• commentary
  • MONDAY JULY 9 2007 9:00 AM

Fuck Fred Thompson



Volume 9 of the FTR series in which he puts the word "fuck" in front of a presidential candidate's name.

Ninety-seven percent of Republicans masturbate at least once a week while thinking about Ronald Reagan. It is a statistical fact. Reagan is their God, even though in hindsight he was clearly showing signs of Alzheimer’s throughout his presidency. It’s different for me. When I was a child I read a book my father had on his desk full of Reagan quotes. I could not believe the man was president.

"Trees cause more pollution than automobiles do."

"Abortion is advocated only by persons who have themselves been born."


Reagan classics. The man was an idiot. And since he left office, Republicans have been creating a false mythology that no Earth bound man could ever match. Until now. Republicans seem to have found a candidate who is just as void of substance, just as snappy with a stupid phrase and…he’s an ACTOR! Did you just cum in your pants, also? It’s pretty exciting.

The main problem with Fred Thompson is that he is one hell of a douche bag. But he’s a charming, actor douche bag and that’s what the Republicans are looking for. You may know him as District Attorney Arthur Branch from "Law & Order," or one of his many roles in movies. Add that to the fact that he a conservative with a strong presence and we get statement like this:

Thompson's commanding presence, background and conservatism bring to mind another actor-turned-pol, Wamp said. "The whole thing is very Reagan-esque. The whole story."


I guess, I mean, Reagan was an idiot, too. But, could there be anything worse for a Republican candidate, than to compare him to Reagan? No one can live up to that, especially a lazy, corrupt, liar, like Fred Thompson.

Thompson recently gave a speech at an event in Orange County, California. The Lincoln Club was filled with conservatives waiting to hear and see “The new Reagan.” And they were completely disappointed:

Thompson sounded more like a concerned elder statesman contemplating the country's problems over cigars and brandy than someone who is losing sleep about the direction of the country.


And unlike Reagan, he is not getting a break from the mainstream press.

His stump speech consists of broad conservative themes, talk of bipartisanship and commentary on issues of the day, but it largely lacks any vision for the future of the country. He deflects questions on what a Thompson presidency would look like and demurs when pressed for specific proposals for how to fix the nation's ills. He opines on hot topics, from taxes to terrorism, in online columns and on his Web site, usually without being challenged. His campaign-trail time is minimal, largely limited to giving speeches at state GOP events.


Sounds so very presidential, doesn’t it? The guy just wreaks leadership. I know whey I think of the great US presidents of our past one word always comes to mind: Lazy.

His high school football coach in Lawrenceburg, Tenn., told the Nashville Tennessean, "He was smart, but he was lazy. He probably could have been a straight-A student if he'd applied himself." With eight years in the Senate, his legislative record was thin.

Says a former adviser: "While the Senate is filled with ambitious men who aren't in a rush to get home at night, Senator Thompson kept a lean formal schedule, did the bare minimum to get by and then hightailed [it] to the Prime Rib or the Capital Grille."

A veteran lobbyist said: "He was viewed as a lazy son of gun who would say at two in the afternoon, 'I'm done.' Can you name one major piece of legislation he authored? I can't."


Look at that. Three quotes that span his entire life. Impressive. During his time in the Senate, Thompson introduced 97 bills. Only 4 were passed. That is some serious hustle.

Possible campaing slogan: Thompson '08: I Will Sleep Through A Lot Of Shit.

Fred’s career kicked off in the early 1970s, when was brought in as investigating counsel for the Senate Watergate committee. He was hired by Republicans to aid in the investigation of Nixon's wrongdoings. Nixon’s response was mixed.

Nixon expressed concern that Thompson was not "very smart."

"Not extremely so," Buzhardt agreed.

"But he's friendly," Nixon said.


Ah, friendly and dumb. Oh, so perfect.

Possible campaign slogan: Thompson '08: Both Dumb and Nice and Dumb

After getting the job, Thompson did what any ethical lawyer would do: He leaked information to Nixon, the man he was supposed to be investigating. Some Democrats working on the committee, like investigator Scott Armstrong, are still pissed at Thompson’s actions during Watergate.

Thompson was a mole for the White House. Fred was working hammer and tong to defeat the investigation of finding out what happened to authorize Watergate and find out what the role of the president was.

When the prosecutor discovers the smoking the gun, he's going to be shocked to find that the deputy prosecutor called the defendant and said, 'You'd better get rid of that gun.


The “gun” he is talking about are the Nixon tapes. When Thompson learned that Democrats on the committee knew about the existence of recording devices in the White House, he tipped off the president.

