• commentary
  • SUNDAY SEPTEMBER 23 2007 9:00 AM

Sally Field Needs To Shut Her Pie Hole



Last week, Sally Field won an Emmy for something. I don’t know what and I really don’t care. What happened after she took the stage to accept her award is what caught my attention.



Let’s face it, if mothers ruled the world there would be no God damn wars in the first place.


On behalf of half of the human race, I’d like to say, “Fuck off, Sally Field.” What an insulting, arrogant, untruthful load of shit. This is something I’ve heard for years from a few women, who have apparently never opened a history book. The idea that war is exclusive to males is ridiculous. Leaders are generally narcissistic assholes, whether male or female. The same crazy desire that makes someone want to actually run a country also makes one want to go to war. It’s about power and ladies throughout history have been drunk on it for hundreds of years.

But we can start right here in American, in this century, to prove Sally wrong. Here’s a list of female Senators who authorized the use of force against Iraq.


    Blanche Lincoln
    Dianne Feinstein
    Mary Landrieu
    Olympia Snowe
    Susan Collins
    Jean Carnahan
    Hillary Clinton
    Kay Bailey Hutchison
    Maria Cantwell


Why do you hate Sally, ladies? And love war? But, hey, they are just carrying on the tradition of women and war.

Russia has seen its share of women who carry on wars. In 1736 Anna Ioannovna declared war on the Ottoman Empire. Next up came Elizabeth, who led her country into the Seven Years War. (Maria Theresa of Austria also jumped in on that one.) In 1762 Catherine the Great took over Russia and went right to work expanding the Russian empire. She conquered Crimea, the Northern Caucasus and Ukraine for mother Russian, all through bloody conflicts.

How about England?

Queen Elizabeth I was a great mom. She also had Mary, Queen of Scots beheaded and fought a war against Spain. Later came Queen Anne who started a war that came to be known as Queen Anne’s War. The war was fought in North America, between France and Britain in North America. Spain and American Indian tribes were also involved. Next up was Queen Victoria, who was constantly at war, including the Crimean War, The Indian Mutiny, campaigns on North-west Frontier of India, campaigns in Africa including the Zulu War, the Boer War, and campaigns in Egypt and Sudan. And she was a mommy! Recently Margaret Thatcher went to war with Argentina over the tiny, useless Falkland Islands. Bad mommy!

What about Asia?

The Empress Dowager Cixi of China came to power in a bloody coup in 1861. In 1864 she sent her army to crush the Taiping Army and won! Her son must have been so proud! Indira Gandhi, Prime Minister of India, must have been a man because she went to war with Pakistan in 1971. Later, she ordered an attack on the holiest Sikh shrine in India, the Golden Temple, which led to the death of 450 people. Oh, and she accelerated India’s nuclear program, which resulted in India becoming the world's youngest nuclear power. She was also a mommy of two!

And we can’t forget about Israel and their hateful neighbors. Golda Meir, Foreign Minister and Prime Minister of Israel, also oversaw her countries nuclear weapons development program. I guess it was a present for her kids. In 1956, Golda helped to plan an Israeli-British-French attack on Egypt. Later, in 1973, she was forced to defend Israel against six Arab states.

On the other side of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are female suicide bombers. Is this the kind of mommy Sally was talking about?


A 22-year-old Palestinian mother of two small children, pretending to be disabled, killed four Israelis at a Gaza border crossing yesterday after duping soldiers into allowing her a personal security check rather than going through a metal detector.


What about this grandmommy?


On the television screen a woman is reading slowly from a sheet of paper held close to her face. The moment is awkward. Her hands shake, she avoids the camera and a large, black M-16 assault rifle hangs from her shoulders. Her head and neck are wrapped tightly in a white scarf.

This is the final message in the life of Fatma al-Najar, widow, great-grandmother, matriarch of her large family and, a few hours after this brief video was shot, the oldest Palestinian to become a suicide bomber.


Most importantly, we cannot forget about Admiral Helena Cain Pegasus, who attacked the Battlestar Galactica. That was fucking bullshit.

So, shut the fuck up Sally and all you other ladies who say that women wouldn’t start wars. It's insulting and it’s a load of horse shit. (And that includes my wife.)

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

 ... 15

Next

Comments
FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

SEP 23, 2007 03:29 PM

Zarth said:

Archaneus said:

Oninotaki said:
now just to be fair, all the women that were listed ran governments that were full of men, not other mothers. We have no historical precident for an entire government run by moms, and how they would interact with other governments either run by men, run by moms and men, or run by just other moms. So untill such time as the world is run completly by mothers and not just mothers with non-mothers as subordinates and advisors we cannot truely say that she is wrong. wink


That's not strictly true. There are records of a couple of matriarchies in the past and they were even more brutal than the patriarchal societies that came before and after. I'm a little fuzzy on the specifics since it's been awhile, but any other history geeks out there who remember what it is I'm talking about want to fill in the gaps?


Nope. There is no solid evidence of any actual matriarchy ever existing. A premodern few societies, here and there, have accorded women in general an honorable status and individual women may have held positions of power, but there is no known culture in which women have been accorded a generally superior social status.



