- commentary
- WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 6 2006 11:03 PM
Religious Conservatives Hate Dick Cheney's Daughter
Submitted by legionnaire
Edited by legionnaire
Tags: Cheney, lesbian, pregnant, conservative
Mary Cheney scored some political points for her father in the 2004 presidential election when her sexual orientation became a card played by the Kerry campaign. The idea was to make the Bush/Cheney ticket appear hypocritical given their support for the Federal Marriage Amendment which would have redundantly banned gay marriage by altering the US constitution. The ploy backfired, however, when Cheney came off as a sympathetic political pawn being crudely manipulated by the Kerry campaign for their own, selfish gain. But really, could the conservative and religious right be satisfied having an open lesbian in their midst, even if she is the daughter of one of their heroes? Apparently not, as news of Cheney's recent pregnancy sparked outrage and hand wringing from some of the more vicious American conservative groups.
Janice Crouse of Concerned Women for America described the pregnancy as "unconscionable."
"It's very disappointing that a celebrity couple like this would deliberately bring into the world a child that will never have a father," said Crouse, a senior fellow at the group's think tank. "They are encouraging people who don't have the advantages they have."
Crouse said there was no doubt that the news would, in conservatives' eyes, be damaging to the Bush administration, which already has been chided by some leaders on the right for what they felt was halfhearted commitment to anti-abortion and anti-gay-rights causes in this year's general election.
Carrie Gordon Earll, a policy analyst for the conservative Christian ministry Focus on the Family, expressed empathy for the Cheney family but depicted the newly announced pregnancy as unwise.
"Just because you can conceive a child outside a one-woman, one-man marriage doesn't mean it's a good idea," said. "Love can't replace a mother and a father."
So by that logic, a child whose father dies before he or she is born is also "unconscionable," seeing as that baby will never have a real father either? Typically the Concerned Women for America don't rush off to every pregnant widow looking to scold them for the atrocity they're about to wreak upon the world, nor does Focus on the Family tell those mothers that their love will never replace a real father for the child. The half-hearted attempt to shame the Bush administration into speaking out against the pregnancy seems fated to be unsuccessful, seeing as most everyone hates George W. Bush already, and he can't run for another term, so it's hard to see what sort of leverage these groups have.
Interestingly enough, Dick Cheney's own position on gay rights is oddly reasonable (considering his positions on virtually everything else) and the sort of thing that most Americans might actually agree with.
at a vice presidential debate in 2000, Cheney was asked, "Should a male who loves a male and a female who loves a female have all the constitutional rights enjoyed by every American citizen?"
Cheney responded, "People should be free to enter into any kind of relationship they want to enter into. It's really no one else's business, in terms of trying to regulate or prohibit behavior in that regard."
He added, "I think different states are likely to come to different conclusions, and that's appropriate. I don't think there should necessarily be a federal policy in this area. I try to be open-minded about it as much as I can and tolerant of those relationships. ... (I) wrestle with the extent of which there ought to be legal sanction of those relationships. I think we ought to do everything we can to tolerate and accommodate whatever kind of relationships people want to enter into."
At the very least, it hardly seems appropriate for political or religious groups to make an issue about one particular couple's decision to have a baby, regardless of who that couple happens to be. Of course, these are the same people whose idea of a perfect country would be them having unfettered access to everyone's bedroom to make sure that our conduct meets their own, arbitrary standards. That is, until they're revealed to be raving hypocrits and then we're all expected to forgive them.
Hopefully Bush (and the Democrats) will just ignore these people, and maybe they'll finally just go away and leave politics to the adults. They're clearly not capable of acting like respectable grownups, so until they are the rest of the political world should just ignore them.




PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3
Comments
Ecto_Cooler
Bronx, NY
April 2004
DEC 06, 2006 11:19 PM
emotedcreations
Germany
July 2006
DEC 06, 2006 11:20 PM
squerk
Seattle, WA
December 2004
DEC 06, 2006 11:35 PM
MrCrisp
I'm lost
August 2004
DEC 06, 2006 11:37 PM
AlphaX
Fargo, ND
November 2006
DEC 06, 2006 11:37 PM
Gringo
Spokane, WA
May 2006
DEC 07, 2006 12:47 AM
emotedcreations
Germany
July 2006
DEC 07, 2006 12:54 AM
Markus001
United Kingdom
November 2004
DEC 07, 2006 02:05 AM
quagmirething
I'm lost
June 2005
DEC 07, 2006 02:41 AM
JoLeigh
SUICIDEGIRL
Florida, USA
DEC 07, 2006 05:57 AM
Targeted
Willsboro, NY
June 2006
DEC 07, 2006 06:01 AM
Andvari
Calgary, AB
April 2005
DEC 07, 2006 07:28 AM
legionnaire
Belgium
November 2003
DEC 07, 2006 07:29 AM
squerk
Seattle, WA
December 2004
DEC 07, 2006 07:44 AM
Lycoris
Toronto, ON
October 2005
DEC 07, 2006 07:51 AM
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3