• commentary
  • WEDNESDAY AUGUST 29 2007 12:00 AM

Yet Another Hint From Europe?



While trying to light my cigarette this morning on a break during work (my Zippo was out of fuel, sadly), I came across this article (I was reading the print edition, of course). I found it very interesting. I've always felt that Europe is light-years ahead of the U.S. in certain respects, namely the social arena. And this might be another example.

For those of you with diminished attention spans, the article speaks of a $38 million dollar program the Dutch are instituting for schools and neighborhood in which they hope to stem the growth of right-wing nationalism and Islamic fundamentalism in their country. They're not fighting these groups--merely preventing new ones from forming. A rather novel idea, I'd say. Attacking the source of the problem, the root rather than the branches. Kill the body and the head will die.

After the 2004 death of filmmaker Theo Van Gogh by a Muslim extremist, the number of hate crimes in the Netherlands rose sharply. Many of these involved Muslims in retaliatory attacks by Dutch citizens (Note: 5.5% or about 1 million of the country's population is Muslim). Such a reaction is natural, I suppose, given the current geopolitical situation. After all, it seems like in today's lightning-fast, media-driven, consumerism-saturated world, where everyone has their 15 gigabytes of fame, you really have to do something extreme to get noticed and have your voice truly heard above the din.

But let's get back to The Program, as it were.

Stopping hatred before it starts, is essentially what they're doing. Teaching the youth (5 to 16 or 18, I'm assuming) that such radicalism and subsequent hate (terror?) crimes will not be tolerated in their society, and on a larger scale, the world. That's absolutely brilliant, I say. Yes, parents are also responsible for the rearing and teaching of their children, especially on an intrapersonal level. But so is the government, and especially on the interpersonal level (ah, there's the Democrat in me). After all, it's a global society now, and whether we like it or not, we're all hooked up to the same cable now--as close together as stations on a dial. A shock at one end will travel round, affecting everyone. The flapping of a butterfly's wings can cause a hurricane on the other side of the world, it seems.

I say bravo to the Dutch. I really hope their program works. Because as each new, successive generation inherits the planet (amid the cries of "It was broken when I got here!"), the problems and the solutions fall to them; they become the new stewards of society. There is a sense of duty and responsibility, I think, that they will accept. This planet is all we've got, and if the whole Human Comedy is to continue, we've got to live with each other as best we can--you and me, we're in this together now.

I don't know what the curriculum entails. I assume it's something along the lines of common sense: that in order for humanity to keep progressing, we've got to stop the formation of the radicals/fundamentalists of all stripes who wish to keep the status quo and drag us back into the Dark Ages because it's easier to just give in and not fight, it's more comfortable that way; change is bad. A static society is easier to control than a dynamic society.

I hope the Dutch kids go for this program. After all, the Netherlands is a very liberal country, it seems; we all know the stories about how Amsterdam is a creative and recreational capital, with its Red-Light District and 'coffeehouses' and other so-called 'hedonistic' venues. Hell, they have the brains to legalize all the things we good Americans consider bad and impure, and what do they get: a pretty laidback and liberal society. They're a beacon of social tolerance and they really get along with each other.

Could such a program work here in the U.S.? Maybe, I don't know. I mean, there's plenty of students with beards, but I really don't see our country moving towards the left end of the sociopolitical spectrum for a while--at least 20 years or more, when the twentysomethings of today hit their forties and get really active in national politics and keep the ideas of their youth. For great change does not come in leaps and bounds, it comes in baby steps. And in order for something of this nature to take place in such a puritanical country as America, we've got to wait for the old guard to fade away and let the young Turks take the reins. Yes, there will still be the right-wing holdovers of another time and another place hanging on and railing against the change (Hell, maybe we do need them, for balance, as Believers need Skeptics), but we're all heading for the same destination: the future. And we've already brought about such a globalized society that we're experiencing many other cultures and people who are much different than we are--what did we expect, for Them to be all like Us? And we're all in the same boat...if it sinks, we're all Doomed, so let's try and make the ride comfortable for everybody.

