• feature
  • FRIDAY FEBRUARY 6 2009 10:00 AM

Music Business Bail-Out?

I guess if I'm going to be a columnist for SG, I'm going to have to talk about something I know well. I go back and forth about one particular subject because I don't want to bite the hand that feeds. I don't want to piss people off to the point where they completely stop buying my records, and I don't want to come off as a whiny musician. I love what I do and I love my life but the fact is, the music industry is in serious trouble. In the age of government bail-outs, who is going to take care of the music business? Who is going to bail us out?

For the past 10 years between file sharing online, people copying their CDs for friends, blatant piracy and lesser quality product, the music industry has been taking a massive beating. U2's manager Paul McGuiness said the industry is on its way to oblivion in the next couple of years. It goes down about 20% in volume every year. Even though music is more popular than ever, our industry is failing miserably. So what roles do the audience, the musicians and the technology play in all of this?

Well, the mainstream music audience is acting like sheep. They are fine with three (now four) judges once a week picking out the safest, cleanest singers out there and re-packaging them like in a factory. The audience eats it up, buys the "Idol's" records and turns the reality star into a household name.

If you're an independent, small band, there's no money to invest to go deep into the promotion of your record. It's hard to get a real shot. Even on a major label, it's difficult for anyone who's not a multi-platinum act because you'll only get one chance for a hit single. If you don't catch that break, you'll be sent packing.

During better days, a young Bruce Springsteen released two records at the beginning of his career that completely stiffed. By then, his record company had invested millions of dollars in him, and were committed to him because someone believed. If it were today, they might have given up and dropped him. By his third record, Springsteen got it right and created Born to Run. This kind of investment and commitment by a label will never be seen again. There is no artist development. There is no patience. There is no place for an artist to grow in today's musical climate.

Today, musicians have got to learn how to make records cheaply, efficiently and quickly. In Filter's world, I've learned how to make records for 1/10th of what I used to spend on a single video. And I don't get to pocket all of the money made from sales. I am not alone in this. I have to pay my engineers, producers, band members, managers, agents, touring crew, and many, many more. It's not just one guy sitting with a mic and a guitar. It takes a whole team of people to create, release, and promote an album. I consider myself lucky to see any profit at all. Like you, I'm just happy to keep a roof over my head and put food out on the table for my family.

Advances in technology have made it incredibly easy to make records, which helps, but it's also made it incredibly easy to steal records. You can grab someone's CD, put it in your laptop and burn 100 copies of that very CD. And file sharing? People can find whatever they want on the internet and simply take it. It has devalued music to the point that people do not even believe they are doing anything wrong. Back in my day, if you wanted to steal music, you had to go into a record shop, pick up a CD, fucking punch someone in the face and run out of the store with it-or hide it under your jacket like a common thief. Every time this happens, it gives one less band a realistic shot at greatness, it cuts the salary of an engineer or a guitar player, it perpetuates a very ugly downward cycle that I unfortunately don't see stopping anytime soon.

It is really up to everyone to be decent and responsible, something the majority of society has a problem doing. Can the artists make better financial decisions? Can the fans be more honest about how they get the music? We have to work together to make the music industry work because we aren't getting a bailout anytime soon.


Richard Patrick is the frontman for the rock band Filter. Their latest album, Anthems for the Damned, which features the single "Soldiers of Misfortune," is in stores now. Look out for their greatest hits collection, The Very Best Things (1995-2008), which will be available on March 31. Click HERE for more info.


 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 8

Next

Comments
nicole_powers

nicole_powers

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

FEB 08, 2009 09:52 AM

I think we need to get away from the personal attacks and back on point here: whatever your feelings on file sharing (for or against), unless you know the person you're "sharing" with, it really is just a white-washed and palatable euphemism for stealing.

The question is are you morally OK with that? Is it a petty acceptable crime? Or something that in the long term may deprive us of talent, since perhaps down the line the only new artists that will be able call music their career will be already rich dilatants (a trend I'm already noticing!).

I think we all agree the industry as we know it needed to die. We also need to deal with the issue that there’s a plethora of ways beyond file sharing that artists are being deprived of their rightful income (as per my previous comment). The major labels share responsibility with radio and the other broadcast industries in this.

