• news
  • SATURDAY MARCH 18 2006 1:17 PM

Los Angeles Addresses Skid Row Causes

Finally, civil libertarians, law enforcement officials, downtown business owners, and the city government of Los Angeles have come to an agreement on a plan to reduce the downtown Skid Row population. For once, it doesn't involve short-sighted sweeps of the tent-and-cardboard-box encampments, which have only served to temporarily relocate the homeless population to short-term jail stays or push the camps into other neighborhoods.

The new approach combines cracking down on drug dealers, increasing patrols by experienced police officers instead of rookie beat cops, and expanding drug rehab programs, medical care programs, and job training programs in the area.

The various parties are lined up behind a plan put forward by criminologist George Kelling, who has called for the LAPD to crack down on the drug dealers, prostitutes and other criminals on skid row.

His strategy would put dozens more officers on the streets of skid row, with an emphasis on experienced beat cops rather than rookies. In addition to the heavier uniformed police presence, there would be more undercover officers assigned to target the area's drug bazaars.

But the plan would leave in place for now the homeless encampments that stand near the increasingly gentrifying sections of downtown where historic buildings have been converted into upscale lofts and condos.

Downtown business interests, traditionally the biggest advocates for a "take back the streets" approach to cleaning up the area, say they support Kelling's plan even if it would allow homeless people to remain in their tents for now.

"We've come to the sad conclusion that most of it is a drug problem," Central City Assn. President Carol Schatz said.

[Los Angeles Mayor Antonio] Villaraigosa is spearheading a $50-million effort to build thousands of heavily subsidized apartments for the most intransigent street people, placing them in buildings that will also offer medical care, counseling and job training.



With money coming in from Proposition 63, which increased funding for services like Villaraigosa wants, and increased understanding and cooperation from the downtown Business Associations, perhaps this multi-pronged approach to reducing the causes of homelessness will have a positive effect on the more than 24,000 who currently call the streets of Los Angeles "home."

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

Comments
BraveArt

BraveArt

Los Angeles, CA
February 2004

MAR 21, 2006 01:29 PM

the thing is....imho...Nick and Shal are both right. Not every homeless person is there for the exact same reason. There is no one magic "cure-all". Yes, for many people, an effective treatment program may be the first and best step towards rehabilitation...and for others, just to get a roof over their heads would begin to turn things around rapidly. It is a far more complex problem that requires a multi-pronged solution in order to see progress. just my .02

NickFaust

NickFaust

USA
April 2004

MAR 21, 2006 04:51 PM

Cash said:

I'd like to see some links & references dealing with this program in New York. At first glance...I'd lean towards Shalome in thinking that giving a severe drug addict or a mentally unstable person a place to live before eliminating the problems that made them homelss in the first place would, on the surface, seem like a temporary solution at best.



This from a NYtimes Article.

The traditional approach has been to require this population to clean itself up before obtaining housing. But the approach, however fair, does not work, Mr. Tsemberis said. ''The reason that we've had this group of chronically homeless people,'' he said, is that officials controlling the programs are ''very attached to that idea.''

Thus far the Pathways alternative -- providing housing first, with a team of social workers, psychiatrists, nurses, employment specialists, substance-abuse counselors and peer counselors offering support afterward -- has proved effective. A federally funded study, written by Mr. Tsemberis, randomly assigned 225 homeless people to either Pathways or New York's traditional homeless service program and tracked them for 24 months; 80 percent of Pathways clients found and maintained housing, compared with 34 percent in the control group.

The program has proved cost effective as well. In Westchester, a year of Pathways housing costs about $23,000, versus $36,000 to $48,000 a year for a shelter, according to Kevin Mahon, commissioner of the county Department of Social Services. Mr. Mahon says the county is considering a top-to-bottom shift to the housing-first model.

The effect of the approach, on both the homeless populations and the bottom line, has made it attractive to liberals and conservatives alike. The Bush administration has placed the concept at the center of its 10-year plan to end chronic homelessness.



Here is the link, but it is subscription.

This is a link to Pathways to Housing's publications page, where there are several publications documenting the approach and its outcomes.

It really does work. There is big controversy in the addictions field over abstinence vs. harm reductions strategies, but the research is really supporting the idea that helping people, and then helping them to cut down on drug use is a very effective approach. Eventually, they want to get clean, which is the key of course.

But think about it, if you were living on the street, why would you want to be straight?

CheshireCat

CheshireCat

Los Angeles, CA
January 2004

MAR 21, 2006 05:45 PM



want to be straight


....again its a individual choice ......... everyone has a different reason. Giving someone a roof is not going to make them a better citizen.something happened that puut them on the street.Maybe it starts with education ...being intelligent whatever. when I was homeleSs I did everything I could to get out of that stiuation ;some people sink into drugs because of it......they just completely give up on life.

grahf

grahf

New York, NY
September 2002

MAR 21, 2006 07:54 PM

CheshireCat said:
they are not all crazy, sure a drug habit is hard to kick but they must willingly make the decision to stop


Anyone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it the case that something like that 50% of homeless people have both mental illness and substance abuse problems. That's some evil synergy there.

NickFaust

NickFaust

USA
April 2004

MAR 21, 2006 08:17 PM

CheshireCat said:


want to be straight


....again its a individual choice ......... everyone has a different reason. Giving someone a roof is not going to make them a better citizen.something happened that puut them on the street.Maybe it starts with education ...being intelligent whatever. when I was homeleSs I did everything I could to get out of that stiuation ;some people sink into drugs because of it......they just completely give up on life.



Let's be clear about something okay? The fact that you were had a little vacation on skid row (that is according to your description, right?) does not make you an expert on homelessness. Regardless of your personal experience, the data seems pretty clear that Housing First initiatives do work.

