• commentary
  • WEDNESDAY AUGUST 2 2006 9:00 PM

Maybe There's Nothing the Matter with Kansas?

In his book "What's the Matter with Kansas?" Thomas Frank asks the question of how a state that had previously been associated with union activism and progressive politics had become so incredible conservative, with the nadir arriving in 1999 when the state school board voted to remove mandatory teaching of evolution from the academic curriculum, allowing local districts to decide for themselves whether their high school students should study creationism or science. It was a sad day for many in the scientific community, who saw this as the beginning of the end for the era of rationalism that had, with fits and starts, propelled the Western world into the modern era since the Enlightenment. Several years later things seemed to only be getting worse, as a 6-4 majority voted for mandatory criticisms of Darwinian evolution to be taught in schools, a move many considered to be a precursor to mandating creationism in the classroom.

Things may be finally looking up for Kansas though. With its school board having become a lightning rod for negative publicity and a major source of embarrassment as devotees of the flying spaghetti monster, comedians and politicians made the state the butt of their jokes, a school board election may have turned things around.

With just 6 districts of 1,990 yet to report as of 8 a.m. Central time today, two conservatives — including incumbent Connie Morris, a former west Kansas teacher and author who had described evolution as “a nice bedtime story” — appear to have been defeated decisively by two moderates in the Republican primary elections. One moderate incumbent, Janet Waugh from the Kansas City area, held on to her seat in the Democratic primary.

If her fellow moderates prevailed, Ms. Waugh said last week, “we need to revisit the minutes and every decision that was 6-4, re-vote.”


It's about damned time. Maybe I'm a hopeless optimist, but I like to think that the citizens of Kansas were just caught off guard by these bible-thumping Luddites who would like to drag us all back to the great chain of being and probably ban Islam and Judaism along the way. Regardless, the voters have spoken, some of the idiots have been tossed, and hopefully Kansas students will no longer have to endure being the object of ridicule as they "poke holes" in a scientific theory that is beyond dispute by the scientific establishment, despite the misconceptions still held on it by the general American public. Score one for the good guys.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

Comments
dopeydadwarf

dopeydadwarf

I'm lost
June 2005

AUG 02, 2006 09:57 PM

What happened to our freedoms? Does anybody even remember a document something like the Consitution? Or what about the bill of rights?

Everybody needs to worry about their own damn family! Teach all aspects and allow for the choice. Don't spoonfeed pre-chewed tastless food as to brainwash future generations into the prior reign of thought.

We only hinder by limiting exploration. None of us will know for sure until it is too late anyway. Live your life how you choose. I'd rather live as if there was a God and die to find out there isn't, than to live as if there wasn't and find out there is.

That however does not give me or anybody the right to change the course of live for another mans children.

My 2 cents

MessyJessy

MessyJessy

Fort Myers, FL
August 2005

AUG 02, 2006 10:24 PM

Asparouk

Asparouk

Lafayette, IN
May 2005

AUG 02, 2006 11:06 PM

It's funny. The conservatives love to criticize the public school system and lately they have been focusing on the fact that our science education needs to build up speed again. Yet, they also want trained professionals to teach that Jesus rode a dinosaur and completely ignore the rigorous scientific basis for evolution. Worse, they want to teach "Intelligent Design" as a valid critique of evolutionary theory -- which it isn't. It's a religious objection masquerading as science.

Perhaps some of the more rational people in Kansas (and yes, there are many) have finally figured out the stupidity of the situation.

SirPsychoSexy

SirPsychoSexy

Ridgewood, NJ
January 2004

AUG 02, 2006 11:49 PM

AlterEgo said:
What happened to our freedoms? Does anybody even remember a document something like the Consitution? Or what about the bill of rights?

Everybody needs to worry about their own damn family! Teach all aspects and allow for the choice. Don't spoonfeed pre-chewed tastless food as to brainwash future generations into the prior reign of thought.

We only hinder by limiting exploration. None of us will know for sure until it is too late anyway. Live your life how you choose. I'd rather live as if there was a God and die to find out there isn't, than to live as if there wasn't and find out there is.

That however does not give me or anybody the right to change the course of live for another mans children.

My 2 cents



My 3 cents is the opposite, I'd rather life my life as if there were no eternity and beyond, since I have nothing to look forward to but nothingness after the end result of this cosmic joke we call human consciousness.

And if I am wrong??
Eh.
I live my life without regret, why should "the afterlife" be any different?