I say to the Dutch, you've got at least one American behind your noble efforts. I hope that one night, we can all go to sleep and wake up the next morning to find that the Dream has been realized.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Next

Comments
SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

AUG 29, 2007 03:42 PM

aaronthere said:
right on, galahad.

I think this, perhaps the greatest of political failures, stems from the simple maxim, that people tend to be more lazy and self-serving when monitoring their own behaviors and more self-righteous and hypocritical when monitoring others behaviors. This is why parents become more conservative and why politicians are too.

People and politicians start catering to ideas like "well I don't want my kids to be around drugs..." even after they went through the same thing themselves when they were kids. Politicians think that "allowing" drug use to happen is sending the wrong message, which is utterly useless and ineffectual.



Fixed.

Seriously, the use of "liberal" and "conservative" misses the point entirely.

Cassiel

Cassiel

Aurora, CO
September 2004

AUG 29, 2007 03:47 PM

Gerry_D said:
If the terrorists really hated freedom, the Netherlands would be dust -- David Cross



point taken.

Rafi

Rafi

Santa Monica, CA
January 2003

AUG 29, 2007 05:19 PM

freshprncebelair said:
The reason this sounds like a waste of money for the most part is that the problem is pretty much one-sided.

Europeans for the most part allowed he Muslims into Europe with open arms because it was assumed they would attempt to integrate with the prevailing culture.



aaronthere said:
Um... isn't this thread about a european response to a muslim murdering a european man for making a movie they didn't agree with? I feel like we are all referring to that. The difference is people in Holland are open and into diversity, whereas Muslim extremists believe that if you are not Muslim you are an infidel and it is ok to kill infidels.



Did you two miss the part where this program was largely instituted in response to hate crimes and attacks by native Dutch against Muslims living in the Netherlands?

Or do only the crimes commited by Muslims against Europeans count as attacks, while crimes commited by Europeans against Muslims are 'retaliation,' since of course everybody knows the Europeans welcome diversity with open arms, while the Muslim immigrants are all about violence against infidels?

Esoteric

Esoteric

Portland, OR
January 2005

AUG 29, 2007 07:47 PM

abracadabra said:
If I could find a way , I would build a time machine . Then , I would go back in time and somehow , get my parents to settle and fuck in Amsterdam or Paris . Thereby birthing me into a liberal society , making this obviously backwards one seem a little more tolerable . Thanks Mom !



So you're saying SEATTLE isn't liberal enough for you? In that case I don't think Amsterdam or Paris would be enough either, you ought to use your time machine to head to Moscow during the Stalin era.

aaronthere

aaronthere

San Francisco, CA
September 2003

AUG 29, 2007 11:04 PM

SockPuppet said:

aaronthere said:
right on, galahad.

I think this, perhaps the greatest of political failures, stems from the simple maxim, that people tend to be more lazy and self-serving when monitoring their own behaviors and more self-righteous and hypocritical when monitoring others behaviors. This is why parents become more conservative and why politicians are too.

People and politicians start catering to ideas like "well I don't want my kids to be around drugs..." even after they went through the same thing themselves when they were kids. Politicians think that "allowing" drug use to happen is sending the wrong message, which is utterly useless and ineffectual.



Fixed.

Seriously, the use of "liberal" and "conservative" misses the point entirely.



thanks. this is the first response I've gotten that doesn't feel like it's from a hormonal angsty pre-teen.
so you don't think conservatives are self rightous and hypocritical? oh well....

Heathen_Dave

Heathen_Dave

Birmingham, AL
July 2005

AUG 30, 2007 12:10 AM

I'm feeling delightfully un-PC right now.

Islam as many practice it is far too controlling to be a viable part of the first world, global culture.

I think it's a shitty religion. Even compared to me thinking all religions are foolish, I think Islam is extra shitty.

