Proving once again that government totally knows what's best for everyone, the Oklahoma State Senate has unanimously passed a bill which would equate "violent video games" with hardcore pornography.
HB3004 seeks to amend an existing Oklahoma statute, and redefine what is considered "harmful to minors." Authored by State Rep. Fred Morgan (R), the bill would add "inappropriate violence" to the statute. In the actual wording of the bill, "harmful to minors" means: "the material or performance lacks serious literary, scientific, medical, artistic, or political value for minors."
Well. that's awesome. I'm so glad a bunch of politicians sitting in Oklahoma City have decided that they are the arbiters of decency for everyone in their state, including all the adults.
The effect of this legislation, if passed, would mean the Oklahoma government could designate certain games "inappropriate," and the games would then be treated like pornographymeaning it would be illegal for retailers to sell the game to minors. What makes the Oklahoma Senate's unanimous decision particularly significant is that similar bills in other states have been killed time and time again, because of the same vague wording of HB3004's definitions of "inappropriate."
Virtually everyone can agree that there are games which are clearly inappropriate for children, but that's what ratings and parents are for. Why is it that Republican lawmakers are gung-ho for personal responsibility and government abstinence when it comes to healthcare, welfare, and minimum-wage laws, but they can't vote "aye" fast enough when it comes to intrusively legislating morality?
If this bill becomes law, it will be a crime to sell a "harmful" game to a anyone under 18. There are countless reasons that this is incredibly stupid, among them the fact that a 17 year-old can buy himself a ticket to a graphically violent film like Saw or Hostel, or a sexually-charged film like Showgirls. But that same 17 year-old couldn't legally purchase DOOM 3, and the person who sold it to him would be criminally liable. How does this make sense? The answer is, it doesn't. Bills like this have nothing to do with protecting the children or seriously addressing issues which need governmental attention. Bills like this are entirely about election-year pandering to the ultra-conservative minority who unfortunately make up the modern Republican Base.
Bills like this have come up time and again all over the country, but they've always been defeated by lawmakers who have a last-minute attack of common sense, and several laws have been over-turned at the federal level, the most recent in Michigan, on First-Amendment grounds (note to conservatives: you have to respect all the amendments, not just the second one.) If this bill is signed into law by Oklahoma's governor (very likely, according to sources) it will certainly set up another legal battle, which will likely be found in favor of the game developers, because scientific studies have yet to find a link between simulated violence in videogames and real-life violence in the streets, yo.
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3
Comments
Paul9000
Monterey, CA
November 2004
APR 26, 2006 02:15 PM
Paul9000
Monterey, CA
November 2004
APR 26, 2006 02:18 PM
captainoats
Bronxville, NY
September 2005
APR 26, 2006 02:51 PM
SonOfAPunk
Maple Ridge, BC
January 2006
APR 26, 2006 03:58 PM
Nokturn
United Kingdom
April 2006
APR 26, 2006 04:58 PM
voodoognome
Norman, OK
May 2005
APR 26, 2006 05:35 PM
Necia
San Francisco, CA
August 2005
APR 26, 2006 06:09 PM
malkav11
Saint Paul, MN
July 2003
APR 26, 2006 06:14 PM
Aya
SUICIDEGIRL
Alberta, Canada
APR 26, 2006 06:31 PM
Trevallion
Murfreesboro, TN
February 2004
APR 26, 2006 06:41 PM
Keith
Oklahoma City, OK
August 2002
APR 26, 2006 06:47 PM
Nokturn
United Kingdom
April 2006
APR 26, 2006 07:15 PM
Andvari
Calgary, AB
April 2005
APR 26, 2006 07:22 PM
FrankMask
Saint Paul, MN
June 2003
APR 26, 2006 07:27 PM
MarginWalker2002
San Diego, CA
April 2004
APR 26, 2006 07:35 PM
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3