Okay, so a prosecutor is leaking information to the person being investigated. Totally wrong, but it will be excused by many because of the politics involved. Democrats thought Thompson should have been fired, because he was orchestrating a defense for the man he was supposed to be prosecuting.

Instead, Thompson was rewarded and his political career was off and running. Soon after Thompson tipped off the president, he was given the opportunity to ask Nixon aid Alexander Butterfield about the existence of the tapes during the Watergate hearings. It was a huge moment in the hearings and Thompson was asking the question. He was on all the news program that night and became a national player instantly. Who cares that he was undermining the investigation and being an unethical asshole? It pays to be a man with no morals in Washington.

To this day, Thompson still brags about his actions during Watergate, suggesting he helped to discover the tapes and exposed the truth to the nation. All of which is false. That makes him a filthy liar. Check that off your list.

Possible campaign slogan: Thompson ’08: Living The Unethical Dream

So, what to do if you are now a nationally known Washington player? How about taking a job that is just slightly above child molester? Yes, Fred became a lobbyist. For nearly two decades he did the bidding of any corporation that would slap money in his giant, greasy hands.

Some of his clients included Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, Westinghouse, General Electric, a German mining company and Toyota. Recently, between 2004 and 2007, he did some quality lobbying for a London outfit called Equitas. The company paid him $760,000 and in return, Thompson gave the company information about upcoming bills that dealt with Asbestos. Yes, asbestos. Equitas was on the hook to pay for billions of dollars in asbestos related health problems and Freddy made sure they paid a lot less. In 2005 he used his powers to have Congress drop a provision in a bill what would have forced Equitas to pay a large portion of an asbestos settlement. Thompson is one of very few pro-asbestos people in the world.

Possible campaign slogan: Thompson ’08: Will Fight for More Asbestos.

Unfortunately for America, that was not even the worst lobbying Fred did. In 1982, he lobbied Congress on behalf of the Savings and Loan industry. He made recommendations and Congress thought they were super ideas, so they were added to the Garn-St Germain Depository Institutions Act. It was a really great act that allowed Savings and Loan companies to make riskier ventures. The act was a major contributor to the Savings and Loan crisis of the late 1980’s. It cost the US government about $125 billion. And Fred’s dirty, sweaty hands were all over it.

Possible campaign slogan: Thompson ’08: Helped America Lose $125 Billion.

Recently, the LA Times revealed that Fred lobbied for the pro-choice abortion movement in 1991. He was hired by the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Assn to lobby president George H.W. Bush on what was known as the “gag” rule.

His task was to urge the administration of President George H.W. Bush to withdraw or relax a rule that barred abortion counseling at clinics that receive federal money, according to the records and the five people who worked on the matter.


Just to make sure I’m clear: Five people claim he worked for a pro-choice group. The Times also got the minutes from the board meeting during which the announcement of Thompson’s hiring was recorded. So, how did Thompson respond to this information? Well, first his spokesman said it was not true. Those five people were apparently wrong, and someone fucked with the minutes from a board meeting in 1991, just to screw over Fred's campaign 16 years later. Also, I guess, his old lobbying colleague is also lying.

Former Rep. Michael D. Barnes (D-Md.), a colleague at the lobbying and law firm where Thompson worked, said that DeSarno had asked him to recommend someone for the lobbying work and that he had suggested Thompson. He said it was "absolutely bizarre" for Thompson to deny that he lobbied against the abortion counseling rule.

"I talked to him while he was doing it, and I talked to [DeSarno] about the fact that she was very pleased with the work that he was doing for her organization," said Barnes. "I have strong, total recollection of that. This is not something I dreamed up or she dreamed up. This is fact."


When Thompson was asked directly about his work for the pro-choice group, he came up with a delightful, Reagan-esque response.

"I'd just say the flies get bigger in the summertime. I guess the flies are buzzing," said Thompson. He refused comment on whether he recalled doing the work.


I’d also say monkeys have hair…and in the winter they have more hair. Anyway, did you want to answer the question? The delightful thing about responses such as this is that it is no longer the early 1980s. Reagan never would have survived the days of U Tube. The scrutiny is incredible now, compared to how it was just seven years ago, when Bush ran for president. This kind of shit will be filmed, written about and absorbed by the masses ad nauseum on the interwebs.

Why is this important? Take Fred’s answer there, take a couple of quotes from the lobbying for a pro-choice group, put a little music behind it and throw this in moment from Fox News, and you have a devastating political video.

HANNITY: One is when you checked a box in 1994 when you were running for Senate, where you — the box said, "Abortion should be legal in all circumstances for the first three months." That wasn't your voting record, interestingly. Did you make a mistake checking the box?

