• news
  • WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 6 2006 4:30 PM

Working in Congress No Longer a Part Time Job

Friday sees the end of the 109th Congress, infamous for rubber stamping and feet dragging. In fact, even after two years, members of the outgoing Congress have only worked 103 days, seven days fewer than the "Do-Nothing Congress" of 1948. Instead of passing important bills that would have regulated government spending or address critical societal needs, members were off on vacations paid for by generous lobbyists or trying to enact completely useless amendments.

Things may change, though, with the newly elected 110th Congress. The new House majority leader, Rep. Steny Hoyer, announced a change that has stunned many lazy lawmakers:

"I have bad news for you," Hoyer told reporters. "Those trips you had planned in January, forget 'em. We will be working almost every day in January, starting with the 4th."



Crack that whip, baby, it's time to work!

From The Washington Post:

For lawmakers, it is awful, compared with what they have come to expect. For much of this election year, the legislative week started late Tuesday and ended by Thursday afternoon—and that was during the relatively few weeks the House wasn't in recess.

With the new calendar, the Democrats are trying to project a businesslike image when they take control of Congress in January. House and Senate Democratic leaders have announced an ambitious agenda for their first 100 hours and say they are adamant about scoring legislative victories they can trumpet in the 2008 campaigns.

Hoyer and other Democratic leaders say they are trying to repair the image of Congress, which was so anemic this year it could not meet a basic duty: to approve spending bills that fund government.

Hoyer said members can bid farewell to extended holidays, the kind that awarded them six weekdays to relax around Memorial Day, when most Americans get a single day off. He didn't mention the month-long August recess, the two-week April recess or the weeks off in February, March and July.

He said members need to spend more time in the Capitol to pass laws and oversee federal agencies. "We are going to meet sufficient times, so the committees can do their jobs on behalf of the American people," he said.



Some members of Congress, though, are not happy with actually having to do their jobs.

"Keeping us up here eats away at families," said Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.), who typically flies home on Thursdays and returns to Washington on Tuesdays. "Marriages suffer. The Democrats could care less about families—that's what this says."

Time away from Washington is just as important to being an effective member of Congress as time spent in the Capitol, Kingston added. "When I'm here, people call me Mr. Congressman. When I'm home, people call me 'Jack, you stupid SOB, why did you vote that way?' It keeps me grounded."

Rep. Elton Gallegly (R-Calif.), who had intended to retire this year, only to be persuaded to run again, wondered whether the new schedule was more than symbolic. "If we're doing something truly productive, that's one thing," he said. "If it's smoke-and-mirrors hoopla, that's another."

Setting a calendar that satisfies 435 members is impossible, said the current majority leader, Rep. John A. Boehner (R-Ohio), who will become minority leader in January. "Between the travel issues, the members' work schedules, the family and district issues, it was a Rubik's cube," he said.


So far, with the ambitious plan for the first 100 hours and now this larger, more professional work week, the 110th Congress looks poised to make a good amount of progress over the next two years. That is if some of the do-nothing Congressmen decide to show up for work.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

Comments
MschfMayhemSoap

MschfMayhemSoap

Phoenix, AZ
April 2006

DEC 06, 2006 04:43 PM

Next thing you know, Congress will adopt the ROWE dynamic tongue

IgnorantProdigy

IgnorantProdigy

Naples, FL
June 2006

DEC 06, 2006 04:48 PM


Ladies and gentleman welcome to the life of the middle class family. I'd say this is exactly the sort of experience Mr. Kingston needs in order to stay in touch with the folks who voted him in. How appalling to suddenly realize that if you are working allot you wont get to see your children as much.

You are almost their Mr. Kingston, just a few more synaptic connections and the picture may actually become clear to you.

ninetysevencents

ninetysevencents

Rochester, NY
August 2003

DEC 06, 2006 04:48 PM

"Keeping us up here eats away at families," said Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.), who typically flies home on Thursdays and returns to Washington on Tuesdays. "Marriages suffer. The Democrats could care less about families--that's what this says."



Come on, man! Democrats could not care less about families. If you're going to make a sweeping generalization at least get it right.

-------------------

The optimist in me can't wait for the next Congress to get to work.

The pessimist thinks that this is just another way Congress members are going to justify giving themselves a pay raise...not that they've ever needed to justify it in the past..

RandomNerd

RandomNerd

I'm lost
January 2005

DEC 06, 2006 05:50 PM

A congressman makes almost $160,000 a year. More for a congressional leader. And they worked 103 days?

