• commentary
  • FRIDAY OCTOBER 19 2007 9:00 AM

A Hero Rises Out Of The Democratic Shit Heap



Yesterday, Democratic Senator Chris Dodd stood up to Bush, Republicans and even his own party and showed them all what leadership qualities actually look like. The Democrats were about to cave once again, this time on the FISA wiretapping bill, when Dodd placed a hold on the legislation. It is the first time any Democrat has said, “Enough is enough.” As of now, the bill is stalled.

Amazingly, the Democratic leadership had once again given in to our very unpopular president’s wishes to undermine the Constitution. The bill would have given retroactive immunity to telecommunication companies for breaking the law. Democrats were actually going to let companies and the president get away with breaking the law.


Senate Democrats and Republicans reached agreement with the Bush administration yesterday on the terms of new legislation to control the federal government's domestic surveillance program, which includes a highly controversial grant of legal immunity to telecommunications companies that have assisted the program.

It was a victory for President Bush, whose aides lobbied heavily against the Democrats' bill, and an embarrassment for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who had pushed for the measure's passage. It will include full immunity for those companies that can demonstrate to a court that they acted pursuant to a legal directive in helping the government with surveillance in the United States.


I thought the government was made up of three branches. This article in the Washington Post is a tad misleading, because it is not the government that gave a legal directive, but the White House. This sort of shitty reporting is becoming the norm, however, and it is part of the reason Bush can get away with his nightmarish policies. They also neglected to mention that Democrat Jay Rockefeller is a telecom whore and greased this bill through his committee.

There is absolutely no need to update FISA as the Patriot Act already gutted it. In 2001 Bush authorized the NSA to secretly wiretap Americans without a court order, which happened to be illegal at the time. Telecommunication companies jumped at the chance to give away private citizens records and Bush was on his way to violating the Fourth Amendment. Comcast even charged the administration $1000 for each person’s record they illegally handed over. Currently lawsuits are making their way through the courts and it is not looking good for the telecom companies.


AT&T's customers sued them for violating their privacy in violation of long-standing federal laws and for violating their Fourth Amendment rights. Even with the most expensive armies of lawyers possible, AT&T and other telecoms are losing in a court of law. The federal judge presiding over the case ruled against them -- ruled that the law is so clear they could not possibly have believed that what they did was legal -- and most observers, having heard the Oral Argument on appeal, predicted that they will lose in the Court of Appeals, too.


The Democratic Congress has attempted to investigate the administrations circumvention of FISA, but the president has refused to give up any documents. And Vice President Cheney went as far as to actually block telecom companies from testifying before Congress, an act that is not even remotely legal. Now that a federal court has found the entire program to be illegal and unconstitutional, the telecom companies could be liable for damages. But we can’t have that now, can we? Those poor companies took part in a crime because a powerful person asked them to. How can you hold someone liable for something like that? If my mayor asks me to rape a lady, I do it and I shouldn’t be prosecuted for it. That is how America works. If an elected leader asks you to break the law, you do it and you get off totally free.

The Democrats gave in after blustering last week that the the telecom companies would not get immunity until they explained what criminal acts had been committed. Bush said no to the request, and the Democrats then reverted to their normal spineless selves and said, “Okay," because they are the world’s biggest pussies who wouldn’t know power if it was rammed up their anuses. (That is a double body hole sentence – 27 points)

But one man stood up yesterday and put a stop to this egregious crap: Chris Dodd.


The Military Commissions Act. Warrantless wiretapping. Shredding of Habeas Corpus. Torture. Extraordinary Rendition. Secret Prisons.

No more.

I have decided to place a "hold" on the latest FISA bill that would have included amnesty for telecommunications companies that enabled the President's assault on the Constitution by illegally providing personal information on their customers without judicial authorization.

I said that I would do everything I could to stop this bill from passing, and I have.

It's about delivering results -- and as I've said before, the FIRST thing I will do after being sworn into office is restore the Constitution. But we shouldn't have to wait until then to prevent the further erosion of our country's most treasured document. That's why I am stopping this bill today.


As far as I am concerned, someone just stepped to the front of the Democrat presidential candidate line. Barack Obama can blow all the rhetoric he wants out of his mouth, but until he actually stands up and takes action I don’t give a shit or have any reason to believe what he says. We don’t need the “politics of hope” right now; we need the “politics of knock that shit off.” Hillary Clinton runs her campaign by polls and would never have the courage actually stand up for what she believes in, whatever the fuck that is. Chris Dodd showed leadership qualities today, more than any other Democratic candidate so far. Personal strength is the most attractive quality a politician can have and Dodd is looking like the man right now.

So, what does the hold accomplish? Holds are a strange thing. If a Senator wants to hold up a bill, they tell the party leader that they will object and withhold their support from a bill being brought to the floor under unanimous consent. It forces the Senator supporting the bill to follow the actual rules of the Senate, which are much more difficult. They have to make a “motion to proceed,” which requires a vote on whether or not to start debate. The objecting Senator can then filibuster the motion to proceed. At that point 60 votes would be required to stop the filibuster. In a Senate that barely has a majority, Senators generally don’t want to risk angering anyone who they may need on their side some day. It’s an “I’ll scratch your back if you scratch mine” situation.