40% of homeless people in LA are children. 20% of Homeless people in LA are victims of domestic violence. 25% of homeless people in LA suffer from physical disabilities. 25% of homeless people in LA are mentally ill. In short, there are lots of reasons that people become homeless (and the have little to do with how smart or educated they are.) 30 to 50% of people who are homeless are chronic drug users, did they use before they became homeless, after they became homeless, or was it incidental to their homelessness? I don't know and guess what? You don't either.

People need help. Even people who have given up on themselves need help. You have said very little about the circumstances of your homelessness, but I am betting that you didn't get out of it all by yourself - or if you did you are the one and only exceptional human being (which sort of makes me wonder how you became homeless in the first place, with all that character and personal strength).

Be skeptical if you want, but your conclusions about why people become and stay homeless amounts to nothing more than prejudice. It is the kind of prejudice that predominates in programs that do little more than keep people homeless.

The Housing First movement is an authentic, effective effort that helps people find permanent housing. Do they become "good citizens"? Well, I don't know. What we do know is that they get and keep housing. Who are we to judge beyond that?

talisman

talisman

Minneapolis, MN
November 2004

MAR 22, 2006 01:48 AM

i'm still waiting for the part where the people of Skid Row are quoted on their thoughts about their own lives.

that should provide plenty of time to start a study on why the people who study people, fellow human beings, in terms of problems and solutions, symptoms and disease, almost always forget to ask questions about their own viewpoint, about their own culture and belief system.

Godfrey Reggio speaks on a similar theme in interview segments on the dvd releases of Koyaanisqatsi and Poyaqqatsi. Baraka is a film that reminded me that Democracy, capitalism, consumerism, and all that has come with it is nothing the moment I forget I am a fellow human traveller on this planet in this time, in this manner.

CheshireCat

CheshireCat

Los Angeles, CA
January 2004

MAR 22, 2006 01:08 PM



nothing more than prejudice


.......lets stop the fighting first hand. I never claimed to be an expert on the homeless;only on what I have seen and been around. I use to work at a place which catered to recovering drug addicts ; mainly heroin users so I saw alot of people from different walks of life.I have known trust fund kids living on the streets next to your average disturbed homeless person. I do not argue that people need help but they also need to help themselves instead of milking the system.Statistics and percentages do not get you to know the people you are trying to help. You do not understand street culture unless you have been there in the gut undercover....try that instead of looking on from a distance . Go live with them and get a first hand experience. My situation was due to economics in which I was forced to live that way for a short while ..........and in turn I learned alot from it. All I am saying is that some people embrace the life.There are people I have tried to help but they did not want it;thet preferred and were cognitive of the way they were living. I use to go down to tent city at night and hand out supplies but the shelters asked us to stop doing it;why I do not know.

NickFaust

NickFaust

USA
April 2004

MAR 22, 2006 01:19 PM

CheshireCat said:


nothing more than prejudice


.......lets stop the fighting first hand. I never claimed to be an expert on the homeless;only on what I have seen and been around. I use to work at a place which catered to recovering drug addicts ; mainly heroin users so I saw alot of people from different walks of life.I have known trust fund kids living on the streets next to your average disturbed homeless person. I do not argue that people need help but they also need to help themselves instead of milking the system.Statistics and percentages do not get you to know the people you are trying to help. You do not understand street culture unless you have been there in the gut undercover....try that instead of looking on from a distance . Go live with them and get a first hand experience. My situation was due to economics in which I was forced to live that way for a short while ..........and in turn I learned alot from it. All I am saying is that some people embrace the life.There are people I have tried to help but they did not want it;thet preferred and were cognitive of the way they were living. I use to go down to tent city at night and hand out supplies but the shelters asked us to stop doing it;why I do not know.



I have spent years working with the mentally ill and addicted homeless. From that experience I would put the number of people who are homeless as a lifestyle choice at less than 5%.

I am also aware the many drug users appear recalcitrant. My experience has been that that appearance rises more from the perspective and approach of the people trying to "help" them, than it does from them.

In any case, I have, in the course of the time I have worked with these folks never encountred a person who did not want to improve their lot in life and change the circumstances of their existance.

CheshireCat

CheshireCat

Los Angeles, CA
January 2004

MAR 23, 2006 12:26 PM



mentally ill


........so what do you do with the percentage that cannot be helped;meaning the incurable..?? I think most people in prison have it better than the homeless; you know shelter , consistent feeding, drugs...etc..etc.... was there not a time in the 80s when alot of mental facilities were closed and the people just released upon the streetS....??

NickFaust

NickFaust

USA
April 2004

MAR 23, 2006 01:01 PM

CheshireCat said:


mentally ill


........so what do you do with the percentage that cannot be helped;meaning the incurable..?? I think most people in prison have it better than the homeless; you know shelter , consistent feeding, drugs...etc..etc.... was there not a time in the 80s when alot of mental facilities were closed and the people just released upon the streetS....??



There were two waves of hospital closures, in the 60's when people were just streeted and in the late 80's when they were supposed to be released to programs in communities. The technology has changed quite a bit in the intervening years, but efforts now focus on the basics, a place to live and some kind of work.

Prison - which is now the largest provider of shelter for the mentally ill is no good alternative. People in prison are victimized, abused and harmed in ways that are incomparable to anything they would experience on the street.

The "incurable" is actually quite a small number. Most people can be helped if you fiqure out the right approach. For that small number who cannot, well it is their right to refuse treatment and if they are able to make it on the streets and stay out of jail, that is a form of success.

The point of my posts has been to say that there are great methods out there for helping people - insisting that they be clean and sober before you get them housing is not among them.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next