primary rhetoric.

Well, fuck. Now you've got me over here crossing my fingers.

DevilsReject

DevilsReject

Cleveland, OH
February 2007

NOV 03, 2007 01:42 AM

FellOnEarth said:
(like getting their elected officials to give a damn and do a good job while hopefully not fucking over everyone once they are in, corporate welfare queens excluded).



That's where i have kind of lost faith. Dennis Kucinich is the 10th District Congressional representative in Ohio. I fall into that 10th District. This district has done nothing but go down hill since he has decided to run for president. We're one, if not the highest taxed county in Ohio, maybe the nation.

Cleveland and the outlying suburbs are going to hell, and nobody is coming up with any solutions to make the situation better. The best thing the state of Ohio can come up with is a law that states erotic dancers aren't allowed to touch patrons, and they have to stay a minimum of 6 foot away with the patron, along with some other stupid rules. They still won't allow gambling in Ohio, so everyone leaves the state and goes to every surrounding state to spend their money. Not one or two, every surrounding state has legal gambling.

It seems like everything in this district is just out of control because there is no leadership. No one is listening to the voters because the leadership is too busy trying to gain a presidential seat. Ohio is becoming a useless state, fast. They keep harping on how we are becoming a vacation spot, who wants to come to an old steel city, with a high crime rate, with no gambling, and a dancer can't even touch you?

I am upset because he was elected to do a job, and he is basically ignoring that job to get a better paying job.

I'm not against people bettering themselves, but don't forget what you were elected to do in the first place, and don't forget why you are where you are!

FellOnEarth

FellOnEarth

Temecula, CA
April 2006

NOV 03, 2007 01:54 AM

Alas, perhaps that is one of the greatest pitfalls of politics, namely avarice (greed is pretty close to that one and may on occasion be the greater of the two evils. But for the sake of argument, let's just call them the same thing). I'm generally suspicious of people who get into politics in the first place anyway (I think most are just trying to do themselves and their buddies favors once they latch on to the tit of power). Damned if there aren't a few good and honest people who really do care about their constituents and their country instead of themselves.

FYI, the reason why I said I'm more inline with Kucinich isn't because I support him. I don't know a damn thing about him to be honest (other then the fact that he once saw a triangular shaped UFO). I took a test and responded to different politician's anonymous remarks in favorable vs unfavorable format. At the end they reveal who you found most favorable to least favorable according to their remarks. For me, it turned out to be the Kuc (can I call him that?) I was surprised, but then again, he does want to impeach the entire executive wing of government, so he does earn a few major kudos from me in that regard.

Im sorry things suck for you in Ohio. They suck here too. blackeyed

Toku666

Toku666

Columbus, OH
May 2004

NOV 03, 2007 02:12 AM

Columbus is actually doing pretty well, in spite of a noticeable brain- and 20-something-drain trend.

But shit's been hard on Ohio over the course of the years that each neighboring state has legalized some form of "entertainment gambling" (read: casino or riverboat) that is a draw, as opposed to the pissant horse-racing and video poker you can find here and there in Ohio. And Kentucky still has us beat for horse-racing anyway.

Still, Columbus is overall on an upward trend, and I think Strickland is a terrific governor.

FellOnEarth

FellOnEarth

Temecula, CA
April 2006

NOV 03, 2007 02:37 AM

Toku666 said:
Columbus is actually doing pretty well, in spite of a noticeable brain- and 20-something-drain trend.

But shit's been hard on Ohio over the course of the years that each neighboring state has legalized some form of "entertainment gambling" (read: casino or riverboat) that is a draw, as opposed to the pissant horse-racing and video poker you can find here and there in Ohio. And Kentucky still has us beat for horse-racing anyway.

Still, Columbus is overall on an upward trend, and I think Strickland is a terrific governor.


Hmm, perhaps you could compensate by legalizing something else instead of gambling... I guarantee that Ohio's problems would be over quickly, one way or another. (Then again you'd have a whole other nut to crack, namely Federal prohibition statutes.)

On that note, I hear that California's #1 cash crop isn't exactly legal, but it sure is tender. wink

Toku666

Toku666

Columbus, OH
May 2004

NOV 03, 2007 02:52 AM

FellOnEarth said:
On that note, I hear that California's #1 cash crop isn't exactly legal, but it sure is tender. wink



Yeah, Ohio division of NORML is pretty big. It has held Hempfest smack dab in the middle of the OSU campus for the better part of two decades now. Sadly, we've only just now gotten into the third year of freedom from a Republican vise grip on our state politics, and it's slow goin' with such things when you've got people voting for a fucking law that makes titty clubs close at midnight and institute a 6-foot zone. I'm not a huge fan of what these clubs represent, and will only ever give custom to the wonderful Zanzibar of Toronto, ON for the remainder of my life, but that's all beside the point. There's no reason such things should be legal limitations of businesses of that type.

"HMMM, how is this "thread"?"