For example, America is one of the only countries in the western world that doesn’t fully recognize neighboring rights –– performance income which is a neighboring right to publishing --–– hence the name. Broadcasters in the U.S. have consistently and successfully lobbied our government because they didn’t want to pay performers when they broadcast their music. This not only deprived artists of income here in the U.S. but since the U.S. wouldn’t recognize rights that other countries did, they weren’t given the benefits of reciprocal rights, the upshot being that American performers don’t receive this income from the rest of the world either. In simple terms, this makes an American singer or musician poorer than his compatriot who has a similar success-level in Europe. This situation is being rectified somewhat with online broadcast, and Sound Exchange (if you’re an artist be sure to join), but terrestrial radio is still get a free- ride at the expense of artists, who are also losing out on rest of world income because of it.

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

FEB 08, 2009 09:57 AM

okay...

Spid3y said:
Your band started making shitty music, then started making even shittier videos that were over produced bullshit, and now you are going to blame piracy on your failure?


a) i think we're listening to different bands, and b) please show me where, in the article, he complained about the present success of his band. he said that label money was tighter than it used to be, yes, but most of the article discussed the problems new artists are having. less ad hominems and more reading comprehension, plz.

Spid3y said:
So fuck you for writing this bullshit, complaining about Idol's when there has been Star Search since 1983 and other shows that have been the same thing so for long without a major hit to the industry.


yeah, see, Star Search and its ilk were never actually all that popular. American Idol is topping the Nielsen ratings. your logic is fail.

it's weird how some peoples' first reaction to a celebrity is mindless hostility.

nicole_powers said:
whatever your feelings on file sharing (for or against), unless you know the person you're "sharing" with, it really is just a white-washed and palatable euphemism for stealing.

The question is are you morally OK with that? Is it a petty acceptable crime? Or something that in the long term may deprive us of talent, since perhaps down the line the only new artists that will be able call music their career will be already rich dilatants (a trend I'm already noticing!).


the thing is, i don't think the moral argument is ever going to persuade enough people to make a difference. the morality of filesharing is kinda irrelevant for the simple reason that too many people don't care about the morality. maybe it's wrong--but it's not going anywhere.

Hunkpapa

Hunkpapa

United Kingdom
June 2004

FEB 08, 2009 10:41 AM

nicole_powers said:

Courtney Love was right. Musicians need better representation. Her concept of a new guild was the right idea at the wrong time. Perhaps it could work now in this new, more union friendly climate.



The Featured Artist's Coalition was launched over here last year, which was a good sign.

Jena

Jena

New York, NY
June 2003

FEB 08, 2009 11:53 AM

nicole_powers said:
back on point here: whatever your feelings on file sharing (for or against), unless you know the person you're "sharing" with, it really is just a white-washed and palatable euphemism for stealing.



That's an opinion.

Do you honestly not see the connection between the rise of file sharing and the simutaneous jump in cd prices along with cessation of singles for sale? Seriously.

If people seriously want to whine about "stealing", one could counter that artists and labels are total scumbags for forcing fans to either pay $20 to get one song or eat shit. If labels continued to produce singles for purchase (like the old days!) and hadn't been so greedy in trying to forcefully boost album sales, the downloading culture wouldn't have become so rampant.

Jena

Jena

New York, NY
June 2003

FEB 08, 2009 12:02 PM

Not to mention, countless mainstream artists have created alternate ways of making up for the reality that people are not buying new releases at full value (like me, buying used cds).

Radiohead put themselves at the center of the world by offering an album for donation only, The White Stripes sell cooky limited edition teasures, I already explained Prince (page 2) and low and behold, vinyl and exclusive collectable vinyl releases have made a strong comeback.

Sorry to say but if you're an artist and you can't be creative, you need to find another profession.

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

FEB 08, 2009 12:04 PM

yeah, it's really less of a moral question than it is a legal question. it's not really accurate to call filesharing "stealing" since the victim incurs no actual losses--that is, their inventory of salable goods is not reduced, and according to many studies they're not even losing a possible sale (in other words, people aren't downloading stuff that they would otherwise buy). it's illegal, yes, but law and morality are not the same thing. artificially maintaining your inflated prices by attempting to suppress technological breakthroughs is legal. is it moral?

what's really being lost, i think, is exactly what RPatrick_Filter complained of--the ability of the music industry to produce artificially popular stars. new artists are no longer able to depend (to the extent that they ever were) on being discovered and nurtured by a producer with deep pockets. that means that they have to depend on their own resources to get their music out to the public--which, given internet, is not as hard as it sounds. it's still really really hard, of course, but at least it's not really really really really really hard.

the long-term effect, i think, will be a lower number of "superstars"--fewer big-name, popular artists that everyone knows. we'll trend instead towards a larger number of moderately-successful artists.

though i could be wrong. people loves them some celebrities, and business executives loves them some money. i would not be at all surprised to see a generation of rock stars who never sell a single album.

drrn

drrn

Washington, NJ
December 2007

FEB 09, 2009 05:24 PM

RPatrick_Filter said:
Tapes aren't DIGITAL! They sound like crap! Mp3 are almost perfect reproductions, leading people to not buy the album because they sound the same.



