• news
  • SUNDAY MAY 13 2007 1:00 PM

Teacher Fired For Being Good At His Job



Michael Baker had been teaching at East High School in Lincoln Nebraska since 1981. Last week he was forced to retire. He is one of only 47 teachers in Nebraska to achieve National Board Certification and appears to have been a rare and unique teacher who attempted to teach his students to think. Unfortunately we don’t teach “thinking” at our public high schools, we teach conformity.

Last year he found himself in trouble with district officials for teaching history backwards. If you think about that approach, it is sort of brilliant. It would clearly encourage more thought, as you would discuss, “how did we get here?” And teaching students to think was all that Baker wanted to do.


“I really enjoyed engaging high school students in critical dialogue,” he says. “I found that very satisfying. A lot of kids are in classrooms where they are lectured to. I’d much rather engage in critical thought and problem-solving, and I’ve always had classrooms where we show respect for each other.”


What a dick. You live in America, sir. We don't care for that kind of shit.

The school district forced him to stop teaching history backwards but Baker was still fighting to continue with his method. Unfortunately, it would have been difficult for him because the district had “prohibited him from teaching US history.” The district had a great reason.


The school’s consultant said it was “not logical, does not contribute to effective teaching or monitoring of progress, and puts students at a disadvantage” with newly instituted statewide tests.


The school district was obviously looking for an excuse to get rid of Baker and on April 18th they got it. Baker showed a geography class “Baghdad ER,” a documentary about life in the emergency room of a combat support hospital in Baghdad. I’ve seen it and it was pretty great. Maybe great is not the right word. It was awesome in its sadness.

The day after Baker played the DVD in front of the class he was gone. Last week came the news that he had “retired.” Under agreement with the district, he may not speak of his “retirement.” He also can't talk about Fight Club.

Students held a “sit-in” in an attempt to force the administration to tell them why Baker “retired.” The administrators came but were evasive. Students have created a page called “Bring Michael Baker Back” on Facebook. Past and present students praised the teacher.


“My concern is that they took our teacher out of the classroom and he’s the most unique teacher ever. I really liked Mr. Baker as a teacher. He brings more to the table than other teachers do. He makes you think. That’s what he wants you to do. . . he allows you to voice your opinion in class, you learn lots of different viewpoints.”



“This is truly a tragedy,” wrote Kendra Kazebeer. “I am a Lincoln East graduate from the year 2003. . . . Mr. Baker was one of my favorite teachers. . . . I was introduced to a whole new way of thinking about the world and myself, and for once in school I wasn’t pushed to conform. I was valued because of my unique opinions…I would not be the person I am today had it not been for your influence and the motivation you gave me to never give up. Because of you, I make a difference.”



“I am a former student of Mr. Baker,” Jared D wrote. “We hardly ever agreed on political issues, but I have to tell you, being in his class benefited me in ways that I never thought were possible. He does not deserve to be treated like this!!! He is a very kind man who wants nothing but the best for his students.”


Of course, there is always this guy:


“Baker is an anti-American socialist who has been using his classes to attack capitalism and democracy,” Craig wrote. “There are many students who were unhappy with him. . . . This is a teacher who should have been fired a long time ago. This is a good day for Lincoln.”


Well said, Craig. Sorry he tried to make you think.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 7

Next

Comments
eyerush

eyerush

Hayward, CA
October 2005

MAY 13, 2007 01:12 PM

I can't understand why forward thinking (ironic choice of words, I know) is not encouraged in teaching. Man, if I had that guy. I was stuck with the footbball coach for my history classes. puke

Architectonic

Architectonic

United Kingdom
August 2006

MAY 13, 2007 01:23 PM

Teaching history like that seems like such a good idea! Would have made far more sense to me that way. And showing a video about Baghdad? If that was the issue, then.. I despair. I haven't seen it though - is it any worse than what you'd see on the news?

Baci

Baci

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

MAY 13, 2007 01:29 PM

Well, we all know what happened to Waldorf when he tried change conventional teaching methods!

...Wait, you mean he got a chain of schools and this guy got fired?
Sucks to be Mr. Baker. frown

Priest_

Priest_

USA
January 2007

MAY 13, 2007 01:29 PM

Don't knee jerk. He showed Baghdad ER in a GEOGRAPHY class. Now yes, Geography should include more than just where rivers and mountains are but Baghdad ER could very easily be construed as politically biased. I know people will say, "it's just the truth, it's not biased" but any video that shows the horrors of the war without also showing the triumphs (what few there are) is at least a little biased.

