BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH



Yesterday Bush, as promised, vetoed the State Child Health Insurance Program bill.

Bush, in only the fourth veto of his presidency, said he rejected the bipartisan bill because it would "move healthcare in this country in the wrong direction" and would mean that "government coverage would displace private health insurance for many children."
....
Rep. Elton Gallegly, a Simi Valley Republican who voted against the bill, said the Democrats' decision to delay the override attempt shows their goal is to score political points, not to provide health insurance to children.

"This is a classic case of the ugliest part of our government process, which is taking something as critical as the healthcare of children and turning it into political spin," Gallegly said.



Ugly, ugly, ugly. Denying health insurance to children because providing it is "the wrong direction" is the "political spin" here. SCHIP wouldn't "displace private insurance" for fucking anyone; it would *provide* insurance for kids who don't have it.

Here's what will happen in California, Gallegly's state:

Unless Congress overrides the veto, California will not only be prohibited from expanding the program, but the state will also have to drop as many as 250,000 children who are currently insured under the program, Wright said.



More facts:

In 2005, there were 8.3 *million* uninsured children in the U.S. In 2006, there were 8.7 million.

Between 1998, the year the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was implemented, and 2004, the number of uninsured children fell every year. But since 2004, as the availability of funding for SCHIP expansion has tightened and as a restrictive Medicaid policy enacted in early 2006 has taken effect, progress in enrolling uninsured children in SCHIP and Medicaid has stalled.


These are children with asthma, with disabilities, with chronic ear infections, with toothaches, with eczema, with allergies; kids in foster care, kids with depression or ADHD. The idea that most people are basically healthy and that if you get sick without health insurance you can always go to the ER applies to "most people" because "most people" have had decent health care as children and haven't developed long-term or chronic problems because they lacked it. Untreated colds, head lice when you can't afford the medicine that kills them, eczema that drives you crazy--that kind of minor ongoing problem undermines kids' ability to attend school, undermines their ability to focus when they are in school, undermines their long-term health and the health of their entire families. ER visits for head lice or asthma are a fuck of a lot more expensive to the almighty taxpayer than providing kids with inhalers and topical medications.

And it's fucking pathetic that we have to resort to that kind of "it costs more not to treat them" argument for convincing the wealthiest country in the world to make sure kids can see a doctor once or twice a year.

The good news is that the Senate has enough votes for SCHIP to override Bush's asshole veto.

The bad news is that the House doesn't. We need 25 more Representatives to act like decent human beings and switch their votes.

So. Do the decent thing. Go here and find out who your representative is.

Then scroll down the list below to see if his or her name is on it. These are the folks who voted against SCHIP.

Write them (you can do so via the first link, or you can google their name and find a real honest-to-god mailing address) and tell them to change their vote. That's all you have to do.

If you want to do more, google the name of your state + "uninsured children numbers" and find out what percentage of kids in your state are uninsured. Mention that in your letter. If your representative was one of the good guys, write to the people on the list below who are from your state, admit that you're not in their district, but tell them you write as a resident of your state, and point out that their vote affects everyone.

If you want to do even more, talk to your friends and make sure they know about this. Tell them who their representative is. Urge them to write or call. Give them your representative's contact information. (A list of people who are *most* likely to change their votes is here, but even the dyed-in-the-wool assholes should hear how unpopular their stubbornness on this issue is with their constituents.)

If you want to do even more than that, print out a few flyers that say "Your Representative in Congress voted AGAINST providing health insurance to uninsured children," put your Representative's name, face, and contact information on it, and post them around town.

If you want to do even more than all of that, think of what else you can do and post it in the comments below.

