BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH



Yesterday Bush, as promised, vetoed the State Child Health Insurance Program bill.

Bush, in only the fourth veto of his presidency, said he rejected the bipartisan bill because it would "move healthcare in this country in the wrong direction" and would mean that "government coverage would displace private health insurance for many children."
....
Rep. Elton Gallegly, a Simi Valley Republican who voted against the bill, said the Democrats' decision to delay the override attempt shows their goal is to score political points, not to provide health insurance to children.

"This is a classic case of the ugliest part of our government process, which is taking something as critical as the healthcare of children and turning it into political spin," Gallegly said.



Ugly, ugly, ugly. Denying health insurance to children because providing it is "the wrong direction" is the "political spin" here. SCHIP wouldn't "displace private insurance" for fucking anyone; it would *provide* insurance for kids who don't have it.

Here's what will happen in California, Gallegly's state:

Unless Congress overrides the veto, California will not only be prohibited from expanding the program, but the state will also have to drop as many as 250,000 children who are currently insured under the program, Wright said.



More facts:

In 2005, there were 8.3 *million* uninsured children in the U.S. In 2006, there were 8.7 million.

Between 1998, the year the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was implemented, and 2004, the number of uninsured children fell every year. But since 2004, as the availability of funding for SCHIP expansion has tightened and as a restrictive Medicaid policy enacted in early 2006 has taken effect, progress in enrolling uninsured children in SCHIP and Medicaid has stalled.


These are children with asthma, with disabilities, with chronic ear infections, with toothaches, with eczema, with allergies; kids in foster care, kids with depression or ADHD. The idea that most people are basically healthy and that if you get sick without health insurance you can always go to the ER applies to "most people" because "most people" have had decent health care as children and haven't developed long-term or chronic problems because they lacked it. Untreated colds, head lice when you can't afford the medicine that kills them, eczema that drives you crazy--that kind of minor ongoing problem undermines kids' ability to attend school, undermines their ability to focus when they are in school, undermines their long-term health and the health of their entire families. ER visits for head lice or asthma are a fuck of a lot more expensive to the almighty taxpayer than providing kids with inhalers and topical medications.

And it's fucking pathetic that we have to resort to that kind of "it costs more not to treat them" argument for convincing the wealthiest country in the world to make sure kids can see a doctor once or twice a year.

The good news is that the Senate has enough votes for SCHIP to override Bush's asshole veto.

The bad news is that the House doesn't. We need 25 more Representatives to act like decent human beings and switch their votes.

So. Do the decent thing. Go here and find out who your representative is.

Then scroll down the list below to see if his or her name is on it. These are the folks who voted against SCHIP.

Write them (you can do so via the first link, or you can google their name and find a real honest-to-god mailing address) and tell them to change their vote. That's all you have to do.

If you want to do more, google the name of your state + "uninsured children numbers" and find out what percentage of kids in your state are uninsured. Mention that in your letter. If your representative was one of the good guys, write to the people on the list below who are from your state, admit that you're not in their district, but tell them you write as a resident of your state, and point out that their vote affects everyone.

If you want to do even more, talk to your friends and make sure they know about this. Tell them who their representative is. Urge them to write or call. Give them your representative's contact information. (A list of people who are *most* likely to change their votes is here, but even the dyed-in-the-wool assholes should hear how unpopular their stubbornness on this issue is with their constituents.)

If you want to do even more than that, print out a few flyers that say "Your Representative in Congress voted AGAINST providing health insurance to uninsured children," put your Representative's name, face, and contact information on it, and post them around town.

If you want to do even more than all of that, think of what else you can do and post it in the comments below.

Alabama

AL-1 Bonner, Jo (R)
AL-2 Everett, Terry (R)
AL-3 Rogers, Michael (R)
AL-4 Aderholt, Robert (R)
AL-6 Bachus, Spencer (R)

Arizona

AZ-2 Franks, Trent (R)
AZ-3 Shadegg, John (R)
AZ-6 Flake, Jeff (R)

Arkansas

AR-3 Boozman, John (R)

