• commentary
  • TUESDAY APRIL 24 2007 8:00 AM

Fuckface Asshole Roundup



A crazy college kid goes on a shooting spree that ends in the largest gun massacre in US history. It is shocking and horrifying. The country has to analyze what happened and figure out how to prevent it in the future. The Virginia Tech community will be grieving for years to come. It is a time for quite, respectful observance. But not if you’re a fuckface asshole! Come on down, Fuckface Limbaugh!

The shootings took place on Monday and by Wednesday Rush already had Cho pegged as a…guess…guess…liberal! It's so obvious. What else could he be?


"If this Virginia Tech shooter had an ideology, what do you think it was? " Limbaugh asked. "This guy had to be a liberal. You start railing against the rich and all this other -- this guy's a liberal. He was turned into a liberal somewhere along the line. So it's a liberal that committed this act.”


See how easy that was? First you wonder what Cho’s ideology was, then in a split second you come up with it. Then you support it with an absurd, borderline retarded fact. And bam! You state it as a concrete fact. Now what? Well, since you made a crazy statement that can in no way be backed up as fact, you take an immediate defensive position.


“Now, the drive-bys will read on a website that I'm attacking liberalism by comparing this guy to them. That's exactly what they do every day, ladies and gentlemen. I'm just pointing out a fact. I am making no extrapolation; I'm just pointing it out."


Lie equals fact, fact equals truth teller, truth teller equals victim. Nicely done, you fat, four times divorced, millionaire, drug abuser…I mean, speaker for the common man.

Who’s up next? How about Fuckface Gingrich? The Newt was on ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos on Sunday when he decided to let that horrid anus under his nose cough out some vile words.

After the Columbine shootings, Newt blamed “liberalism.” Stephanopoulos asked Newt is he still believed that to be true.


GINGRICH: Yes, I think the fact is, if you look at the amount of violence we have in games that young people play at 7, 8, 10, 12, 15 years of age, if you look at the dehumanization, if you look at the fact that we refuse to say that we are, in fact, endowed by our creator, that our rights come from God, that if you kill somebody, you’re committing an act of evil.

STEPHANOPOULOS: But what does that have to do with liberalism?

GINGRICH: Well, who has created a situation ethics, essentially, zone of not being willing to talk about any of these things. Let me carry another example. I strongly supported Imus being dismissed, but I also think the very thing he was dismissed for, which is the use of language which is stunningly degrading of women — the fact, for example, that one of the Halloween costumes this last year was being able to be either a prostitute or a pimp at 10, 11, 12 years of age, buying a costume, and we don’t have any discussion about what’s happened to our culture because while we’re restricting political free speech under McCain-Feingold, we say it’s impossible to restrict vulgar and vicious and anti-human speech. And I would argue that that’s a major component of what’s happened to our culture in the last 40 years.”


So, there you go. No holes in that argument. Thirty three people died at Virginia Tech because of video games and the effect they are having on…wait, I mean, Imus got fired and language is bad…I mean, kids dress up like fucking whores on Halloween…and uh, Cho killed students because of that fucking McCain-Feingold bill…so we don’t talk about stuff and then an Asian dude shoot people. Fucking Liberalism.

What a couple of man-cunts, or munts, if you will.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next

Comments
FellOnEarth

FellOnEarth

Temecula, CA
April 2006

APR 28, 2007 01:51 AM

I say let the colossal douche that is Rush dig his hole deeper, if he continues to rant about Liberals being anti rich, he may alienate a large segment of his audience. As long as he maintains that all Republicans are rich (or that all the rich are Republicans), they'll soon figure it out: the classism to which Rush is referring is exclusive. Of course, I'm being naive here, anyone who listens to Rush and actually believes him isn't going to question their god of filth, they'll simply become more entrenched within their comfortable little bubble of ignorance.

Ok, I'm a flip-flopper, Rush is actually a colossal colostomy bag full of leaks... It's annoying that he's still around but now I think he really needs to go. He recently upped the ante by having a modern day "black face" performance on his radio show. The racist diatribe included a white man impersonating Rev. Al Sharpton's voice complaining about Barak Obama in a little piece entitled "Barak The Magic Negro" (note to Firefox users, the video won't load unless you open it in I.E., my browser kept crashing every time until I did this). Limbaugh thinks that by claiming it is a comedy sketch gives him carte blanch to include any offensive and racist material he deems fit. I think that he's exhibited enough unethical behavior already to warrant him being branded as a racist, but to get a way with it on the air!?! Unfortunately, he probably won't be out of a job until more people boycott any businesses that choose to advertise during his program. I for one would like to know if such a list exists, I'd share it with every one I know and ask them to do the same. I've seen a few lists, but none of them are recent (it looks like this movement has been going on for some time now).

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

APR 28, 2007 12:42 PM

Femke said:
politics are silly

Yep, that's the obvious conclusion to draw. whatever

malkav11

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN
July 2003

APR 28, 2007 04:15 PM

fuckfuck said:
if you call for more gun control people who are against it are going to voice their opinions no matter what the title of the thread is, just because we disagree on the solution to these problems doesn't mean we have to be enemies we both want these things to stop



The first person to mention the gun debate in this thread was JosephD. The thread is about Limbaugh and Gingrich ascribing everything bad in the world to liberals. Also known as being gigantic gaping assholes. Obviously when gun control is actually being debated there is room for arguments from both sides. But it wasn't, so your argument is equally misplaced.

Ff

Ff

I'm lost
August 2006

MAY 09, 2007 12:36 PM

malkav11 said:

fuckfuck said:
if you call for more gun control people who are against it are going to voice their opinions no matter what the title of the thread is, just because we disagree on the solution to these problems doesn't mean we have to be enemies we both want these things to stop



The first person to mention the gun debate in this thread was JosephD. The thread is about Limbaugh and Gingrich ascribing everything bad in the world to liberals. Also known as being gigantic gaping assholes. Obviously when gun control is actually being debated there is room for arguments from both sides. But it wasn't, so your argument is equally misplaced.



read page 2 again, then rethink this comment

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next