I'm expecting a future radicalization of more western peoples that will lead to open violence; there simply is no viable route I see to a lasting peace between Islam and the west.

I am very excited to see the sort of PC bullshit that some people will bring up. It's all well and good to talk niceties and ideals, but reality's gotta kick in at some point.

And here I wanted to go to sleep. Crap.

Edit: Man I'm tired, that was not well put together at all. Whatever.

edith

edith

France
April 2006

AUG 30, 2007 12:50 AM

Rafi said:

Or do only the crimes commited by Muslims against Europeans count as attacks, while crimes commited by Europeans against Muslims are 'retaliation,' since of course everybody knows the Europeans welcome diversity with open arms, while the Muslim immigrants are all about violence against infidels?



um yeah, it's not one thing or the other

i think the difference is that a fundamentalist muslim guy tried to behead a beloved dutch artist in the middle of the city. you are not allowed to have an opinion about the muslim religion or else you risk getting beheaded while riding your bike. don't you think people should have a right to discuss religion in their own country?

i think more people from the netherlands should post in this thread...i have no idea what it's like there. but i think people should be able to say what they want about religion without fearing death. no one sliced off sinead o'connor's head for ripping up a picture of the pope.

edith

edith

France
April 2006

AUG 30, 2007 12:51 AM

Esoteric said:

abracadabra said:
If I could find a way , I would build a time machine . Then , I would go back in time and somehow , get my parents to settle and fuck in Amsterdam or Paris . Thereby birthing me into a liberal society , making this obviously backwards one seem a little more tolerable . Thanks Mom !



So you're saying SEATTLE isn't liberal enough for you? In that case I don't think Amsterdam or Paris would be enough either, you ought to use your time machine to head to Moscow during the Stalin era.



indeed!

Rafi

Rafi

Santa Monica, CA
January 2003

AUG 30, 2007 01:07 AM

Heathen_Dave said:
I'm feeling delightfully un-PC right now.

Islam as many practice it is far too controlling to be a viable part of the first world, global culture.

I think it's a shitty religion. Even compared to me thinking all religions are foolish, I think Islam is extra shitty.



I always love it when people describe their dogmatically bigoted & hate-filled ejaculations as "un-PC," as if adding merely applying that term gives their words some kind of badge of honor.

Rafi

Rafi

Santa Monica, CA
January 2003

AUG 30, 2007 01:27 AM

edith said:

Rafi said:

Or do only the crimes commited by Muslims against Europeans count as attacks, while crimes commited by Europeans against Muslims are 'retaliation,' since of course everybody knows the Europeans welcome diversity with open arms, while the Muslim immigrants are all about violence against infidels?



um yeah, it's not one thing or the other

i think the difference is that a fundamentalist muslim guy tried to behead a beloved dutch artist in the middle of the city. you are not allowed to have an opinion about the muslim religion or else you risk getting beheaded while riding your bike. don't you think people should have a right to discuss religion in their own country?




You missed my point. What I was calling attention to is the fact that some people were taking one shameful atrocity (the murder of Theo Van Gogh) as evidence of a monolithic sickness in all or most Dutch Muslims, while completely ignoring other shameful acts (the spike in hate crimes commited by native Dutch against Islamic immigrants) in their eagerness to describe the whole of native Netherlanders as 'welcoming of diversity.'

And yes, of course people should have the right to discuss religion in their own country (or any country for that matter). Who here has said they don't? Has anybody claimed that outspoken critics of Islam shouldn't have full and total protection against intimidation from extremists?

Unless I'm misunderstanding your use of the word "right." Legally speaking, any citizen of the Netherlands DOES have the "right" under Dutch law to speak freely about Islam. If you mean "right" in the sense that they should be able to do so without any fear of attacks - then yes, clearly there is too much outside intimidation around these issues in Holland, and that's one of the things this new school program in the country aims to combat by aggressively tackling Islamic fundamentalism and radicalism in elementary and high school-aged children. But that's not what "freedom of speech" is legally, so I'm not sure where you're getting that people don't have the "right" to discuss religion in Holland.