That means they got over a thousand dollars every time they showed up and agreed to eviscerate the constitution. I may just cry.

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

DEC 06, 2006 06:06 PM

"When asked for his opinion on Hoyer's plan, Rep. Dante Hicks (I-Nj.) said, 'I'm not even supposed to be here today!'"



(note to whomever edited my story: what's with all the line breaks? good lord.)

TPKAZ

tpkaz

Scottsdale, AZ
August 2006

DEC 06, 2006 06:07 PM

First the Republicans screwed up the country now its the Dem's turn

Cash

Cash

USA
OLD SKOOL

DEC 06, 2006 06:07 PM

RandomNerd said:
A congressman makes almost $160,000 a year. More for a congressional leader. And they worked 103 days?

That means they got over a thousand dollars every time they showed up and agreed to eviscerate the constitution. I may just cry.



I'm not about to defend Congress...but I'd ask you not to focus on the number of days they work. Judge them by the quality of their work, not the number of days they put in.

For example...I only work about 88 days a year. I still work a 44 hour week, but that's condensed into 24 hour shifts. If you figured out what I got paid based on how many DAYS I work...it would seem a lot higher than what I actually make.

_kungfoo_

_kungfoo_

Los Angeles, CA
April 2005

DEC 06, 2006 06:16 PM

"Keeping us up here eats away at families," said Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.), who typically flies home on Thursdays and returns to Washington on Tuesdays. "Marriages suffer. The Democrats could care less about families_that's what this says."



Awwww...

Hey you, republican dickhead, go fuck yourself.

You voted for a war that keep many people away from their families for months, even years, fighting a bullshit war. mad mad mad

RandomNerd

RandomNerd

I'm lost
January 2005

DEC 06, 2006 06:19 PM

Cash said:

RandomNerd said:
A congressman makes almost $160,000 a year. More for a congressional leader. And they worked 103 days?

That means they got over a thousand dollars every time they showed up and agreed to eviscerate the constitution. I may just cry.



I'm not about to defend Congress...but I'd ask you not to focus on the number of days they work. Judge them by the quality of their work, not the number of days they put in.

For example...I only work about 88 days a year. I still work a 44 hour week, but that's condensed into 24 hour shifts. If you figured out what I got paid based on how many DAYS I work...it would seem a lot higher than what I actually make.



A good point, but the past few congresses have been awful, hence the despair.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

DEC 06, 2006 06:46 PM

I honestly don't understand why this is such a profound idea, that is, actually showing up to work. And while I can appreciate Cash's comment I highly doubt there's a single congressman/woman who works a 24 hour day on any type of consistent basis (aside from maybe when they're trying to keep their job). I understand that representatives need to spend part of the time with their constituency, but you can't bitch when you spend that time alloted to you on vacation (ie the long breaks they get). You abuse a priviledge, you get it taken away. It's like they're little children. We shouldn't even have to be having this conversation. It's REDiculous. *rant*

Good article SenorCrispy...

interpolantic

interpolantic

Indianapolis, IN
May 2006

DEC 06, 2006 08:10 PM

"Keeping us up here eats away at families," said Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.), who typically flies home on Thursdays and returns to Washington on Tuesdays. "Marriages suffer. The Democrats could care less about families_that's what this says."

Whoever said this needs his nuts kicked in. What about truck drivers or soldiers or any other number of working people that get to see thier families far less. Seriously, someone kick his nuts in.

Remj

Remj

Seattle, WA
April 2003

DEC 06, 2006 08:20 PM

It's sad that they couldn't do their work like they were paid to do. Maybe they should get docked pay?

I mean, they're obviously not hourly. If they're salary, and they don't fulfill their job duties, they get fired...just like any other job. Except since we can't fire them, maybe at least sue them for reimbursement for an unfulfilled contract.

This sounds like they need oversight! *cough*

hadees

hadees

Austin, TX
December 2003

DEC 06, 2006 08:26 PM

It was always a full time job. Only the job was raising as much money as you can instead of governing. Lets hope that's what really changes.

Darke

Darke

Columbia, MO
June 2005

DEC 06, 2006 08:52 PM

These fuckers should have to punch a damn clock and be able to stay in office 20 years if they want to collect their full pension...

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

DEC 06, 2006 09:09 PM

hadees said:
It was always a full time job. Only the job was raising as much money as you can instead of governing. Lets hope that's what really changes.


Good point. Campaigns seem to be getting longer and more expensive.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next