• commentary
  • SUNDAY JUNE 24 2007 9:00 AM

Coming Soon: War With Iran



As a nation we are practically forcing Bush and Cheney to attack Iran because of our relentless dislike of the administration. If we liked them they might actually listen to us, but we don’t, so they won’t. Bush and Cheney both know that if they build up false reasons to attack Iran, then follow through; Bush will get a bump in the polls. That is how America works.

Currently all signs point to an attack on Iran. First of all, there is a man named Dick Cheney who seems to be completely insane. His idea of diplomacy is to find out where you live, drive over to your house and anally rape you. Harpers has given us a delightful list of conclusions Cheney has already reached regarding Iran.

Diplomacy rarely works, and certainly won’t work with a nation like Iran.

Sanctions are worthless – why after all, when I ran Halliburton, we could always find ways to get around them and have profitable dealings with Iran.

Iran is moving ahead with its plans to emerge as a nuclear weapons policy, is running far ahead of schedule, and will certainly achieve its objectives far ahead of the timeline that those numbskulls over at the National Intelligence Council have worked up.

The only solution we can count on is a military solution.

Because of the fickleness of the American electorate, the next government will not have the resolve and will to use military force that are the great strength of America under Bush, which counsels in favor of action now.

The current hostage crisis (involving five Americans held by Tehran and five Iranians held by Washington) will furnish a perfectly decent causus bellum if managed properly, fed and fanned.


The administration is currently preparing for a war with Iran. Right now the US has two carrier strike groups in the Persian Gulf. In a day or two they will be joined by a third carrier strike group, then next week, a fourth carrier strike group will arrive. Which means, in the Red Sea we will have…

Four aircraft carriers, 12-16 destroyers, 4-8 submarines, 4-8 AEGIS cruisers, and over 200 strike aircraft. The world has not witnessed such a mustering of naval might since… the invasion of Iraq.


Ah, the invasion of Iraq. How did that turn out?

As far as land preparations, no one knows. But we do know that before Rumsfeld (neo-con) left office, he developed bases in countries surrounding Iran. We can now attack Iran from every direction from "lilypads."

Next up, the hostages. Yes, the hostages. The US has been holding 5 Iranian diplomats hostage since January. They were invited into Iraq by the Iraqi government, and then the US stormed their compound and seized them. The Irbil five are said to be members of the elite Quds Force, an arm of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard. Recently Condoleezza Rice attempted to have the men released, but Cheney put a stop to her reasonable nonsense.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice went into the meeting Tuesday advising that the men be freed because they are no longer useful, but after a review of options she went along with the consensus, U.S. officials say. Vice President Cheney's office made the firmest case for keeping them.


In response, neo-cons claim Iran began taking “hostages.” The information is not easy to find, unless you go to neo-con sites like The Heritage Foundation.

In recent months, Iran's hostile regime has again resorted to one of its favorite tactics: taking hostages to advance its aggressive foreign policy.


Neo-cons claim Iran has taken four hostages of dual citizenship, and possibly a fifth. The fifth hostage is a little murky because some believe the ex-FBI agent converted to Islam and moved to an island off Iran. Expect the “hostage crisis” to be ramped up on Fox News and in the pages of the Wall Street Journal.

Here is a video of Norman Podhoretz making the case for attacking Iran. Seem eerily familiar? The build up to Iraq, maybe?



Iran will also be labeled as the big problem in the Middle East. This will, of course, distract from the fact that the US is the biggest problem in the Middle East, with all of our invading and whatnot. Iran will be accused of stirring up animosity throughout the region and spreading their ideology. The fact that this is exactly what the US is doing will be largely ignored. The accusation that Iran is arming militias in Iraq and Afghanistan will be heard ad nauseam. How dare they get involved while their enemy attempts to secure the countries on their Eastern and Western borders! Overall, the case will be made that Iran is becoming too powerful in the Middle East, the place where the country resides – and we do not.

And don’t forget Iran’s nuclear program. Yawn. Of course Iran is pursuing nuclear energy. How else could they possibly stop the US from invading? Iraq was not pursuing nuclear weapons but the case was made that they were, meanwhile North Korea was pursuing nuclear weapons and was left alone. Not hard to figure out which path to follow if you are an enemy of the US. The international estimate of when Iran will get nuclear weapons is longer that the Cheney estimate. Who has a history of being correct when it comes to weapons of mass destruction? I’ll give you a hint: The correct party is not insane.

No one seems to ever talk about the fact that Iran will never use nuclear weapons. They would be immediately wiped off the map. It would be suicide and people in power are not big on suicide. The rulers of Iran, no matter how religious they are, are living a life of luxury and will not give it up anytime soon. Sanctions worked against Iraq and they will work against Iran as well. Oh, and Iran does not have a missile capable of reaching Europe or the US, which sort of diminishes the threat. But by the end of the year America should be scared shitless about Iran’s future nuclear attack on the most powerful country on the planet.

Enjoy the war!

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 17

Next

Comments
Trauma

Trauma

Downey, CA
April 2005

JUN 24, 2007 09:08 AM

World War III is coming...

poptard

poptard

United Kingdom
November 2003

JUN 24, 2007 09:11 AM

i knew this was coming a long time ago,

its bloddy obvious, i'd be more surprised if we didn't go to war

Untimely

Untimely

Chicago, IL
January 2007

JUN 24, 2007 09:16 AM


Diplomacy rarely works, and certainly won't work with a nation like Iran.



