• news
  • THURSDAY JUNE 15 2006 12:00 PM

Microsoft Patches Security Hole One Day Ahead of Exploits

One day after Microsoft released 21 updates to patch security vulnerabilities in its software, new exploits for some of those vulnerabilities appeared on the Internet. The patches may have come just in time to stay ahead of the bad guys, but users who are slow to patch their systems are still at risk.

Most of the patches that Microsoft issued were for flaws that were widely known. But at least two flaws were made public for the first time on Tuesday as part of the company's monthly security update.

Security firms reported finding the code on Wednesday. The exploit code for previously unknown flaws means hackers could use the code to pounce on computer systems with managers who are slow to apply patches.

Some of the exploits are marked "critical," and affect components like Windows Media Player and remote access.

Windows users should ensure that their systems are up to date, or visit Ubuntu.com for a more comprehensive security solution.

 
Comments
m0unds

m0unds

Rio Rancho, NM
April 2003

JUN 15, 2006 12:54 PM

it's nice that M$ is being partially proactive in patching..since usually it takes weeks for them to patch an exploit..


Windows users should ensure that their systems are up to date, or visit Ubuntu.com for a more comprehensive security solution.



no thank you. lunix is still not a very good (read: user/media friendly) desktop OS. and I don't think that users that are slow to patch windows boxes would be any quicker to patch a lunix box. call me crazy if you must.


(yes, i intentionally spell it "lunix")

temporal

temporal

Sunnyvale, CA
July 2003

JUN 15, 2006 01:05 PM

Of *course* exploits came out the day after they patched them. The people who make these exploits usually do it by looking at the patches, seeing what was fixed, and then figuring out how to exploit it.

barfbarffart

barfbarffart

Columbia, MD
May 2006

JUN 15, 2006 01:56 PM

the exploits are around a long time before they are release to the public. So really them releasing the updates a day before doesn'r mean shit.

filmjedi

filmjedi

Brighton, MA
June 2004

JUN 15, 2006 02:17 PM

::hugs his ibook and g5::

carla

Carla

Edmonton, AB
July 2004

JUN 16, 2006 01:23 PM

m0unds said:


Windows users should ensure that their systems are up to date, or visit Ubuntu.com for a more comprehensive security solution.



no thank you. lunix is still not a very good (read: user/media friendly) desktop OS. and I don't think that users that are slow to patch windows boxes would be any quicker to patch a lunix box. call me crazy if you must.


(yes, i intentionally spell it "lunix")




I'm pretty sure he was saying that at least partly tongue-in-cheek, but have you taken a serious look at Ubuntu? The whole point of that platform is to make things relatively easy for your average desktop user. I'll agree that there are many intimidating distros out there that are definitely not "user/media friendly", and unapologetically so, but Ubuntu isn't one of them.

shawntastic

shawntastic

Winnipeg, MB
April 2005

JUN 27, 2006 08:16 AM



yadda lunix yadda yadda



Ubuntu: 25 minutes to install, 10 seconds to boot, connected wireless just for kicks, 3 minutes to grab codecs for mp3 and all those other ones WMP just looks at with a puzzled face.

Zero to streaming porn in under 1/2 hr, before WinXP is done building its network settings. Yeah, I know linux isn't for everyone - but it usually works out okay for those interested enough to learn a different way of doing things or those ignorant or lucky enough to not have been trained by Windows since day one.

And since the mention was in his comment about security, the last time my Ubuntu or OSX got a virus was... well, never. I've tried running a few installs of XP and even SP2 only survived about 15 minutes without an antivirus/firewall. Ubuntu, e.g, can be set to update itself with newest security patches just like winxp - and if any huge changes happen to the os, its user friendly as all hell to upgrade: Skipping ahead three full versions (think 98 -> ME -> XP ->XP-sp2) took a total of 20 minutes, 1 reboot and no backing up of files, no lost programs, no 'why the hell isn't this working.'

ghostandride

ghostandride

Austin, TX
June 2006

AUG 09, 2006 08:10 AM

I'd have said it, but shawntastic said it for me. M0unds, Ubuntu and OS X are your friends. I'm not saying I don't use or like Microsoft, I just prefer things that are nicer to me, my wallet and my orifices.