If Democrats vote to end the filibuster, they are pissing off one of their own – in this case a man who is putting his career on the line for what he believes is right. And now Dodd is that guy in Tiananmen Square standing in front of the tanks. The left’s heroes, like Boxer, Feingold and Obama, did not have the balls to take this action. It is a big deal and a rare show of responsibility, courage and conviction by a politician.

And Dodd is about to get hit with a shit storm from the right. I don’t think we’ve ever seen the kind of attack we are about to witness on just one man. He will be threatened with retribution in the Senate by the right wing. His fellow lawmakers will threaten to filibuster and knock down every bill he introduces from this day forward. Fox News, the president and AM radio are going to go ape shit on the man. But Dodd did it anyway and it is important to recognize.

Dodd is a rare politician and everyone should now take a look at the man as a presidential candidate. At the very least, you can shoot him a message to thank him for doing what is right.

Update:

Majority Leader and amazing coward Harry Reid is threatening to do what he can to push the bill forward. Dodd responds:

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next

Comments
OhSoOrdinary

OhSoOrdinary

New York, NY
July 2006

OCT 19, 2007 11:29 AM

Well, you get $20 bucks from me, Dodd.

JunkyardAngel

JunkyardAngel

San Gabriel, CA
February 2006

OCT 19, 2007 11:30 AM

Trahern said:
Someone had a cunning plan!



Baldrick!

freshprncebelair

freshprncebelair

Ellicott City, MD
June 2004

OCT 19, 2007 11:51 AM

If Chris Dodd wins the Democratic nomination, im voting for him most definitely. He's got a lot of good policies.

Adelaidey

Adelaidey

Sarasota, FL
February 2007

OCT 19, 2007 11:55 AM

Well, that's certainly the first time I contributed to a politician.

Clidna

Clidna

Canada
January 2005

OCT 19, 2007 12:05 PM

Dubya = puke eeek mad
Dodd = biggrin love *applause*

Thanks for the link FTR, I sent a note (although I don't know if they'll even read it, as I'm Canadian wink)

Skywisdom

Skywisdom

Portland, OR
December 2005

OCT 19, 2007 12:29 PM

Why is no one else reporting on this?
Has anyone else found a news article about this?

DeusExMachina

DeusExMachina

Berkeley, CA
August 2004

OCT 19, 2007 12:39 PM

Just in time for my paper on "Executive Power, and the NSA's Domestic Spying Program"

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

OCT 19, 2007 12:45 PM

Skywisdom said:
Why is no one else reporting on this?
Has anyone else found a news article about this?



Hmm, telecoms...media...I don't know

_kungfoo_

_kungfoo_

Los Angeles, CA
April 2005

OCT 19, 2007 01:01 PM


Might I take a moment and ask anybody concerned about this issue (among other issues involving electronics, privacy and free speech), take a moment and send the Electronic Frontier Foundation a few spare dollars. They are a non-profit group, directed involved with this issue:

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed a class-action lawsuit against AT&T on January 31, 2006, accusing the telecom giant of violating the law and the privacy of its customers by collaborating with the National Security Agency (NSA) in its massive, illegal program to wiretap and data-mine Americans' communications.

Skywisdom

Skywisdom

Portland, OR
December 2005

OCT 19, 2007 02:11 PM

FearTheReaper said:

Skywisdom said:
Why is no one else reporting on this?
Has anyone else found a news article about this?



Hmm, telecoms...media...I don't know



Yeah, but shouldn't there at least be FOX news spouting about how he is halting the process and how democrats don't like doing anything, they just like stopping bills that protect our freedom, or whatever the fuck it is? I just hear silence.

jbaldwin

jbaldwin

Moscow, PA
January 2007

OCT 19, 2007 02:40 PM

I am glad to see this from out politician!

Metaverse

Metaverse

USA
March 2005

OCT 19, 2007 04:56 PM

Who the hell elected a senator with a brain?! WTF is going on!?

*hell freezes over*

OctEgon

OctEgon

Tustin, CA
July 2005

OCT 19, 2007 05:02 PM

Tell you what, Dodd. I'll make it $40 and spread the word.

Don't let me down

LostLucy

LostLucy

USA
December 2006

OCT 19, 2007 05:47 PM

I'm glad DODD has the balls to take this important stand. I do feel disappointed that my man is so concerned with *not * mussing up the hope and all by taking a stand when it is important, going all wild, and getting good and angry like DODD.

He will never, ever be the nominee, but who cares?

I know this site has a lot of you young'uns, but really FTR, Tip O'Neill is going to crawl out of his grave and come kick your butt for saying no one else ever stood up to the GOP!

SirPsychoSexy

SirPsychoSexy

Ridgewood, NJ
January 2004

OCT 19, 2007 05:47 PM

Just got 20$ from me.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next