• news
  • WEDNESDAY AUGUST 23 2006 9:00 AM

Time to Unleash Halliburton on the Mexicans

In another brilliant move, our government wants to turn control of our borders over to private companies. The protection and defense of borders is considered important to most nations, but not the U.S. of A! We’re just looking for another way to make our sweet corporations more cash, even at the expense of security.


Immigration policy, programs and current proposals are replete with references to privatization - enforcement, detention, inspections and services - that would place the fate of potential immigrants in the hands of private mercenaries and military contractors.


The best news of all is that America’s best friend, Halliburton, is going to get a piece of the pie. Halliburton has contracts to oversee the expansion of the federal government's capacity to detain immigrants. I’m sure Halliburton will do it’s best to keep down costs while being really, really nice to the immigrants. Does not at all sound like a situation ready for abuse.

In May the government asked for bids from Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Ericsson and Northrop Grumman to build a "virtual fence" of unmanned aerial vehicles, ground surveillance satellites and motion-detection video equipment along the border. Meanwhile, Blackwater Inc., a private security firm of mercenaries, is negotiating to train U.S. Border Patrol officers.

What could possibly go wrong if military contractors and private mercenaries control the borders? Just think of all the exciting possibilities once the federal border patrol is removed from public scrutiny and it disappears into the black hole of corporate rule. And all the exciting profit to be made from human misery. Why send immigrants back quickly, when you make more money by holding onto them? And you can use your Washington lobbyists to create harsher anti-immigrant laws and divert more funding to needless electronic border surveillance. It’s a Goddamn cash cow just waiting to be milked!

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

Comments
fountainofdreams

fountainofdreams

Mokena, IL
January 2005

AUG 23, 2006 04:20 PM

nephares6 said:
We keep privatizing national security and this private club of defense contractors will become more powerful than Caesar.



become?

fountainofdreams

fountainofdreams

Mokena, IL
January 2005

AUG 23, 2006 04:22 PM

ASSH0LE said:
Sounds like it could be a bad idea, that could end up with some great outcome.

What if they're absolutely as effective as it's claimed?

American business can't get the low-wage workers it needs, and the money gets saved somewhere else (which means all kinds of bad news for the rest of us) or the stock market takes a hit. Though to be completely honest, when stuff like this impacts every company equally, the economy tends to work things out some way.

Perhaps we'll just get higher costs generating inflation.

In other words, solving this "problem" will create some real problems that'll need to get solved, perhaps with real laws rather than the current semi-enforced batch of laws.

Perhaps I should buy a home in Las Vegas while there's still some being built by Mexican carpenters versus my buds over at the union. I'd be expecting housing prices to rise here without SOME contractors using lower-paid Mexican laborers.



people might actually have money to pay for these rising prices if they're hired instead of undocumented workers that can be paid shit for a hard day's work.

ThetotalM

ThetotalM

Providence, RI
July 2004

AUG 23, 2006 04:37 PM

I think that its a bad idea for blackwater to take control of the border..leave that to the border control...even if its just training...there trained now..what it hasn't been good enough up until this point. I know Illegals still get in but if theres a will in someone theres a way,. Blackwater will make it all about profilt and disregard human life and that is not an option. Even if you don't like the border patrol send in the national guard like they were originally going to do. Not blackwater. Cheny has racked in enough money for his croonies.

guishy

guishy

I'm lost
June 2005

AUG 23, 2006 05:35 PM

Migrant workers are not a national security issue. No 9/11 hijackers crossed the Rio Grande. Most of them--like half of all illegal immigrants--were overstaying tourist and student visas. If national security justifies a fence on the Mexican border, then it also justifies one on the Canadian border.

The bottom line is that most illegal immigrants are willing to break the law to work in America because so many employers are willing to break the law to hire them. It's a two-way street. So if it so important to stop illegal immigration then lets give Halliburton a billion-dollar contract to build an effective employment eligibility verification system. Otherwise, lets not put stock in conservative pipe dreams.

In the long run, the only people who are going to be separated by a multi-billion-dollar border fence are moderate republicans and extremist republicans. Moderates are plenty ticked because it will be impossible for them to get a majority vote when (very soon) the majority of voters are ethnic minorities. And fiscal conservatives are plenty ticked at how much money the government would be pissing down an endless rathole.

Just my $.02

DhD_No_Pants

DhD_No_Pants

Katy, TX
May 2006

AUG 23, 2006 09:11 PM

ThetotalM said:
I think that its a bad idea for blackwater to take control of the border..leave that to the border control...even if its just training...there trained now..what it hasn't been good enough up until this point. I know Illegals still get in but if theres a will in someone theres a way,. Blackwater will make it all about profilt and disregard human life and that is not an option. Even if you don't like the border patrol send in the national guard like they were originally going to do. Not blackwater. Cheny has racked in enough money for his croonies.



The Nat'l Guard is stretched thin as it is. And you don't know that Blackwater will make it all about profit without any regard for human life. I'm not really envisioning mercenaries sitting on the border sniping out Mexicans as they come through. whatever

My question is whether or not some type of realistic budget can be set in place and adhered to, along with a 'trial' period of allowing a private corporation to take over border control. We don't have to keep 'em there forever, ya know. While they are in the trial period, brainstorm a bit more, and if they don't work out, implement plan B.

