• news
  • MONDAY MAY 21 2007 8:00 PM

San Francisco Wants Orphans to Have Homes; Christian Right Not Amused



Everyone knows that San Francisco has a large and relatively affluent gay population. Biology being what it is, the vast majority of gay couples in the city are without children. Nationwide, there are an estimated half a million children that spend their youth going from foster home to foster home, yearning to be adopted by a stable home wherein they will be loved and cared for.

The San Francisco Department of Human Services looked at the above three facts and said to themselves “Huh. I’ll bet we can do something about this.”

Today, the San Francisco Department of Human Services is starting a campaign to recruit more [same-sex couples] to adopt foster kids, especially teens, who are among the hardest to place. The agency sees gays and lesbians as an underutilized pool of potential parents.

"We're always looking for adoptive homes for children, and we never have enough families," said Debby Jeter, deputy director for the city's Family and Children Services. "We believe same-sex couples have the ability to provide the same kind of family for a child as non-same-sex couples."

It's a tough time for foster agencies, which have to compete against international adoptions, in vitro procedures and surrogate mothers. So many prospective parents prefer babies and worry about the physical or mental needs of older foster children, who most often have landed in the system because they experienced neglect.


It’s really a perfect solution. You have this huge population of underutilized potential parents and a huge population of foster children who need parents. Simple, easy. Especially when, according to the Urban Institute, a non-partisan think tank, “[s]ame-sex couples raising adopted children are older, more educated, and have more economic resources than other adoptive parents.” The Institute also noted that past studies have shown no ill effects on children raised by gay parents.

However, some might see San Francisco’s move as a response to the idiots at James Dobson’s Focus on the Family, who are not very happy about these children focusing on getting a family of their own.

[SFDHS’s campaign] comes just two weeks after the evangelical Christian group Focus on the Family began its drive to recruit more Christians as adoptive parents, partly -- the group said -- to keep foster children out of homosexual hands.

Focus on the Family's objection to same-sex parents is grounded in interpretation of biblical scripture and research by Paul Cameron, director of the Family Research Institute in Colorado. Cameron says gays and lesbians are unfit parents, are more likely to molest children of their same sex, switch partners frequently, have shorter life expectancies and cause their children embarrassment and social difficulties.

"Any child that can be adopted into a married-mother-and-father family, that's the gold standard," Cameron said. "An orphanage would be the second choice, and then a single woman."


Of course, Dr. Cameron’s “research” is a load of utter horseshit. Dobson knows this, but that doesn't stop him and his ilk from attempting to keep children in orphanages and foster homes through their support of a ban on same-sex adoption and their dissemination of their usual noxious garbage.

California is among a handful of states where sexual orientation cannot be a basis for preventing someone from adopting. On the other hand, Florida forbids "homosexuals" from adopting, Mississippi bans "same-gender" couples from adopting, Utah bans fostering and adoption by all unmarried couples and Nebraska has a policy prohibiting gay people from fostering.


The bans are based on some sort of assumption that being raised by gay couples somehow harms children. But SF’s response is essentially that the proof is in the pudding.

In San Francisco, gay men and lesbians already adopt a large share of the foster children who are not adopted by relatives -- 88 percent since last July, for example, according to Dan Kelly with the Human Services Department.


But perhaps the strongest argument for the benefits of same-sex adoption comes from one such adoptee.

"It's easier for me (to have two dads) than growing up on my own.”


Precisely.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next

Comments
NickFaust

NickFaust

USA
April 2004

MAY 21, 2007 08:09 PM

We need to stop calling these folks the "Christian Right." It is like calling Nazi's the "Teutonic Right."

I suggest proteso-fascists.

mamet

mamet

Charleston, SC
March 2005

MAY 21, 2007 08:14 PM


"An orphanage would be the second choice, and then a single woman."



Yeah, that makes...total sense to me. whatever

DeadGuyPerez

DeadGuyPerez

Denver, CO
January 2003

MAY 21, 2007 08:14 PM

Why is a gay man more likely to fuck a little boy than a straight man going after a little girl? Hasn't it pretty much been established that most child molesters are straight anyway?

punk

punk

Phoenix, AZ
January 2004

MAY 21, 2007 08:20 PM

As a child raised by a single mother, I would like to say "Fuck you, and eat a dick" to Focus on the Family.