Oh, okay:

"Hey Democratic candidates:

Please free me and all of my brothers and sisters from ideological slavery. Please return us to a country where at least lip service is paid to all being equal, as opposed to a land where the President himself declares atheists to be un-American because of lack of adherence to a McCarthy era change to the Pledge of Allegiance, which was originally nothing more than copy from advertisements for a flag-making company.

Video games, weed, and stupid movies aren't going to do nearly as much damage to us as the ransom of our children into the pockets of men furnishing their golden parachutes that give out sloppy blowjobs.

Please please stop talking about attacking Iran.

Amen, or, wait fuck--
"

FellOnEarth

FellOnEarth

Temecula, CA
April 2006

NOV 03, 2007 03:15 AM

Amen. Goodnight and good luck. I'm turning in, I've got to work at 9:00 AM and I've been up till dawn the last two days... I'm turning into an SG zombie & I need to stop.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

NOV 03, 2007 10:31 AM

bald_eagle said:

emotedcreations said:
frown

I'm sure you're right. I just got in a huge debate with my sister's boyfriend who is well educated and intelligent. He refuses to vote, says it's a waste. He thinks all politicians are crooked and he won't help anyone of them get into office. I just wasted an hour of my life basically. He wouldn't concede a single point I was trying to make.


There are a lot of different types of intelligent. If he thinks voting is a waste, his intelligence is myopic, in my opinion.

The funny thing is he oversees different construction crews for a contracting company that he will either one day have part ownership in or he will start his own. I just told him to wait till he has his own company he'll realize how directly local and federal laws affect what and how he can do what he has to do. He told me he still won't vote which I don't buy. I mean shit, my dad is an educator/researcher and I'd always consult him about certain position that were up on the ballot. I mean, there were certain people who if got elected would have effected his ability to obtain funds and perform certain research. It's just so obvious to me that voting matters, but I'm preaching to the choir.

And yeah, I'd concede that his intelligence is a bit myopic. There was resistance to the idea that I couldn't put my finger on. Perhaps it's just apathy. But when I said intelligent he is generally thoughtful and can discuss nuanced positions beyond just the black and the white.

FellOnEarth said:
Personally I'm not really jazzed about the lottery idea though since it would come out of the coffers that are badly needed for fighting terrorism, funding "faith-based" initiatives, subsidizing those poor dirt farmers at Conagra, Altrea, et al., building roads for bankrupt lumber mills and Walmart (to support their distribution needs), and for shoring up beach erosion along millionaire's private residences. The list goes on... I feel so bad when ever I hear that multi-billion dollar companies are about to go belly up because they forgot to turn the iron off... Sometimes I just want to run out and send them a check for my entire life savings (not much, mind you) just so they don't have to starve.

Personally, I think the lottery is a bad idea. People would be voting for the wrong reasons, and I believe the percentage of uninformed electorate would gradually increase. I think giving people the day off is a good idea though. I think a lot of people who would like to vote but put their job above voting would be given the opportunity.

DevilsReject said:
They still won't allow gambling in Ohio, so everyone leaves the state and goes to every surrounding state to spend their money. Not one or two, every surrounding state has legal gambling.

Detroit's like what two and a half hours away? And they have three big Casinos, and then Windsor is just across the river. That's four cool casinos just a couple hours away.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

NOV 03, 2007 11:39 AM

bald_eagle said:
It sounds like more than apathy to me. Sounds like denial. He thinks he's above the whole process and doesn't want to dirty his hands by participating in the process. What he doesn't realize is that he does help determine the outcome by staying home. I can't believe that anyone in the construction business has never had to choose from between two evils.

He's still pretty young. Hopefully he'll come around, and you can be sure I'm going to try and help quicken that process.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

NOV 03, 2007 01:34 PM

bald_eagle said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

emotedcreations said:

bald_eagle said:
It sounds like more than apathy to me. Sounds like denial. He thinks he's above the whole process and doesn't want to dirty his hands by participating in the process. What he doesn't realize is that he does help determine the outcome by staying home. I can't believe that anyone in the construction business has never had to choose from between two evils.

He's still pretty young. Hopefully he'll come around, and you can be sure I'm going to try and help quicken that process.


Good luck. Really.

Thanks, I'll need it.

SirPsychoSexy

SirPsychoSexy

Ridgewood, NJ
January 2004

NOV 06, 2007 05:34 PM

ckdexterhaven said:

SirPsychoSexy said:

Subrosa said:
Also, Hillary will win in a walk against anyone the GOP nominates.



No. No, not really.

Ambivalence, apathy, low voter turnout are one thing that this country seriously suffers from. Hillary Clinton will drive people to the polls just to vote against her.


I agree with this up to a point. But if Rudy is the nominee, you'll see conservatives stay at home or vote 3rd party. It'll be the political equivalent of the Mets/Yankees Subway Series a while back. A ton of buildup, but most of the country just won't give a damn. You might get the hardcore Hannity/Limbaugh jerkoffs to vote specifically against Hillary, but I don't think will account for much of the overall turnout.

