BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH

Help! Blackwater Is Sad!

THURSDAY OCTOBER 25 2007 9:00 AM

Submitted by FearTheReaper. Edited By erin_broadley.

TAGS: Blackwater, Iraq, Erik Prince



America is birthing a new Oliver North right now. It is a painful process because first we have to find a guy who is totally fucking over the country and then we have to elevate him to the level of right wing hero. The new North is Blackwater CEO Erik Prince and he is one hell of a douche bag.

Prince has been making the rounds on television lately because Blackwater has been murdering people in Iraq and they cannot be prosecuted under current laws. See, Blackwater says it falls under US military laws that give it immunity from prosecution. And coincidentally, the company says it is not a branch of the US military, so it does not have to obey the military's rules of conduct. To they can roam the land killing anybody without consequence. It’s a murder party! Yay!

Recently Blackwater murdered 17 Iraqi civilians without cause. There is no evidence that Blackwater guards were fired on by Iraqis, but a lot of evidence that Blackwater shot at innocents who had no weapons.



A bit of a hiccup by Prince when Wolf said there was no evidence of Iraqi shell casings. Uh, uh uh...


The US military unit on the scene says that Blackwater fired on Iraqis as they ran from the square. Both eyewitness accounts and an Iraqi investigation -- reliant on videotape, interviews and other unspecified investigative methods -- have discounted the idea that Iraqis fired on Blackwater.


There were two teams of Blackwater guards in the area, both containing multiple vehicles. They could have easily fired on each other and then started killing civilians. Either way, they appear to be a group of mercenaries who massacred civilians.

So what to do if you are about to lose a massive military contract? PR push! Send out the emails! Turn that frown upside down! So far Prince has had interviews with The Washington Post, Newsweek, The Wall Street Journal, CNN’s "Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer," CBS’ "60 Minutes" and PBS’ "Charlie Rose." Today the company sent out an email.


From: Blackwater Worldwide
Date: October 24, 2007 12:42:04 PM EDT
To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Subject: A Request for Your Support Reply-To: btw@blackwaterusa.com

A Request for Your Support

The Blackwater family is comprised of dedicated and active service providers that work vigorously to support the American nation. In this tumultuous political climate, Blackwater Worldwide has taken center stage, our services and ethics aggressively challenged with misinformation and fabrications. Letters, e-mails and calls to your elected Congressional representatives can and will create a positive impact by influencing the manner in which they gather and present information.

While we can’t ask that each supporter do everything, Blackwater asks that everyone does something. Contact your lawmakers and tell them to stand by the truth. Correspondence should be polite and professional. We don’t support generating negative messages. Tell the Blackwater story and encourage your representatives to seek the truth instead of reading negative propaganda and drawing the wrong conclusions.

Suggested themes:

- Cost efficiency of Blackwater – saving the US taxpayer millions of dollars so that the US Government doesn’t have to take troops from their missions or send more into harms way

- Professional population of service veterans and mature law enforcement personnel

- Sacrifice in lives lost by Blackwater saving US diplomats without one single protectee harmed

If you see a lawmaker speaking good things about Blackwater, contact their offices and let them know that they have your support. Find and contact your federal, state, and local officials by visiting www.congress.org.

Expanding our communications effort starts with you. Pass the word – pass the truth.


Jesus, boo fucking hoo.

Using Blackwater murderers is far more expensive in terms of actual money and the cost of horrible publicity with Iraqis.


It costs the U.S. government a lot more to hire contract employees as security guards in Iraq than to use American troops.

An unmarried sergeant given Iraq pay and relief from U.S. taxes makes about $83 to $85 a day, given time in service. A married sergeant with children makes about double that, $170 a day.


The average Blackwater guard makes $600, which is a tad bit more. And it’s great for our guys because they can see a bunch of assholes driving around killing people and ramming vehicles, while making shit loads more money. I believe that is what is not known as “morale building.”

Today, the Iraqi government hit back.


The private security industry is trying to make sense of the announcement today from Baghdad that the Iraqi government is revoking a CPA-era edict, known as Order 17, immunizing contractors from prosecution in Iraqi courts. Some believe that the State Department will succeed in an anticipated attempt to prevent Americans from appearing before an Iraqi judge, while warning that if a full revocation succeeds, American companies or individual contractors might simply up and leave Iraq rather than potentially face charges in an immature justice system.


That actually sounds great. Get ready for a draft, kids! The US has no business bringing mercenaries into this occupation. It is a recipe for disaster and they seem to have a bit of a problem with restraint. The private businesses are a large reason why we are in a huge hole. They are operating with no oversight, fucking over everything they touch without the threat of repercussions. Our government is giving shitloads of money to corrupt businesses that do shoddy work. Just take a look at our fucked up embassy in Baghdad.


The massive U.S. embassy under construction in Baghdad could cost $144 million more than projected and will open months behind schedule because of poor planning, shoddy workmanship, internal disputes and last-minute changes sought by State Department officials, according to U.S. officials and a department document provided to Congress.


