• commentary
  • MONDAY DECEMBER 11 2006 10:00 PM

Onward, Christian Soldiers

It's no big secret that the vast majority of Americans define themselves as some variety of Christian. Nor would it shock anyone (particularly in the past few years) to see many top level government or military personnel profess their beliefs in the Christian faith. What might surprise some, however, is seeing high ranking military officials in uniform and in the Pentagon participating in a promotional video for an evangelical christian group without anyone ever mentioning that those views might not be endorsed by the military.

In the video, much of which was filmed inside the Pentagon, four generals and three colonels praise the Christian Embassy, a group that evangelizes among military leaders, politicians and diplomats in Washington. Some of the officers describe their efforts to spread their faith within the military.

The 10-minute video is on the group's Web site, Christianembassy.com. The organization was founded nearly 30 years ago by the late Bill Bright, who also founded Campus Crusade for Christ. The Christian Embassy Web site says the group holds prayer breakfasts each Wednesday in the Pentagon's executive dining room and organizes small groups to help military leaders "bridge the gap between faith and work."

Army Brig. Gen. Bob Casen refers in the video to the Christian Embassy's special efforts to reach admirals and generals through Flag Fellowship groups. Whenever he sees another fellowship member, he says, "I immediately feel like I am being held accountable, because we are the aroma of Jesus Christ."


The aroma smells distinctly different from where I'm standing. A former Air Force officer "Mikey" Weinstein, who has pushed for a more removed role of religion in the military for the past few years, would probably agree, and is pushing the military to begin a formal inquiry into the video.

Weinstein, a White House lawyer in the Reagan administration, cites Defense Department regulations barring personnel from appearing in uniform in "speeches, interviews, picket lines, marches, rallies or any public demonstration . . . which may imply Service sanction of the cause for which the demonstration or activity is conducted."

All the officers are identified in the video by their Defense Department positions, "yet the video failed to include any disclaimers indicating that the views expressed were not those of the Department of Defense," the letter says.

It asks whether the officers received permission to promote the Christian Embassy and whether any other religious or secular organizations have been allowed to use Pentagon facilities and uniformed personnel in promotional videos.

Catton said yesterday that he does not remember whether he sought approval to appear in the video, which he said was made in 2005. "If someone asked me today to do it, I for sure would ask permission," said the general, who sparked controversy this year by raising money from fellow officers for a congressional candidate.


It's an understandable policy for the Defense Department to maintain, considering that the participation of military personnel in a movie endorsing a specific brand of religion could come uncomfortably close to seeming as if the federal government itself were endorsing that religion, a concept that would be anathema to the idea of a separation of church and state.

The officers who participated in the video are, in all probability, not involved in any evangelical Christian conspiracy to take over the military and the federal government. However, it's their duty as officers, and representatives of the United States, to understand the delicate and uncomfortable situation their starring in this movie creates for all military personnel. Particularly in places like Iraq, where the widespread belief, especially in the Middle East, that the Christian right is controlling US foreign policy is only making problems worse for soldiers currently stationed in Iraq. If they're seen not only as foreign invaders but also as missionaries it makes them even bigger targets for terrorists looking to make a statement. And the assumption that the US military is any way a Christian organization by virtue of association with any type of project like this is antithetical to some of the fundamental principles that it is meant to uphold in the first place. That's something everyone should take very seriously, especially those in uniform.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

Comments
geo35

geo35

Minneapolis, MN
January 2003

DEC 12, 2006 08:43 AM

Wow, what a shocker, huh?



zyryx

zyryx

Tyler, TX
April 2004

DEC 12, 2006 08:48 AM

not trying to invoke Godwin's Law, but... christianity today really reminds me of Germany in the 1920's and 30's.

MschfMayhemSoap

MschfMayhemSoap

Phoenix, AZ
April 2006

DEC 12, 2006 09:15 AM

Religion and the military..... sounds truely Christian to me...


"So it's believe what I say or I'll hurt"


"THAT'S RIGHT!" *Hits Brian with bible*

SmellsLikeSciFi

SmellsLikeSciFi

Houston, TX
April 2004

DEC 12, 2006 03:59 PM

Um...hey, "Christian" soldiers: You know that line in the old testament that the good majority of you who claim to be "Pro-Lifer" 's like to throw in 16 year old girls faces while trying to get into a clinic to abort their uncle's incestuous fetus growing inside them that goes: "Thou shalt not kill." ????

If you think SHE is going to hell for that, KILLING IS YOUR JOB. These people and anyone else who claims Christianity while cheering on war is a total fucking hypocrite.

Lest we not invoke the Golden Rule, Jesus' instructions to turn the other cheek, etc.

92.9999999% of people who claim to adhere to christian standards need to actually read the fucking bible instead of blindly following Pat Robertson.

puke puke puke puke puke

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

DEC 12, 2006 04:09 PM

Killing is still fine, I mean have you read the Bible? Old Testament god was all about the blood and violence.

You can read the Cliff notes version here.

http://www.thebricktestament.com/

maj1234

maj1234

Windsor, ON
July 2002

DEC 12, 2006 04:25 PM

Meh...Christians, for the most part, are harmless. I'm much more concerned about Islamic fundamentalists and radical liberals than bible-toting Baptists.

biggrin biggrin biggrin

/awaiting unavoidable response about abortion bombers, the Crusades or Timothy McVeigh (not a Christian). If you're going to compare the two, I'd say the Christians have a whole lot of killing to do to catch up with the Jihadists.

