Bush Gets A Big “F” on Surge Report
WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 5 2007 9:00 AM
Submitted by FearTheReaper. Edited By erin_broadley.
TAGS: Iraq, GAO, Patraeus,

On September 15th, Bush will release his carefully picked over and re-written version of General Petraeus’ report. That is the report Congress has been waiting for, in order to determine if they will continue to support this disaster of a war. It was previously thought that the General would write the report, but last month it was revealed that the White House would do the writing and Patraeus would read it to Congress. That way the White House can easily confuse Americans into thinking that Patraeus actually wrote the report. And you can bet the report will make it seem like things are looking up! But according to the Government Accountability Office, Bush’s surge has been completely worthless. Yesterday, the GAO released their own report on the surge.
Thirteen of the eighteen benchmarks set to measure whether or not the surge has been successful have not been met. The GAO report claims that only three out of the eighteen have been met. That is 16.6%. Unless we are grading on a curve, the surge gets a big fat F.
Of course, like any grade school kid who gets an “F,” the administration believes the GAO report is mean and too hard.
It's pretty clear that if that's your measurement standard a majority of the benchmarks would be determined not to have been met. A lot of them are multipart and so, even if 90 percent of it is done, it's still a failure. The standard the GAO has set is far more stringent. Some might argue it's impossible to meet.
Aw. Boo hoo. Were the benchmarks too hard? Maybe we can make up an extra-credit surge? Keep spinning, it is obvious the surge is a failure. More Iraqi civilians and American soldiers were killed this summer than last summer. And on top of that horrible statistic, almost nothing was accomplished to show progress on other fronts.
Here is a list of the benchmarks that were met and the many that were not met.
Benchmarks met:
* Establishing supporting political, media, economic, and services committees in support of the Baghdad security plan.
* Establishing all of the planned joint security stations in neighborhoods across Baghdad.
* Ensuring that the rights of minority political parties in the Iraqi legislature are protected.
Benchmarks partially met:
* Enacting and implementing legislation on procedures to form semi-autonomous regions.
* Providing three trained and ready Iraqi brigades to support Baghdad operations.
* Ensuring that, according to President Bush, Prime Minister Maliki said ‘‘the Baghdad security plan will not provide a safe haven for any outlaws, regardless of [their] sectarian or political affiliation.’’
* Allocating and spending $10 billion in Iraqi revenues for reconstruction projects, including delivery of essential services, on an equitable basis.
Benchmarks not met:
* Forming a Constitutional Review Committee and then completing the constitutional review.
* Enacting and implementing legislation on de-Ba'athification.
* Enacting and implementing legislation to ensure the equitable distribution of hydrocarbon resources of the people of Iraq without regard to the sect or ethnicity of recipients, and enacting and implementing legislation to ensure that the energy resources of Iraq benefit Sunni Arabs, Shia Arabs, Kurds, and other Iraqi citizens in an equitable manner.
* Enacting and implementing legislation establishing an Independent High Electoral Commission, provincial elections law, provincial council authorities, and a date for provincial elections.
* Enacting and implementing legislation addressing amnesty.
* Enacting and implementing legislation establishing a strong militia disarmament program to ensure that such security forces are accountable only to the central government and loyal to the Constitution of Iraq.
* Providing Iraqi commanders with all authorities to execute this plan and to make tactical and operational decisions, in consultation with U.S. commanders, without political intervention, to include the authority to pursue all extremists, including Sunni insurgents and Shiite militias.
* Ensuring that the Iraqi security forces are providing even-handed enforcement of the law.
* Reducing the level of sectarian violence in Iraq and eliminating militia control of local security.
* Increasing the number of Iraqi security forces’ units capable of operating independently.
* Ensuring that Iraq’s political authorities are not undermining or making false accusations against members of the Iraqi security forces.
Writing that some benchmarks were “partially met” kinda fucks up the White House talking point that, “even if 90 percent of it is done, it's still a failure.” But the White House pressured the GAO to change the report to include a “partial” category.
The study was slightly more upbeat than initially planned. After receiving substantial resistance from the White House, the GAO determined that four benchmarks — instead of two — had been partially met.
Very soon you will begin to hear the term "sub-benchmarks" or "mini-marks." That is how we reframe failure in America.
And I can guarantee that the "Patraeus’ report" (White House report) will paint a much prettier picture and Republicans will scream that we cannot pull out now, because of all the “progress” and then the Democrats will cave like bitches. And the war will go on and on and on, even though it is obviously never going to be successful.



















































PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
... 15
MrCrisp
Charleston, SC
August 2004
SEP 05, 2007 09:06 AM
KingHELL
Portland, OR
July 2003
SEP 05, 2007 09:22 AM
Zarth
Seattle, WA
December 2004
SEP 05, 2007 09:28 AM
SirPsychoSexy
Ridgewood, NJ
January 2004
SEP 05, 2007 09:34 AM
magpieboy
Seattle, WA
June 2004
SEP 05, 2007 09:35 AM
SirPsychoSexy
Ridgewood, NJ
January 2004
SEP 05, 2007 09:36 AM
Zarth
Seattle, WA
December 2004
SEP 05, 2007 09:36 AM
graphicsman77
Pasadena, MD
June 2007
SEP 05, 2007 09:37 AM
aaronthere
San Francisco, CA
September 2003
SEP 05, 2007 09:40 AM
aaronthere
San Francisco, CA
September 2003
SEP 05, 2007 09:41 AM
Zarth
Seattle, WA
December 2004
SEP 05, 2007 09:44 AM
Rafi
Santa Monica, CA
January 2003
SEP 05, 2007 09:50 AM
Heathen_Dave
Birmingham, AL
July 2005
SEP 05, 2007 09:51 AM
Zarth
Seattle, WA
December 2004
SEP 05, 2007 09:52 AM
d20
San Francisco, CA
September 2003
SEP 05, 2007 09:52 AM
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
... 15