
This month, the emoticon turned 25 -- that's older than me. Does that make it all the more sad that I sort of subscribe to the whole "Internet Dumbing Down of Society" spiel and keep holding out wistfully for yesterday's technologies? Yeah, I do think it does, but on the other hand, this sort of thing is enough to make a girl spend an hour trying to learn how to use a slide rule.
Just like any other business, law firms have to hire fresh meat and attract new clients, and it's an aspect that can get competitive (also just like any other business) so executives sometimes have to fight to come out on top in the eyes of their target demographic. It's impossible to deny the mass appeal of Web 2.0 and the deluge of amateur user-made web content that came with it, and that's where the marketing come in. According to an article in the good old New York Times Online, a few law firms are apparently stepping boldly into the terrifying and self-effacing realm of web videos.
Law firms have discovered YouTube. Well, actually, they have discovered that the law students they are trying to recruit as summer associates watch YouTube, the popular video Web site.
Several firms are trying to parlay that discovery into a hiring tool, creating recruiting videos and Web sites with the look and feel of YouTube. The firms hope to persuade students that their lawyers, and by extension the firms, are young-thinking and hip.
Now, in no way would I ever generalize lawyers as NOT being young-thinking and hip; I know a few lawyers on this here site alone that would discount any claim to the otherwise. That said, it's always kind of amusing to me when anyone goes out of their way via viral marketing to appeal directly to a seemingly incongruous audience. Especially when said seemingly incongruous audiences (read: 16-year-old girls in their bedrooms) are better at the game than the professionals.
“The videos are still kind of in the early days,” said Brian Dalton, the senior law editor at Vault Reports, which ranks law firms. “A lot of them come off seeming like hostage videos.”
Well, I don't know, who doesn't want to feel held hostage by the law? Granted, some have gotten a handle on the whole "quippy and ironic web video" oeuvre a little quicker than others -- NYT mentions Choate Hall & Stewart as a stand-out for glomming onto one of viral marketing's most beloved comedy duos.
In four spots called “Choate vs. Megafirm,” a hapless male associate at Megafirm is seen variously trying to find his briefcase in one of his employer’s many offices; tied up in boat rope, explaining that the firm placed him in “leveraged lease and ship financing” when he really wanted litigation; and clad in a business suit, pants rolled up, with an inner tube around his waist, on his “working” vacation.
His counterpart, a young female associate at Choate, is rather smug as she explains how life there is different. Just as on YouTube, there are ratings — albeit fake — like the one from a Web poster with the handle, “Jdhound,” who writes, “This are like so professional. Our site not.”
Uh-oh, and I bet they use PCs at Megafirm, too! It's a pretty cute idea, though, and well executed. Not everyone is so lucky, and in contrast, an LA firm's ad decided to lay on the schmaltz and fake storyline, which everyone ought to know is against the primary rules of successful YouTube videos (Glib and non-sequitur wins the race, kids!), with not-so-successful results.
[Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges] started a Web site, which, among other things, was to feature “A Day in the Life of an Associate.”
The video told the story of Ivey, a young brunette, who is first seen as she develops photos in her darkroom and plays Ultimate Frisbee. Ivey (really an actress) says she has a B.A. from Yale and a J.D. from Stanford, and is seen wearing a form-fitting jersey shirt, blue jeans and chunky necklaces as she consults with the partners.
But when the Web site went live last week, the video did not appear. “Some of the associates, some of the partners, thought it was too contrived; maybe corny was probably a better word,” said A. William Urquhart, the firm’s hiring partner.
Well, you can't win them all. Especially not by cramming as many "hip active carefree college girl" stereotypes into one person as one possibly can. (Though it's hard to really tell without having been able to see it.)
Some firms seem to be going the simple route, using just straight-up conversations to try and display employees' personalities without making too big a show of it. One such firm is Sullivan and Cromwell, whose videos I'm sure I'd really like if I could actually view them properly. (Perhaps you all can tell me if they are effective or not.) These videos are said to be aimed at a generation who "takes the Web for granted," not into it so much for the novelty, but for the honest social networking. Will it work? Perhaps. It's the closest to old-school recruiting we seem to get nowadays. But deep down... well.You've got to love PC vs Apple.
Oh, internets.
_DictionaryGirl_'s mother would be saddened to see all these law firm sites open on her browser, and not a single application. She did so want her to become a lawyer.













































Lyte88
Kitchener, ON
May 2007
SEP 29, 2007 08:41 AM
SignalNoise
Chicago, IL
February 2004
SEP 29, 2007 09:16 AM
flabajaba2213
Plymouth, MA
July 2006
SEP 29, 2007 09:19 AM
Rapid_Fire
Saskatoon, SK
July 2007
SEP 29, 2007 10:14 AM
RileyStClair
Los Angeles, CA
September 2006
SEP 29, 2007 12:21 PM
Cassiel
Aurora, CO
September 2004
SEP 29, 2007 02:55 PM
saturdaypunk
Fort Worth, TX
May 2007
SEP 29, 2007 03:37 PM
attn_ho
Brooklyn, NY
February 2004
SEP 29, 2007 03:39 PM
PerilousPup
I'm lost
May 2007
SEP 29, 2007 06:11 PM
end_of_innocence
Milton, ON
April 2006
SEP 29, 2007 09:03 PM
Tallboy66
Chicago, IL
January 2005
OCT 02, 2007 05:16 PM