Don't hate on tape culture. frown

lil_tuffy

lil_tuffy

MODERATOR

San Francisco, CA

FEB 09, 2009 06:20 PM

The music industry doesn't need a bailout; it needs an enema.

The thought that a bailout would help anyone but the fatcats and pre-manufactured crap is ludicrous.

This whole bailout nonsense has me all worked up -- people seem to confuse it with a hand-out. Lord know I'm not going to get a break... ever.

Shal

Shal

Los Angeles, CA
October 2002

FEB 09, 2009 06:34 PM

lil_tuffy said:
The music industry doesn't need a bailout; it needs an enema.

The thought that a bailout would help anyone but the fatcats and pre-manufactured crap is ludicrous.

This whole bailout nonsense has me all worked up -- people seem to confuse it with a hand-out. Lord know I'm not going to get a break... ever.



Perhaps you need a label to nurture you, Tuffy.

lil_tuffy

lil_tuffy

MODERATOR

San Francisco, CA

FEB 09, 2009 07:02 PM

Shalome said:

lil_tuffy said:
The music industry doesn't need a bailout; it needs an enema.

The thought that a bailout would help anyone but the fatcats and pre-manufactured crap is ludicrous.

This whole bailout nonsense has me all worked up -- people seem to confuse it with a hand-out. Lord know I'm not going to get a break... ever.



Perhaps you need a label to nurture you, Tuffy.



You think musicians get the raw end of the deal? Try making art for musicians.

mydogfarted

mydogfarted

Oakland, NJ
June 2003

FEB 09, 2009 07:19 PM

lil_tuffy said:

Shalome said:

lil_tuffy said:
The music industry doesn't need a bailout; it needs an enema.

The thought that a bailout would help anyone but the fatcats and pre-manufactured crap is ludicrous.

This whole bailout nonsense has me all worked up -- people seem to confuse it with a hand-out. Lord know I'm not going to get a break... ever.



Perhaps you need a label to nurture you, Tuffy.



You think musicians get the raw end of the deal? Try making art for musicians.



Perhaps it's time for the end of free bacon night.

lil_tuffy

lil_tuffy

MODERATOR

San Francisco, CA

FEB 09, 2009 07:32 PM

Free bacon night pays more bills than most of the bands I work for do. does. whatever.

LaneMeyer

LaneMeyer

Brooklyn, NY
August 2002

FEB 09, 2009 08:18 PM

If doing what you do doesn't work for you, then do something else. Or don't.

nicole_powers

nicole_powers

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

FEB 10, 2009 09:54 AM

lil_tuffy said:
The music industry doesn't need a bailout; it needs an enema.



Agreed.

Also, I think a lot of people are missing the double meaning in the "Bail-Out?" headline.

I don't think Richard's necessarily suggesting that the music industry should get a banking industry style bailout, he's also asking if it's time for artists to bail out of the industry as we know it.

These days it really makes sense for bands to cut the industry out of their business, if possible, to maintain a direct link with their fans. Musicians can then make more money on one tenth of the sales, selling downloads direct as opposed to CDs via the majors. Richard's point being, that new artists do need the kind of development and financial assistance that majors used to offer in order to get to this self-sustaining level.

As for illegal downloading, steps are being taken to make this less of an issue, and prophylactic copyright protection technology is starting to catch up with that of downloaders who are unwilling to pay. However, though I do appreciate copyright holders have a right to protect their intellectual property, I found this development, as reported by the LA Weekly, rather disturbing.

Apparently, the powers that be at Google's Blooger, are culling posts that have the potential to infringe music copyrights, without warning or any of the appropriate checks to find out if any copyrights are indeed being infringed.

The article is well worth reading, and those who maintain journals on Blogger may want to consider switching to another platform.

mydogfarted

mydogfarted

Oakland, NJ
June 2003

FEB 10, 2009 11:13 AM

lil_tuffy said:
Free bacon night pays more bills than most of the bands I work for do. does. whatever.



Yes, but 5 cent bacon could keep the terrorists from winning. tongue

As to your original statement, I can't even grasp the pittance you see for your work, only to potentially see it on the cover of a multi-platinum record. I'm guessing there are no royalties to be had?

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 8

Next