California

CA-2 Herger, Walter (R) -- did not vote
CA-3 Lungren, Daniel (R)
CA-4 Doolittle, John (R)
CA-19 Radanovich, George (R)
CA-21 Nunes, Devin (R)
CA-22 McCarthy, Kevin (R)
CA-24 Gallegly, Elton (R)
CA-25 McKeon, Howard (R)
CA-26 Dreier, David (R)
CA-33 Watson, Diane (D) -- voted "present" but did not vote aye or nay on the bill
CA-40 Royce, Edward (R)
CA-41 Lewis, Jerry (R)
CA-42 Miller, Gary (R)
CA-44 Calvert, Ken (R)
CA-46 Rohrabacher, Dana (R)
CA-48 Campbell, John (R)
CA-49 Issa, Darrell (R)
CA-50 Bilbray, Brian (R)
CA-52 Hunter, Duncan (R)

Colorado

CO-4 Musgrave, Marilyn (R)
CO-5 Lamborn, Doug (R)
CO-6 Tancredo, Thomas (R)

Florida

FL-1 Miller, Jeff (R)
FL-4 Crenshaw, Ander (R)
FL-5 Brown-Waite, Virginia (R)
FL-6 Stearns, Clifford (R)
FL-7 Mica, John (R)
FL-8 Keller, Ric (R)
FL-9 Bilirakis, Gus (R)
FL-11 Castor, Kathy (D)
FL-12 Putnam, Adam (R)
FL-14 Mack, Connie (R)
FL-15 Weldon, David (R)
FL-18 Ros-Lehtinen, Ileana (R)
FL-21 Diaz-Balart, Lincoln (R)
FL-24 Feeney, Tom (R)
FL-25 Diaz-Balart, Mario (R)

Georgia

GA-1 Kingston, Jack (R)
GA-3 Westmoreland, Lynn (R)
GA-6 Price, Tom (R)
GA-7 Linder, John (R)
GA-8 Marshall, James (D)
GA-9 Deal, Nathan (R)
GA-10 Broun, Paul (R)
GA-11 Gingrey, John (R)

Idaho

ID-1 Sali, Bill (R)

Illinois

IL-6 Roskam, Peter (R)
IL-11 Weller, Gerald (R)
IL-13 Biggert, Judy (R)
IL-14 Hastert, J. (R)
IL-15 Johnson, Timothy (R)
IL-16 Manzullo, Donald (R)
IL-19 Shimkus, John (R)

Indiana

IN-3 Souder, Mark (R)
IN-4 Buyer, Stephen (R)
IN-5 Burton, Dan (R)
IN-6 Pence, Mike (R)
IN-7 Carson, Julia (D) -- did not vote
IN-9 Hill, Baron (D)

Iowa

IA-5 King, Steve (R)

Kansas

KS-4 Tiahrt, Todd (R)

Kentucky

KY-1 Whitfield, Edward (R)
KY-2 Lewis, Ron (R)
KY-4 Davis, Geoff (R)
KY-5 Rogers, Harold (R)

Louisiana

LA-1 Jindal, Bobby (R) -- did not vote
LA-4 McCrery, James (R)
LA-5 Alexander, Rodney (R)
LA-6 Baker, Richard (R)
LA-7 Boustany, Charles (R)

Maryland

MD-6 Bartlett, Roscoe (R)

Massachusetts

MA-10 Delahunt, William (D) -- did not vote

Michigan

MI-2 Hoekstra, Peter (R)
MI-4 Camp, David (R)
MI-7 Walberg, Timothy (R)
MI-8 Rogers, Michael (R)
MI-9 Knollenberg, Joseph (R)
MI-11 McCotter, Thaddeus (R)

Minnesota

MN-2 Kline, John (R)
MN-6 Bachmann, Michele (R)

Mississippi

MS-1 Wicker, Roger (R)
MS-3 Pickering, Charles (R)
MS-4 Taylor, Gene (D)

Missouri

MO-2 Akin, W. (R)
MO-6 Graves, Samuel (R)
MO-7 Blunt, Roy (R)
MO-9 Hulshof, Kenny (R)

Nebraska

NE-1 Fortenberry, Jeffrey (R)
NE-2 Terry, Lee (R)
NE-3 Smith, Adrian (R)

Nevada

NV-2 Heller, Dean (R)

New Jersey

NJ-3 Saxton, H. (R)
NJ-5 Garrett, E. (R)
NJ-11 Frelinghuysen, Rodney (R)

New Mexico

NM-2 Pearce, Steven (R)

New York

NY-26 Reynolds, Thomas (R)
NY-29 Kuhl, John (R)

North Carolina

NC-2 Etheridge, Bob (D)
NC-3 Jones, Walter (R)
NC-5 Foxx, Virginia (R)
NC-6 Coble, Howard (R)
NC-7 McIntyre, Mike (D)
NC-8 Hayes, Robin (R)
NC-9 Myrick, Sue (R)
NC-10 Mchenry, Patrick (R)

Ohio

OH-1 Chabot, Steven (R)
OH-2 Schmidt, Jean (R)
OH-4 Jordan, Jim (R)
OH-8 Boehner, John (R)
OH-10 Kucinich, Dennis (D) -- WTF?

