BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH

Roger Daltrey Calls Live Earth Shows 'Bollocks'

SATURDAY MAY 19 2007 5:00 PM



Man, it seemed that most if not all of us could agree that Al Gore was doing a pretty cool thing with his upcoming Live Earth concerts, but count Who frontman Roger Daltrey out of the back-patting party.

In a recent conversation with British tabloid The Sun, Daltrey wasn't shy about sharing his view that the event is a load of shit.

"Bollocks to that! The last thing the planet needs is a rock concert. I can't believe it. Let's burn even more fuel. We have problems with global warming, but the questions and the answers are so huge I don't know what a rock concert's ever going to do to help. Everybody on this planet at the moment, unless they are living in the deepest rainforest in Brazil, knows about climate change.”


Fair enough. At least Roger doesn't mince words. So what does the singer propose we do to remedy our environmental woes?

"My answer is to burn all the fucking oil as quick as possible and then the politicians will have to find a solution.”


Surprisingly, noted humanitarian Sir Bob Geldof seems to agree with Daltrey. Last week he more or less told the press the same thing, noting that "we are all fucking conscious of global warming." No love for Al, I suppose. A spokesperson for the event came to Mr. Gore's defense, reminding the Brits that people "are aware of global warming but millions are not doing anything about changing their lifestyles.”

Judge for yourself on July 7, when Live Earth take place at various venues around the world.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

PlanNine

PlanNine

Orlando, FL
January 2005

MAY 19, 2007 05:07 PM

Wasn't Bob Geldof behind the Live 8 which was the same fuckin stupid thing, but it was awareness for poor countries, not global warming? whatever

ZetaMale

ZetaMale

Tallahassee, FL
April 2006

MAY 19, 2007 05:28 PM

"My answer is to burn all the fucking oil as quick as possible and then the politicians will have to find a solution."


Admittedly, I know very little about this sort of thing, so by all means correct me if I'm wrong, but won't that do the same amount of damage that we're doing now, only much more quickly?

Also, the objection to an energy-consuming concert would carry more weight with me if he didn't make his living doing the same thing. At the very least, the energy consumption of the Live Earth concerts are for charity, whereas Who concerts (again, please correct me if I'm wrong) are not as much so.

theaceface

theaceface

Los Angeles, CA
March 2007

MAY 19, 2007 05:39 PM

The Who do a fairly large number of charity shows, more so than you would think. None of the charities they work with are in support of environmental issues to my knowledge.

While I may agree with Roger that this concert will not make a dent with those influential enough to make changes that would help fight global warming, his solution doesn't seem to offer an amenable solution. Remember that The Who played Woodstock, which was supposed to change an entire generation's way of thinking, but all it really amounted to was a great concert in the mud with really bad acid and no water.

ckdexterhaven

ckdexterhaven

Redding, CA
December 2005

MAY 19, 2007 05:55 PM

I don't know, i think raising awareness of the issues is a good thing.

Redspider

redspider

New York, NY
May 2007

MAY 19, 2007 05:55 PM

Maybe by doing something like this concert, they could come up with alternatives to power the shows, get people to bring their own fuckin' baggies,wipe their asses with Seventh generation Toilet paper





,...anything.



And hell , if that don't get the ball rolling in the right direction, do what Jolly Roger and his bros have been doing all along, namely turning them amps up to 11 and to hell with the world......

masterfrederick

masterfrederick

Beaverton, OR
November 2006

MAY 19, 2007 06:02 PM

ZetaMale said:

"My answer is to burn all the fucking oil as quick as possible and then the politicians will have to find a solution."


Admittedly, I know very little about this sort of thing, so by all means correct me if I'm wrong, but won't that do the same amount of damage that we're doing now, only much more quickly?



Not really...

