• commentary
  • WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 12 2012 10:49 AM

Modest Solutions To Voter Suppression

by Steven Whitney

An alarming crusade that threatens not only the democratic ideal but our very democracy itself is currently sweeping the country. Falsely posing as stern protectors of electoral integrity, the GOP has started yet another costly and totally unnecessary war – The War on Voter Fraud.

It might be a just war...if it were true. But like so many GOP grand proclamations, it’s a sham, merely another false charge Republicans are criminally deploying to their advantage.

A new study released this past August 12th and financed by the non-partisan Carnegie and Knight Foundations examined thousands of court documents, official reports, and media reports involving voter fraud since 2000 and found conclusively that voter fraud is “virtually non-existent.” Of roughly 600 million votes cast since 2000, there were only 10 cases of alleged in-person voter fraud. 10...and those were just alleged. There were no convictions of in-person voter fraud during that time frame. Not anywhere in the US. Not one. In fact, you are sixty times more likely to get hit by lightning in any given year than the US is going to suffer from voter fraud.

But what the hell, there weren’t any WMDs in Iraq either...and they got away with that one (at a cost of more than a trillion dollars and thousands of American lives). And this is clearly in the same realm, a Machiavellian twist of a tactic Naomi Klein labeled “The Shock Doctrine,” manipulating real or made-up disasters (or threats to your “freedoms”) to urgently push an extreme political or economic agenda that no one in their right mind would otherwise consider – in this case, limiting the number of votes cast in elections.

For the GOP controlling votes is, indeed, an urgent matter. As US demographics tilt rapidly toward fuller minority share – a long-standing goal of true democracies - the party of “old white guys” is losing its dominance. They could, of course, try to appeal to minorities, but Republicans really don’t want to include in their party millions of people who were probably born in Kenya. So the only other option is to prevent them from voting.

How do they do it? The two most effective methods are to pass laws in GOP-held state legislatures requiring obstructive Voter ID standards or to restrict voting hours and days to an absolute minimum. Usually it’s one or the other and sometimes both. In addition to the financial implications associated with existing IDs laws, the potential cost estimate for ID requirements advanced by the GOP in 2011 in 35 states runs as high as $838 million for the first four years alone – certainly an unreasonable burden to taxpayers at a time when state treasuries are suffering severe budget crises.



But even more destructive is how these requirements negatively affect individual voters. Almost all of the proposed or enacted photo ID laws involve some monetary cost – passport books cost $140 and a driver’s license additionally requires both a written and a road test. Not only does that place an “unreasonable burden” on potential voters, it flies in the face of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

What voting blocs are most affected by these restrictions? Roughly 25% of African-Americans, 20% Asian-Americans, 19% Hispanics, 18% of those between the ages of 18-24, and 15% of Americans making less than $35,000 per year. And, of course, seniors of all stripes who no longer drive or travel out of the country but who still want to vote to keep Medicare.



Not coincidentally, those are the very groups who generally vote overwhelmingly for Democrats. It should also be noted that every single state undergoing a “voter purge” has Republican election officials. It’s also no fluke that that the GOP claims that voting fraud in these demographics is most flagrant in precisely the same states that polls indicate are still undecided, the so-called “swing states” that will end up deciding the election.

In Wisconsin (10 electoral votes), Republican Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen petitioned the state Supreme Court just a few weeks ago to reinstate before the November elections a Voter ID law passed by the Republican-controlled legislature, hopefully at a date so late as to make any legal appeal impossible.

In Florida (29 electoral votes), GOP Governor Rick Scott fired one Secretary of State who refused to implement his plan to suppress votes and appointed one who will.

Jon Husted, GOP Secretary of State of Ohio (18 electoral votes), singled out two large Democratic districts for fewer voting days and no evening or weekend voting hours, privileges all Republican precincts retained. A Federal Court intervened, ordering Husted to cease and desist all efforts to limit voting access. Instead, Husted defied the order, continuing his path of suppression. Husted is due in court this week to ask for a stay of the order until the appeal process has been exhausted, which would occur only after the election. Husted is also running a 3-card monte ruse with polling places, switching them to one suburb after another. At this late date, voters in Toledo don’t even know where to vote!

And that’s just the tip of the figurative iceberg – confusion and suppression reign in nearly every state controlled at some level by GOP leaders masquerading as crusaders for honesty and transparency in the election process when just the opposite is true. Ohio Republicans on the Board of Elections even admitted that the ID requirements specifically targeted black voters. Despite the hue and cry, Republicans will not be moved – they know suppressing up to 5 million votes nationwide is the only way they can win the election. Of course, all of this is criminal...but if the GOP has its way, it’ll be too late to stop them and if they win the election, their Republican brethren will hardly seek prosecution.