Alabama

AL-1 Bonner, Jo (R)
AL-2 Everett, Terry (R)
AL-3 Rogers, Michael (R)
AL-4 Aderholt, Robert (R)
AL-6 Bachus, Spencer (R)

Arizona

AZ-2 Franks, Trent (R)
AZ-3 Shadegg, John (R)
AZ-6 Flake, Jeff (R)

Arkansas

AR-3 Boozman, John (R)

California

CA-2 Herger, Walter (R) -- did not vote
CA-3 Lungren, Daniel (R)
CA-4 Doolittle, John (R)
CA-19 Radanovich, George (R)
CA-21 Nunes, Devin (R)
CA-22 McCarthy, Kevin (R)
CA-24 Gallegly, Elton (R)
CA-25 McKeon, Howard (R)
CA-26 Dreier, David (R)
CA-33 Watson, Diane (D) -- voted "present" but did not vote aye or nay on the bill
CA-40 Royce, Edward (R)
CA-41 Lewis, Jerry (R)
CA-42 Miller, Gary (R)
CA-44 Calvert, Ken (R)
CA-46 Rohrabacher, Dana (R)
CA-48 Campbell, John (R)
CA-49 Issa, Darrell (R)
CA-50 Bilbray, Brian (R)
CA-52 Hunter, Duncan (R)

Colorado

CO-4 Musgrave, Marilyn (R)
CO-5 Lamborn, Doug (R)
CO-6 Tancredo, Thomas (R)

Florida

FL-1 Miller, Jeff (R)
FL-4 Crenshaw, Ander (R)
FL-5 Brown-Waite, Virginia (R)
FL-6 Stearns, Clifford (R)
FL-7 Mica, John (R)
FL-8 Keller, Ric (R)
FL-9 Bilirakis, Gus (R)
FL-11 Castor, Kathy (D)
FL-12 Putnam, Adam (R)
FL-14 Mack, Connie (R)
FL-15 Weldon, David (R)
FL-18 Ros-Lehtinen, Ileana (R)
FL-21 Diaz-Balart, Lincoln (R)
FL-24 Feeney, Tom (R)
FL-25 Diaz-Balart, Mario (R)

Georgia

GA-1 Kingston, Jack (R)
GA-3 Westmoreland, Lynn (R)
GA-6 Price, Tom (R)
GA-7 Linder, John (R)
GA-8 Marshall, James (D)
GA-9 Deal, Nathan (R)
GA-10 Broun, Paul (R)
GA-11 Gingrey, John (R)

Idaho

ID-1 Sali, Bill (R)

Illinois

IL-6 Roskam, Peter (R)
IL-11 Weller, Gerald (R)
IL-13 Biggert, Judy (R)
IL-14 Hastert, J. (R)
IL-15 Johnson, Timothy (R)
IL-16 Manzullo, Donald (R)
IL-19 Shimkus, John (R)

Indiana

IN-3 Souder, Mark (R)
IN-4 Buyer, Stephen (R)
IN-5 Burton, Dan (R)
IN-6 Pence, Mike (R)
IN-7 Carson, Julia (D) -- did not vote
IN-9 Hill, Baron (D)

Iowa

IA-5 King, Steve (R)

Kansas

KS-4 Tiahrt, Todd (R)

Kentucky

KY-1 Whitfield, Edward (R)
KY-2 Lewis, Ron (R)
KY-4 Davis, Geoff (R)
KY-5 Rogers, Harold (R)

Louisiana

LA-1 Jindal, Bobby (R) -- did not vote
LA-4 McCrery, James (R)
LA-5 Alexander, Rodney (R)
LA-6 Baker, Richard (R)
LA-7 Boustany, Charles (R)

Maryland

MD-6 Bartlett, Roscoe (R)

Massachusetts

MA-10 Delahunt, William (D) -- did not vote

Michigan

MI-2 Hoekstra, Peter (R)
MI-4 Camp, David (R)
MI-7 Walberg, Timothy (R)
MI-8 Rogers, Michael (R)
MI-9 Knollenberg, Joseph (R)
MI-11 McCotter, Thaddeus (R)

Minnesota

MN-2 Kline, John (R)
MN-6 Bachmann, Michele (R)

Mississippi

MS-1 Wicker, Roger (R)
MS-3 Pickering, Charles (R)
MS-4 Taylor, Gene (D)