It's sad that an election that looked as though it would be something exciting and different, will probably just be another year where at least 50-55% of people will stay home.



I still think you under estimate how many left leaning people who dislike Hillary Clinton, not because of her specific point on some political spectrum, but because of the type of slimy wishy washy politician she is. She is not just the definition of an opportunist, it's like she read the definition and decided she could do it one better. It appears as if she has engineered her entire life, both private and public, not for profit, not personal empowerment, not pubic service or representation, but entirely for political advancement.
She is not just a political animal, she is alarmingly close to politics incarnate.

DevilsReject

DevilsReject

Cleveland, OH
February 2007

NOV 06, 2007 05:51 PM

emotedcreations said:
Detroit's like what two and a half hours away? And they have three big Casinos, and then Windsor is just across the river. That's four cool casinos just a couple hours away.



There's a dozen casinos within one to two to three hours of me. The point is that the religious zealots think that gambling is hell on earth. That's money just walking out of Ohio. Rather than spend the cash in Ohio, they drive two to three hours to get to a casino and spend money there.

Bus trips around here are a dime a dozen, that is flocks of money leaving the state of Ohio to never return, because no one comes to Ohio. Around here we have perfect places like the Cuyahoga River for Casinos, but once again, the religious zealots fear that people with "gambling addictions" will threaten the welfare of the state.

The same religious reich thinks that they need to keep me safe from the soul sucking stripper.

Columbus is the only city prospering in Ohio, Cinci is dieing, Cleveland and Akron are dieing, and Strickland has his hands full trying to fix things. It's just not a good state to be in right now.

Necia

Necia

San Francisco, CA
August 2005

NOV 06, 2007 09:41 PM

Subrosa said:
Also for what it's worth, Kerry was seen as a far superior debater than Bush in the traditional debate format. It was one of the things that kept him close.



Thank you. FTR, did you watch one single debate in the 2004 election cycle at all? What the hell are you talking about? Kerry clearly stomped Bush in both the first and the third debates, and he didn't lose the second one either.

I know people are all into that after-the-fact, "told you so"- style hating on Senator Kerry and Al Gore and anyone else who's ever lost an election in the history of democratic political systems, but you ought at least to try to sound like you know what you're talking about while spewing that.

Necia

Necia

San Francisco, CA
August 2005

NOV 06, 2007 09:44 PM

bl00dcr0w said:
Clinton is as much a tool of the GOP as was Kerry. Her Position-switching alienates her would-be supporters just enough to ensure her defeat in the general election. Much the same way Kerry's "fliping" on the issues destroyed his support base. She has always been on the far right. She does more for the GOP than anything for the DNC.



Please substantiate any of those statements you just made, in any way--particularly that last one.

Go.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

NOV 06, 2007 10:16 PM

Necia said:

Subrosa said:
Also for what it's worth, Kerry was seen as a far superior debater than Bush in the traditional debate format. It was one of the things that kept him close.



Thank you. FTR, did you watch one single debate in the 2004 election cycle at all? What the hell are you talking about? Kerry clearly stomped Bush in both the first and the third debates, and he didn't lose the second one either.

I know people are all into that after-the-fact, "told you so"- style hating on Senator Kerry and Al Gore and anyone else who's ever lost an election in the history of democratic political systems, but you ought at least to try to sound like you know what you're talking about while spewing that.



Likability has little to do with "trouncing." Did he on knowledge? Yes. Could John Kerry say a sentence without rambling on for hours? No. Boring your audience to death is not a quality debating strategy.

Remember all those crisp, nice sound bites out of Kerry? Yeah, neither do I. I guess that is why the Daily Show continued to show him babbling on and on every night of the campaign, unable to make a quick concise point, because he was an awesome speker. Don't pull this "I told you so" shit out, when I watched Jon Stewart slam his head into his desk night after night as he felt the same way many of us did. If you don't see the same thing with Hillary, good luck to you.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR by orbro

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR

There's like a half-hour of video here. You should do a vlog. More ...

Asshole Fuckface Roundup #74

Last Comment 4 HR

Parents who are accustomed to carrying guns around may not think anything of going into child-related... More ...

An Encounter With Jonathan Shaw's Narcisa

Last Comment 5 HR

thanx gurlz... u rrrrrule!! xx jonathan shaw and narcisa More ...

SuicideGirl: Bob

Bob

Terrible Woman's MySpace Alias Leads to Teen's Suicide.

Last Comment 20 HR

But, it's delivered poorly...really poorly. Unless, it's not a joke, in which case, it's a good place... More ...

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08 by Shalome

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08

Oh my fucking god. More ...

Filtering the Truth: Religion - Friend or Foe?

Last Comment 11/30/08

I'm just going to skip over the mass orgy that's going on and say my piece: I don't think religion is... More ...

SuicideGirls Interview: Al Franken
SuicideGirls Interview: Al Jourgensen of Ministry
SuicideGirls Interview: Terry Zwigoff