• commentary
  • WEDNESDAY APRIL 18 2007 10:00 AM

Why Wasn’t Steven Biskupic Fired With the Other US Attorneys?



Steven Biskupic is a US Attorney in the state of Wisconsin. During the 2006 Wisconsin Governor’s campaign, one of the dastardly criminals he convicted was used to attempt to smear Democrat (and eventual winner) Jim Doyle. That horrible convict’s name was Georgia Thompson. Ms. Thompson was a civil servant at the state purchasing office. She allegedly used her influence to award a state travel contract to a firm whose CEO made several large donations to Doyle’s campaign. Her story was used in attack ads paid for by his Republican opponent’s campaign. Here is one of those ads.



Sounds pretty shady, huh? Well, there’s just one problem: Georgia Thompson’s conviction was total fucking bullshit, legally speaking.

Federal judges Thursday ruled that former state purchasing supervisor Georgia L. Thompson was wrongly convicted of making sure a state travel contract went to a firm linked to Gov. Jim Doyle's re-election campaign and freed her from an Illinois prison.

The three-judge panel in Chicago acted with unusual speed, ruling after oral arguments by Thompson's attorney and the U.S. attorney's office.

During 26 minutes of oral arguments, all three judges assailed the government's case, with Judge Diane Wood saying at one point that "the evidence is beyond thin."

During a news conference later Thursday, Doyle, a former state attorney general, said the three judges did an "extraordinary thing" by entering an order finding Thompson innocent and ordering her immediate release.

Decisions at that level of the federal judicial system usually take weeks or months after oral arguments.


Let me repeat that. The evidence that Mr. Biskupic based his prosecution on was so “beyond thin” that an appeals court made the decision to release the woman directly after oral arguments. The situation has caused the New York Times’ Adam Cohen (among many, many others) to inquire as to why Thompson was prosecuted in the first place.

To charge her, Mr. Biskupic had to look past a mountain of evidence of innocence. Ms. Thompson was not a Doyle partisan. She was a civil servant, hired by a Republican governor, with no identifiable interest in politics. She was only one member of a seven-person committee that evaluated the bidders. She was not even aware of the Adelman campaign contributions. She also had a good explanation for her choice: of the 10 travel agencies that competed, Adelman submitted the lowest-cost bid.

While Ms. Thompson did her job conscientiously, that is less clear of Mr. Biskupic. The decision to award the contract — the supposed crime — occurred in Madison, in the jurisdiction of Wisconsin’s other United States attorney. But for reasons that are hard to understand, the Milwaukee-based Mr. Biskupic swept in and took the case.

While he was investigating, in the fall of 2005, Mr. Biskupic informed the media. Justice Department guidelines say federal prosecutors can publicly discuss investigations before an indictment only under extraordinary circumstances. This case hardly met that test.


So what the fuck is going on here? Why is Biskupic being such a cock to this poor woman?

The prosecution proceeded on a schedule that worked out perfectly for the Republican candidate for governor. Mr. Biskupic announced Ms. Thompson’s indictment in January 2006. She went to trial that summer, and was sentenced in late September, weeks before the election.


How very convenient for them! And how unusual that a member of the Justice Department would be manipulating their office to score cheap political points! Gee, who woulda thunk it?

But really, what’s the big deal? I mean, sure this poor woman lost her job, her house, her good name and spent four months in jail, but in the long run Doyle won. No harm no foul, right? And what does this have to do with the Attorney firing scandal?

Most of the eight dismissed prosecutors came from swing states, and Democrats suspect they may have been purged to make room for prosecutors who would help Republicans win close elections. If so, it might also mean that United States attorneys in all swing states were under unusual pressure.

Wisconsin may be the closest swing state of all. President Bush lost it in 2004 by about 12,000 votes, and in 2000, by about half that. According to some Wisconsin politicians, Karl Rove said that their state was his highest priority among governor’s races in 2006, because he believed a Republican governor could help the party win Wisconsin in the 2008 presidential election.


Under normal circumstances I’d say this kind of broad conspiracy theory is a bit unlikely. These, however, are not normal circumstances. It is beyond clear that the Justice Department has been overrun by political hacks and appointed “Bushies.” They have been appointed not to fight for Justice or defend the Constitution, but to push a bitter political agenda.

They should be ashamed of themselves, and we should be ashamed of our Justice Department.

 
Comments
RileyStClair

RileyStClair

Los Angeles, CA
September 2006

APR 18, 2007 10:13 AM

i can only assume either you or bitch PhD is working on a piece about gonzales v. carhart. either way, i eagerly anticipate the response.

cunninglinquist

cunninglinquist

Quakertown, PA
November 2003

APR 18, 2007 10:23 AM

But he was trying to help unseat a Democratic governor, so there is nothing wrong with that in the eyes of the Bush administration and his lap dog Gonzales

DeusExMachina

DeusExMachina

Berkeley, CA
August 2004

APR 18, 2007 10:36 AM

You Sir, are going to single-handedly make the newswire worth reading again. Thanks for a job well done Subrosa.

d20

d20

San Francisco, CA
September 2003

APR 18, 2007 10:48 AM

you know, after you've been writing for the newswire for six months or so, you'll probably have enough material for a pretty badass book.

SlackerInChief

SlackerInChief

Sanford, FL
February 2005

APR 18, 2007 12:43 PM

I can't believe this,
What I can't believe the most though is the fact that no one ever seems to be doing anything about this...

Heigai

Heigai

Columbus, OH
May 2004

APR 18, 2007 01:05 PM

Anybody who says "why doesn't anybody do anything about this" needs to get the information, make the decision, and contact their Congress reps. Tell others to do the same. Fun for friends, fun for family.

bean

bean

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

APR 18, 2007 01:48 PM

SlackerInChief said:
I can't believe this,
What I can't believe the most though is the fact that no one ever seems to be doing anything about this...


These things are just coming to light, and there are Congressional investigations into it. Now, whether or not anything will come of those investigations remains to be seen, but still, I think that hardly qualifies as "no one doing anything about it."

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

APR 18, 2007 04:08 PM

d20 said:
you know, after you've been writing for the newswire for six months or so, you'll probably have enough material for a pretty badass book.



Question is, will it find an American publisher... frown

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

APR 18, 2007 06:22 PM

I just have to say (because I don't see the pictures until they go up either) that this might be the best photo-tag pic of all time.

SignalNoise

SignalNoise

USA
February 2004

APR 18, 2007 06:27 PM

Egads.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

APR 18, 2007 08:04 PM

I'm getting the idea that the administration likes cases made even if there's little to no evidence with the caveat that the defendants guilt will hurt the perception of the Democratic party, no?

Furthermore this:

She was only one member of a seven-person committee that evaluated the bidders.

is telling to say the least. Right on Mr. Prosecutor.