Missouri

MO-2 Akin, W. (R)
MO-6 Graves, Samuel (R)
MO-7 Blunt, Roy (R)
MO-9 Hulshof, Kenny (R)

Nebraska

NE-1 Fortenberry, Jeffrey (R)
NE-2 Terry, Lee (R)
NE-3 Smith, Adrian (R)

Nevada

NV-2 Heller, Dean (R)

New Jersey

NJ-3 Saxton, H. (R)
NJ-5 Garrett, E. (R)
NJ-11 Frelinghuysen, Rodney (R)

New Mexico

NM-2 Pearce, Steven (R)

New York

NY-26 Reynolds, Thomas (R)
NY-29 Kuhl, John (R)

North Carolina

NC-2 Etheridge, Bob (D)
NC-3 Jones, Walter (R)
NC-5 Foxx, Virginia (R)
NC-6 Coble, Howard (R)
NC-7 McIntyre, Mike (D)
NC-8 Hayes, Robin (R)
NC-9 Myrick, Sue (R)
NC-10 Mchenry, Patrick (R)

Ohio

OH-1 Chabot, Steven (R)
OH-2 Schmidt, Jean (R)
OH-4 Jordan, Jim (R)
OH-8 Boehner, John (R)
OH-10 Kucinich, Dennis (D) -- WTF?

Oklahoma

OK-1 Sullivan, John (R)
OK-2 Boren, Dan (D)
OK-3 Lucas, Frank (R)
OK-4 Cole, Tom (R)
OK-5 Fallin, Mary (R)

Oregon

OR-2 Walden, Greg (R)

Pennsylvania

PA-5 Peterson, John (R)
PA-9 Shuster, William (R)
PA-16 Pitts, Joseph (R)

South Carolina

SC-1 Brown, Henry (R)
SC-2 Wilson, Addison (R)
SC-3 Barrett, James (R)
SC-4 Inglis, Bob (R)

Tennessee

TN-1 Davis, David (R)
TN-2 Duncan, John (R)
TN-3 Wamp, Zach (R)
TN-7 Blackburn, Marsha (R)

Texas

TX-1 Gohmert, Louis (R)
TX-2 Poe, Ted (R) -- did not vote
TX-3 Johnson, Samuel (R)
TX-4 Hall, Ralph (R)
TX-5 Hensarling, Jeb (R)
TX-6 Barton, Joe (R)
TX-7 Culberson, John (R)
TX-8 Brady, Kevin (R)
TX-10 McCaul, Michael (R)
TX-11 Conaway, K. (R)
TX-12 Granger, Kay (R)
TX-13 Thornberry, William (R)
TX-14 Paul, Ronald (R)
TX-19 Neugebauer, Randy (R)
TX-21 Smith, Lamar (R)
TX-24 Marchant, Kenny (R)
TX-26 Burgess, Michael (R)
TX-30 Johnson, Eddie (D) -- did not vote
TX-31 Carter, John (R)
TX-32 Sessions, Peter (R)

Utah

UT-1 Bishop, Rob (R)
UT-3 Cannon, Christopher (R)

Virginia

VA-1 Davis, Jo Ann (R)
VA-2 Drake, Thelma (R)
VA-4 Forbes, James (R)
VA-5 Goode, Virgil (R)
VA-6 Goodlatte, Robert (R)
VA-7 Cantor, Eric (R)

Washington

WA-4 Hastings, Doc (R)

Wisconsin

WI-1 Ryan, Paul (R)
WI-5 Sensenbrenner, F. (R)

Wyoming

WY-0 Cubin, Barbara (R) -- did not vote

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 8

Next

Morgan

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Georgia, USA

OCT 06, 2007 03:52 PM

mamet said:

Margot_Dent said:
even though numerous people have pointed how how providing preventative care is cheaper to the taxpayer than the alternative, i honestly cannot comprehend how someone would not be willing to "sacrifice" an unnoticeable amount of money to help sick children. i really just don't get it.



It's because you're not a horrible person.



