• news
  • THURSDAY AUGUST 24 2006 11:00 PM

More Dirty Tricks From The Jesus People

We have a president who believes intelligent design should be taught in school because he is a crazy evangelical. And now suddenly, and without explanation, evolutionary biology has disappeared from a grant list of acceptable fields of study for low-income college students. Poof! Gone.

The Department of Education insists the removal was an accident and the major should be on the list. The omission was discovered on August 15th but it still has not been corrected. Not having evolutionary biology on the list has a great impact. If any major is not on the list, students cannot get grants unless they declare another major.

The list is specifically designed so majors cannot be left off. Each major is assigned a number, which translates to a code. That code must be used to pick a major or grants will not be given. A major cannot just be written into the list. Evolutionary biology is assigned the number 26.1303. But currently between marine biology 26.1302, and aquatic biology 26.1304, is an empty space.

The omission concerns scientists who are already upset about attacks on the teaching of evolution in schools. An anonymous source at the Department of Education drew professor Dr. Lawrence M. Krauss’ attention to the matter but was too worried about being identified to blow the whistle on their own. Given the current climate many scientists do not believe the removal was a clerical error.


Dr. Krauss said: “Removing that one major is not going to make the nation stupid, but if this really was removed, specifically removed, then I see it as part of a pattern to put ideology over knowledge. And, especially in the Department of Education, that should be abhorred.”

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 34

Next

Comments
_kungfoo_

_kungfoo_

Los Angeles, CA
April 2005

AUG 25, 2006 08:54 AM

education be the devil

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

AUG 25, 2006 08:57 AM

KUNGFOO said:
education be the devil



Julian_Delphinki

Julian_Delphinki

Tijeras, NM
June 2005

AUG 25, 2006 08:57 AM

PointBlank said:

conservative said:
So all you screaming liberals out there that are removing the church from everything understand that you are destroying our country and our society. That is a fact. When religion begins to be removed from society and science takes over that is the beginning of the end. If you don't believe me look at all the great societies of the past, the Romans are the best to look at because we are the most like them and we are walking down the same path.



How about this--show me where the Romans (ha!) "removed religion" before they fell. You can't, because that ain't how it happened, genius.

If I were more of a wise guy, I'd point out that the Roman empire fell around the same time that Chritianity started, so by your own sad excuse for logic, one could say that Christianity destroys cilvilizations.

BTW, how does this site figure in to your devoutness, padre?



When are the retards in charge going to realize that religion is obsolete, counter-productive and needs to be done away with, if for no reason than to find new excuses to kill each other.

artpie

artpie

Winston Salem, NC
December 2003

AUG 25, 2006 09:02 AM

conservative said:
You know it is amazing that we can teach evolution but we cannot teach creationism. I understand the separation between church and state but that it sort of like teaching what the republican party is all about but not teaching what the democrats are about. Wouldn't that cause a major up roar? With that said there should be equal time given to both subject matters. Yes evolution is a good thing to be taught but we don't know how the world started and both theories and that is all they are are theories should be given equal time.

In the old days when people did go to church, the bible is what kids learned to read on. Even in schools folks that is right kids at the turn of the century and before did not read about Dick and Jane, they read excerpts from the bible, in school. Can you believe it and they are the people that built this great country and made it what it is today. There's no way that can't be, our society was so good back then, there's no way they could have read the bible.

So all you screaming liberals out there that are removing the church from everything understand that you are destroying our country and our society. That is a fact. When religion begins to be removed from society and science takes over that is the beginning of the end. If you don't believe me look at all the great societies of the past, the Romans are the best to look at because we are the most like them and we are walking down the same path.



I... um.... well... at least you seem to be who you say you are.

