• commentary
  • SUNDAY MAY 20 2007 5:00 PM

The Bible as Porn? Maybe in Hong Kong



Hearing the word "bible" typically does not conjure images in one's mind of scantily clad individuals romping around or engaging in exciting Jerry Bruckheimer-worthy acts of violence. In fact, for many people the bible tends to evoke images of old men in cheap suits rambling about moral decay, thoughts of shame and guilt, ponderous lists of names and notions of the meek somehow inheriting the earth. However, a group in Hong Kong seems to be in the former camp, and is fighting to get the bible labeled as indecent and obscene. If they are successful no one under the age of 18 will be allowed to purchase a bible, and it will have to be individually wrapped to ensure that it is not accidentally opened.

More than 800 Hong Kong residents have called on authorities to reclassify the Bible as "indecent" due to its sexual and violent content, following an uproar over a sex column in a university student journal.

A spokesperson for Hong Kong's Television and Entertainment Licensing authority (TELA) said it had received 838 complaints about the Bible by noon Wednesday.

The complaints follow the launch of an anonymous Web site -- www.truthbible.net -- which said the holy book "made one tremble" given its sexual and violent content, including rape and incest.

The Web site said the Bible's sexual content "far exceeds" that of a recent sex column published in the Chinese University's "Student Press" magazine, which had asked readers whether they'd ever fantasized about incest or bestiality.


But surely this is all the work of godless atheists seeking to subvert the word of God, right? Well, let's have a look and see just what it is that's got them so upset.

Book of Genesis, chapter 19:

he two angels reached Sodom in the evening, as Lot was sitting at the gate of Sodom. When Lot saw them, he got up to greet them; and bowing down with his face to the ground, he said, "Please, gentlemen, come aside into your servant's house for the night, and bathe your feet; you can get up early to continue your journey." But they replied, "No, we shall pass the night in the town square." He urged them so strongly, however, that they turned aside to his place and entered his house. He prepared a meal for them, baking cakes without leaven, and they dined. Before they went to bed, all the townsmen of Sodom, both young and old--all the people to the last man--closed in on the house. They called to Lot and said to him, "Where are the men who came to your house tonight? Bring them out to us that we may have intimacies with them." Lot went out to meet them at the entrance. When he had shut the door behind him, he said, "I beg you, my brothers, not to do this wicked thing. I have two daughters who have never had intercourse with men. Let me bring them out to you, and you may do to them as you please. But don't do anything to these men, for you know they have come under the shelter of my roof."

Pretty hot and heavy stuff. I think I remember the same premise from a softcore porn movie on Cinemax.

Book of Deuteronomy, Chapter 22:

If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found;Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.

Sex with virgins, rape, forced marriage. Scandalous!

Book of Samuel II, Chapter 16:

Ahithophel said to Absalom, “Go in to your father’s concubines, that he has left to keep the house. Then all Israel will hear that you are abhorred by your father. Then the hands of all who are with you will be strong.” So they spread Absalom a tent on the top of the house; and Absalom went in to his father’s concubines in the sight of all Israel.

Cavorting with his father's concubines in plain sight of everyone else? Who wouldn't be turned on?

Book of Isaiah, Chapter 36:

But Rabshakeh said, Hath my master sent me to thy master and to thee to speak these words? hath he not sent me to the men that sit upon the wall, that they may eat their own dung, and drink their own piss with you?

Eating shit and drinking piss, well that's got to turn on someone... probably.

OK, but that's all old testament stuff, fire and brimstone. Not like the New testament, which is all happiness and pleasantries, right? See for yourself.

Gospel according to Luke, chapter 12:

Do you think that I have come to give peace on earth? No, I tell you, but rather division. For from now on in one house there will be five divided, three against two and two against three. They will be divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against her daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law.

Doesn't exactly sound... peaceful, does it?

Gospel according to Luke, chapter 19:

But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.


That's not very friendly either.

Gospel according to Matthew, chapter 10:

Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.


Sounds rather violent to me.

The truth is that censorship of any reading material is abhorrent and not justifiable. But should religious books receive a pass just because they're religious? In an update from the Hong Kong media regulator, the answer is a resounding "Yes."

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

Comments
Synthiviper

Synthiviper

Chicago, IL
June 2004

MAY 20, 2007 05:06 PM


But should religious books receive a pass just because they're religious?



No.

Bastardo

Bastardo

Boston, MA
January 2005

MAY 20, 2007 05:16 PM

Synthiviper said:


But should religious books receive a pass just because they're religious?



No.



Just to be a dick, no as well.

baby_squid

baby_squid

Hillsboro, OH
February 2007

MAY 20, 2007 05:31 PM

^^^ ditto

doolittle

doolittle

Mesa, AZ
December 2004

MAY 20, 2007 06:16 PM

I'm kind of surprised this is happening in Hong Kong of all places. When I was there it seemed like a fairly culturally open minded place, particularly for being so closely attached to China. Just seems weird to me is all.