THOMPSON: I don't remember that box. You know, it was a long time ago, and I don't know if I filled it out or my staff, based on what they thought my position was, filled it out.


Or this moment from a Hoover Institute on camera interview could be added.

Q: Since you got your law degree in 1967, which decision of the Supreme Court has done the greatest disservice to the nation?

THOMPSON: Oh, I suppose, that overall, I’d have to say Roe v. Wade.

Q: Rudy Giuliani recently said, that he’d appoint justices, and it would be alright with him if they upheld Roe, and it would be alright with him if they overturned Roe. What’s your view on this?

THOMPSON: No. I think Roe was fabricated out of whole cloth.


See? The darling of the right wing just became a liability because of his lying about abortion. Good luck getting the Republican nomination.

There is nothing more disgusting to me than a politician who changes his mind on the subject of abortion in an attempt to win the presidency. Like Kucinich and Romney before him, Fred Thompson slimy opportunist. There is more than enough evidence to prove he was once pro-choice.

"On July 29, 1993, the Memphis Commercial Appeal reported that Thompson…said during an interview that he "supports the Supreme Court's Roe vs. Wade decision that established a constitutional right to abortion." In an October 21, 1994, article, The Washington Post similarly reported that Thompson "believes in legal abortion."


And he filled out a form, where he checked a box that said, "Abortion should be legal in all circumstances for the first three months." It’s not like I’m writing about a guy who claims he came to some God inspired moment, where he realized abortion was wrong. Thompson claims he was “always” against abortion. Never mind the evidence, he’s the new Reagan!

Possible campaign slogan: Thompson ’08: Against Abortion - Unless I Can Make Money Being For It.

But the best story of all is about Fred and his little red truck. When Fred decided to run for the Senate in Tennessee in 1994, he’d been living in Washington for years. But that didn’t mean he couldn’t get back to his old, country self. Thompson threw away the lobbying suit and put on the blue jeans and boots. He was a man of the people, gosh darn it. He drove himself to campaign stops in his old, red pick up truck.

Just a common, everyday good fella, whose entire persona was manufactured by his GOP handlers.

They decided it had to be a red truck because that would be photogenic: "Red made sense. We didn't want anything too flashy, so used made sense. We wanted something that was going to be roomy because there were going to be people with him from time to time, so we got a stretch cab."

But how do you magically produce a truck matching that exact description?

"I said, 'Before the sun sets, I can find you a red truck,' " McMahan said. "I made one phone call to a friend of mine who was the owner of Reeder Chevrolet in Knoxville."


Makes you feel all warm inside, doesn’t it? Fred would drive the truck to a campaign stop and chat with the people. Afterwards, he’d drive it a few hundred feet away, get out and leave it with a campaign staffer. Then Fred would slide out of town in his “sweet silver luxury sedan.” Man of the people.

Possible campaign slogan: Thompson ’08: Just Stare At The Truck, Idiots.

Fred Thompson is the prefect candidate for anyone looking for a leader who is lazy, a liar, an opportunist, economically destructive, pro-asbestos, a poser and without ethics. Vote Thompson!

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 13

Next

Comments
FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

JUL 09, 2007 04:52 PM

In old country, woman cook, man hunt.

aldoushuxley

aldoushuxley

USA
November 2005

JUL 09, 2007 04:56 PM

Honestly I have no wish to see Hillary the socialist as president, I would much rather have Obama as president if it was to be a democratic president. As for a republican president I would like Mcain, but I know that will not happen. You know I hate to say it, but I have no real interest in any of the candidates because not a single one has talked about eliminating the national debt, which is the most important issue, the ways you would remove said debt would be to stop expensive government activity, wars, crazy energy and health care policies, all would help eliminate the debt. Any way what I really am interested is what FTR wants in a presidential candidate..... eeek

ericwine

ericwine

Charlotte Hall, MD
January 2007

JUL 09, 2007 05:07 PM

Rafi said:
A nice piece, FTR. Wil you ever run out of candidates to 'fuck'?



I hope not, every single one running deserves this treatment, the whole field is underwhelming to say the least. Mr. Thompson does nothing to improve it.

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

JUL 09, 2007 05:09 PM

FearTheReaper said:
In old country, woman cook, man hunt.



In Mother Russia, woman hunt and cook you!

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
No, there really was absolutely no point to this post. But then again, look up.

Rafi

Rafi

Santa Monica, CA
January 2003

JUL 09, 2007 05:30 PM

aldoushuxley said:
Honestly I have no wish to see Hillary the socialist as president,



Please indentify what policies specifically Hillary has implemented or proposed that would categorically switch America's economic system from capitalist to socialist-based if you are going to use this qualifier. kthxbye.

thrash242

thrash242

Pearland, TX
September 2004

JUL 09, 2007 05:37 PM

Untimely said:
Those republicans, always looking for some glossy shill who can take their bullshit lies, memorize them, recite them, and make them sound believable.