Holy_Mountain

Holy_Mountain

West Palm Beach, FL
February 2004

AUG 03, 2006 02:33 AM

AlterEgo said:
Teach all aspects and allow for the choice. Don't spoonfeed pre-chewed tastless food as to brainwash future generations into the prior reign of thought.



Do you think we should teach both the Geocentric and Heliocentric models and allow the students to choose which to believe in? Instead of spoonfeeding and brainwashing children into thinking the earth is round, should we presnt the flat earth theory as an equally valid argument? How is that any more absurd than teaching Creationism in schools?


I'd rather live as if there was a God and die to find out there isn't, than to live as if there wasn't and find out there is.



Pascal's Wager is a pretty weak reason to believe in God.

NikkiIs

NikkiIs

Drexel, MO
April 2005

AUG 03, 2006 04:33 AM

Evolution is just as much a Faith as Creation. Or have they finally found that "Missing Link"? As for the prior schoolboard, putting the Evolution/Creation debate aside, they probably did more to advance education in Kansas then several boards before them. This is the Bible Belt. Always has been and always will be.

jake_lex

jake_lex

Lexington, KY
February 2003

AUG 03, 2006 04:54 AM

NikkiIs said:
Evolution is just as much a Faith as Creation. Or have they finally found that "Missing Link"? As for the prior schoolboard, putting the Evolution/Creation debate aside, they probably did more to advance education in Kansas then several boards before them. This is the Bible Belt. Always has been and always will be.



No, evolution is not "faith". It is based on years and years of field work and observation. It is fully based on scientific method. Darwin's version of evolution has been radically changed, and if a scientist somewhere comes up with a better way to explain things than current evolutionary theory, it will change. By contrast, "creationism" locks its explanation down to a book that was written thousands of years ago, and accepts no alternatives.

This is why I'm glad to see "intelligent design" getting creamed. It fucks up people's understanding of science entirely. The way the term "theory" gets abused in these debates is particularly galling. A "theory" does not mean "a story that we like for now" in the scientific sense.

Oh, and I grew up in the "Bible Belt" too. That's not an excuse for shitty education.

NickFaust

NickFaust

USA
April 2004

AUG 03, 2006 05:51 AM

NikkiIs said:
Evolution is just as much a Faith as Creation. Or have they finally found that "Missing Link"? As for the prior schoolboard, putting the Evolution/Creation debate aside, they probably did more to advance education in Kansas then several boards before them. This is the Bible Belt. Always has been and always will be.



Let's here it for willful, malignant stupidity. I mean, fuck, why don't we teach "Flat Earth" ideas in the schools too. What is with this slavish adherence to the whole round thing.

NickFaust

NickFaust

USA
April 2004

AUG 03, 2006 05:56 AM

AlterEgo said:
What happened to our freedoms? Does anybody even remember a document something like the Consitution? Or what about the bill of rights?

Everybody needs to worry about their own damn family! Teach all aspects and allow for the choice. Don't spoonfeed pre-chewed tastless food as to brainwash future generations into the prior reign of thought.

We only hinder by limiting exploration. None of us will know for sure until it is too late anyway. Live your life how you choose. I'd rather live as if there was a God and die to find out there isn't, than to live as if there wasn't and find out there is.

That however does not give me or anybody the right to change the course of live for another mans children.

My 2 cents



You are indeed lost, my friend.

The issue is not what parents teach their children, which is now and always has been, an unregulated domain.

The issue is what schools teach as science. Creationism (even dressed up in the emporer's new clothes of ID) does not pass muster as science. It is an idea, and as an idea has as much validity as any other idea, but the place for the discussion of ideas is in a philosophy class. Science is a discipline that in which ideas must be tested, questioned, based on replicable evidence and have at least some passing relationship with the emprical world (after which - and only after which, they get to be called theories).

So, teach your children whatever the fuck you want, just leave the teaching of science to science teachers.

BarryJive

BarryJive

Washington, DC
December 2004

AUG 03, 2006 06:05 AM

jake_lex said:
No, evolution is not "faith". It is based on years and years of field work and observation. It is fully based on scientific method. Darwin's version of evolution has been radically changed, and if a scientist somewhere comes up with a better way to explain things than current evolutionary theory, it will change. By contrast, "creationism" locks its explanation down to a book that was written thousands of years ago, and accepts no alternatives.

This is why I'm glad to see "intelligent design" getting creamed. It fucks up people's understanding of science entirely. The way the term "theory" gets abused in these debates is particularly galling. A "theory" does not mean "a story that we like for now" in the scientific sense.

Oh, and I grew up in the "Bible Belt" too. That's not an excuse for shitty education.



