Republican Rep. Duncan Hunter, best known for his advocacy on behalf of the military, launched a longshot bid for the presidency Thursday in this early voting state.
"Let's begin this race for the American presidency and let's win," Hunter, said, wrapping up 25 minute speech.
The 14-term conservative from California, who has made no secret of his White House aspirations, set up a presidential exploratory committee last week.
He initially announced his intentions in October, becoming the first GOP candidate to declare, and then began making stops in early primary and caucus states, including Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina.
He joins an increasingly crowded GOP field of declared and likely candidates, including Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Sam Brownback of Kansas, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani.
Crowded is an understatement. This is one of the most wide open presidential races in the past century, considering that the vice president isn't running, so "stars" (assuming Washginton really is Hollywood for ugly people) from both parties are all making it their time to shine.
Duncan Hunter isn't well known outside of policy wonk circles, where he's been considered a pro-military hawk, with some other conservative tendencies, like a border fence with Mexico:
Hunter stands out amongst many of his chickenhawk compatriots, however. He has an military service record and a son who served in Iraq.
Hunter, 58, was born in Riverside, California, and was an Army Ranger in Vietnam. He worked his way through law school with farming and construction jobs.
Hunter won his U.S. House seat in 1980 and has been an ardent military supporter. His son has spent a pair of seven-month tours in Iraq.
Hunter's bid is a huge long shot, Congress typically doesn't produce Presidents, at least not straight out of the house, and while much of the country still considers itself to be conservative, the results of the midterm election suggest that they may not always vote that way when it matters. Competing with names like Rudy Giuliani and John McCain (not to mention having to deal with other, better known conservatives like Sam Brownback who will be drawing on the conservative base vote) is not going to make the campaign trail easy for Representative Hunter. We'll see if he lasts past New Hampshire.
He's certainly a long-shot. Regardless of what he thinks he's doing, he's really running for vice-president on the assumption the nominee is Giuliani or a governor with little foreign policy experience.
At least the man and his family walk the walk as well as talking the talk, better than the present mob in the white house who are conspircuous for being in favour of other americans dying for their country
Stott said:
Seriously, conservative or liberal this country needs men and women who believe in something and stick to it.
God no, that's how we got in to this mess: the notion that "it doesn't matter what they believe as long as they believe in it strongly and don't waver."
President Bush "believes in something" and "sticks to it." That's exactly the problem.
Stott said:
Seriously, conservative or liberal this country needs men and women who believe in something and stick to it.
God no, that's how we got in to this mess: the notion that "it doesn't matter what they believe as long as they believe in it strongly and don't waver."
President Bush "believes in something" and "sticks to it." That's exactly the problem.
bean said:
God no, that's how we got in to this mess: the notion that "it doesn't matter what they believe as long as they believe in it strongly and don't waver."
President Bush "believes in something" and "sticks to it." That's exactly the problem.
I don't know if I can actually agree with that. It's clear that Bush and the chickenhawks were absolutely determined to invade Iraq from the very beginning of his presidency, but it remains to be seen if this was a manifestation of any sort of belief system.
I've always suspected it was pissant, petty ego and a great deal of self-interest, backed by a quite unreasonable sense of American power. This is not the same thing has having closely held beliefs that give you a moral, ethical basis for political decision making.
I hesitate to describe Dick Cheney as having anything resembling morals or ethics, the man is as close to Machiavellian scum as I've ever seen. He believes in power; his, the president's, the republican party's and America's. In that order.
So I would say the decision to invade Iraq is a good example of a government that lacked any true belief in something beyond their own power and importance. That's not a belief system.
Duncan comes across as a nutbag, but for all accounts he is an honest nutbag who says what he believes and has the guts to really back it. I'll stand that in contrast to Bush, Cheney and the chickenhawks who (to quote Dick, gotta love the Dick) "had other priorities" than serving their country in Vietnam. And have no problems denigrating those who did. And have no problem gutting the Veterans Affairs Administration right before sending thousands into harms way.
These fuckers aren't conservatives, they don't believe in the core ideas of traditional American conservatism (love or loathe them is not the question). These people are political vultures who don't believe in god-damn anything other than serving themselves and their mates at the trough of executive power. Yes I know George has found God etc Religious faith does not make for a moral or ethical system. If it did we wouldn't be having half the problems we presently are.
Comments
ericwine
Charlotte Hall, MD
January 2007
JAN 25, 2007 09:29 PM
scarekrow
USA
December 2005
JAN 25, 2007 09:55 PM
gfvella
Australia
November 2004
JAN 25, 2007 11:21 PM
Matsui
Ewa Beach, HI
December 2005
JAN 26, 2007 12:43 AM
Stott
Chicago, IL
January 2004
JAN 26, 2007 09:44 AM
bean
STAFF
Los Angeles, CA
JAN 26, 2007 09:56 AM
SockPuppet
I'm lost
July 2006
JAN 26, 2007 02:47 PM
gfvella
Australia
November 2004
JAN 26, 2007 07:45 PM