• news
  • SATURDAY FEBRUARY 17 2007 2:00 PM

"Meth Babies"



Do y'all remember the "crack baby epidemic" of the '80s? Where are those "crack babies" now? Weren't we supposed to have an epidemic of violent, mentally damaged sociopaths on our hands?

Huh. Guess it was mostly racist drug war propaganda.

Now the powers that be are trying to reprise the hysteria, this time focused on "meth babie." At the moment, they're trying to criminalize pregnant meth users for "child abuse" in Wyoming, Idaho, Iowa, and Missouri.

We all know that tossing people in jail rather than, say, providing treatment programs or actual fact-based information is part and parcel of the government's war on social undesirables rather than anything resembling a coherent or intelligent drug policy. Criminalizing pregnant women for "child abuse" or "delivery of drugs to a minor" combines the racism and classism of the drug wars with the ongoing right-wing attacks on women's reproductive rights. If you give a shit about either one, you really should be paying particular attention when women are prosecuted for drug use while pregnant.

Luckily, the folks at National Advocates for Pregnant Women are starting to point this out, most recently at this month's Meth Conference in Salt Lake City. Keep your ears and eyes open for this organization and its head, Lynn Paltrow: she's on the leading edge of women's rights in this country, and she's a force to be reckoned with.

And if you, or someone you know, ends up in legal trouble for something you did while pregnant — from drug use to home birth to refusing invasive medical care — drop NAPW (or me) a line. Your constitutional rights don't evaporate when you get knocked up, no matter what the pregnancy policy try to tell you.

Bitch_PhD, who smoked, drank booze and coffee, ate sushi and bacon, and otherwise misbehaved while pregnant, attended the NAPW Summit last month.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 22

Next

Comments
Horrorflick

Horrorflick

Detroit, MI
February 2003

FEB 17, 2007 04:55 PM

deanmoriarty said:


It must be fun being so dumb.


I personally think that all procreation should be put on an indefinite hold until we un-fuck the planet. After that, it should take a license to have a child. (I always thought that was funny. People who want to adopt a child have to go through a screening process that would have caught the Pope in barbed wire, but trailer-trash, idiots, vermin, poor excuses for humanity, people who watch American Idol, whatever; they can squeeze out as many kids as their organs will allow them without anybody being able to say anything. We should take god/women's rights to be mothers/that slippy-dippy little "ooohhh, look at the baby" feeling we get any time somebody breaks out pictures of their genetic excrement/whatever out of the equation and start looking at this from a purely scientific point of view. The population of our planet is going up faster than the planet can adapt to it. I'm with Bill Maher on this one: It's not like we're re-building after the great flood or something. They should start sterilizing people, pronto...



bingo! My point, exactly...

thryster

thryster

I'm lost
October 2005

FEB 17, 2007 05:01 PM

theconservative said:

Bitch_PhD said:
Just for all y'all who are all "meth is bad for kids, those women *should* be locked up!" folks--just exactly how is locking up women addressing the problem? How is it going to help children to throw their mothers in jail?

Or is it just about making us feel morally superior to those bad, bad meth users?



i think that sometimes criminals just have to be punished for what they do. it would've helped those kids a lot more if their deadbeat mothers hadn't been smoking that shit.



christ! are u that big of a reptile? do u really think there are addicted woman out there who think it is perfectly harmless to use drugs while pregnant? addiction is a disease and these people need help.

thefaintjoy

thefaintjoy

Tampa, FL
May 2006

FEB 17, 2007 05:33 PM

thryster said:

theconservative said:

Bitch_PhD said:
Just for all y'all who are all "meth is bad for kids, those women *should* be locked up!" folks--just exactly how is locking up women addressing the problem? How is it going to help children to throw their mothers in jail?