Oklahoma

OK-1 Sullivan, John (R)
OK-2 Boren, Dan (D)
OK-3 Lucas, Frank (R)
OK-4 Cole, Tom (R)
OK-5 Fallin, Mary (R)

Oregon

OR-2 Walden, Greg (R)

Pennsylvania

PA-5 Peterson, John (R)
PA-9 Shuster, William (R)
PA-16 Pitts, Joseph (R)

South Carolina

SC-1 Brown, Henry (R)
SC-2 Wilson, Addison (R)
SC-3 Barrett, James (R)
SC-4 Inglis, Bob (R)

Tennessee

TN-1 Davis, David (R)
TN-2 Duncan, John (R)
TN-3 Wamp, Zach (R)
TN-7 Blackburn, Marsha (R)

Texas

TX-1 Gohmert, Louis (R)
TX-2 Poe, Ted (R) -- did not vote
TX-3 Johnson, Samuel (R)
TX-4 Hall, Ralph (R)
TX-5 Hensarling, Jeb (R)
TX-6 Barton, Joe (R)
TX-7 Culberson, John (R)
TX-8 Brady, Kevin (R)
TX-10 McCaul, Michael (R)
TX-11 Conaway, K. (R)
TX-12 Granger, Kay (R)
TX-13 Thornberry, William (R)
TX-14 Paul, Ronald (R)
TX-19 Neugebauer, Randy (R)
TX-21 Smith, Lamar (R)
TX-24 Marchant, Kenny (R)
TX-26 Burgess, Michael (R)
TX-30 Johnson, Eddie (D) -- did not vote
TX-31 Carter, John (R)
TX-32 Sessions, Peter (R)

Utah

UT-1 Bishop, Rob (R)
UT-3 Cannon, Christopher (R)

Virginia

VA-1 Davis, Jo Ann (R)
VA-2 Drake, Thelma (R)
VA-4 Forbes, James (R)
VA-5 Goode, Virgil (R)
VA-6 Goodlatte, Robert (R)
VA-7 Cantor, Eric (R)

Washington

WA-4 Hastings, Doc (R)

Wisconsin

WI-1 Ryan, Paul (R)
WI-5 Sensenbrenner, F. (R)

Wyoming

WY-0 Cubin, Barbara (R) -- did not vote

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 8

Next

mingol

mingol

Singapore
July 2005

OCT 05, 2007 04:43 PM

attn_ho said:

mingol said:
Seriously, the extent to which this administration fetishizes the privatization of anything and everything is flat-out pathological.


this administration? this party! look up one funny name: grover norquist


The party generally, but this administration particularly.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

OCT 05, 2007 04:50 PM

bald_eagle said:
...they sometimes "pair." That is, people who know they will cancel each other's vote will both be absent. I don't know whether she did this.

That's interesting. I've never heard that before. See you can learn things on SG!

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

OCT 05, 2007 05:27 PM

kaosmaker666 said:
Hooray for the veto!!! This was a piece of crap legislation anyway!!! Since when are 25 year olds considered kids? Also in some states if you make up to $80,000 a year you could still qualify.


Yeah, both of those statements are utter lies propagated by Bush and his ilk to justify his veto. Neither are the case. In fact, this legislation shores up the loophole that would have allowed the $80k situation. So shove it, idiot.


attn_Hussein_ho

attn_Hussein_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

OCT 05, 2007 05:35 PM

Subrosa said:

kaosmaker666 said:
Hooray for the veto!!! This was a piece of crap legislation anyway!!! Since when are 25 year olds considered kids? Also in some states if you make up to $80,000 a year you could still qualify.


Yeah, both of those statements are utter lies propagated by Bush and his ilk to justify his veto. Neither are the case. In fact, this legislation shores up the loophole that would have allowed the $80k situation. So shove [edit] your four dollars a month into a donation for a family without health care. [/edit]




fixed!

