- commentary
- WEDNESDAY APRIL 18 2007 10:00 AM
Why Wasnt Steven Biskupic Fired With the Other US Attorneys?
Tags: Biskupic, US Attorneys, Gonzales, Wisconsin, Doyle

Steven Biskupic is a US Attorney in the state of Wisconsin. During the 2006 Wisconsin Governors campaign, one of the dastardly criminals he convicted was used to attempt to smear Democrat (and eventual winner) Jim Doyle. That horrible convicts name was Georgia Thompson. Ms. Thompson was a civil servant at the state purchasing office. She allegedly used her influence to award a state travel contract to a firm whose CEO made several large donations to Doyles campaign. Her story was used in attack ads paid for by his Republican opponents campaign. Here is one of those ads.
Sounds pretty shady, huh? Well, theres just one problem: Georgia Thompsons conviction was total fucking bullshit, legally speaking.
Federal judges Thursday ruled that former state purchasing supervisor Georgia L. Thompson was wrongly convicted of making sure a state travel contract went to a firm linked to Gov. Jim Doyle's re-election campaign and freed her from an Illinois prison.
The three-judge panel in Chicago acted with unusual speed, ruling after oral arguments by Thompson's attorney and the U.S. attorney's office.
During 26 minutes of oral arguments, all three judges assailed the government's case, with Judge Diane Wood saying at one point that "the evidence is beyond thin."
During a news conference later Thursday, Doyle, a former state attorney general, said the three judges did an "extraordinary thing" by entering an order finding Thompson innocent and ordering her immediate release.
Decisions at that level of the federal judicial system usually take weeks or months after oral arguments.
Let me repeat that. The evidence that Mr. Biskupic based his prosecution on was so beyond thin that an appeals court made the decision to release the woman directly after oral arguments. The situation has caused the New York Times Adam Cohen (among many, many others) to inquire as to why Thompson was prosecuted in the first place.
To charge her, Mr. Biskupic had to look past a mountain of evidence of innocence. Ms. Thompson was not a Doyle partisan. She was a civil servant, hired by a Republican governor, with no identifiable interest in politics. She was only one member of a seven-person committee that evaluated the bidders. She was not even aware of the Adelman campaign contributions. She also had a good explanation for her choice: of the 10 travel agencies that competed, Adelman submitted the lowest-cost bid.
While Ms. Thompson did her job conscientiously, that is less clear of Mr. Biskupic. The decision to award the contract the supposed crime occurred in Madison, in the jurisdiction of Wisconsins other United States attorney. But for reasons that are hard to understand, the Milwaukee-based Mr. Biskupic swept in and took the case.
While he was investigating, in the fall of 2005, Mr. Biskupic informed the media. Justice Department guidelines say federal prosecutors can publicly discuss investigations before an indictment only under extraordinary circumstances. This case hardly met that test.
So what the fuck is going on here? Why is Biskupic being such a cock to this poor woman?
The prosecution proceeded on a schedule that worked out perfectly for the Republican candidate for governor. Mr. Biskupic announced Ms. Thompsons indictment in January 2006. She went to trial that summer, and was sentenced in late September, weeks before the election.
How very convenient for them! And how unusual that a member of the Justice Department would be manipulating their office to score cheap political points! Gee, who woulda thunk it?
But really, whats the big deal? I mean, sure this poor woman lost her job, her house, her good name and spent four months in jail, but in the long run Doyle won. No harm no foul, right? And what does this have to do with the Attorney firing scandal?
Most of the eight dismissed prosecutors came from swing states, and Democrats suspect they may have been purged to make room for prosecutors who would help Republicans win close elections. If so, it might also mean that United States attorneys in all swing states were under unusual pressure.
Wisconsin may be the closest swing state of all. President Bush lost it in 2004 by about 12,000 votes, and in 2000, by about half that. According to some Wisconsin politicians, Karl Rove said that their state was his highest priority among governors races in 2006, because he believed a Republican governor could help the party win Wisconsin in the 2008 presidential election.
Under normal circumstances Id say this kind of broad conspiracy theory is a bit unlikely. These, however, are not normal circumstances. It is beyond clear that the Justice Department has been overrun by political hacks and appointed Bushies. They have been appointed not to fight for Justice or defend the Constitution, but to push a bitter political agenda.
They should be ashamed of themselves, and we should be ashamed of our Justice Department.




Comments
RileyStClair
Los Angeles, CA
September 2006
APR 18, 2007 10:13 AM
cunninglinquist
Quakertown, PA
November 2003
APR 18, 2007 10:23 AM
DeusExMachina
Berkeley, CA
August 2004
APR 18, 2007 10:36 AM
d20
San Francisco, CA
September 2003
APR 18, 2007 10:48 AM
SlackerInChief
Sanford, FL
February 2005
APR 18, 2007 12:43 PM
Heigai
Columbus, OH
May 2004
APR 18, 2007 01:05 PM
bean
STAFF
Los Angeles, CA
APR 18, 2007 01:48 PM
SockPuppet
I'm lost
July 2006
APR 18, 2007 04:08 PM
Subrosa
San Francisco, CA
July 2004
APR 18, 2007 06:22 PM
SignalNoise
USA
February 2004
APR 18, 2007 06:27 PM
emotedcreations
Germany
July 2006
APR 18, 2007 08:04 PM