• commentary
  • SATURDAY APRIL 21 2007 4:00 PM

Why Republicans Are Such Fucking Babies



Now, that headline may seem like a biased generalization about Republicans, but it is a scientific fact according to Psychology Today. Suddenly everything makes sense and I can actually feel a bit of empathy for these obtuse, sad creatures.

"Personality differences between liberals and conservatives are evident in early childhood. In 1969, Berkeley professors Jack and Jeanne Block embarked on a study of childhood personality, asking nursery school teachers to rate children's temperaments. They weren't even thinking about political orientation.

Twenty years later, they decided to compare the subjects' childhood personalities with their political preferences as adults. They found arresting patterns. As kids, liberals had developed close relationships with peers and were rated by their teachers as self-reliant, energetic, impulsive, and resilient. People who were conservative at age 23 had been described by their teachers as easily victimized, easily offended, indecisive, fearful, rigid, inhibited, and vulnerable at age 3. The reason for the difference, the Blocks hypothesized, was that insecure kids most needed the reassurance of tradition and authority, and they found it in conservative politics.”


Wow. Conservatives started being annoying at age 3. They were the ones doing all the crying and whining and making life tough the well-adjusted liberals. Excuse me, I meant self-reliant, energetic liberals. So, what kind of horrible, fearful life have conservatives lived since then? We can look to a 2003 study involving 22,000 participants.

Researchers found that conservatives have a greater desire to reach a decision quickly and stick to it, and are higher on conscientiousness, which includes neatness, orderliness, duty, and rule-following. The study's authors also concluded that conservatives have less tolerance for ambiguity, a trait they say is exemplified when George Bush says things like, "Look, my job isn't to try to nuance. My job is to tell people what I think," and "I'm the decider." Those who think the world is highly dangerous and those with the greatest fear of death are the most likely to be conservative.


So, there you go, scientific proof that conservatives are awful, scared people. Until now I hadn’t realized that people actually responded positively to Bush saying, “I’m the decider.” Fascinating. It’s like a look inside a badger den – even more horrible than I could have imagined. It’s all shit, claws and hair.

What about liberals? How about everything that is good in the world?

Liberals are higher on openness, which includes intellectual curiosity, excitement-seeking, novelty, creativity for its own sake, and a craving for stimulation like travel, color, art, music, and literature.


Thank you liberals, for art and happiness. Too bad conservatives are also scared of art.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 7

Next

Comments
Untimely

Untimely

Chicago, IL
January 2007

APR 21, 2007 05:00 PM

razumikhin said:
no, the ones putting paste in each other's hair were the whigs.



Wow. Very nice.

skeptik

skeptik

New Orleans, LA
February 2004

APR 21, 2007 05:08 PM

st_even said:



I thought FearTheReaper did a good job...but once again was PROVEN WRONG.



Well, not necessarily.
It's the same study, but the last story was only published in the Toronto Star. Getting published in Psychology Today means they passed peer review. In that respect, the story is news.

Also, FTR wasn't on the site yet when Dead_Ringer wrote that other article.

dufsmashXIII

dufsmashXIII

Eureka, IL
December 2005

APR 21, 2007 05:35 PM

george b is a doodie head

mydcmbr81

mydcmbr81

Wesley Chapel, FL
October 2003

APR 21, 2007 05:39 PM

I ate everything else as a kid but not paste or crayons. Lint off the couch, pieces of vinyl off the car's dashboard, paper.

But paste? Dude that's just sick. puke puke

OctEgon

OctEgon

Tustin, CA
July 2005

APR 21, 2007 05:49 PM

Any information on those that went on to join the Whig Party?

attn_ho

attn_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

APR 21, 2007 05:51 PM

skeptik said:

st_even said:



I thought FearTheReaper did a good job...but once again was PROVEN WRONG.



Well, not necessarily.
It's the same study, but the last story was only published in the Toronto Star. Getting published in Psychology Today means they passed peer review. In that respect, the story is news.

Also, FTR wasn't on the site yet when Dead_Ringer wrote that other article.


this is an excellent point. good catch.

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

APR 21, 2007 05:56 PM

Vestril said:

Zarth said:

Volkov said:

Vestril said:

Johnny_Flapjacks said:
so wait.... which ones were eating paste?


Libertarians?


socialists?


I'm guessing from this exchange that they were both too occupied putting paste in each other's hair to eat much of it.


Why are you so completely humorless, Zarth?


It was a childhood accident - the same incident that made my face stick like this.

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

APR 21, 2007 05:57 PM

herbancowboy said:

Johnny_Flapjacks said:
so wait.... which ones were eating paste?


Clearly not the vegan anarchists.


Yeah, they went straight to snorting glue.

geo35

geo35

Minneapolis, MN
January 2003

APR 21, 2007 06:33 PM

"Those who think the world is highly dangerous and those with the greatest fear of death are the most likely to be conservative."

I wish I could remember who said, "Parents who aren't afraid of death will be able to raise children who aren't afraid of life."

But, whatever...

None of this surprises me. I figured out years ago, by watching my religious nut-job acquaintances, that they NEEDED that shit. It's not that the universe is actually organized around a Holy Trinity or gods & devils, angels & jeebus. It's that THEIR universe MUST be organized that way, or they blow a fuse and can't function. That's why they will spend all their energies proselytizing and lobbying lawmakers to reinforce THEIR theology. They're just wired that way and can't help themselves.

Unfortunately, there just isn't enough Kool-Aid to go around.

meatpieboy

meatpieboy

Korea, D.P.R.
June 2004

APR 21, 2007 07:02 PM

skeptik said: Getting published in Psychology Today means they passed peer review. In that respect, the story is news.



um, isn't that just a trade rag?

Zarth said:

herbancowboy said:

Johnny_Flapjacks said:
so wait.... which ones were eating paste?


Clearly not the vegan anarchists.


Yeah, they went straight to snorting glue.



Wait, if the paste was homemade, and just organic flour and spring water, I'm sure the vegans would have been fine with it. As long as they weren't going gluten-free. Fucking gluten.

Magpie

Magpie

SUICIDEGIRL

Oregon, USA

APR 21, 2007 07:08 PM

someone should do a cultural study as to why people in the SG boards are such fucking babies.

skeptik

skeptik

New Orleans, LA
February 2004

APR 21, 2007 07:21 PM

magpieboy said:

skeptik said: Getting published in Psychology Today means they passed peer review. In that respect, the story is news.



um, isn't that just a trade rag?



Yeah, you're right. PT is a themed magazine, not a peer-reviewed journal.

What makes this article different is not the peer review (which was done elsewhere), but that it reports on several studies, not just the Blocks'.

meatpieboy

meatpieboy

Korea, D.P.R.
June 2004

APR 21, 2007 07:25 PM

Magpie said:
someone should do a cultural study as to why people in the SG boards are such fucking babies.


*cries*

IKCSmiley

ikcsmiley

Asheville, NC
July 2003

APR 21, 2007 08:08 PM

oyaji said:
Well, what do you expect from a bunch of Islamocommunistnazifascistliberals from Berkeley? THINK, PEOPLE!



Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

APR 21, 2007 08:10 PM

FLAG

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
I have no sense of humor.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 7

Next