• news
  • WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 27 2006 4:30 PM

Bush and McCain Put Their Raping Hats On

The new torture bill being peddled by the White House and the Senate includes loopholes that allow for rape, sexual assault and sexual abuse. Serbia would be so proud of us. In it’s current form, the bill could make it impossible to prosecute rape or sexual assault as torture. In order to prosecute torture, according to the legislation, there must be specific proof of intent to commit a crime. Motive is nearly impossible to prove in cases of rape or assault according to Rhonda Copelon, a professor of law at the City University of New York.

The bill only mentions rape or sexual assault twice and both times the wording creates loopholes to allow American torturers to engage in the heinous acts. The bill blatantly does not define rape as sex without consent, which is how federal law defines it. Without fear of prosecution guards or interrogators could easily rape inmates as the bill is currently written.


Experts on sexual violence fear that the intent is to absolve American soldiers and their commanders from prosecution for deeds that have occurred since Sept. 11. Copelon also points out that the United States has been trying for years to write a specific intent requirement into international law on torture.


The bill’s definition of sexual abuse is also very narrow, requiring physical contact. These means prisoners could be ordered to strip, and forced into a pile of other naked prisoners (Abu Ghraib) or wear underwear on their head while someone takes nice photos.

Neither Sen. Lindsey Graham nor Sen. John McCain, the bill's authors, responded to questions from the New York Times about why they are okay with rape.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

Comments
swingkitten

swingkitten

Portland, OR
OLD SKOOL

SEP 28, 2006 08:17 PM

More and more these days, I'm realizing it's not healthy to have my brain in constant "suspension of disbelief" mode. I hate this shit.

GhettoBlaster

GhettoBlaster

Cleveland, OH
September 2003

OCT 02, 2006 06:18 AM

To imply that this was deliberately worded so people could get raped is quit a stretch.

Hooraydiation

Hooraydiation

Boston, MA
October 2005

OCT 02, 2006 06:36 AM

GhettoBlaster said:
To imply that this was deliberately worded so people could get raped is quit a stretch.



Even considering that rape has happened before (receiving national attention) and therefore would be something to explicitly disallow, assuming one wanted to make it clear that we do not condone rape?

dem_z

dem_z

United Kingdom
June 2004

OCT 03, 2006 02:03 AM

This makes those complaints about UN troops using prostitutes seem a bit odd.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next