• commentary
  • SATURDAY APRIL 21 2007 4:00 PM

Why Republicans Are Such Fucking Babies



Now, that headline may seem like a biased generalization about Republicans, but it is a scientific fact according to Psychology Today. Suddenly everything makes sense and I can actually feel a bit of empathy for these obtuse, sad creatures.

"Personality differences between liberals and conservatives are evident in early childhood. In 1969, Berkeley professors Jack and Jeanne Block embarked on a study of childhood personality, asking nursery school teachers to rate children's temperaments. They weren't even thinking about political orientation.

Twenty years later, they decided to compare the subjects' childhood personalities with their political preferences as adults. They found arresting patterns. As kids, liberals had developed close relationships with peers and were rated by their teachers as self-reliant, energetic, impulsive, and resilient. People who were conservative at age 23 had been described by their teachers as easily victimized, easily offended, indecisive, fearful, rigid, inhibited, and vulnerable at age 3. The reason for the difference, the Blocks hypothesized, was that insecure kids most needed the reassurance of tradition and authority, and they found it in conservative politics.”


Wow. Conservatives started being annoying at age 3. They were the ones doing all the crying and whining and making life tough the well-adjusted liberals. Excuse me, I meant self-reliant, energetic liberals. So, what kind of horrible, fearful life have conservatives lived since then? We can look to a 2003 study involving 22,000 participants.

Researchers found that conservatives have a greater desire to reach a decision quickly and stick to it, and are higher on conscientiousness, which includes neatness, orderliness, duty, and rule-following. The study's authors also concluded that conservatives have less tolerance for ambiguity, a trait they say is exemplified when George Bush says things like, "Look, my job isn't to try to nuance. My job is to tell people what I think," and "I'm the decider." Those who think the world is highly dangerous and those with the greatest fear of death are the most likely to be conservative.


So, there you go, scientific proof that conservatives are awful, scared people. Until now I hadn’t realized that people actually responded positively to Bush saying, “I’m the decider.” Fascinating. It’s like a look inside a badger den – even more horrible than I could have imagined. It’s all shit, claws and hair.

What about liberals? How about everything that is good in the world?

Liberals are higher on openness, which includes intellectual curiosity, excitement-seeking, novelty, creativity for its own sake, and a craving for stimulation like travel, color, art, music, and literature.


Thank you liberals, for art and happiness. Too bad conservatives are also scared of art.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 7

Next

Comments
ElizaTheTroll

ElizaTheTroll

Australia
January 2006

APR 21, 2007 08:10 PM

^^^ Oh god, I love that. I want that as a bumper sticker.

Edit: I mean that thing above humorless guy.

d20

d20

San Francisco, CA
September 2003

APR 21, 2007 08:27 PM

this thread delivers in many, many ways.

mishkastudio

mishkastudio

USA
January 2007

APR 21, 2007 08:35 PM

Just remember that social scientists themselves are generally liberals, and so their studies will reflect that. The same article which the original poster quoted also admits:
"...Even with impeccable methodology, bias may creep into the choice of which phenomena to study. "There is a bias among social scientists," admits Glaser. "They look for the variables that are unflattering"..."

And no I'm not a conservative...I'm neither entirely liberal OR conservative (and if you're a free-thinker, you shouldn't sign up to any group ideology lock, stock, and barrel)...I'm just pointing out what the original articles says. And I wouldn't say that either, or ANY, group has a grip on "everything that is good in the world"!! Don't be a follower!!
-Mishka smile

Quirky

Quirky

Birmingham, AL
October 2005

APR 21, 2007 09:22 PM

d20 said:
this thread delivers in many, many ways.



HAY GUYS so i herd yu leik mudkips.

herbancowboy

herbancowboy

Houston, TX
June 2004

APR 21, 2007 09:31 PM

mishkastudio said:
(and if you're a free-thinker, you shouldn't sign up to any group ideology lock, stock, and barrel)


It's true. I just debated the topic with myself. Guess who won.

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

(Hint: The hyphenated part of me.)



jjscholar

jjscholar

Cocoa, FL
August 2005

APR 21, 2007 09:49 PM

While it appears on the surface that the research findings are compelling, it is very possible that this line of research which concludes that liberals are more cognitively flexible and more emotionally stable than conservatives could be a result of chance and nothing more. Everyone needs to remember that any sort of research in Psychology is very inexact to say the very least. That is if you can consider any sort of research in Psychology to be truly scientific at all. The greatest problem I find in the so called study of human behavior is simply that no two human beings are a like. Therefore, it is logical to conclude that perhaps it is impossible to truly use the scientific method to study human behavior at all.

herbancowboy

herbancowboy

Houston, TX
June 2004

APR 21, 2007 09:57 PM

jjscholar said:
it is impossible to truly use the scientific method to study human behavior at all.


That's why I never leave home without my Ouija board.

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

APR 21, 2007 10:01 PM

Well, in all seriousness, according to that study, what with my pessimism, social maladjustment, and constant morbid brooding, I should be a devout, warmongering fascist instead of a bleeding-heart, godless democratic socialist. So for my own part, I suspect the whole thing is bullshit.

jjscholar

jjscholar

Cocoa, FL
August 2005

APR 21, 2007 10:18 PM

That is why I left my eariler comment. Zarth, you are right. That whole line of research is a bunch of BS.

halfjack

halfjack

Allston, MA
June 2005

APR 21, 2007 10:41 PM

no science is exact. but trends can be detected. so in short, waaaaaaah.

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

APR 21, 2007 10:45 PM

Zarth said:
Well, in all seriousness, according to that study, what with my pessimism, social maladjustment, and constant morbid brooding, I should be a devout, warmongering fascist instead of a bleeding-heart, godless democratic socialist. So for my own part, I suspect the whole thing is bullshit.



that, or you've been living a lie. a horrid, humorless lie!

veggrrrl22

veggrrrl22

Bristol, CT
January 2006

APR 21, 2007 11:17 PM

okee... the guy the left the first comment... why is he on this site?

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

APR 21, 2007 11:20 PM

MrCrisp said:
that, or you've been living a lie. a horrid, humorless lie!


OH, NOOOO!!!!!!!!

Priest_

Priest_

USA
January 2007

APR 21, 2007 11:20 PM

Priest_

Priest_

USA
January 2007

APR 21, 2007 11:27 PM

Magpie said:
someone should do a cultural study as to why people in the SG boards are such fucking babies.



I'm rubber, you're glue, bounces off me and sticks to you!

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 7

Next