Ascanius

Ascanius

USA
October 2006

DEC 12, 2006 04:31 PM

emotedcreations said:

legionnaire said:
What might surprise some, however, is seeing high ranking military officials in uniform and in the Pentagon participating in a promotional video for an evangelical christian group without anyone ever mentioning that those views might not be endorsed by the military.


From the website:

Disclaimer: " The views expressed by any government officials in this video are their personal views and are not intended to represent the U.S. government nor any department in which they serve."


Here's the LINK, if you're interested.



I think he meant that it doesn't say anywhere in the video that it's not endorsed by the military, although I haven't watched the whole video, so I couldn't say for sure.

MrStitches

MrStitches

Brooklyn, NY
November 2003

DEC 12, 2006 05:24 PM

maj1234 said:

/awaiting unavoidable response about abortion bombers, the Crusades or Timothy McVeigh (not a Christian). If you're going to compare the two, I'd say the Christians have a whole lot of killing to do to catch up with the Jihadists.



If you are taking the crusades into account in your figuring there, you'd probably be wrong. Of course that has nothing at all to do with this article.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

DEC 12, 2006 05:30 PM

SomeKid said:

emotedcreations said:

legionnaire said:
What might surprise some, however, is seeing high ranking military officials in uniform and in the Pentagon participating in a promotional video for an evangelical christian group without anyone ever mentioning that those views might not be endorsed by the military.


From the website:

Disclaimer: " The views expressed by any government officials in this video are their personal views and are not intended to represent the U.S. government nor any department in which they serve."


Here's the LINK, if you're interested.



I think he meant that it doesn't say anywhere in the video that it's not endorsed by the military, although I haven't watched the whole video, so I couldn't say for sure.



It doesn't. But that's why I didn't comment. I just juxtaposed the two. Draw whatever conclusions you will.

malkav11

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN
July 2003

DEC 12, 2006 06:29 PM

It's possible that they added the disclaimer to the website after the fact precisely because of the uproar. Though that's speculation.

NickFaust

NickFaust

USA
April 2004

DEC 12, 2006 07:07 PM

SmellsLikeSciFi said:
Um...hey, "Christian" soldiers: You know that line in the old testament that the good majority of you who claim to be "Pro-Lifer" 's like to throw in 16 year old girls faces while trying to get into a clinic to abort their uncle's incestuous fetus growing inside them that goes: "Thou shalt not kill." ????

If you think SHE is going to hell for that, KILLING IS YOUR JOB. These people and anyone else who claims Christianity while cheering on war is a total fucking hypocrite.

Lest we not invoke the Golden Rule, Jesus' instructions to turn the other cheek, etc.

92.9999999% of people who claim to adhere to christian standards need to actually read the fucking bible instead of blindly following Pat Robertson.

puke puke puke puke puke



You're kidding right? The bible is full of wholesale and wanton slaughter.

SmellsLikeSciFi

SmellsLikeSciFi

Houston, TX
April 2004

DEC 12, 2006 07:50 PM

NickFaust said:

SmellsLikeSciFi said:
Um...hey, "Christian" soldiers: You know that line in the old testament that the good majority of you who claim to be "Pro-Lifer" 's like to throw in 16 year old girls faces while trying to get into a clinic to abort their uncle's incestuous fetus growing inside them that goes: "Thou shalt not kill." ????

If you think SHE is going to hell for that, KILLING IS YOUR JOB. These people and anyone else who claims Christianity while cheering on war is a total fucking hypocrite.

Lest we not invoke the Golden Rule, Jesus' instructions to turn the other cheek, etc.

92.9999999% of people who claim to adhere to christian standards need to actually read the fucking bible instead of blindly following Pat Robertson.

puke puke puke puke puke



You're kidding right? The bible is full of wholesale and wanton slaughter.



uh...that's mostly my point.

Tallboy66

Tallboy66

Chicago, IL
January 2005

DEC 12, 2006 08:12 PM

Uglynproud said:
How does the whole "love yer enemies, thou shall not kill and turn the other cheek" stuff work in the military??



*Bingo*

Stiles

Stiles

Philadelphia, PA
November 2002

DEC 12, 2006 08:14 PM

MrStitches said:
Aside from the fact that I don't find this even remotely surprising, I'd like to add:

Mmmmm, Jesus! I was burning some jesus aromatherapy candles before. My bedroom smells Messiahriffic!



Now in Myrrh!

Gringo

Gringo

Spokane, WA
May 2006

DEC 12, 2006 08:20 PM

maj1234 said:
Meh...Christians, for the most part, are harmless. I'm much more concerned about Islamic fundamentalists and radical liberals than bible-toting Baptists.


That's because you're in a safer place away from said Baptists. In northern FL (Clay county), the baptists have made it to where you cannot purchase alcohol before 1:00 p.m. on Sundays....because you're supposed to be in church instead of drinkin'. I've yet to have any Islamic fundamentalist infringe upon my drinking rights.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next