• news
  • TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 11 2007 9:00 AM

Whores Totally Cool, Gay Stuff Not So Much



Remember Senator David Vitter? A few weeks ago we learned that he used to spend time banging hookers. The Louisiana Senator apologized for “a very serious sin in his past.” What he meant was that he was having sex with a prostitute and, according to phone records, was even calling the DC Madam while he was on the House floor making votes.


This was a very serious sin in my past for which I am, of course, completely responsible. Several years ago, I asked for and received forgiveness from God and my wife in confession and marriage counseling. Out of respect for my family, I will keep my discussion of the matter there - with God and them. But I certainly offer my deep and sincere apologies to all I have disappointed and let down in any way.


Of course, his fellow Republican lawmakers let it slide. No slap on the wrist for Vitter. And why should they? He apologized to them and to God. Also, the statue of limitations had passed, so he was free and clear. How does one respond to a religious man who spent his years trying to legislate morality and then gets caught screwing hookers? His fellow Republicans gave him a standing ovation upon his return to the Senate. That is some quality douchebaggery, there.

Now, lets take a look at Senator Larry Craig. Things did not go so well for him when he was arrested in a bizarre gay bathroom sting operation at the Minneapolis airport. As soon as his Republican colleagues learned of his illegal gay activity, they demanded he resign.

Craig has since claimed he is not gay and has filed papers to withdraw his guilty plea and fight the charges. He will most probably win the case because all he did was tap his foot near a cop’s foot. It will be a tough crime to prosecute. But his fellow Republicans don’t care whether or not he is going to withdraw his plea and fight the charges. They want the gay dude gone.

So, here’s the crime scorecard. Vitter admits to having sex with hookers and there is even evidence that he called for whores while he was voting on the House floor. Standing ovation. Larry Craig pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor because he was scared that the media would discover his arrest. He then said he would fight the charges. He is forced to resign. One man was having straight sex, while the other was looking for gay sex. Both are crimes, but one got lucky with the statute of limitations. Not hard to figure out what the problem was with Craig.

But the heat is about to be turned up on David Vitter. Another prostitute claimed she had a four-month “sexual relationship” with the Senator. Because her claims could not be verified, the charges went away. But now it looks like they are coming back.

Larry Flint paid for the hooker to take a lie detector test, which she passed. Today he will hold a news conference with the prostitute to reveal the results. They will then challenge Senator Vitter to take his own polygraph.


Ellis said Monday that she took the polygraph test because Vitter tried to impugn her credibility at a news conference in July, when he denied news reports about his involvement with prostitutes in New Orleans without being specific.


Please don’t impugn the credibility of the whore. That is not cool.

And it gets better. Flynt is paying Ellis to detail all her fuck sessions with Vitter. They will be published next spring in Hustler. The magazine made sure Ellis passed the lie detector test before they offered her the deal.


Ellis said she met regularly with Vitter in the French Quarter apartment and that he paid her through her pimp, Jonathan, whose last name she did not know. She said Vitter met her through the New Orleans Escort Service.


Sadly, Vitter was not a freak.


Ellis said she and Vitter had safe sex and that he did not have any unusual proclivities. She said he paid $300 an hour for her services.

"He was a very clean man," Ellis said. "He came in, took a shower, did his business and would leave."


Boo. Why couldn’t he just shit on her chest once? It would have made this a lot more fun. Either way, as much as the Republicans and Vitter want this to go away, it’s not. And the same can be said for Larry Craig, as he gears up to fight the charges. Keep it in the news as long as you can, boys. And don't forget, one is good and the other is bad.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 9

Next

Comments
sarahg

sarahg

I'm lost
November 2004

SEP 11, 2007 07:09 PM

meh. democrat or republican, gay or straight, i hate all politicians. puke

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

SEP 11, 2007 07:29 PM

Zarth said:

coyotemike said:
I could probably look it up, but what exactly was the crime that Craig did? Is gay sex a crime? Was it because it was in a public place? I just haven't figured that part out yet. I'm also curious as to why police officers were wasting their time with this sting when there are real crimes going on in the world. I could understand if the cop was posing as a 15 year old boy or something, but if two adult males want to bang anonymously in a bathroom stall, I don't see what the problem is.