I agree with the above sentiments that religious books and literature don't necessarily get a "free pass", but it makes me bummed to think they would go out of their way to censor such an influential (whether you believe in what it says or not it IS influential) book as the bible surreal

Jimbo_Radio

Jimbo_Radio

Santa Cruz, CA
October 2005

MAY 20, 2007 06:19 PM

some people (important, decision-making type people, apparently) think that religious books SHOULD receive a free pass...


Hong Kong's media regulator has rejected calls to reclassify the Bible as an indecent publication following more than 2,000 complaints about its sexual and violent content, including rape and incest.

"The Bible is a religious text which is part of civilization. It has been passed from generation to generation," Hong Kong's Television and Licensing Authority (TELA) said in a statement issued late Thursday.

It said it would not submit the Bible to the Obscene Articles Tribunal for classification.

...

TELA said in its statement the Bible "had not violated standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable members of the community."



PFFT. figures. whatever

mQx

mqx

Seattle, WA
January 2003

MAY 20, 2007 06:31 PM

The religious pass thing was certainly applied to Passion of the Christ which G*d fearing, responsible parents thought was okay to drag their kids to in droves.

At the same time, you're not going to hear about Noah's wang flopping around in the Sunday School ark stories. Much less Ruth exposing her master's "feet" or Lot's hot daughter three way.

China is just doing in whole what our clergy already does in chapter and verse.

roguemind

roguemind

Groton, CT
October 2006

MAY 20, 2007 06:32 PM

The world is rampant with religious immunity. It is an untouchable holy land because we may offend the those who are not so sure about there religion. its my view, that if you truly believe in something that important some athiest trying to bring reason into your world should have no place in your mind. He or she would just be passed of as another heathen going to hell.

PS: I love you.

legionnaire

legionnaire

Belgium
November 2003

MAY 20, 2007 07:22 PM

Jimbo_Radio said:
some people (important, decision-making type people, apparently) think that religious books SHOULD receive a free pass...


Hong Kong's media regulator has rejected calls to reclassify the Bible as an indecent publication following more than 2,000 complaints about its sexual and violent content, including rape and incest.

"The Bible is a religious text which is part of civilization. It has been passed from generation to generation," Hong Kong's Television and Licensing Authority (TELA) said in a statement issued late Thursday.

It said it would not submit the Bible to the Obscene Articles Tribunal for classification.

...

TELA said in its statement the Bible "had not violated standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable members of the community."



PFFT. figures. whatever



Thanks for the tip, I'll update the story now.

Spaceboy

Spaceboy

Dallas, TX
October 2004

MAY 20, 2007 07:23 PM


Hong Kong's media regulator has rejected calls to reclassify the Bible as an indecent publication following more than 2,000 complaints about its sexual and violent content, including rape and incest.



Anybody else realize that 2000 people in Hong Kong is only about .03 percent of the population that are upset?

WhiteOut

WhiteOut

I'm lost
November 2003

MAY 20, 2007 07:31 PM

Bilharzia

Bilharzia

I'm lost
April 2004

MAY 20, 2007 07:35 PM



The truth is that censorship of any reading material is abhorrent and not justifiable.



Debatable.

Rainking13

Rainking13

Saint Peters, MO
December 2006

MAY 20, 2007 07:43 PM

OK ill be the asshold but why is it on the site that its ok to be anti government which I agree on but not ok to read the Bible? I mean I like the rock music and have a moral compass that I got from that "obscene" book. I am not devout in any sense but dont understand I guess. Maybe its couse im a hayseed from the midwest but that is my view.

malkav11

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN
July 2003

MAY 20, 2007 07:44 PM

I don't think limiting sales to those over 18 and putting it in a nondescript wrapper constitutes censorship. And frankly, I'm all for it. Limiting Bible availability to those who are of a maturity to make their own decisions could only improve the world.

Uncle_Screwtape

Uncle_Screwtape

Los Angeles, CA
February 2004

MAY 20, 2007 07:48 PM

Bilharzia said:


The truth is that censorship of any reading material is abhorrent and not justifiable.



Debatable.



Care to debate it then? Or were you just trolling?

Uncle_Screwtape

Uncle_Screwtape

Los Angeles, CA
February 2004

MAY 20, 2007 07:54 PM

Rainking13 said:
OK ill be the asshold but why is it on the site that its ok to be anti government which I agree on but not ok to read the Bible? I mean I like the rock music and have a moral compass that I got from that "obscene" book. I am not devout in any sense but dont understand I guess. Maybe its couse im a hayseed from the midwest but that is my view.



If you got your moral compass from a book - any book - then it's not a very good one. People who don't know right from wrong on their own don't know right from wrong, period.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=8RV46fsmx6E

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next