Well, sure, it's difficult when you've had no diplomatic relations with a country for years.

Snottlebocket

Snottlebocket

Netherlands
March 2004

JUN 24, 2007 09:25 AM

Trauma said:
World War III is coming...



If it is, it's going to be pretty interesting when it's time to pick sides.

pariah002

pariah002

Pittsburgh, PA
July 2003

JUN 24, 2007 09:27 AM

Just what we need. Fucking great.
Those clowns really have a hard on for the middle east.
Fuck it, why take care of the ills in America, lets just keep wars in other places going to blow our money, kill a lot of people and just make the world even more fucked than it already is.
This makes my head hurt. puke

Snottlebocket

Snottlebocket

Netherlands
March 2004

JUN 24, 2007 09:41 AM

pariah002 said:
Just what we need. Fucking great.
Those clowns really have a hard on for the middle east.
Fuck it, why take care of the ills in America, lets just keep wars in other places going to blow our money, kill a lot of people and just make the world even more fucked than it already is.
This makes my head hurt. puke



sssh, don't draw their attention to us.

defaultx

defaultx

I'm lost
February 2006

JUN 24, 2007 09:41 AM

The thing should of been nipped in the bud 28yrs ago.

bombs away!

Omega_Blue

Omega_Blue

Antelope, CA
June 2007

JUN 24, 2007 09:45 AM

War is possible, but I am not sure if it would ever be declared; I once heard that if we were to attack Iran, that we would need 500,000-1,000,000 ground forces, this is not possible unless there is a draft...which I doubt will be reinstated any time soon.

OpticNerve

OpticNerve

Arlington, MA
November 2003

JUN 24, 2007 09:47 AM

Well, maybe getting turned down for the job in San Francisco wasn't such a bad thing for me. :inevitableterroristtarget:

unfiltrator

unfiltrator

San Francisco, CA
April 2004

JUN 24, 2007 09:48 AM

They couldn't even get a surge big enough to do a "clear, hold, build" in Baghdad. The US has been trying to live in Baghdad without attempting to clear the insurgents out of town. They are only trying to clear a part of of the city at this point.

I don't see how they can get congress to go along with more troops for a whole new war. Maybe that's why the Navy and Air Force is a big deal to the Iran War and then what? We bomb and then never go in?

_kungfoo_

_kungfoo_

Los Angeles, CA
April 2005

JUN 24, 2007 09:51 AM

Omega_Blue said:
War is possible, but I am not sure if it would ever be declared; I once heard that if we were to attack Iran, that we would need 500,000-1,000,000 ground forces, this is not possible unless there is a draft...which I doubt will be reinstated any time soon.



It won't be a ground invasion, it will be done with air strikes.

I do wonder what country in the middle east would allow the US to stage air strikes from air bases in their countries though. They face the threat of retaliation from Iran for allowing the US to attack them.

Plus the fact that this WILL make things much worse in Iraq for all parties involved.

American_Psycho

American_Psycho

Anaheim, CA
March 2007

JUN 24, 2007 10:08 AM

Hummm... I might want to get a piece of this wink

NikkiIs

NikkiIs

Drexel, MO
April 2005

JUN 24, 2007 10:15 AM

Maybe I am just looking at this the wrong way but...

Iran's major ally is Russia. Rusia is asking us nicely to stay out of Iran.

The Cheney/Bush Administration is pushing Kosovo to declare Independence against the wiser counsel of the EU and NATO. Russia is against an Independent Kosovo.

All of our current actions seem to be leading up to a direct confrontation with Russia. I am fairly certain that at some point an invasion of Iran, or our support of Kosovo, will have us facing Russian troops.

Maybe Cheney needs to take his meds and realize that the Cold War is over









Snottlebocket

Snottlebocket

Netherlands
March 2004

JUN 24, 2007 10:18 AM

NikkiIs said:
Maybe I am just looking at this the wrong way but...

Iran's major ally is Russia. Rusia is asking us nicely to stay out of Iran.

The Cheney/Bush Administration is pushing Kosovo to declare Independence against the wiser counsel of the EU and NATO. Russia is against an Independent Kosovo.

All of our current actions seem to be leading up to a direct confrontation with Russia. I am fairly certain that at some point an invasion of Iran, or our support of Kosovo, will have us facing Russian troops.

Maybe Cheney needs to take his meds and realize that the Cold War is over



Last time we were in Russia their troops were selling every bit of gear they had issued to them to tourists at the trainstation, in order to buy food for their family since the state hadn't paid them in ages.

Friend of mine came away with some really nice night vision goggles.

Rin

Rin

SUICIDEGIRL

British Columbia, Canada

JUN 24, 2007 10:19 AM

KUNGFOO said:

Omega_Blue said:
War is possible, but I am not sure if it would ever be declared; I once heard that if we were to attack Iran, that we would need 500,000-1,000,000 ground forces, this is not possible unless there is a draft...which I doubt will be reinstated any time soon.



It won't be a ground invasion, it will be done with air strikes.




yeah, and they just replaced the leader of the whole u.s. forces (pardon me for my lack of exact terminology) with a navy guy. hrrrrm! suspect!

my first hope is that they wouldn't attack iran but since that seems imminent, that they won't do it to soon...my dude and i have an agreement that when they attack iran, we will move back to canada...and i am digging living in california!

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 17

Next