"Lewd behavior" was the charge. It is a crime to engage in sex - gay or straight - in any public space.



Thanks for the clearup. I should have known it was something like that.

LordHAlmighty

LordHAlmighty

Citrus Heights, CA
July 2007

SEP 11, 2007 08:25 PM

If this isn't further proof that "family values" is politico for "give my campaign your money and I'll write laws to punish people who are different from you", I don't know what is. Of the morons, for the money, and by the God that only Disney still believes in...

Tiger_Fodder

Tiger_Fodder

Braintree, MA
June 2007

SEP 11, 2007 08:29 PM

Gotta love Flynt!

LordHAlmighty

LordHAlmighty

Citrus Heights, CA
July 2007

SEP 11, 2007 08:30 PM

... if only the other "rebel millionaires" out there would use some of their money like this... politics might someday be only dirty enough to require picking up out of the dirt and brushing off the "sprinkles" before ingesting...

princkly

princkly

I'm lost
April 2006

SEP 11, 2007 08:33 PM

TheFuckOffKid said:
I was wondering as I read this piece about whether I would have enjoyed it more with less seemingly derogatory use of the word "whore".

Thank you FuckOffKid. I agree! I'ts been used throughout the article and some of the responses with an ugly sense of self-righteousness. As somebody who loves and regularly engages the beautiful women in this profession, I find the word "whore" being used in such a condesending and bitter way as unacceptable. It's like listening to some smug little middle class white boy trying to be cool by using the word "nigger".

Otoki

Otoki

SUICIDEGIRL

Minnesota, USA

SEP 12, 2007 09:05 AM

princkly said:

TheFuckOffKid said:
I was wondering as I read this piece about whether I would have enjoyed it more with less seemingly derogatory use of the word "whore".

Thank you FuckOffKid. I agree! I'ts been used throughout the article and some of the responses with an ugly sense of self-righteousness. As somebody who loves and regularly engages the beautiful women in this profession, I find the word "whore" being used in such a condesending and bitter way as unacceptable. It's like listening to some smug little middle class white boy trying to be cool by using the word "nigger".


Although we should know to expect it from this site. Last time hos were mentioned as being "concerned parent" that just brought out all sorts of wittiness from the edgy members of this PORN site.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

SEP 12, 2007 04:25 PM

Renshai said:


Blogger Beldar just got off the phone with the Hennepin, County Court Clerk. He was trying to find out if there was a Form 11 in the file showing Craig had been advised of and waived his right to counsel.

The Clerk said she didn't see one and told Beldar a hearing has been set for September 26th at 1:30 pm on Craig's motion to withdraw the plea.



I listened to the tape of the police interview and Craig was read his rights and and agreed to talk to them without an attorney.



So, OK, does he still have grounds for appealing? (Not to gripe at Renshai, I'm just a little puzzled.)

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

SEP 12, 2007 04:29 PM

princkly said:

TheFuckOffKid said:
I was wondering as I read this piece about whether I would have enjoyed it more with less seemingly derogatory use of the word "whore".

Thank you FuckOffKid. I agree! I'ts been used throughout the article and some of the responses with an ugly sense of self-righteousness. As somebody who loves and regularly engages the beautiful women in this profession, I find the word "whore" being used in such a condesending and bitter way as unacceptable. It's like listening to some smug little middle class white boy trying to be cool by using the word "nigger".



Yeah, that's a good analogy. The word "nigger" is much like the use of the word "whore."

Tell you what. And this may seem kind of crazy, but I do think I am better than whores. I know, it's weird.