Nail = hit right on the head.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

OCT 06, 2007 04:29 PM

Keri said:

emotedcreations said:
I mean, I can understand, although I don't agree with, the notion that people need to work and pay for their own health insurance.


i can't understand that at all. i think the government should take sole responsability in caring for it's people. that's why we pay fucking taxes. maybe if we took away the limos, fancy suits, family vacations, and golf clubs, that money alone could care for our children. fuck it could probably care for our adults too.

I'm not exactly sure why you focused on that part of my comment. It was only meant to demonstrate the ridiculousness of the veto by comparison. But OK...

NickFaust

NickFaust

USA
April 2004

OCT 06, 2007 05:10 PM

I am seriously suffering from outrage fatigue here.

I mean, I just can't get anything more than your basic "meh" from myself about anything this administration does anymore.

Heathen_Dave

Heathen_Dave

Birmingham, AL
July 2005

OCT 06, 2007 06:17 PM

freshprncebelair said:

Heathen_Dave said:

Keri said:

emotedcreations said:
I mean, I can understand, although I don't agree with, the notion that people need to work and pay for their own health insurance.



i can't understand that at all. i think the government should take sole responsability in caring for it's people. that's why we pay fucking taxes. maybe if we took away the limos, fancy suits, family vacations, and golf clubs, that money alone could care for our children. fuck it could probably care for our adults too.



People who buy limos, fancy suits, family vacations, and golf clubs would not work quite so hard if they knew they would not get limos, fancy suits, family vacations, and golf clubs as a reward for their work.



Additionally, if you took away such rewards, you also might find that healthcare gets more expensive due to the fact that people might not be as willing to go 300k in debt to finish med school and become doctors.

Basically, the problem is essentially that healthcare has become an arms race type situation, and this has driven the cost up amazingly out of reach of more and more people. Why would a doctor want to work for peanuts in General Practice, when they can earn three times as much as a specialist treating very specific stuff? In countries with social health programs, the wage differential is much lower, and thus you have rational health costs because much of the arms race is dismantled, but also, you don't get a lot of exotic and cutting edge treatments either.



Don't be silly, there will always be someone else willing to shoulder the responsibility of taking care of you.

Virtute

Virtute

Brooklyn, NY
July 2007

OCT 06, 2007 06:39 PM

fanboy37 said:
Hey you're right though, I really am ruining the country. Every morning when I wake up and put on the uniform I wear, I'm tearing it down piece by piece. confused Yeah...I don't really see how that works.



Of course, Quantico, that makes sense.
It's kind of funny you're making a stink about this, considering your salary and benefits are taxpayer subsidized.

attn_Hussein_ho

attn_Hussein_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

OCT 06, 2007 06:46 PM

to play devils advocate, all those dead kids would be just the thing to solve new orleans levee problem!

attn_Hussein_ho

attn_Hussein_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

OCT 06, 2007 07:35 PM

bald_eagle said:

attn_ho said:
to play devils advocate, all those dead kids would be just the thing to solve new orleans levee problem!



Dude ...



too soon?

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

fuck it man. george bush doesnt care about any non-millionaires.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

OCT 06, 2007 07:40 PM

And all this time I thought he cared about me...

attn_Hussein_ho

attn_Hussein_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

OCT 06, 2007 08:07 PM

bald_eagle said:

attn_ho said:

bald_eagle said:

attn_ho said:
to play devils advocate, all those dead kids would be just the thing to solve new orleans levee problem!



Dude ...



too soon?

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

fuck it man. george bush doesnt care about any non-millionaires.


Perhaps a tad. It takes a little longer when you add in the dead kids factor.


of course. but dont forget that GW can act swiftly when it comes to denying children health care, and at the same time, react incredibly slowly to a life threatening natural or man made disaster.

in fact, his 4 vetoes in office have all had the effect of denying life!
Two of them would have helped advance research into life-saving medical procedures. Another would have started bringing troops home from Iraq.

all of which you knew. but my disgusting bon mot is a tribute to GW's death grimace.

skeptik

skeptik

New Orleans, LA
February 2004

OCT 06, 2007 11:49 PM

fanboy37 said:
If someone can explain to me why I should have to pay for everyone else' kids health coverage through my tax dollars........I'll agree that the veto was a bad Idea...

the way I see it, this actually the first good thing Bush has done in a long time.