But there are some prescriptive actions that could minimize the negative effect of these illegal purges, both now and in the future.

First, no fair-minded citizen in a participatory democracy wants anyone’s vote to be stolen or unduly suppressed. Whatever one’s party affiliation, everyone in a democracy must strive for transparency in, and the legitimacy of, the election process. More than anything else, free elections are what keep us free. Otherwise we’re just another, albeit bigger, banana republic, where those on top steal whatever they can – money, votes, and your country. So whether you’re liberal or conservative, if someone – Republican or Democrat – tries to deny citizens their right to vote, you must vote against them. The reason goes to the heart of American values – stealing votes is the grossest betrayal of the democratic ideals our nation was founded upon and for which millions of Americans have died over the last 240 years.

Secondly, federal judges and prosecutors need to adopt a zero-tolerance policy toward those who would suppress the most fundamental of American rights. If election officials ignore court directives to restore order, our courts are honor bound to issue bench warrants and throw them into the hardest and most unforgiving lock-ups imaginable – Alcatraz factored by ten – until they fully comply with the law. Just because they have a government title in front of their name does not mean they are above the law, especially as they have sworn to uphold it.

Lastly, it would be sweet irony – and a GOP nightmare – to use Citizens United to help get out the vote. With the influx of undisclosed money flowing into the coffers of SuperPACs on both sides of the aisle, the price tag of this November’s election is in the vicinity of $5.8 billion (including approximately $2.5 billion for the Presidential election alone).

Now, one or more SuperPACs needs to put aside one-half of 1% of that total - $29 million – and spend it on getting minorities and seniors state IDs acceptable for voter verification. And, like the GOP, it needs to focus on large swing states. For instance, the basic cost of an Ohio-issued photo ID is $8.50, or $5.1 million to purchase IDs for 600,000 voters. Florida’s photo ID can be had for $25.00, or $15 million to secure voting rights for another 600,000 citizens. Allow $8.9 million for administration costs and voter outreach and 1,200,000 otherwise disenfranchised voters can pass any challenge at their polling places. Those two states alone are enough to make a real difference.

Alternatively, federally-issued passport cards cost only $30. And they’re good for ten years, or five elections – 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2020 – six bucks per cycle. So 700,000 passport cards would cost $21 Million, plus $8 million for admin and outreach, equals $29 million. Implemented every two years, this expense would sign up three and a half million minority and senior voters over ten years. In emergencies, the Passport Office promises to have your document ready in 3 working days – and if an important business meeting in London meets that criteria, your right to vote should be given equal weight.

When you figure that over $4 billion will be spent on media advertising alone this year, spending $29 million to actually insure the voting rights of 1.2 million minority and senior voters is comparably little money well spent – and money certainly spent in the cause of true democratic principles.

Besides, the SuperPAC(s) should get all of their money back. If states demand payment for an ID that is required to vote, that is a “poll tax,” and against the law. So if the SuperPAC(s) putting up the money sues both the state and the individuals involved for full reimbursement, and then recycles that money every two years until Republicans no longer think stealing your vote is a good investment, it’s a net gain for everyone involved (except those rigging the vote). If Jon Husted was personally on the hook for, say, $10 million, he might change his mind about letting you cast your ballot.

These are options to correct just the false In-Person Voter Fraud touted by Republicans. In an upcoming column, I’ll be talking with Greg Palast - arguably our country’s leading expert on this issue – about everything you need to know about real voter fraud.

It may well be the most important issue facing America’s survival. If the illegal GOP purges succeed in suppressing large demographics from voting, our nation relinquishes both the moral high ground and democratic principle to every other country capable of running clean elections.

And, too, we don’t want to awaken on November 7th only to discover that yet another election has been stolen.

Related Posts:
Character. . . And The RNC
The Do-Damage Congress: Who’s Responsible?
Worse Than A Do Nothing Congress
Forget The Barbeque On Labor Day – It’s Time To Take Care Of Business
Chicken Shits: The Slippery Slopes of Chick-fil-A
The Vagina Solution
Fighting Back Part 4: The Big Liar, Intimidation And Revenge
Fighting Back Part 3: Fighting Fire With Fire
When The Past Is Prologue
Fighting Back Part 2: Defining Rovian Politics
Fighting Back
The Electoral Scam
Being Fair
Occupy Reality
Giving. . . And Taking Back
A Tale Of Two Grovers
A Last Pitch For Truth
America: Forget it, Jake. It’s Chinatown.
Gotcha!

