- commentary
- SATURDAY NOVEMBER 4 2006 2:30 PM
Victims of US Torture Can't Discuss it Because of "National Security"
Submitted by legionnaire
Edited by legionnaire
Tags: national security, torture, victims, Bush, Republicans
The story just keeps more and more absurd. First there was talk of secret CIA prisons where the US could keep suspected terrorists held outside of the protections of US laws. Then the discovery of widespread torture of inmates at the US holding facility in Guantanamo bay, Cuba. The realization that suspected terrorists in these facilities did not have access to an actual public trial, but had to submit to a military tribunal's decision if they attempted to challenge their imprisonment (later found to be unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court.) Now the Bush administration has decided that these torture practices that the US "does not practice" have become a matter of "sensitive national security." And as such, their victims may not discuss the conditions of their "interrogations" with anyone, even their attorneys.
The Bush administration has told a federal judge that terrorism suspects held in secret CIA prisons should not be allowed to reveal details of the "alternative interrogation methods" that their captors used to get them to talk.
The government says in new court filings that those interrogation methods are now among the nation's most sensitive national security secrets and that their release -- even to the detainees' own attorneys -- "could reasonably be expected to cause extremely grave damage." Terrorists could use the information to train in counter-interrogation techniques and foil government efforts to elicit information about their methods and plots, according to government documents submitted to U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton on Oct. 26.
Majid Khan, the complainant in the case, was held captive in US facilities for years in what can only be described as horrendous conditions, while his family did not know his whereabouts.
All of these tactics, when combined, point to a regime that goes beyond any notion of a Nixonian "imperial" presidency. It is tyranny, plain and simple, in the guise of democracy and a "war" against terrorism. Naysayers are often quick to dismiss this type of characterization of the US, assuring people that the secret police have not begun coming in the middle of the night to abduct suspects. Think again.
The family said Khan was staying with a brother in Karachi, Pakistan, in March 2003 when men, who were not in uniform, burst into the apartment late one night and put hoods over the heads of Khan, his brother Mohammad and his brother's wife. The couple's 1-month-old son was also seized.
Another brother, Mahmood Khan, who has lived in the United States since 1989, said in an interview this week that the four were hustled into police vehicles and taken to an undisclosed location, where they were separated and held in windowless rooms. His sister-in-law and her baby remained together, he said.
According to Mahmood, Mohammad said they were questioned repeatedly by men who identified themselves as members of Pakistan's intelligence service and others who identified themselves as U.S. officials. Mohammad's wife was released after seven days, and he was released after three months, without charge. He was left on a street corner without explanation, Mahmood said.
Periodically, he said, people who identified themselves as Pakistani officials contacted Mohammad and assured him that his brother would soon be released and that they ought not contact a lawyer or speak with the news media.
"We had no way of knowing who had him or where he was," Mahmood Khan said this week at the family home outside Baltimore.
Khan may be an actual terrorist. He may be involved in planning terrorist actions against the US and its allies. As such he should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. But that statement only means something when the law itself means something. A government that is willing to place itself above its own constraints in such fundamental aspects of civilization as a right to a fair and public trial, access to an attorney, imprisonment and interrogation in humane conditions and presumption of innocence in order to pursue a political agenda has lost all credibility and moral authority. A complete lack of Congressional oversight on the actions of the Bush presidency have contributed to this disaster, a situation which will hopefully be remedied soon in a few days when the Republicans who toed the line as their president pissed on the constitution are stomped on by their Democratic opponents in the election.




PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3
Comments
MschfMayhemSoap
Phoenix, AZ
April 2006
NOV 04, 2006 02:48 PM
brett54
Australia
November 2004
NOV 04, 2006 03:12 PM
theseeman
Asheville, NC
December 2002
NOV 04, 2006 03:48 PM
Waldo_Jeffers
United Kingdom
OLD SKOOL
NOV 04, 2006 03:53 PM
DieWhiteGirls
Madison, WI
July 2005
NOV 04, 2006 04:31 PM
MikeofEvil2
United Kingdom
September 2003
NOV 04, 2006 04:58 PM
Chainlink
Key West, FL
August 2005
NOV 04, 2006 05:00 PM
DieWhiteGirls
Madison, WI
July 2005
NOV 04, 2006 05:07 PM
DieWhiteGirls
Madison, WI
July 2005
NOV 04, 2006 05:10 PM
Westley
Vatican City
April 2004
NOV 04, 2006 05:18 PM
DieWhiteGirls
Madison, WI
July 2005
NOV 04, 2006 05:28 PM
swedrock
Louisville, KY
October 2005
NOV 04, 2006 05:31 PM
Westley
Vatican City
April 2004
NOV 04, 2006 05:32 PM
Chainlink
Key West, FL
August 2005
NOV 04, 2006 05:36 PM
Chainlink
Key West, FL
August 2005
NOV 04, 2006 05:40 PM
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3