NikkiIs, I think you've just been pwned. And I'm not sure that science will ever find a "missing link". What have they found is that, genetically speaking, we're all very similar. All modern humans are descended from a single group of early humans, likely the only survivors of a large-scale natural catastrophe to hit the Earth some 100K years ago.

JosephB

JosephB

Concordia, KS
July 2006

AUG 03, 2006 07:13 AM

Kansas progressives are delighted that the primary election had raised the prospect of a return to a science-oriented State Board of Education. We are also proud of Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius, her defense of women's rights and her opposition to the conservative agenda. She should be the first female President!

JosephB
jbdetrixhe@nckdirect.com

mrpenbrook

mrpenbrook

Oak Park, IL
February 2004

AUG 03, 2006 07:55 AM


Regardless, the voters have spoken, some of the idiots have been tossed, and hopefully Kansas students will no longer have to endure being the object of ridicule as they "poke holes" in a scientific theory that is beyond dispute by the scientific establishment, despite the misconceptions still held on it by the general American public.



There's no such thing as a scientific theory that is beyond dispute. It's just that the dispute must come in the form of more science. wink

demonesskage

demonesskage

Oakland, CA
July 2004

AUG 03, 2006 08:21 AM

NickFaust said:
The issue is what schools teach as science. Creationism (even dressed up in the emporer's new clothes of ID) does not pass muster as science. It is an idea, and as an idea has as much validity as any other idea, but the place for the discussion of ideas is in a philosophy class. Science is a discipline that in which ideas must be tested, questioned, based on replicable evidence and have at least some passing relationship with the emprical world (after which - and only after which, they get to be called theories).



I think you managed to put this better then anyone else. Certainly better then I would have been able to.

At one point Kansas had the best public education in the country. I'm glad to hear that someone is trying to reclaim that.

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
Not that I have children, want to have children, or will ever live in Kansas. But that is another matter entirely.


I don't even want to think about running into newly graduated humans in my career in the future, who were taught that sort of thing as fact. By then it would be so ingrained it would be nearly impossible to disillusion them.

NikkiIs

NikkiIs

Drexel, MO
April 2005

AUG 03, 2006 04:36 PM

BarryJive said:

jake_lex said:
No, evolution is not "faith". It is based on years and years of field work and observation. It is fully based on scientific method. Darwin's version of evolution has been radically changed, and if a scientist somewhere comes up with a better way to explain things than current evolutionary theory, it will change. By contrast, "creationism" locks its explanation down to a book that was written thousands of years ago, and accepts no alternatives.

This is why I'm glad to see "intelligent design" getting creamed. It fucks up people's understanding of science entirely. The way the term "theory" gets abused in these debates is particularly galling. A "theory" does not mean "a story that we like for now" in the scientific sense.

Oh, and I grew up in the "Bible Belt" too. That's not an excuse for shitty education.



NikkiIs, I think you've just been pwned. And I'm not sure that science will ever find a "missing link". What have they found is that, genetically speaking, we're all very similar. All modern humans are descended from a single group of early humans, likely the only survivors of a large-scale natural catastrophe to hit the Earth some 100K years ago.




Well they can beleive what they want. Since I didn't state that creation is right either, maybe they should go back to school to learn about reading comprehension. But the entire THEORY behind one day we where Homo Eructus and then the next, Homo Sapien is as completely absurd as creation. For that matter lets go with the "A spaceship full of Telephone Sanitizers and Hair Dressers crashed and BOOM. Here we are" route. So yes folks, call me stupid, call me ignorant, but remember. 100 years ago science said it would never be possible to walk on the moon. Boy science sure was wrong.

bean

bean

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

AUG 03, 2006 04:46 PM

NikkiIs said:
Well they can beleive what they want. Since I didn't state that creation is right either, maybe they should go back to school to learn about reading comprehension. But the entire THEORY behind one day we where Homo Eructus and then the next, Homo Sapien is as completely absurd as creation. For that matter lets go with the "A spaceship full of Telephone Sanitizers and Hair Dressers crashed and BOOM. Here we are" route. So yes folks, call me stupid, call me ignorant, but remember. 100 years ago science said it would never be possible to walk on the moon. Boy science sure was wrong.



BZZZT! Try again, and this time, try not completely misinterpreting the word "theory" in the context of science. Scientific theory is not the same as a hairbrained idea pulled out of someone's ass, and it's not the same thing as faith.

Try letting this concept soak in for a bit:

mrpenbrook said:
There's no such thing as a scientific theory that is beyond dispute. It's just that the dispute must come in the form of more science. wink


Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next