It's all part of the same problem. Private business allowed to run about and do what ever the fuck they want. At this point, the best thing that could happen to America’s misadventure in Iraq would be for the Blackwater guards to be charged in an Iraqi court for killing the civilians. But expect the right wing to circle the wagons and do what they can to help out Prince and his murderers. Then Prince will be elevated to hero status and given a radio show.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 8

Next

Zarth

Zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

OCT 25, 2007 02:49 PM

Given that Blackwater gets its personnel already trained (by the US military as often as not), that's not a very strong argument.

Maxtype

Maxtype

Pueblo, CO
October 2007

OCT 25, 2007 03:02 PM

Supposedly Contractors aren't mercenaries per se because they aren't foreign troops paid by our Govt.,but I dislike the idea just the same.I support and admire American Soldiers,but Blackwater does seem to be playing Cowboys over there.

I won't tar all the contractors with the same brush,but clearly THESE Blackwater personnel committed a War Crime,and should face charges under the UCMJ.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

OCT 25, 2007 03:17 PM

freshprncebelair said:


It costs the U.S. government a lot more to hire contract employees as security guards in Iraq than to use American troops.



An unmarried sergeant given Iraq pay and relief from U.S. taxes makes about $83 to $85 a day, given time in service. A married sergeant with children makes about double that, $170 a day.



The average Blackwater guard makes $600, which is a tad bit more. And it's great for our guys because they can see a bunch of assholes driving around killing people and ramming vehicles, while making shit loads more money. I believe that is what is not known as "morale building."




The cost savings comes when you realize it costs almost 100k to train and equip a single US soldier, and you have to sign them for a minimum of 4 years. So you are looking at 200k for a single troop for 4 years, roughly.

If you want troops for all those four years, it's ineffective to hire them from Blackwater (at over 200k per troop PER YEAR). If you just want short term burst capability for troops (especially the highly trained troops blackwater specializes in), it's very cost effective to hire Mercs. Also, it's a good way of capturing the best troops you might have lost otherwise.

But as an aside, it's funny how congress dems are calling Blackwater out for tax evasion by calling its soldier contractors. What a crock of shit. Blackwater troops fit contractor status to a T, and if the US gove isn't getting its taxes, go after the troops who aren't paying them (as anyone who has ever worked as a contractor knows, contractors don't have taxes withheld, and are supposed to pay the payroll taxes at income tax time)



Well, you'd know more than that article I linked to in the Washington Post.
tongue

FattyFatty2x4

FattyFatty2x4

Salt Lake City, UT
May 2006

OCT 25, 2007 03:24 PM

Ahhh shit-saki, Zarth.....you're right. I'm sorry.

01_Conservative

01_Conservative

El Cajon, CA
March 2004

OCT 25, 2007 03:25 PM

I know you all view me as a conservative mouth piece but let me straighten the good gentleman, Mr FearTheReaper, out.

Blackwater's website says that the pay starts at $550/day, a little less then what is quoted, so I would ask is that an average or where did that info come from. Then he gives the amount that a Sergeant would make, I would say what grade of sergeant, e5, e6, e7, e8. They all make different amounts and we would be talking about the grades of e6 or higher with a minimum of 8 years experience. That would put minimum pay closer to 100+/day for a Sergeant without dependants. So, off by a little bit but still close. My question what is he taking into consideration in those numbers, I only considered housing allowance and pay. No family separation, no hazardous duty pay, and no airborne pay. All of those would be paid out as well taking the daily amount higher. Plus the military does not pay for medical, was that taken into consideration, especially if there is a family.

How much do you pay for your family's medical insurance, now divide that by 30 and add it to the amount listed above. Also keep in mind that the people that work for Blackwater were trained by the US gov't, so that means even though they are no longer in the military we still get the benefit of their training. Now add that figure in and the cost of training new people to replace them comes into play. Some of the jobs that they do are done by a very limitted few military experts. High level personel protection is done by Delta Force and possibly some SEAL teams. They are few and spread thin around the world as it is. If not for Blackwater and other companies like them the military would be spread thinner.

Plus their letter says to tell and find the truth, what if the truth is they were wrong. Guess the letter blows up in their face.

So maybe it is and maybe it isn't cost effective to use them, but one thing is for sure as long as they are there we still get the benefit of their training, the gov't still gets to use their expertise and military lives are saved by them running convoy protection.

So now add all that up and every war has war crimes. I am not saying that they are right but it happens. If they are committed the perpetraitors need to be prosecuted and put in jail.

Zarth

Zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

OCT 25, 2007 03:26 PM

FattyFatty2x4 said:
Ahhh shit-saki, Zarth.....you're right. I'm sorry.


Nothing of it, my good man. I'm pleased we reached a peaceable understanding.

01_Conservative

01_Conservative

El Cajon, CA
March 2004

OCT 25, 2007 03:32 PM

I am finally glad to see that I am not the only person with a counter opinion on this site.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

OCT 25, 2007 03:37 PM

conservative said:
I know you all view me as a conservative mouth piece but let me straighten the good gentleman, Mr FearTheReaper, out.

Blackwater's website says that the pay starts at $550/day, a little less then what is quoted, so I would ask is that an average or where did that info come from.