WADO

WADO

Brooklyn, NY
March 2006

MAY 21, 2007 08:21 PM

Paul Cameron gives science, reason, logic, and humanity a bad name. He's one of those people you'd just like to pitch off a roof. Damn list keeps growing.

NickFaust

NickFaust

USA
April 2004

MAY 21, 2007 08:22 PM

punk said:
As a child raised by a single mother, I would like to say "Fuck you, and eat a dick" to Focus on the Family.



Are these consecutive or concurrent activities?

punk

punk

Phoenix, AZ
January 2004

MAY 21, 2007 08:25 PM

NickFaust said:

punk said:
As a child raised by a single mother, I would like to say "Fuck you, and eat a dick" to Focus on the Family.



Are these consecutive or concurrent activities?



Gosh...I don't know. Decisions!

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

MAY 21, 2007 08:25 PM

punk said:
As a child raised by a single mother, I would like to say "Fuck you, and eat a dick" to Focus on the Family.



And look at where that got you! You're a regular poster on a porn site!

Case closed.

WADO

WADO

Brooklyn, NY
March 2006

MAY 21, 2007 08:29 PM

Subrosa said:

punk said:
As a child raised by a single mother, I would like to say "Fuck you, and eat a dick" to Focus on the Family.



And look at where that got you! You're a regular poster on a porn site!

Case closed.



You know, that's funny, cause God how we half-orphans love the porn.

sonic_tooth

sonic_tooth

Kansas City, MO
April 2007

MAY 21, 2007 08:35 PM

Why does anyone ever listen to anything James Dobson ever says?

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

MAY 21, 2007 08:37 PM

WADO said:

Subrosa said:

punk said:
As a child raised by a single mother, I would like to say "Fuck you, and eat a dick" to Focus on the Family.



And look at where that got you! You're a regular poster on a porn site!

Case closed.



You know, that's funny, cause God how we half-orphans love the porn.



but doesn't everyone love porn?

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

MAY 21, 2007 08:48 PM

Everyone knows homos like to rape teenage boys, I don't care what logical retort you might assert.

triskadekafobic

triskadekafobic

Germany
April 2006

MAY 21, 2007 08:52 PM

MrCrisp said:

WADO said:

Subrosa said:

punk said:
As a child raised by a single mother, I would like to say "Fuck you, and eat a dick" to Focus on the Family.



And look at where that got you! You're a regular poster on a porn site!

Case closed.



You know, that's funny, cause God how we half-orphans love the porn.



but doesn't everyone love porn?



but this site isn't a porno site, check out this set proves it!
reagan art vs. porn

thefreak

thefreak

NEWSWIRE

Gardner, MA

MAY 21, 2007 08:54 PM

Fixed.

emotedcreations said:
Everyone knows priests and Republicans like to rape teenage boys, I don't care what logical retort you might assert.


-TM

WADO

WADO

Brooklyn, NY
March 2006

MAY 21, 2007 08:55 PM

mamet said:


"An orphanage would be the second choice, and then a single woman."



Yeah, that makes...total sense to me. whatever



That single women dig is quite the fucking hum-dinger there, and is actually hitting on a topic striking more than a few nerves of late. The Beat posted this bit from a longer essay by Buffy and comic scribe Joss Whedon today: Let's Watch a Girl Get Beaten to Death.

I really don't know where to start on this issue. There is a strong and currently ongoing movement among the proteso-fascists (which is how I will refer to them thank you Mr.Faust), specifically people like Beverly Lahaye, wife of Left Behind Author and spiritual advisor to President Bush (he's the man Bush spent an hour on the phone with before deciding to invade Iraq) heads a group devoted to repealing women's suffrage. Then there are the marked similarities between religious extremists from 2 very different cultures whose attitudes towards women are separated only by a matter of degrees on a spectrum of misogynistic behavior. This really seems beyond misogyny, if only because that word doesn't sound strong enough to use in this context. Jesus, I think we've failed you.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next