Or is it just about making us feel morally superior to those bad, bad meth users?



i think that sometimes criminals just have to be punished for what they do. it would've helped those kids a lot more if their deadbeat mothers hadn't been smoking that shit.



christ! are u that big of a reptile? do u really think there are addicted woman out there who think it is perfectly harmless to use drugs while pregnant? addiction is a disease and these people need help.



so then you must be for women in general not going to jail for drug use. sure pregnancy is a big deal but it is a technicality not a superior circumstance to the law. i recall a debate at school where someone basically suggested that execution of old people is somewhat significantly immoral to executing a young person. basically, they'll die soon anyway.

anyone with a heart, is looking out for the childrens best interest, but the mother shouldn't get to brush of repercussions.

theconservative

theconservative

Spring, TX
October 2004

FEB 17, 2007 05:34 PM

thryster said:

theconservative said:

Bitch_PhD said:
Just for all y'all who are all "meth is bad for kids, those women *should* be locked up!" folks--just exactly how is locking up women addressing the problem? How is it going to help children to throw their mothers in jail?

Or is it just about making us feel morally superior to those bad, bad meth users?



i think that sometimes criminals just have to be punished for what they do. it would've helped those kids a lot more if their deadbeat mothers hadn't been smoking that shit.



christ! are u that big of a reptile? do u really think there are addicted woman out there who think it is perfectly harmless to use drugs while pregnant? addiction is a disease and these people need help.



people need to be held responsible for their actions

bedukay

bedukay

Endicott, NY
March 2003

FEB 17, 2007 06:01 PM

Bitch_PhD said:
Or perhaps that the argument that what I chooses to do with/to one's own body is up to me--an argument I assume we all support, what with subscribing to SG and all--applies to women as well as to men?



If meth use while pregnant does damage to an unborn child and the woman is going to carry the baby to term then she is doing damage to something that isn't her own body. Jailing her will accomplish at least one thing: that she most likely won't use meth while incarcerated.

I am a Libertarian so I am for legalization of most drugs so I don't agree that this is the best answer but the argument that a woman can do what ever she wants to an unborn child (who is going to be born, I generally don't believe in restricting a woman's right to abortion) should fall under the protection of a person's right to do with their body as they please because by the very nature of reproduction the child won't be part of her body forever.

theconservative

theconservative

Spring, TX
October 2004

FEB 17, 2007 06:05 PM

bedukay said:

Bitch_PhD said:
Or perhaps that the argument that what I chooses to do with/to one's own body is up to me--an argument I assume we all support, what with subscribing to SG and all--applies to women as well as to men?



If meth use while pregnant does damage to an unborn child and the woman is going to carry the baby to term then she is doing damage to something that isn't her own body. Jailing her will accomplish at least one thing: that she most likely won't use meth while incarcerated.

I am a Libertarian so I am for legalization of most drugs so I don't agree that this is the best answer but the argument that a woman can do what ever she wants to an unborn child (who is going to be born, I generally don't believe in restricting a woman's right to abortion) should fall under the protection of a person's right to do with their body as they please because by the very nature of reproduction the child won't be part of her body forever.



so are you telling me that an expectant mother bears NO responsibility to care for her unborn child?

Byrd

Byrd

HOPEFUL

Reno, NV

FEB 17, 2007 06:23 PM

i work with developmentally disabled adults. several people that i work with that have the most debilitating (sp?) emotional and behavioral issues have them because of in uetero drug exposure. it is FUCKING SAD and unbelivably cruel to condemn an innocent person to irreversible hardship like that. i agree that prisons and the legal system will not help these drug addicted mothers. i believe that it is absolutely a class issue. however, if you've seen some of the victims of FAS and drug exposure, it's not always easy to find a lot of sympathy for the people who made them that way. i understand that addiction is a disease...there's really no happy right answer here. i hope we can come up with more creative solutions to drug addiction than locking people in cages. but using meth while pregnant, or crack, or booze or whatever, IS child abuse. i whitness the repercussions first hand every day.

theconservative

theconservative

Spring, TX
October 2004

FEB 17, 2007 06:29 PM

theconservative said:

bedukay said:
Bitch_PhD said:
Or perhaps that the argument that what I chooses to do with/to one's own body is up to me--an argument I assume we all support, what with subscribing to SG and all--applies to women as well as to men?



