• commentary
  • THURSDAY APRIL 19 2007 2:00 PM

Can You Guess the Most Powerful Person in American Government?

Did you say George Bush? Please. Dick Cheney? Getting warmer, but no. Karl Rove? Joe Lieberman? Nancy Pelosi? Harry Reid? John Roberts?

No, no, no, no and no.

The most powerful person in American government, and possibly the most powerful person in the country, is a former Constitutional Law professor at McGeorge School of Law in Sacramento, California named Anthony McLeod Kennedy.

I know what you’re saying. You’re saying, “But ‘Brosa, he’s just one of nine Justices on the Court! Heck, he’s not even the Chief Justice! What the golly-eff-gee are you going on about?”

All true. Kennedy is just one of nine. He is not the Chief Justice. However, he’s still the most powerful man in government. Why? Because he is now the one and only “swing” voter left on the Court. The other eight justices are predictable. Roberts, Alito, Scalia and Thomas on the “right”, Souter, Breyer, Ginsberg and Stevens on the “left.” They are predictable voting blocks and vote together seemingly all of the time. The wild card left is Justice Kennedy.

Remember that article I wrote about Massachusetts v. EPA? Guess who was the swing vote in that case? Kennedy. Who was the swing vote in the case that ruled it was unconstitutional to execute minors? Kennedy. What about the partial birth abortion case decided yesterday? Wait for it… wait for it…

KENNEDY! Hell, dude even wrote the opinion. All in all, Kennedy has been the pivotal vote in a 5-4 decision in no less than nine times this term. Dude goes both ways more than Anne Heche.

Don’t believe me? I’m not the only one saying it.

"We better get used to it," said Northwestern University law professor Robert Bennett ."Now Kennedy is right smack in the middle. I suspect he loves it."
[…]
"It really is the Kennedy court," Duke University law professor Erwin Chemerinsky said.


(For those of you who don’t know who that last guy quoted is, he’s essentially a Constitutional law demigod. His word is bond, if you will.)

It used to be that Kennedy and Justice Sandra Day O’Connor were the swing voters who could go either way on social issues but would predictably vote with the conservative justices on matters like defining the reach of the commerce clause or which president to install. Those days are gone. I can’t be sure because he’s only been on the Court for a short period of time, but if we ever see Samuel Alito (the Justice who replaced O’Connor for all intents and purposes) vote with the liberal justices on a social issue, I’ll eat my bar card. Point is that on virtually every issue that’s close we will be seeing Kennedy cast the deciding vote for the foreseeable future.

That is what makes Kennedy so powerful. But don’t misunderstand me, my friends. I didn’t like the Gonzales v. Carhart decision yesterday, but there are plenty of conservatives who hate Kennedy wayyyyy more than you or I do.

Conservative leaders meeting in Washington yesterday for a discussion of "Remedies to Judicial Tyranny" decided that Kennedy, a Ronald Reagan appointee, should be impeached, or worse.

Phyllis Schlafly, doyenne of American conservatism, said Kennedy's opinion forbidding capital punishment for juveniles "is a good ground of impeachment." To cheers and applause from those gathered at a downtown Marriott for a conference on "Confronting the Judicial War on Faith," Schlafly said that Kennedy had not met the "good behavior" requirement for office and that "Congress ought to talk about impeachment."

Next, Michael P. Farris, chairman of the Home School Legal Defense Association, said Kennedy "should be the poster boy for impeachment" for citing international norms in his opinions. "If our congressmen and senators do not have the courage to impeach and remove from office Justice Kennedy, they ought to be impeached as well."

Not to be outdone, lawyer-author Edwin Vieira told the gathering that Kennedy should be impeached because his philosophy, evidenced in his opinion striking down an anti-sodomy statute, "upholds Marxist, Leninist, satanic principles drawn from foreign law."

Ominously, Vieira continued by saying his "bottom line" for dealing with the Supreme Court comes from Joseph Stalin. "He had a slogan, and it worked very well for him, whenever he ran into difficulty: 'no man, no problem,' " Vieira said.


Classy! Granted, those quotes came in 2005, so presumably they’ve calmed down since Kennedy just authored the opinion that approved a “partial birth abortion” ban. One would think they may not subtly threaten to kill him after that, but stranger things have happened.

It is odd that this much vitriol is aimed at Kennedy from the right. I mean, sure they consider him a traitor (“He was appointed by Reagan and thinks buttsex is OK?! Stone him!”), but Justices Stevens and Souter were also GOP appointees. I think what scares these people is that Kennedy seems to march to the beat of his own drum and plays the center-line well. Reactionary conservatives are threatened by that sort of uncertainty.

That uncertainty is, of course, what also makes him The Most Powerful Person in American Government. Hail to the true Philospher-King! It’s Kennedy’s world and we’re all just living in it.