Well, I'll take a stab at it.

You know that time when somebody you worked with had to miss work to take care of their sick kid? And you had to work twice as hard to make up for their lost hours? Or maybe they caught whatever their kid had, got sick too, and had to stay out even longer.

Or maybe they sucked it up and came in to work anyway, and you caught the flu from them. Or shingles. Or life-threatening-to-adults chicken pox. Etc. Etc.

Guess where their kid got it from?





Probably someone else's kid.


Ensuring proper preventive medical care for underinsured children is a public health issue - and you are a member of the public. It benefits you.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

OCT 07, 2007 12:39 AM

That was well put.

stinkyfj60

stinkyfj60

Alamosa, CO
February 2007

OCT 07, 2007 08:53 AM

Our govt is not here to provide health care.

attn_Hussein_ho

attn_Hussein_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

OCT 07, 2007 09:00 AM

stinkyfj60 said:
Our govt is not here to provide health care.



or roads. but yknow, we do.
or police. but we do.
or fire fighters. but we do.
whatever

Margot_Dent

Margot_Dent

Los Angeles, CA
February 2004

OCT 07, 2007 09:37 AM

skeptik said:

fanboy37 said:
If someone can explain to me why I should have to pay for everyone else' kids health coverage through my tax dollars........I'll agree that the veto was a bad Idea...

the way I see it, this actually the first good thing Bush has done in a long time.



Well, I'll take a stab at it.

You know that time when somebody you worked with had to miss work to take care of their sick kid? And you had to work twice as hard to make up for their lost hours? Or maybe they caught whatever their kid had, got sick too, and had to stay out even longer.

Or maybe they sucked it up and came in to work anyway, and you caught the flu from them. Or shingles. Or life-threatening-to-adults chicken pox. Etc. Etc.

Guess where their kid got it from?





Probably someone else's kid.


Ensuring proper preventive medical care for underinsured children is a public health issue - and you are a member of the public. It benefits you.



thats a really good point, i hadnt thought of that

Heathen_Dave

Heathen_Dave

Birmingham, AL
July 2005

OCT 07, 2007 09:55 AM

attn_ho said:

stinkyfj60 said:
Our govt is not here to provide health care.



or roads. but yknow, we do.
or police. but we do.
or fire fighters. but we do.
whatever



There are some things the government does that would simply be out of the scope of private business. The interstate system is one of those things, NASA would be another, for example. Police and Fire Fighters are a government institution because it's the government's job to protect its citizens.

You could make the argument that health care should be government run because it's "protecting" the citizens, but whether or not it's really viable in America, I can't say.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 8

Next

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR by orbro

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR

There's like a half-hour of video here. You should do a vlog. More ...

Asshole Fuckface Roundup #74

Last Comment 4 HR

Parents who are accustomed to carrying guns around may not think anything of going into child-related... More ...

An Encounter With Jonathan Shaw's Narcisa

Last Comment 5 HR

thanx gurlz... u rrrrrule!! xx jonathan shaw and narcisa More ...

SuicideGirl: Bob

Bob

Terrible Woman's MySpace Alias Leads to Teen's Suicide.

Last Comment 20 HR

But, it's delivered poorly...really poorly. Unless, it's not a joke, in which case, it's a good place... More ...

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08 by Shalome

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08

Oh my fucking god. More ...

Filtering the Truth: Religion - Friend or Foe?

Last Comment 11/30/08

I'm just going to skip over the mass orgy that's going on and say my piece: I don't think religion is... More ...

SuicideGirls Interview: John Carpenter
SuicideGirls Interview: Queens of the Stone Age: An Interview With Troy Van Leeuwen
SuicideGirls Interview: Crispin Hellion Glover: It Is Fine! Everything Is Fine