Glassmachine

Glassmachine

United Kingdom
November 2004

AUG 30, 2007 02:24 AM

Rafi said:

Heathen_Dave said:
I'm feeling delightfully un-PC right now.

Islam as many practice it is far too controlling to be a viable part of the first world, global culture.

I think it's a shitty religion. Even compared to me thinking all religions are foolish, I think Islam is extra shitty.



I always love it when people describe their dogmatically bigoted & hate-filled ejaculations as "un-PC," as if adding merely applying that term gives their words some kind of badge of honor.



It's perfect isn't it?

There's no mention of the positive impact of Islam on individuals - the discipline, respect and peace that it can instill in wayward young people (especially in this country) the way it can help stabilize communities and how it's the honestly, peacefully held beliefs of millions of jolly nice people.

No, these people have watched the news, read a few threads on SG and it's all about radicalism and oppressing women. They can pass judgement on Islam and it''s followers because they've bought into the stereotypes.

Meanwhile, in the West we're still discriminating over colour and paying our female executives significantly less than our male ones. It was only in 1984 that The Sun newspaper ran an overtly racist headline about the amount of black players in the national football team. Yeah, we're fucking miles out of the dark ages, no wonder we can judge so easily.

And before someone accuses me of being a Islamic Fundamentalist Apologist or something - I do not agree with the way that Islam is implemented in some places to exert unfair control over people. And neither do a lot of muslims.

I remember having a conversation with a guy when I was at school about all of the gang violence that was taking place in a bad area of our town involving a lot of Asian youths. He said to me that it's hard to stay out of it, especially when his friends are getting beaten up but, and I quote, "I've got Islam, man. When you've got a faith it keeps you out of trouble, Islam keeps me from all of that shit."

Obviously I told him that he was a pre-historic moron and that his religion was founded in nought but hearsay and fairytales. Then I went and found the nearest woman with a Hijab on and tore it of screaming 'GLORY TO WESTERN LIBERTY! YOU ARE FREE NOW, WOMAN, FREE!!'

Tiger_Fodder

Tiger_Fodder

Braintree, MA
June 2007

AUG 30, 2007 04:27 AM

If any of you like Cassiel really are interested in a similar program for Americans, you should visit the Southern Poverty Law Center's Teaching Tolerance program. This program has been in use for many years in many public and private schools around the US. It is not sponsored by the government. It is funded by donations from regular citizens.

edith

edith

France
April 2006

AUG 30, 2007 06:32 AM

Rafi said:
You missed my point. What I was calling attention to is the fact that some people were taking one shameful atrocity (the murder of Theo Van Gogh) as evidence of a monolithic sickness in all or most Dutch Muslims, while completely ignoring other shameful acts (the spike in hate crimes commited by native Dutch against Islamic immigrants) in their eagerness to describe the whole of native Netherlanders as 'welcoming of diversity.'



well, immigrants are welcomed all over europe..that's why there are so many. most kids are used to growing up around muslim kids and are friends with them. every day i see groups of kids playing together. a few minutes ago three 14 or 15 year old girls walked by--two of them blonde and one of them in a headscarf. do you think europe didn't welcome immigrants? why are so many here?

i meant that people can't talk about muslim stuff without getting put on a murder list. people are afraid to even discuss it in public because quite simply people will want to kill you. if you say something--anything--about it you need to start walking around with bodyguards. this is what people get so upset about in the netherlands i think. this complete fear.

defaultx

defaultx

I'm lost
February 2006

AUG 30, 2007 07:58 AM

islam is not compatible with the west.

DhD_No_Pants

DhD_No_Pants

Katy, TX
May 2006

AUG 30, 2007 08:07 AM

defaultx said:
islam is not compatible with the west.



Too much Islam mixing with the West can kill you, FYI.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Next