Nessagirl

Nessagirl

USA
May 2006

OCT 05, 2007 05:37 PM

Very sad and interesting...it's kinda like the whole "no children left behind" law. And look how many fucking kids are left behind. Yeah I understand America produces a lot of freaking kids but seriously these are the ones who will be here when we die. And with all these supposed mass epidemic scares of getting flus and diseases. If they can't or don't have insurance to get these vaccinations who the hell is going to be left. Bush is a dumbass in vetoing this!! whatever

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

OCT 05, 2007 05:40 PM

Subrosa said:

kaosmaker666 said:
Hooray for the veto!!! This was a piece of crap legislation anyway!!! Since when are 25 year olds considered kids? Also in some states if you make up to $80,000 a year you could still qualify.


Yeah, both of those statements are utter lies propagated by Bush and his ilk to justify his veto. Neither are the case. In fact, this legislation shores up the loophole that would have allowed the $80k situation. So shove it, idiot.

Although I'm glad you cleared that up for those who don't know, sometimes I feel it's better to just ignore that type of chatter...

Tallboy66

Tallboy66

USA
January 2005

OCT 05, 2007 05:54 PM

mingol said:
I'll be very interested to see how Bush tries to spin this veto.

I mean, is "government coverage would displace private health insurance for many children" really the best justification he's got?



I know right. What difference does it make who gives care to your child.

I guess these children will be left behind.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

OCT 05, 2007 06:12 PM

Bitch_PhD said:
Without health insurance, how are our children supposed to get the medical care they need to stay healthy, to perform in school, and to ensure that common health problems--asthma, ear infections, eczema, allergies, even head lice--do not require extended absences and extended sick days for working parents?



And how will they be healthy enough to become useful soldiers?


sy_old

sy_old

Columbia, MO
March 2007

OCT 05, 2007 06:58 PM

I mailed my Rep today. Have you all done the same?

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

OCT 05, 2007 07:13 PM

Both my Reps voted for it, although I do own property in South Carolina. I suppose I could write them even though I'm not a resident.

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

Charleston, SC
August 2004

OCT 05, 2007 07:17 PM

compassionate conservates, ha!

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

OCT 05, 2007 07:21 PM

synielle said:
I mailed my Rep today. Have you all done the same?



I would, but I think she's all over this already.

r00kers

r00kers

Nederland, CO
February 2003

OCT 05, 2007 07:38 PM

I know mine voted for it (Mark F'ing Udall), unfortunately we have little leverage over the others. Marilyn Musgrave will likely lose the next election, she barely won the last one and her district is liberalizing right under her ass. Tancredo will always be a gumby douchebag twunt and Lamborn really represents the Kansas part of Colorado, so little hope there.

This is exactly the sort of thing a lame duck asshole president would veto, as the outcome matters little to him. I bet the vote some of these folks made comes back to haunt them, though.

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

Kearney, NE
May 2006

OCT 05, 2007 07:40 PM

I'm not altogether sure my Representatives know how to read, but I'll try anyway.

fanboy37

fanboy37

Quantico, VA
October 2006

OCT 05, 2007 07:52 PM

If someone can explain to me why I should have to pay for everyone else' kids health coverage through my tax dollars........I'll agree that the veto was a bad Idea...

the way I see it, this actually the first good thing Bush has done in a long time.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 8

Next

Now Hear This

Last Comment 3 HR by orbro

Now Hear This

Last Comment 3 HR

There's like a half-hour of video here. You should do a vlog. More ...

Asshole Fuckface Roundup #74

Last Comment 4 HR

Parents who are accustomed to carrying guns around may not think anything of going into child-related... More ...

An Encounter With Jonathan Shaw's Narcisa

Last Comment 5 HR

thanx gurlz... u rrrrrule!! xx jonathan shaw and narcisa More ...

SuicideGirl: Bob

Bob

Terrible Woman's MySpace Alias Leads to Teen's Suicide.

Last Comment 20 HR

But, it's delivered poorly...really poorly. Unless, it's not a joke, in which case, it's a good place... More ...

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08 by Shalome

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08

Oh my fucking god. More ...

Filtering the Truth: Religion - Friend or Foe?

Last Comment 11/30/08

I'm just going to skip over the mass orgy that's going on and say my piece: I don't think religion is... More ...

SuicideGirls Interview: Tura Satana
SuicideGirls Interview: David Mamet
SuicideGirls Interview: Perry Farrell