Here's the interesting part: Once all the oil is gone the atmosphere will be bad-- for a while. Then the weather will do its damage, with acid rain-- for a while. But once it's gone from the air as a result of being scrubbed out of the sky by way of precipitation, it's gone for good. Things will get better. The earth will begin to heal. It's mended all the rest of the damage we've done to it so far-- Nuclear waste stops being radioactive after a time, even plastic eventually decomposes. Petroleum based greenhouse gasses will break down too, given time. The ozone layer can heal too-- static electricity is a BIG producer of ozone. Electricity in general helps a lot too. Ever smell your hairdryer after you turn it off? Own an Ionic air filter? That smell- it's OZONE. In fact, several species that are dying a slow extinction due to the climate change and filthy air might just survive a quicker consumption of the chemicals that are killing them. In short, it will get worse-- for a while. Then it will get BETTER. The air will clear, the climate will cool.

The big advantage to Roger Daltry's idea is that change is forced to take place QUICKLY. None of this waiting while tha matter is bandied about in a committee. No waiting for it to work its way through congress. Hell, with the warmongers we have in the oval office right now, it might just be the best possible idea. He wants to keep fighting, let him come up with a non-petroleum-fueled fighting force. He wouldn't be able to waste time once the oil's all gone. The only two choices would be to bring our boys home or adapt to a war without oil.

ZetaMale

ZetaMale

Tallahassee, FL
April 2006

MAY 19, 2007 06:08 PM

masterfrederick said:

ZetaMale said:

"My answer is to burn all the fucking oil as quick as possible and then the politicians will have to find a solution."


Admittedly, I know very little about this sort of thing, so by all means correct me if I'm wrong, but won't that do the same amount of damage that we're doing now, only much more quickly?



Not really...

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

Here's the interesting part: Once all the oil is gone the atmosphere will be bad-- for a while. Then the weather will do its damage, with acid rain-- for a while. But once it's gone from the air as a result of being scrubbed out of the sky by way of precipitation, it's gone for good. Things will get better. The earth will begin to heal. It's mended all the rest of the damage we've done to it so far-- Nuclear waste stops being radioactive after a time, even plastic eventually decomposes. Petroleum based greenhouse gasses will break down too, given time. The ozone layer can heal too-- static electricity is a BIG producer of ozone. Electricity in general helps a lot too. Ever smell your hairdryer after you turn it off? Own an Ionic air filter? That smell- it's OZONE. In fact, several species that are dying a slow extinction due to the climate change and filthy air might just survive a quicker consumption of the chemicals that are killing them. In short, it will get worse-- for a while. Then it will get BETTER. The air will clear, the climate will cool.


The big advantage to Roger Daltry's idea is that change is forced to take place QUICKLY. None of this waiting while tha matter is bandied about in a committee. No waiting for it to work its way through congress. Hell, with the warmongers we have in the oval office right now, it might just be the best possible idea. He wants to keep fighting, let him come up with a non-petroleum-fueled fighting force. He wouldn't be able to waste time once the oil's all gone. The only two choices would be to bring our boys home or adapt to a war without oil.



My mistake, thanks for correcting me.


theaceface said:
The Who do a fairly large number of charity shows, more so than you would think. None of the charities they work with are in support of environmental issues to my knowledge.



And thanks to you for the correction as well.

slyjason

slyjason

Toronto, ON
April 2006

MAY 19, 2007 06:18 PM

the who kicks ass...thats my comment

otaku

otaku

I'm lost
January 2004

MAY 19, 2007 07:03 PM

Let me guess who wasn't invited to this particular shindig...

bmp

bmp

Edmonton, AB
September 2004

MAY 19, 2007 07:09 PM

Something this moron obviously doesn't know, the live earth concerts are being fueled green. by alternative energy. off site wind turbines etc.

AmalgamSwitch

AmalgamSwitch

Birmingham, AL
May 2006

MAY 19, 2007 07:10 PM

It's kinda like when people say they are raising awareness about breast cancer. That's not what they mean; people are pretty aware of cancer. They're raising money for it, and they just didn't think about the wording of the tag line very well.

SocietysPliers

SocietysPliers

Ocala, FL
October 2004

MAY 19, 2007 07:32 PM

masterfrederick said:

ZetaMale said:

"My answer is to burn all the fucking oil as quick as possible and then the politicians will have to find a solution."