As a teacher, I don't think you should try to persuade your students one way or the other as far as politics go. Educating them about only one side of a major event going on is biased.

So while he might be a great teacher, it's also possible that he was biased in his views and how he taught the students. To me, that would be reason for reprimand at the least. Making students think is good. Trying to get them to think the way you want them to isn't.

yellowdays

yellowdays

Wetaskiwin, AB
January 2005

MAY 13, 2007 01:29 PM

there are so few teachers who can touch a students mind in a way that invites them to think differently then had previously. then again most people out of school have been thinking the same way for so long they dont like the idea of looking at things from a different perspective. when i took international politics in high school my teacher said something that stuck with me; 'in any situation there are at the very lest 3 sides. yours, the other persons and then any non biast bystandar.' he was talking about 911. there is the terrorists view point, the american gov't and the rest of the world watching from the side lines. i have noticed since that there are very few people who can even admit they might be wrong let alone acctually see and desifer anyone elses side of things. the world of education lost when a man who taught open mindedness in thinking was forced to stop. but it doesnt surprise me in the least.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

MAY 13, 2007 01:38 PM

Sphinxter said:
Don't knee jerk. He showed Baghdad ER in a GEOGRAPHY class. Now yes, Geography should include more than just where rivers and mountains are but Baghdad ER could very easily be construed as politically biased. I know people will say, "it's just the truth, it's not biased" but any video that shows the horrors of the war without also showing the triumphs (what few there are) is at least a little biased.



Right. I have a degree in Geography and a flim like that would fit in with the study of geography. It's an incredibly broad field.

yellowdays

yellowdays

Wetaskiwin, AB
January 2005

MAY 13, 2007 01:39 PM

war attributes greatly to the locations terrain afterwards. london looked quite different after the wars in went through.there in geography

Greybeard

Greybeard

Los Angeles, CA
December 2006

MAY 13, 2007 01:42 PM

Sphinxter said:
Don't knee jerk. He showed Baghdad ER in a GEOGRAPHY class. Now yes, Geography should include more than just where rivers and mountains are but Baghdad ER could very easily be construed as politically biased. I know people will say, "it's just the truth, it's not biased" but any video that shows the horrors of the war without also showing the triumphs (what few there are) is at least a little biased.

As a teacher, I don't think you should try to persuade your students one way or the other as far as politics go. Educating them about only one side of a major event going on is biased.

So while he might be a great teacher, it's also possible that he was biased in his views and how he taught the students. To me, that would be reason for reprimand at the least. Making students think is good. Trying to get them to think the way you want them to isn't.



There is already plenty enough Pro-Status-Quo bias in the Straight News media and in Government propaganda. The students can get their fill of it anytime, anywhere. If the teacher presents material that oppositely biased, the result is Balance.

Mandanda

Mandanda

Kenosha, WI
May 2007

MAY 13, 2007 01:43 PM

Due to the huge importance placed upon state and national standardized testing, more and more districts, administrators, and teachers tend to restrict the content of their classrooms and cover specifically what is bound to be on these tests. In other words, they "teach to the test."

In my studies as a future teacher, this topic has come up frequently, and we are frequently told to try to avoid "teaching to the test" and to focus on following the curriculum using methods that challenge students and engage them in critical thinking and problem solving activities.

After seeing what happened to Michael Baker, it's a wonder that MY professors haven't been fired for encouraging us to foster healthy learning environments that do not center on the content of national tests.

This makes me very sad, indeed.

Formus

Formus

Milwaukee, WI
May 2007

MAY 13, 2007 01:53 PM

FearTheReaper said:

Sphinxter said:
Don't knee jerk. He showed Baghdad ER in a GEOGRAPHY class. Now yes, Geography should include more than just where rivers and mountains are but Baghdad ER could very easily be construed as politically biased. I know people will say, "it's just the truth, it's not biased" but any video that shows the horrors of the war without also showing the triumphs (what few there are) is at least a little biased.



Right. I have a degree in Geography and a flim like that would fit in with the study of geography. It's an incredibly broad field.



Not in high school. Not to say that I agree with his firing, but you're picking and choosing here. I doubt that any student watching the video will get one thing out of it that has anything to do with geography. The last thing one thinks of when one sees a bloody, severed limb is mountains or rivers.