And I would respond with, "what sad education did you receive?" You just listed an almost similar STARTING PAY and you can't understand AVERAGE pay? Seriously?

And maybe you didn't notice the little pink letters, but they are called a 'LINK". The numbers are quoted because they come directly from a legitimate news source called the Washington Post.

You, however, are talking out of your blown out anus as if what you say has any meaning without something to back it up. You have nothing, so what you say is irrelvant opinion.

conservative said:
So maybe it is and maybe it isn't cost effective to use them, but one thing is for sure as long as they are there we still get the benefit of their training, the gov't still gets to use their expertise and military lives are saved by them running convoy protection.



And innocent Iraqis die. Sounds like a good days work.

conservative said:
So now add all that up and every war has war crimes. I am not saying that they are right but it happens.



Oh, good, because I thought you were saying they are right. Phew!

Indeed, every war has war crimes. And there is nothing disconcerning about a group of guys running around outside the rule of law in a war zone making shitloads of cash. Nothing at all.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

OCT 25, 2007 03:40 PM

conservative said:
I am finally glad to see that I am not the only person with a counter opinion on this site.



If you think you have anything in common with FattyFatty2x4, then you are more insane than I previously thought. He presented a well thought out post, that made sense.

You need to wipe your ass, because of the volume of shit that came out and landed on your keyboard.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

OCT 25, 2007 03:56 PM

conservative said:
I know you all view me as a conservative mouth piece



How could that possbly have happened? Oh noes!

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

OCT 25, 2007 03:58 PM

conservative said:
So now add all that up and every war has war crimes. I am not saying that they are right but it happens.


And war crimes should be prosecuted. Shouldn't they?

freshprncebelair

freshprncebelair

Ellicott City, MD
June 2004

OCT 25, 2007 04:15 PM

Zarth said:
Given that Blackwater gets its personnel already trained (by the US military as often as not), that's not a very strong argument.



True, but that's a sunk cost. It's never coming back no matter what you do. The alternative is for people to not be in the military anymore.

It's a complex chicken and egg problem: Our massive military industrial complex generates thousands upon thousands of people who exceptionally good at killing, among the best in the world (talking about the people Blackwater recruits, mostly spec ops and expeditionary forces). When they aren't needed, something has to be done with them, and in fact, having these people around creates a market for them.

If you really don't want to see organizations like Blackwater survive, keep our military at a trim level all the time, and limit our military involvement in things. It chokes the market for pre-trained mercenaries.

smithers_jones

smithers_jones

Los Angeles, CA
November 2003

OCT 25, 2007 04:41 PM

freshprncebelair said:

Zarth said:
Given that Blackwater gets its personnel already trained (by the US military as often as not), that's not a very strong argument.



True, but that's a sunk cost. It's never coming back no matter what you do. The alternative is for people to not be in the military anymore.

It's a complex chicken and egg problem: Our massive military industrial complex generates thousands upon thousands of people who exceptionally good at killing, among the best in the world (talking about the people Blackwater recruits, mostly spec ops and expeditionary forces). When they aren't needed, something has to be done with them, and in fact, having these people around creates a market for them.

If you really don't want to see organizations like Blackwater survive, keep our military at a trim level all the time, and limit our military involvement in things. It chokes the market for pre-trained mercenaries.



Or the US governement can just stop hiring them. 90 percent of Blackwater's revenue comes from contracts with the US government.

PointBlank

PointBlank

New York, NY
November 2004

OCT 25, 2007 04:44 PM

It's not like the name Blackwater is totally creepy on its own or anything.


smithers_jones

smithers_jones

Los Angeles, CA
November 2003

OCT 25, 2007 04:44 PM

SockPuppet said:

conservative said:
So now add all that up and every war has war crimes. I am not saying that they are right but it happens.


And war crimes should be prosecuted. Shouldn't they?



There was an intersting article in LA Times last week about whether or not mercs in Iraq were "unlawful combatants." The imaginary category created by Bush and Co to describe Al Queda and Taliban fighters who are engaged in a war zone but not as part of an army tied to a nation-state.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 8

Next

Brett Ratner Considers Ruining Guitar Hero

Last Comment 1 HR

Easy for you Americans to say. The rest of us (British 360 owners aside) are still waiting for a Rock... More ...

"Knight Rider" Movie to Go on Without The Hoff?

Last Comment 5 HR

...and its all because of this: (video) hahaha More ...

McCain Picks A Vagina

Last Comment 5 HR

How is it that every time I read a story about this woman, she comes across as more and more of a petty... More ...

Crybaby Town

Last Comment 7 HR by boombands

Crybaby Town

Last Comment 7 HR

While you would still be spouting bullshit people would perhaps take you a little more seriously if you... More ...

EA's "Dead Space" Goes Viral

Last Comment 16 HR by Gnos

EA's "Dead Space" Goes Viral

Last Comment 16 HR

this game looks sick as hell, I like how they're doing all these sideline projects along with it the animated... More ...

SuicideGirls Interview: Terry Gilliam
SuicideGirls Interview: Dita Von Teese author of The Art of the Teese
SuicideGirls Interview: Joy Division's Peter Hook