If meth use while pregnant does damage to an unborn child and the woman is going to carry the baby to term then she is doing damage to something that isn't her own body. Jailing her will accomplish at least one thing: that she most likely won't use meth while incarcerated.

I am a Libertarian so I am for legalization of most drugs so I don't agree that this is the best answer but the argument that a woman can do what ever she wants to an unborn child (who is going to be born, I generally don't believe in restricting a woman's right to abortion) should fall under the protection of a person's right to do with their body as they please because by the very nature of reproduction the child won't be part of her body forever.



so are you telling me that an expectant mother bears NO responsibility to care for her unborn child?

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

FEB 17, 2007 06:36 PM

theconservative said:

theconservative said:

bedukay said:
Bitch_PhD said: ...

...

...

Talking to yourself again? wink

saltonsea

saltonsea

Toronto, ON
July 2004

FEB 17, 2007 06:40 PM

theconservative said:

thryster said:

theconservative said:

Bitch_PhD said:
Just for all y'all who are all "meth is bad for kids, those women *should* be locked up!" folks--just exactly how is locking up women addressing the problem? How is it going to help children to throw their mothers in jail?

Or is it just about making us feel morally superior to those bad, bad meth users?



i think that sometimes criminals just have to be punished for what they do. it would've helped those kids a lot more if their deadbeat mothers hadn't been smoking that shit.



christ! are u that big of a reptile? do u really think there are addicted woman out there who think it is perfectly harmless to use drugs while pregnant? addiction is a disease and these people need help.



people need to be held responsible for their actions



yes. But going all crazy-right, and throwing them in jail, does nothing towards fixing or curbing the problem.

LostLucy

LostLucy

USA
December 2006

FEB 17, 2007 07:23 PM

It never helps to remove a baby from a biological mother simply for drug addiction.

what else do you think is out there?

i am not saying that children shouldn't be removed for neglect or abuse, nor am i denying th tragedies that happen daily when they aren't. But babies and moms can detox and be managed with case workers who follow up with instrumental support like assistance with enrolling in serives, and education. again, not dissing foster care and adoption, buit hte majority of children removed languish in poor quality care frown blackeyed

or worse

DyeWhiteGirls

DyeWhiteGirls

Madison, WI
December 2003

FEB 17, 2007 07:36 PM

Bitch-

I truly hope that "smoke and drank while pregnant" comment was a joke. If not, you should be locked up along with the meth moms. Granted, smoking and drinking during pregnancy is actually better than giving your kids formula, but that's like saying a bullet to the brain is better than a bullet to the stomach.

DyeWhiteGirls

DyeWhiteGirls

Madison, WI
December 2003

FEB 17, 2007 07:39 PM

And what the fuck is with all of this Utopian bullshit about "helping" the mothers. This society fucking feeds on this grief and misfortune of others and now we're in the industry of helping idiots? You do something as stupid as that, you should be locked up. If you have so little regard for your unborn child that you risk birth defects, you do not deserve to raise the child.

StarBelliedBoy

StarBelliedBoy

Philadelphia, PA
December 2003

FEB 17, 2007 07:48 PM

theconservative said:
people need to be held responsible for their actions



+1000

Calypso

Calypso

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

FEB 17, 2007 08:05 PM

I'm sick of all this "addiction is a disease" bullshit. It is not a goddamned disease. It is a weakness, a crutch. And you know what? It's okay to be weak, and it's okay to falter.

However, you have to want help. You can offer a meth addict every avenue of assistance known to man, but if they don't want to be helped, they can't be helped. And what do you do then?

Your argument that there is are still drugs in prison is ridiculous when coupled with the fact that being in rehab does not mean you do not have access to drugs. Like kids in fat camp don't pay counselors for candy bars?

I agree that counseling would certainly help those willing to kick their addictions, but what do you do when a pregnant woman will not (or cannot, if it is truly a disease) accept treatment? What if she will not or cannot quit? Do you let her walk free, continuing to potentially ruin her child's chance at a long, healthful life?

If the woman choses to carry her child to term, then it is her responsibility to keep her body free from such harmful substances, period.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 22

Next