How many times can you be horribly wrong?

zoom image

zhalaya

zhalaya

HOPEFUL

Australia

SEP 23, 2007 03:38 PM

MPV: Lol, she's a rude old bat I reckon.

This is an informative thread, I never knew those women authorized the use of force.

And women through history have been hell bitches, but yeah everyone has a good point. People are their individual selves. Yet the tone of this article suggests putting all those "mother's like her" in her own little category. Wait hold on, yes you just participated in stereotyping which you just accused her of. Well that's the way life goes, we human beings are creatures of habit, it is too easy to err.

She is old, batty and a rude person to me. But if she believes giving her opinion to the world to be scrutinized so be it. So have our country's leaders when "going to war". She may as well be fair game too.

confused Now what was I doing before I read this?

devowasright

devowasright

Denver, CO
July 2007

SEP 23, 2007 03:40 PM

senseofbalance if that kind of dippy bullshit really makes you mad though, perhaps you shouldn't be watching the emmys.



AHAHHAHAAA!!! VERY well said. smile

MarcyBeth

MarcyBeth

Ocala, FL
July 2006

SEP 23, 2007 03:45 PM

i hate when celebrities assume we care about their ridiculous political opinions.

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

SEP 23, 2007 03:50 PM

FearTheReaper said:

Zarth said:

Archaneus said:

Oninotaki said:
now just to be fair, all the women that were listed ran governments that were full of men, not other mothers. We have no historical precident for an entire government run by moms, and how they would interact with other governments either run by men, run by moms and men, or run by just other moms. So untill such time as the world is run completly by mothers and not just mothers with non-mothers as subordinates and advisors we cannot truely say that she is wrong. wink


That's not strictly true. There are records of a couple of matriarchies in the past and they were even more brutal than the patriarchal societies that came before and after. I'm a little fuzzy on the specifics since it's been awhile, but any other history geeks out there who remember what it is I'm talking about want to fill in the gaps?


Nope. There is no solid evidence of any actual matriarchy ever existing. A premodern few societies, here and there, have accorded women in general an honorable status and individual women may have held positions of power, but there is no known culture in which women have been accorded a generally superior social status.


How many times can you be horribly wrong?

zoom image


I somehow totally forgot about these, too.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

SEP 23, 2007 03:52 PM

Those are some dangerous ladies. I did not know such a bow existed.

Sporky

Sporky

I'm lost
September 2007

SEP 23, 2007 03:52 PM

Oninotaki said:
now just to be fair, all the women that were listed ran governments that were full of men, not other mothers. We have no historical precident for an entire government run by moms, and how they would interact with other governments either run by men, run by moms and men, or run by just other moms. So untill such time as the world is run completly by mothers and not just mothers with non-mothers as subordinates and advisors we cannot truely say that she is wrong. wink


Amen.

Markus001

Markus001

United Kingdom
November 2004

SEP 23, 2007 04:00 PM

This is a strange argument.

Tallboy66

Tallboy66

Chicago, IL
January 2005

SEP 23, 2007 04:01 PM

I've seen women fight, I stay far,far away.

Tallboy66

Tallboy66

Chicago, IL
January 2005

SEP 23, 2007 04:01 PM

Tallboy66

Tallboy66

Chicago, IL
January 2005

SEP 23, 2007 04:01 PM

blink_

blink_

USA
November 2006

SEP 23, 2007 04:22 PM

itwashardlylovex said:
It doesn't really matter because the whole statement was edited out of the west coast broadcast.



and the east coast too, but they didnt get to it untill right before god damn so you got the jist of it

Archaneus

Archaneus

Kalamazoo, MI
October 2006

SEP 23, 2007 04:26 PM

FearTheReaper said:

How many times can you be horribly wrong?



I'm actually not wrong, but I don't blame Zarth for saying what he said. There are indeed, I believe, two premodern societies that were matriarchies but it's not exactly common knowledge and seeing as I don't know where I could find the references to it again I am just not going to argue it.

Regardless of that I'm still agreeing with your points so stop being such a dick for no reason.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

SEP 23, 2007 04:29 PM

Archaneus said:

FearTheReaper said:

How many times can you be horribly wrong?



I'm actually not wrong, but I don't blame Zarth for saying what he said. There are indeed, I believe, two premodern societies that were matriarchies but it's not exactly common knowledge and seeing as I don't know where I could find the references to it again I am just not going to argue it.

Regardless of that I'm still agreeing with your points so stop being such a dick for no reason.



That comment was for Zarth and his lack of understanding of Amazons.

Chainlink

Chainlink

Key West, FL
August 2005

SEP 23, 2007 04:32 PM

Archaneus said:

FearTheReaper said:

How many times can you be horribly wrong?



I'm actually not wrong, but I don't blame Zarth for saying what he said. There are indeed, I believe, two premodern societies that were matriarchies but it's not exactly common knowledge and seeing as I don't know where I could find the references to it again I am just not going to argue it.

Regardless of that I'm still agreeing with your points so stop being such a dick for no reason.



Wow. Defensive much ?

I don't even think he was referring to you. I think he meant Zarth was wrong. You know, hence the Amazon Woman reference wink

But way to stand up for yourself. You're going to make a fine Man someday.

Edit: See ??

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

 ... 15

Next