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

SEP 12, 2007 05:07 PM

princkly said:

TheFuckOffKid said:
I was wondering as I read this piece about whether I would have enjoyed it more with less seemingly derogatory use of the word "whore".

Thank you FuckOffKid. I agree! I'ts been used throughout the article and some of the responses with an ugly sense of self-righteousness. As somebody who loves and regularly engages the beautiful women in this profession, I find the word "whore" being used in such a condesending and bitter way as unacceptable. It's like listening to some smug little middle class white boy trying to be cool by using the word "nigger".



1. Your analogy is very very flawed
2. Prostitution is far less acceptable in the US than it is in Australia.
3. Are you really that mad about the word whore being used or that you just admitted to having to pay for sex on a regular basis?

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

SEP 12, 2007 06:01 PM

FearTheReaper said:

princkly said:

TheFuckOffKid said:
I was wondering as I read this piece about whether I would have enjoyed it more with less seemingly derogatory use of the word "whore".

Thank you FuckOffKid. I agree! I'ts been used throughout the article and some of the responses with an ugly sense of self-righteousness. As somebody who loves and regularly engages the beautiful women in this profession, I find the word "whore" being used in such a condesending and bitter way as unacceptable. It's like listening to some smug little middle class white boy trying to be cool by using the word "nigger".



Yeah, that's a good analogy. The word "nigger" is much like the use of the word "whore."

Tell you what. And this may seem kind of crazy, but I do think I am better than whores. I know, it's weird.



On what basis? How many whores do you know?

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

SEP 12, 2007 06:03 PM

Colinism said:
2. Prostitution is far less acceptable in the US than it is in Australia.



This wild claim is based on ... ?

PatrickY

PatrickY

Vancouver, WA
December 2003

SEP 12, 2007 06:15 PM

TheFuckOffKid said:

Colinism said:
2. Prostitution is far less acceptable in the US than it is in Australia.



This wild claim is based on ... ?



Imbibing a half rack of Fosters tall boys. Other knowledge of Australia gained thereby:

A - Yahoo Serious, Paul Hogan, Steve Irwin, the feral kid from the Road Warrior with the boomerang, and that dude from those old battery commercials are statistically representative of 100% of Aussies. Though the last dude may actually be from New Zealand.

B - All Australian women look like Nicole Kidman, cultivate a bloke mentality that foreign men find endearingly quirky, and demand that you yell out "Crikey, Bruce!" when you cum in their mouths.

C - All kangaroos box, and, as Sylvester the cat cartoons from the 50's tell us, look exactly like mice. Also, if you throw a boomerang at said cartoon monstrosity, your tv will break.

D - Water in Aussie land flows down the drain backwards, and will kill you if you drink too much of it. FYI. Fortunately, Australians only drink Fosters, because it's Australian for: beer, soda, fruit juice, breast milk, and all other forms of liquid nutrition.

E - Something about Aborigines, walkabouts, and tucker.

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

SEP 12, 2007 06:19 PM

TheFuckOffKid said:

Colinism said:
2. Prostitution is far less acceptable in the US than it is in Australia.



This wild claim is based on ... ?



http://www.sexwork.com/coalition/whatcountrieslegal.html

That and the fact that your country was founded by criminals so obviously anything that good god fearing people in sane normal societies would shy away from would be legal in your godless backwards nation of thieves and murderers. wink

wildswan

wildswan

I'm lost
June 2006

SEP 12, 2007 06:23 PM

Colinism said:

TheFuckOffKid said:

Colinism said:
2. Prostitution is far less acceptable in the US than it is in Australia.



This wild claim is based on ... ?



http://www.sexwork.com/coalition/whatcountrieslegal.html

That and the fact that your country was founded by criminals so obviously anything that good god fearing people in sane normal societies would shy away from would be legal in your godless backwards nation of thieves and murderers. wink



I'm going to go out on a limb and say that legality and acceptability are not necessarily interchangeable.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 9

Next