Subrosa, for one, would like to welcome our new California-Born Supreme Court Justice overlord.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

Comments
orbro

orbro

New York, NY
July 2004

APR 20, 2007 02:52 AM

i say off with his head. just kidding. you nailed it rosa.

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

APR 20, 2007 07:30 AM

Emptymouthpiece said:
WHat scares the piss out of me is these fuckers can be in for as long as they damn well please. We've already recognized the damage senators congressmen and the president can have with out term limits, why on earth do we hold out life time appointments for something so vital as the supreme law makers and policy holders/changers of the entire country. It boggles the mind.



Life appointments for the federal judiciary is a really, really good thing. The last thing we want are overtly political judges.

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

APR 20, 2007 07:30 AM

AceT said:
How did 'Brosa know that I say things like "what the golly eff gee"?!



I've got people.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

APR 20, 2007 07:57 AM

AceT said:

emotedcreations said:
If he's so powerful, why can't he get our troops out of Iraq, huh? I'm going to have to go with the President on this one, but either way, good article.


Decisions made by this justice can and will affect your life for decades. He has the power to add or remove any and all of the constitutional rights you hold dear. No president, or any other person in this country, has that power.

Wait, you don't think effects of decisions this President has made will effect this country for decades? Two the President hasn't removed constitutional rights we hold dear? OK, sure, I guess you could say it was Congress, but they did it at the behest of the President.

During the last election I posted that I was way more afraid of the apointees[sic] which would affect me for the next 40 years, than the candidate who would affect me for just four.

Moreover, I was talking about the two as institutions when the next President is elected he will still be more powerful than Mr. Kennedy. I'm sorry I just don't agree. There's a reason they call the President of the United States the most powerful man in the world.

And the funny thing is, I think the fact that the Supreme Court just upheld the partial birth abortion Act, in whatever form, is just more evidence that the President got his way and not vice-versa. Whatcha think?

goodpoltergeist

goodpoltergeist

Douglasville, GA
January 2007

APR 20, 2007 08:55 AM

I think I REALLY like this guy.

I need to be a supreme court justice...

KSCUGrendel

KSCUGrendel

Seattle, WA
January 2007

APR 20, 2007 09:48 AM

because he is a swing vote it allows the conservatives to have even more power and further sets back our country's progress. civil rights alone has gone back over 100 years because of the conservative block and his swing vote.

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

APR 29, 2007 12:04 PM

A few more statistics on Kennedy's voting record here.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, by contrast, is having the kind of year most judges only dream about.

It is not just his recent star turn as the presiding judge in the trial of Hamlet at Washington's Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, either.

Kennedy is a robust 31-1 in signed opinions issued since the court began its current term in October. He is 12-0 in 5-4 cases, the only justice in that narrow majority each time in cases concerning abortion, the death penalty and global warming.

Kennedy has been in the majority nearly 97 percent of the time. Justice David Souter, who has dissented five times, is second at 84 percent.

At the other end are Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. Despite the more conservative bent of this court, Scalia and Thomas have dissented 12 times each, putting them in the majority in just over 60 percent of the court's cases so far.

Scalia dissented from eight of the court's 10 most recent decisions, although he was in the majority in the recent abortion case, among the term's most important.

Kennedy's lone dissent this year was in a case striking down California sentencing rules that allowed judges, rather than juries, to determine facts that justify harsher prison sentences. Kennedy consistently has taken the position that judges should have discretion in sentencing.

soulcompromise

soulcompromise

I'm lost
November 2006

APR 29, 2007 01:17 PM

So he's off his rocker is what you're saying?

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

APR 29, 2007 02:55 PM

He's saying he has a lot of influence i.e. the headline of the article.

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

APR 29, 2007 07:20 PM

soulcompromise said:
So he's off his rocker is what you're saying?



At what point did I say something like that?

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

APR 29, 2007 07:30 PM

The judicial equivalent of the median voter.

Determines the outcomes "singlehandedly".

SignalNoise

SignalNoise

USA
February 2004

APR 29, 2007 07:34 PM

TheFuckOffKid said:
The judicial equivalent of the median voter.

Determines the outcomes "singlehandedly".



Busting out the Tony Downs!

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

APR 29, 2007 07:47 PM

SignalNoise said:

TheFuckOffKid said:
The judicial equivalent of the median voter.

Determines the outcomes "singlehandedly".



Busting out the Tony Downs!



I'm busting out all over the place, baby!

*does top button back up*

soulcompromise

soulcompromise

I'm lost
November 2006

APR 30, 2007 11:52 AM

TheFuckOffKid said:

SignalNoise said:

TheFuckOffKid said:
The judicial equivalent of the median voter.

Determines the outcomes "singlehandedly".



Busting out the Tony Downs!



I'm busting out all over the place, baby!

*does top button back up*



lmao... someone has to hold us together.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next