Of course, I am just a "separationist" and a bigot because I want to enforce any type of border control at all. I hate me some damn beaners and sure do wish summun' wood do somefin bout it.

Vestril

Vestril

Coronado, CA
February 2003

AUG 23, 2006 10:38 PM

I guess I'm kinda leery of the whole standing army enforcing the law that doesn't report directly to the government thing. It seems like hiring more border patrol would be a better solution.

DhD_No_Pants

DhD_No_Pants

Katy, TX
May 2006

AUG 23, 2006 10:47 PM

I think we should put sharks and rabid dogs with frickin laser beams on their heads to patrol the border...

MisterGone

MisterGone

Burnsville, MN
March 2006

AUG 23, 2006 10:58 PM

DANCEHALLDREAMER FOR PREZ 2008!

Can I be your running mate?

Dead_Ringer

Dead_Ringer

I'm lost
September 2004

AUG 23, 2006 10:59 PM

DancehallDreamer said:
I think we should put sharks and rabid dogs with frickin laser beams on their heads to patrol the border...


Now that's the kind of appropriation I can get behind.

ASSH0LE

ASSH0LE

Las Vegas, NV
June 2003

AUG 23, 2006 11:00 PM

horatios_dreams said:
people might actually have money to pay for these rising prices if they're hired instead of undocumented workers that can be paid shit for a hard day's work.



Great, where's the money to pay that come from? It'll come from major economic adjustments. The easiest adjustment is to raise prices. Our prices go up suddenly, we'll demand our wages go up too. Add to that the no-longer depressed unskilled labor wage... and prices go up! Both because there's some people with more money than before, and because it now costs more to produce, service and market WHATEVER. What this COULD get you is a seemingly endless spiralling inflation. That or the rest of us just get squeezed a bunch more.

Though I suppose before the Repubs get voted out they could do away with Welfare so that the American poor would end up HAVING to take those jobs the Mexicans and other illegals are doing today.

Though none of that is likely to happen. Big business will find someone they can buy to pass the well-written guest worker program that could have solved this "problem" in the first place.

That or the new private border patrol will be about as effective as the old one.

DhD_No_Pants

DhD_No_Pants

Katy, TX
May 2006

AUG 23, 2006 11:01 PM

Dead_Ringer said:

DancehallDreamer said:
I think we should put sharks and rabid dogs with frickin laser beams on their heads to patrol the border...


Now that's the kind of appropriation I can get behind.



Quit talking about my appropriation like that, you perv. I know I've got a great one, but you don't have to drool on it.

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

AUG 24, 2006 12:49 AM

DancehallDreamer said:
Of course, I am just a "separationist" and a bigot because I want to enforce any type of border control at all. I hate me some damn beaners and sure do wish summun' wood do somefin bout it.



Yes, you've been a very bad girl. You need discipline.

SpectreInTheUK said:

I've read the article a couple times in order to try and pick out the little bits of fact from the overwhelming amount of biased opinion and the more I read it the more I absolutely LOVE this idea and think that I'm damn glad the government is doing it.



Thanks. You did do it again. It's still funny.

BGage said:

I beg to differ. Just how do you equate this kind of corporate-government cronyism with Libertarian ideas about smaller, less intrusive government, the importance of which I would think should have become abundantly clear these last 6 years?



Right. I forgot for a moment how Libertarians are capable of convincing themselves that a government which is so weak that it cannot resist becoming captive to overwhelmingly powerful private interests is actually somehow "big." Your pretzel-like rationalizations never cease to amaze me.

What's evolving in this country is technically referred to as a kleptocracy - a police state in which a handful of private interests assume control of state power in order to loot the commonwealth. It's Ayn Rand's wet dream, where all power has been removed from that horrible "public" and handed over to those who have a decent will to power.

RedBstrd

RedBstrd

Riverside, CA
April 2004

AUG 24, 2006 01:06 AM

FilthPig said:
...Or shall we have the government run everything, kinda like communism? ...



Exactly. Everyone who thinks the government is the body that should be responsible for defense of the nation is a god-damned dirty commie pinko.

Zarth

zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

AUG 24, 2006 01:09 AM

RedBstrd said:
Exactly. Everyone who thinks the government is the body that should be responsible for defense of the nation is a god-damned dirty commie pinko.



Well, I don't know about everybody else, but last I checked, you and I actually are god-damned dirty commie pinkos.

RedBstrd

RedBstrd

Riverside, CA
April 2004

AUG 24, 2006 01:13 AM

Zarth said:

RedBstrd said:
Exactly. Everyone who thinks the government is the body that should be responsible for defense of the nation is a god-damned dirty commie pinko.



Well, I don't know about everybody else, but last I checked, you and I actually are god-damned dirty commie pinkos.



Correct, comrade. I also fully intend to start a recruitment drive because apparently this signals a great deal of sympathy in our cause.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next