- news
- TUESDAY JULY 17 2007 9:00 AM
Democrats: Only Slightly Less Slimy Than Republicans
Submitted by FearTheReaper
Edited by erin_broadley

In 2005, Representative Randy "Duke" Cunningham plead guilty to federal charges of conspiracy to commit bribery, mail fraud, wire fraud, and tax evasion. He admitted to taking $2.4 million in bribe from defense contractors. The Duke is now serving an eight-year sentence.
The Duke was living a pretty sweet life because he was a member of the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, which allowed him to take bribes and then funnel contracts. He had a mansion near San Diego that he bought for $700,000 below market value and when in DC he lived aboard a yacht that was owned by defense contractors. Occasionally, the Duke would have prostitutes swing by the yacht so he could put his old, nasty penis inside of them. It was a really good time.
But then he got caught. The scandal took down a few Washington insiders, including the number 3 man at the CIA, Dusty Foggo, defense contractor Brent Wilkes, former Navy officer Mitchell Wade and New York financier Thomas Kontogiannis. The prosecutor, US Attorney Carol Lam, was later fired by Republicans to punish her for doing her job and to stop the investigation from spreading to other party members.
The House Intelligence Committee ordered an internal investigation into the scandal to determine what went wrong and how The Duke got away with his illegal activities as a member of the committee. The investigation was finished last year, but Republicans controlled the committee and they would not release the report.
Democrats were outraged! The ranking Democrat on the committee, Jane Harman, fought to have the full report released.
Harman said the public had a right to see the conclusions of the committee's investigation, which was conducted by a special counsel and completed in May. She said she had been pushing for months for the committee to produce an unclassified version of the report.
For months! My, God, nobody would listen to the woman! Harman then wrote up a five-page summary and released it herself, without consent from the Republicans. Republicans were then outraged! The next day one of Harmans staffers was suspended over some trumped up intelligence leak bullshit that was totally unrelated to the report. Eventually the controversy just went away.
But now the Democrats control Congress, so they can release the full report, right? Wrong. It turns out Democrats are just a different version of corrupt fucks. According to yesterdays LA Times:
When the committee's investigation was completed last year, the Republican-controlled panel would not release the results; now that Democrats control the committee, it still will not release the findings.
Why would they do such a thing? Arent the Democrats bringing ethics and integrity back to Washington? Nope. Two weeks ago, several Democrats on the committee voted to block the reports release to other members of Congress. Forget about the report being released to the public, the dirty committee doesnt even want the rest of Congress to see it. The Democrats are now hiding their shady part in the Duke Cunningham scandal.
An internal investigation that the House Intelligence Committee has refused to make public portrays the panel as embarrassingly entangled in the Randy "Duke" Cunningham bribery scandal.
The report details how many senior aides knew what The Duke was up to, but failed to take action. They were deeply troubled but went along with his crimes out of fear.
So, committee staffers were afraid of a man who was blatantly breaking the law. No wonder they dont want the report to come out, it just solidifies the belief that Democrats are raging pussies. According to the report, aides didnt want Cunningham to nuclear or ballistic." That is a great point; the Democrats should take that to the FBI and see if the agency can implement it into their crime fighting tactics. "Don't stop criminals because they might yell at you." The committee staff did have time to point out the complete waste of money and fraud that was going on in emails.
At one point, senior committee aide Michele Lang sent out a staff e-mail describing the program, saying, "HOOAH! Another $5 million of taxpayer money wasted."
Nicely done. Thanks for doing the work of the people with a snarky email. It is obvious why the Democrats dont want this report to come out: They will look like assholes. They been saying the Republican rubber stamp Congress was the problem, when in fact it is the entire system. If this report were to be made public it would just shine a light on their dirty little secrets.
"They are so nervous about this report being out," said one congressional official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "Members oppose putting this thing out because you read this and the natural question is: 'Did you know this, and what did you do about it?' I don't think any members wanted that scrutiny."
Representative Silvestre Reyes is now the Democratic chairman of the committee. He breaks down why the public shouldn't see the report.
"My view was that the report was an internal review, principally of staff activity, and that the full report with all of the names of staff was not intended for dissemination beyond the committee," Reyes said. "The important thing is that the committee took the review seriously and incorporated changes" designed to prevent future abuses.
Oh, perfect. How does this help the Democrats calls for the White House to answer subpoenas into the US Attorney scandal? The Department of Justice can just have their own little internal investigation and incorporate changes.
Arent you the same Silvestre Reyes who said this?
Certain hearings may have to occur in closed session, but a major hearing on legislative proposals -- featuring administration witnesses and outside experts -- will take place in open session. Whenever possible, changes to public laws should be debated in public.
Ooo, pubic debates. That sounds fun! Maybe now that the House Intelligence Committee has been caught up in the worst fraud case in the history of Congress, it could take your advice and attempt to restore some
trust.
Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, says, Fessing up will restore trust in the agency.
But that "fessing up" advice was only for the CIA. Its totally different for the House Intelligence Committee. Didnt take long for the Democrats to take over where the Republicans left off.




PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3
Comments
polverso
Kansas City, MO
December 2005
JUL 17, 2007 09:29 AM
Trahern
United Kingdom
March 2003
JUL 17, 2007 09:34 AM
scorp17yh
Brookings, OR
November 2004
JUL 17, 2007 09:50 AM
projectnova
San Francisco, CA
July 2002
JUL 17, 2007 09:52 AM
Uncognitive
Brooklyn, NY
May 2003
JUL 17, 2007 09:53 AM
ericwine
Charlotte Hall, MD
January 2007
JUL 17, 2007 10:07 AM
DhD_No_Pants
Katy, TX
May 2006
JUL 17, 2007 10:23 AM
emotedcreations
Germany
July 2006
JUL 17, 2007 10:39 AM
FearTheReaper
NEWSWIRE
I'm lost
JUL 17, 2007 10:44 AM
Uncognitive
Brooklyn, NY
May 2003
JUL 17, 2007 11:08 AM
FearTheReaper
NEWSWIRE
I'm lost
JUL 17, 2007 11:15 AM
captevil
Vancouver, BC
April 2005
JUL 17, 2007 11:38 AM
Uncognitive
Brooklyn, NY
May 2003
JUL 17, 2007 11:45 AM
NickFaust
USA
April 2004
JUL 17, 2007 11:49 AM
aldoushuxley
USA
November 2005
JUL 17, 2007 11:55 AM
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3