• news
  • TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 20 2005 11:23 AM

Jobs To Recording Industry: Fuck Off, Greedy Assholes

Apple has been at odds with the recording industry since the launch of ITunes about the price that they charge for downloads. To be specific, some of the biggest music companies in the world want them to charge more. At least at this point, Steve Jobs says prices will remain where they are.



Jobs, speaking before the opening of the Apple Expo in Paris, said some record companies were pushing for higher prices on the company's iTunes Music Store Web sites.

By cutting out manufacturing and marketing costs, record companies already make more profit by selling a song through iTunes than on CD, Apple's co-founder and CEO said.

"So if they want to raise the prices it just means they're getting a little greedy," he said.

Big music companies are seeking to improve the terms of their deals with Apple as contracts come up for renewal for the U.S. iTunes site, which generally charges 99 cents per song. Prices are typically higher in Europe, Japan and other regions.

Apple launched its new Japanese iTunes site in August without Sony BMG's music catalog as negotiations continued. Observers say the same issues are likely to surface between the two companies as their U.S. contract approaches expiration, and Warner Music Group Corp. is also said to be seeking price increases.



And Jobs quite rightfully points out that it's already tough enough to get people used to getting all the songs they want for free on Kazaa or Limewire or other P2P services to pay 99 cents a song, so raising the price will only make it that much harder.



"We're trying to compete with piracy, we're trying to pull people away from piracy and say, `You can buy these songs legally for a fair price,'" he added. "But if the price goes up a lot, they'll go back to piracy. Then everybody loses."



I'm hard pressed to think of an industry more intent on its own destruction than the music industry. They continue to cling to the dying form of the CD (even going so far as to start putting copy protection on some cD's), and now they're trying to fuck over the one legal download service that's really caught on. Nice job, guys.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

Comments
Idjit

Idjit

HOPEFUL

I'm lost

SEP 20, 2005 11:27 AM

jake_lex said:
I'm hard pressed to think of an industry more intent on its own destruction than the music industry. They continue to cling to the dying form of the CD (even going so far as to start putting copy protection on some cD's), and now they're trying to fuck over the one legal download service that's really caught on. Nice job, guys.



Cocaine's a hell of a drug.

Toothpick

Toothpick

New York, NY
January 2005

SEP 20, 2005 11:47 AM

Damn apple! Damn them and their ethical business practices!

commonman

commonman

USA
August 2003

SEP 20, 2005 12:06 PM

What needs to happen is for all these record labels to go bankrupt so the old guard will get bounced out of their cushy, overpaid jobs. Only then will there be recognition of the way the world works today.

anlcnt

anlcnt

Great Lakes, IL
February 2005

SEP 20, 2005 12:39 PM

That just means even fewer people would pay for songs.

anlcnt

anlcnt

Great Lakes, IL
February 2005

SEP 20, 2005 12:41 PM

That just means even fewer people would pay for songs.

ChocolateJesus

ChocolateJesus

I'm lost
January 2005

SEP 20, 2005 12:55 PM

Victrola said:
Damn apple! Damn them and their ethical business practices!



That's just what I was thinkin'.

ocuinneagain

ocuinneagain

Mobile, AL
March 2005

SEP 20, 2005 01:02 PM

i think what the majors are really afraid of is that folks like jobs will become the new face of record labels in the world.

up until now, the major label conglomerates have held a death grip on the music industry by employing standard oil-like monopolies on the whole infrastructure that allows the system to work - from the artists' union, recording studios and manufacturing facilities all the way thru not only the marketing and promotions but by owning a fair chunk of the distribution outlets as well.

i won't spend a lot of time on the old napster, kazaa and others, because they were, yes, in their original forms, technically illegal, other than to say that they accelerated the development of pay-per-download sites like itunes. that, and they showed us what real assholes metallica were. i mean, suing 8-year olds? come ON.

now there is the real possibility that folks like jobs can become the "new" labels. anyone with access to the internet can completely bypass the recording industry assholes and buy music almost directly from the artist. even directly from the artists' site, in some cases. they don't need some a&r prick telling them what they should record and how they should sound, and then proceed to keep 75% of the booty from their sales. now artists can write what they really want, charge a fair price for it, and actually be able to make a living at it for a change.

sony, warner, etc... your days as the godfathers of entertainment are more and more quickly running out... artists don't need you anymore... music fans aren't beholden to you anymore... either change with the times or become the new dinosaurs...

badandy

badandy

Los Angeles, CA
March 2004

SEP 20, 2005 01:12 PM

too bad apple can't be a record label (as per thier settlement with apple records way back in the day) jobs has enough brand built into his name to encourage or just plain start his own 'label' that isn't called apple though.

everybody should try to catch the current touring Z-TRIP show!

hehe. plug.

freshprncebelair

freshprncebelair

Ellicott City, MD
June 2004

SEP 20, 2005 01:24 PM

badandy said:
too bad apple can't be a record label (as per thier settlement with apple records way back in the day) jobs has enough brand built into his name to encourage or just plain start his own 'label' that isn't called apple though.

everybody should try to catch the current touring Z-TRIP show!

hehe. plug.



Well, more importantly than being a "label", he controls a major distribution outlet.

OfScience

OfScience

I'm lost
October 2004

SEP 20, 2005 01:46 PM

Download music for free illegally. Duh.

ricosuave

ricosuave

I'm lost
September 2005

SEP 20, 2005 01:52 PM

ARRR!!!
oink
ARRR!!! ARRR!!!
oink oink oink
ARRR!!!
oink oink
ARRR!!! ARRR!!! ARRR!!! ARRR!!! ARRR!!!

[Edited on Sep 20, 2005 by ricosuave]

edmun

edmun

Springfield, OR
September 2004

SEP 20, 2005 01:57 PM

He could always buy apple records.

I think the agreement said he could not use his apple brand for music.

So he could use another brand name.

Rickets

rickets

Seattle, WA
March 2003

SEP 20, 2005 02:08 PM

Come on people! Pitch in! Metallica is starving here!

Keith

Keith

Oklahoma City, OK
August 2002

SEP 20, 2005 02:08 PM

.99 cents is already too much.

ThisIsWhoWeAre

ThisIsWhoWeAre

Oakland, CA
July 2004

SEP 20, 2005 02:35 PM

OfScience said:
Download music for free illegally. Duh.



I admit I do that pretty regularly, but if I really like the album I DL'd, I'll shell out the $$ and buy the CD anyway. I considerer it my idea of "try before you buy".

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next