Admittedly, I know very little about this sort of thing, so by all means correct me if I'm wrong, but won't that do the same amount of damage that we're doing now, only much more quickly?

Not really...

Here's the interesting part: Once all the oil is gone the atmosphere will be bad-- for a while. Then the weather will do its damage, with acid rain-- for a while. But once it's gone from the air as a result of being scrubbed out of the sky by way of precipitation, it's gone for good. Things will get better. The earth will begin to heal. It's mended all the rest of the damage we've done to it so far-- Nuclear waste stops being radioactive after a time, even plastic eventually decomposes. Petroleum based greenhouse gasses will break down too, given time. The ozone layer can heal too-- static electricity is a BIG producer of ozone. Electricity in general helps a lot too. Ever smell your hairdryer after you turn it off? Own an Ionic air filter? That smell- it's OZONE. In fact, several species that are dying a slow extinction due to the climate change and filthy air might just survive a quicker consumption of the chemicals that are killing them. In short, it will get worse-- for a while. Then it will get BETTER. The air will clear, the climate will cool.

The big advantage to Roger Daltry's idea is that change is forced to take place QUICKLY. None of this waiting while tha matter is bandied about in a committee. No waiting for it to work its way through congress. Hell, with the warmongers we have in the oval office right now, it might just be the best possible idea. He wants to keep fighting, let him come up with a non-petroleum-fueled fighting force. He wouldn't be able to waste time once the oil's all gone. The only two choices would be to bring our boys home or adapt to a war without oil.

I too might be wrong, but I don't think so ,when I suggest that "more quickly" still refers to many many years (at the very least on the nuclear waste ceasing to emit radiation - that's not happening any time soon) - and I know plastic doesn't break down significantly in decades and decades.

Now I do agree with the need for alternative fueling and think it would be stupendous for a big concert to be held using Earth-friendlier energy sources.

TommyTsunami

TommyTsunami

North Richland Hills, TX
July 2006

MAY 19, 2007 08:31 PM

The answers to climate ghange are yet to be ironed out as far as I'm concerned. What I know for sure is that The Who are the single biggest group of sell out phonies in the history of Rock and Roll! They are an absolute joke. "Bollocks" to you Roger! Go write another "Rock Opera!" Die already - You're too OLD.

brett54

brett54

Australia
November 2004

MAY 19, 2007 08:54 PM

OMG !!!!
Someone has expressed free thought and an alternate view.

So isn't there more than a bit of truth in his statement, if all the oil is gone, THEN something will be done. It is an insightful commentary on politicians today.

Touche Roger.

Maat

Maat

Jamaica Plain, MA
January 2004

MAY 19, 2007 08:57 PM

TommyTsunami said:
The answers to climate ghange are yet to be ironed out as far as I'm concerned. What I know for sure is that The Who are the single biggest group of sell out phonies in the history of Rock and Roll! They are an absolute joke. "Bollocks" to you Roger! Go write another "Rock Opera!" Die already - You're too OLD.



Actually, Townshend wrote "Tommy" (and almost the entire Who catalog). You could admonish Daltry to go sing in another rock opera if you need to berate the man, though. smile

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

Recently discussed

SuicideGirls’ Fight Club Opens For Public Spar

Last Comment 15 MIN

Or a way to highlight a great set that people might have otherwise missed. I for one am thankful as I... More ...

You Suck Balls! Sincerely, Your Name Here

Last Comment 21 MIN

WTF... I wrote for the newswire? I have no recollection of this. More ...

Asshole Fuckface Roundup #104

Last Comment 20 HR

Well, you showed him and his better gas mileage. What's next? Maybe he recycles! Stick it to him. More ...

Sweaty Pursuits: The Fight To Be Able To Fight Continues

Last Comment 2 HR

I thought I was unduly sore when I woke up this morning. More ...

Is this Year Zero for the Publishing Industry?

Last Comment 4 HR

People posting fiction on the web! How unique! More ...

SuicideGirls Free Pin-Up Set

Last Comment 11 HR

bully is the reason i joined like almost 2 years ago.she is gotta be the most beautiful girl out there... More ...