OK...as others have said, Creationism is not science. No matter how badly you want it to be. Some may try to offer proofs but these tend to by exercises in deductive reasoning colored by faith or emotionally based observation. That makes them Mythology. At best it becomes the conjecture of Intelligent Design which justifies the science of Evolution with the omnipotence of God.(disclosure: My cousin is a chemical engineer. He has also written a book in support of Intelligent Design called "Deductive Theology")
If you would suggest that we teach Creationism in a class that included the creation stories from all cultures and religions; I would heartily support you & probably take the class. As it is, I went to a Baptist day school as a child and was literally told that dinosaur skeletons were fakes created by godless scientists. While we used standard science text books, any chapter or experiment that suggest any connection to Evolution was omitted from the curriculum. We also read the Bible. Would these be the good "old days" you are referring to? Or perhaps you'd like to go back a little further. To when that same text was used not only to teach us to read, but to also reinforce oppressive social delineations based upon gender, race, sexual preference, contrary belief system, or what silly hat you were wearing.
I would suggest, sir, that the Church should be removed from everything. The church already has its place. It is its place. While I will agree that faith & personal/cultural belief in a higher power have been some of the contributors to societal development, I would also suggest that they have also been some of the most prevalent oppressors and deniers of fact. If you agree that theology should be an aspect of our education, then we must provide exposure to all theologies in order to educate. If not, we are only indoctrinating.

Idjit

Idjit

HOPEFUL

I'm lost

AUG 25, 2006 09:03 AM

Julian_Delphinki said:

PointBlank said:

conservative said:
So all you screaming liberals out there that are removing the church from everything understand that you are destroying our country and our society. That is a fact. When religion begins to be removed from society and science takes over that is the beginning of the end. If you don't believe me look at all the great societies of the past, the Romans are the best to look at because we are the most like them and we are walking down the same path.



How about this--show me where the Romans (ha!) "removed religion" before they fell. You can't, because that ain't how it happened, genius.

If I were more of a wise guy, I'd point out that the Roman empire fell around the same time that Chritianity started, so by your own sad excuse for logic, one could say that Christianity destroys cilvilizations.

BTW, how does this site figure in to your devoutness, padre?



When are the retards in charge going to realize that religion is obsolete, counter-productive and needs to be done away with, if for no reason than to find new excuses to kill each other.



Believe it or not, people have been saying this for literally thousands of years. The reason it hasn't happened is because it isn't true. Religion may be bullshit, but it still plays an important part in the lives of the majority of people out there.

DhD_No_Pants

DhD_No_Pants

Katy, TX
May 2006

AUG 25, 2006 09:04 AM

PointBlank said:

SpectreInTheUK said:

Idjiit said:

conservative said:
You know it is amazing that we can teach evolution but we cannot teach creationism.



You can teach creationism, just not in a science class. Creationism isn't science.



then why don't public schools have any sort of theology classes in them? at least none of the schools I ever went to. Maybe not necessarily christian theology, but just theology in general.

If you had a class like that, where lessons in Creationism fit better, then we might not even be having this argument.



Errr...just about any high school of any merit has a class where you can study the bible, or world religions.

Any other bullshit you want to pull out of your ass?



Mine didn't and I went to a huge, academically recognized school in Houston.

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

AUG 25, 2006 09:06 AM

conservative said:
So all you screaming liberals out there that are removing the church from everything understand that you are destroying our country and our society. That is a fact.



cough.

we're not stopping you from practicing your religion, we're only disagreeing with the integration of it into our schools and government.

it's not like us liberals are god hating people, either. i went to a catholic high school, okay? we had a class especially for catholocism, weekly mass, and a number of science classes (which not only taught evolution as established fact, but also allowed views that directly contradicted church teachings).

NickFaust

NickFaust

USA
April 2004

AUG 25, 2006 09:12 AM

conservative said:
If you don't believe me look at all the great societies of the past, the Romans are the best to look at because we are the most like them and we are walking down the same path.



Umkay, let's look at the Roman's why don't we?

Wanna tell me where the religion was removed from the society of Rome and science took over?

Some would argue that, in fact, it was the conjoining of the state with Christian religion that contributed to the fall of Rome.

But, while we are at it, can you tell me exaclty how we are "like" the Romans? 'Cause I am just not seeing it.

Idjit

Idjit

HOPEFUL

I'm lost

AUG 25, 2006 09:14 AM

NickFaust said:
But, while we are at it, can you tell me exaclty how we are "like" the Romans? 'Cause I am just not seeing it.



Join me in my vomitorium, and I'll explain it all to you.

PointBlank

PointBlank

New York, NY
November 2004

AUG 25, 2006 09:14 AM

DancehallDreamer said:

PointBlank said:

SpectreInTheUK said:

Idjiit said:

conservative said:
You know it is amazing that we can teach evolution but we cannot teach creationism.