Actors are the perfect frontmen for their asinine policies.



Kinda like all those overly-liberal actors? I'm pretty sure there are more well-known liberal actors than conservative ones.

thrash242

thrash242

Pearland, TX
September 2004

JUL 09, 2007 05:38 PM

FearTheReaper said:

alpha22 said:
we all know he is going to be the next president...you can see and hear the fear in the dumbocrats...look at all the people attacking someone who hasnt even joined the race ....all the HATE on the left will be your downfall in 2008....IAM WITH FRED...



Fuck, you are smart.



Another brilliant and insightful response by FTR. whatever

thrash242

thrash242

Pearland, TX
September 2004

JUL 09, 2007 05:40 PM

alpha22 said:
....after FRED WINS the Nomination.... i cant wait to see the first debate when fred shakes hands with hillary and she will look like a little girl standing next to him and then she will try to act tough next to a man...



Ok, I really don't like Hillary, and it kinda sounds like you don't either, but beyond that, I have no clue what you just said.

thrash242

thrash242

Pearland, TX
September 2004

JUL 09, 2007 05:42 PM

Untimely said:
Wow....Sometimes I want to believe that FTR writes his columns, gets drunk, and adopts the persona of illiterate right-wingers just to incite controversy.

But I don't think anyone could really make this stuff up.



I tend to think he gets drunk *then* writes them.

Westley

Westley

Vatican City
April 2004

JUL 09, 2007 05:47 PM

thrash242 said:
Kinda like all those overly-liberal actors? I'm pretty sure there are more well-known liberal actors than conservative ones.


You kind of just made the point for him, Corky.

thrash242

thrash242

Pearland, TX
September 2004

JUL 09, 2007 06:07 PM

Rafi said:

aldoushuxley said:
Honestly I have no wish to see Hillary the socialist as president,



Please indentify what policies specifically Hillary has implemented or proposed that would categorically switch America's economic system from capitalist to socialist-based if you are going to use this qualifier. kthxbye.



I'll give you some pretty damn socialist-sounding quotes by her:

"Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you," Clinton said, according to the Associated Press. "We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you.
"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

"...because an uninsured person who goes to the hospital is more likely to die than an insured person. I mean, that is a fact. So what do we do? We have to build a political consensus. and that requires people giving up a little bit of their own turf in order to create this common ground. The same with energy. You know, we can't keep talking about our dependence on foreign oil and the need to deal with global warming and the challenge that it poses to our climate and to God's creation and just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people."

She also worked as a law clerk for a lawyer for the US Communist Party. That doesn't necessarily tell you her position, but I doubt she would have done that if she were opposed to communism.

This is all just from a few minutes on Google. I'm sure there's much more evidence that she at the very least leans toward the socialist/communist side of things.

No one is going to try to pass legislation turning the US into a socialist country all at once. That doesn't mean there aren't socialists in government trying to move the government in that direction.

aldoushuxley

aldoushuxley

USA
November 2005

JUL 09, 2007 06:23 PM

See my comment were rooted in slightly disturbing facts. Kthxbye

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

JUL 09, 2007 06:27 PM

aldoushuxley said:
See my comment were rooted in slightly disturbing facts. Kthxbye



Um.

No.

joker_

joker_

Minneapolis, MN
October 2005

JUL 09, 2007 06:31 PM

aldoushuxley said:
Honestly I have no wish to see Hillary the socialist as president, I would much rather have Obama as president if it was to be a democratic president. As for a republican president I would like Mcain, but I know that will not happen.



It is good that Mcain will not happen:
http://suicidegirls.com/news/politics/21159/

SignalNoise

SignalNoise

USA
February 2004

JUL 09, 2007 06:33 PM

thrash242 said:
"Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you," Clinton said, according to the Associated Press. "We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you.
"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

"...because an uninsured person who goes to the hospital is more likely to die than an insured person. I mean, that is a fact. So what do we do? We have to build a political consensus. and that requires people giving up a little bit of their own turf in order to create this common ground. The same with energy. You know, we can't keep talking about our dependence on foreign oil and the need to deal with global warming and the challenge that it poses to our climate and to God's creation and just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people."



So a concern for the common good = socialism/Marxism? I mean, "the common good" is a pretty common political tradition. In fact, it's one of the central tenets of republicanism too - the idea of sacrifice, of being bonded to the collective whole. I dunno. I'm not convinced. But I'm a lefty schmuck.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 13

Next