If he wanted to show the video, which he has a right to, he could have chosen another class subject to show it in that would make it a bit more inconspicuous. He was inviting trouble. The school district was biting at the bit here, and he just let them out of the gates.

freshprncebelair

freshprncebelair

Ellicott City, MD
June 2004

MAY 13, 2007 01:55 PM

eyerush said:
I can't understand why forward thinking (ironic choice of words, I know) is not encouraged in teaching.



Because almost every aspect of teaching is lorded over by huge slowly moving beauracracies, from the federal government to teacher's unions.

At my high school, one of the best math teachers in the state just ended up taking retirement because new rules (essentially, you have to have majored in the subject you are teaching) prevented him from being qualified to teach math. The retarded thing is that he had the most students in the county take the Calc AP exams, and the highest percentage of 5's (and 4's) among his students.

Xadrick

Xadrick

Clayton, NC
April 2007

MAY 13, 2007 01:56 PM

They forgot to mention his illegal smuggling of Canadian maple syrup across the border. That's the REAL meat of the story here...

Roethke

Roethke

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

MAY 13, 2007 01:58 PM

Formus said:

FearTheReaper said:

Sphinxter said:
Don't knee jerk. He showed Baghdad ER in a GEOGRAPHY class. Now yes, Geography should include more than just where rivers and mountains are but Baghdad ER could very easily be construed as politically biased. I know people will say, "it's just the truth, it's not biased" but any video that shows the horrors of the war without also showing the triumphs (what few there are) is at least a little biased.



Right. I have a degree in Geography and a flim like that would fit in with the study of geography. It's an incredibly broad field.



Not in high school. Not to say that I agree with his firing, but you're picking and choosing here. I doubt that any student watching the video will get one thing out of it that has anything to do with geography. The last thing one thinks of when one sees a bloody, severed limb is mountains or rivers.

If he wanted to show the video, which he has a right to, he could have chosen another class subject to show it in that would make it a bit more inconspicuous. He was inviting trouble. The school district was biting at the bit here, and he just let them out of the gates.


You have no idea in what contest and what accompanying lecture the film was paired with. Maybe he talked about the vagaries of border and how countries are made and destroyed. Maybe he was talking about how pretty recently the borders were drawn for many of the Middle Eastern countries, and how random those borders were, how they split up ethnic groups and placed traditional enemies together in the same country.

Seems like a great way to teach geography to me. That is, by making it interested and pertinent.

skeptik

skeptik

New Orleans, LA
February 2004

MAY 13, 2007 02:04 PM

Sphinxter said:
...but Baghdad ER could very easily be construed as politically biased.


How so? And by whom?

I know people will say, "it's just the truth, it's not biased" but any video that shows the horrors of the war without also showing the triumphs (what few there are) is at least a little biased.



Since when is "the horrors of war" a political position? Requiring every documentary about the realities of war to make some point about its positives is not "balance." It's propaganda.

phirephli

phirephli

Chandler, AZ
May 2005

MAY 13, 2007 02:06 PM

Formus said:

FearTheReaper said:

Sphinxter said:
Don't knee jerk. He showed Baghdad ER in a GEOGRAPHY class. Now yes, Geography should include more than just where rivers and mountains are but Baghdad ER could very easily be construed as politically biased. I know people will say, "it's just the truth, it's not biased" but any video that shows the horrors of the war without also showing the triumphs (what few there are) is at least a little biased.



Right. I have a degree in Geography and a flim like that would fit in with the study of geography. It's an incredibly broad field.



Not in high school. Not to say that I agree with his firing, but you're picking and choosing here. I doubt that any student watching the video will get one thing out of it that has anything to do with geography. The last thing one thinks of when one sees a bloody, severed limb is mountains or rivers.

If he wanted to show the video, which he has a right to, he could have chosen another class subject to show it in that would make it a bit more inconspicuous. He was inviting trouble. The school district was biting at the bit here, and he just let them out of the gates.


and i got a shit ton of information from the 5 million times i was made to watch 'stand and deliver' in EVERY math class since the beginning of time... teachers make kids watch movies all the time in school (at least when i was there) and most of them didnt directly inform us on anything.. at least this one is non fiction.. maybe someone could grab SOMETHING from it..

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 7

Next