You can teach creationism, just not in a science class. Creationism isn't science.



then why don't public schools have any sort of theology classes in them? at least none of the schools I ever went to. Maybe not necessarily christian theology, but just theology in general.

If you had a class like that, where lessons in Creationism fit better, then we might not even be having this argument.



Errr...just about any high school of any merit has a class where you can study the bible, or world religions.

Any other bullshit you want to pull out of your ass?



Mine didn't and I went to a huge, academically recognized school in Houston.



I have a lot of friends from Houston, and they all had classes in their high school that taught the Bible as literature, as well as social studies classes that discussed the major tenets of the world religions. I'm not sure how you could have a history or English lit program that didn't deal with either of those subjects.

Darke

Darke

Columbia, MO
June 2005

AUG 25, 2006 09:14 AM

Anyone notice on the grant list that 26.1399 still lists as Ecology, Evolution, Systematics and Population Biology, Other?

I mean yeah, maybe it's a conspiracy, but if it is, they were too dumb to notice that all of 26.13xx is listed as Ecology, Evolution, Systematics and Population Biology and there is a catch-all category for people in that department...

Idjit

Idjit

HOPEFUL

I'm lost

AUG 25, 2006 09:14 AM

I'm just glad that someone's representin' the California religious whacko contingent that many in that state would like to pretend doesn't exist.

NewSpectre

NewSpectre

Baltimore, MD
March 2005

AUG 25, 2006 09:15 AM

MrCrisp said:

conservative said:
So all you screaming liberals out there that are removing the church from everything understand that you are destroying our country and our society. That is a fact.



i went to a catholic high school, okay? we had a class especially for catholocism, weekly mass, and a number of science classes (which not only taught evolution as established fact, but also allowed views that directly contradicted church teachings).



this openmindedness is one of the reasons I converted from protestant to Catholic in college.

DhD_No_Pants

DhD_No_Pants

Katy, TX
May 2006

AUG 25, 2006 09:19 AM

PointBlank said:

DancehallDreamer said:

PointBlank said:

SpectreInTheUK said:

Idjiit said:

conservative said:
You know it is amazing that we can teach evolution but we cannot teach creationism.



You can teach creationism, just not in a science class. Creationism isn't science.



then why don't public schools have any sort of theology classes in them? at least none of the schools I ever went to. Maybe not necessarily christian theology, but just theology in general.

If you had a class like that, where lessons in Creationism fit better, then we might not even be having this argument.



Errr...just about any high school of any merit has a class where you can study the bible, or world religions.

Any other bullshit you want to pull out of your ass?



Mine didn't and I went to a huge, academically recognized school in Houston.



I have a lot of friends from Houston, and they all had classes in their high school that taught the Bible as literature, as well as social studies classes that discussed the major tenets of the world religions. I'm not sure how you could have a history or English lit program that didn't deal with either of those subjects.



I think what we have here is a misunderstanding. I thought you meant that there were particular classes devoted to things like world religion. Yes, we had a 'social studies' class, but it went over more of the political than religious beliefs of other nations. And we in no way shape or form had a class that taught the Bible. In fact, for a while, prayer groups in my school were not permitted to gather around the flag pole in the morning for prayers. Even though I, myself, am not a practicing Christian, I signed a petition granting them the rights to pray in school as long as they were not openly 'recruiting' other students or disrupting classes in any way.

PointBlank

PointBlank

New York, NY
November 2004

AUG 25, 2006 09:22 AM

DancehallDreamer said:
[I think what we have here is a misunderstanding. I thought you meant that there were particular classes devoted to things like world religion. Yes, we had a 'social studies' class, but it went over more of the political than religious beliefs of other nations. And we in no way shape or form had a class that taught the Bible. In fact, for a while, prayer groups in my school were not permitted to gather around the flag pole in the morning for prayers. Even though I, myself, am not a practicing Christian, I signed a petition granting them the rights to pray in school as long as they were not openly 'recruiting' other students or disrupting classes in any way.



You couldn't pray in my school either, but you could teach the Bible as literature, just not as fact. Almost all AP English classes will deal with the Bible in some way. I'm sure your school did too.
Teaching the Bible as literature is NOT the same as "teaching the Bible"

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 34

Next