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next

Comments
ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

SEP 13, 2012 08:25 PM

No. Just so much goddamn no.

tomcatrider said:
An ID is only $5 in Iowa - I don't see the financial burden. And you keep saying that these initiatives are aimed at the poor. If they're poor, they're on the Federal Dole. If they're on the Dole, they have to have an ID to get the money. I'm honestly confused by your argument.



Poll taxes were often only $1 or $2 (~$20 or $40 in today's dollars), but it wasn't the amount that was found to be unconstitutional, it was the entire concept of putting a financial burden on voters to exercise their rights. The debate isn't around the amount, the debate is that making people spend money to exercise their rights is pretty much fundamentally fucking wrong.

tomcatrider said:
And you say voter fraud is virtually non-existent. If it wasn't for voter fraud, Obamacare wouldn't be a reality. Senator Smalley (Al Franken) out of Minnesota won by approximately 300 votes, but it's been proven that over 1200 felons who had not had their voting rights restored voted in the 2008 election anyway. More than one survey has shown that 90% or more of these felons voted Democratic. Eliminate those votes and Franken doesn't get elected Senator. No Franken as Senator, no 60 vote super-majority - and no Obamacare.



It hasn't been proven. It's been alleged, by Minnesota Majority, whose allegations were duly investigated--as required by law--by prosecutors in Minnesota and then disproven:

“There is no basis in fact, whatsoever, in these inaccuracies propagated by the Minnesota Majority here, none,” Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman said Wednesday. “After the most closely scrutinized election in Minnesota history in 2008, there were zero cases of fraud. Even the Republicans lawyers acknowledged that there was no systematic effort to defraud the election, none.”

“In Hennepin County, 650,000 people voted,” he continued. “The Minnesota Majority presented us with 1,500 cases that they felt there were problems with voting. Our own election bureau gave us 100. At the end of the day, we charged 38 cases. And all but one of them are felons voting who were still under the penalty [of not legally applying to regain individual voting rights]. There was no fraud.” (source)



This was not in-person voter fraud of the type that voter ID laws would prevent. Moreover, it was not intentional, systemic, and widespread voter fraud of the kind alleged repeatedly by Minnesota Majority, repeated in a new book by John Fund and Hans von Spakovsky, and dutifully carried forth and repeated without any critical examination by the Washington Examiner's Brian York. It is, bluntly, complete and utter horseshit.

tomcatrider said:
My opinion (yep - I have one, just like I have an a$$hole) is that voting is not just a right - it is also a responsibility and a privilege. There should NEVER be any barriers to voting (as long as you're not dead, or an illegal alien), but you should have to make an effort.

Anyway - I'm not trying to piss anyone off, I am honestly trying to understand the liberal viewpoint. And just as an FYI - I'm a Libertarian, not a Republican. Please keep that in mind before you start bashing me... biggrin



Please keep in mind that when you repeat zombie accusations--nearly verbatim--deployed by Republicans in a manner that delegitimizes both duly elected officials and the laws passed by those officials, you look like a complete fucking cunt. Hans von Spakovsky spent six years and god knows how many taxpayer dollars in the Bush Justice Department hunting for in-person voter fraud and found less than a hundred cases nationwide over a ten year period, the vast majority of which were that people didn't understand the basics of the laws and did things like fill out their children's absentee ballots.

Here's an important question that I feel should always be asked of people repeating long-debunked charges of voter fraud:

What do you think is ultimately more damaging to fair and free elections in the US, the minuscule amount of voter fraud that's proven to exist in this country, or the repeated and unproven accusations that undermine all voters faith in elections and their results?

Stiles

Stiles

Philadelphia, PA
November 2002

SEP 14, 2012 02:45 AM

mingol said:[spolier]

Stiles said:
NJ non driver ID is $24, and you need 6 points of other ID to get one - one primary ( a valid US passport, certified state copy of birth certificate, US certificate of naturalization) one or two secondary, proof of social security number and proof of residency as well)


When I was living in Michigan and applied for a state ID I was required to produce three pieces of identification. All I had was a passport; my parents had to mail the rest, including my original birth certificate (a notarized copy wasn't good enough), from Singapore.

I also had to produce utility bills with my name and address on them, which I couldn't do, because at the time I was subletting a place and the bills weren't in my name. To get around that I had to rope in a relative's help and list their home (which was in another city) as my address.

The government office wasn't within walking distance or on a bus route, so I had to ask friends to drive me there every time I went (it took at least three trips). And though I don't recall exactly how much the ID cost, it was certainly more than $5.[/spoiler]

Even with money and resources, it was not a simple process. If I were poor and didn't already have a birth certificate and passport, it would have been extremely difficult.



We are agreeing. My overarching point was that even if the non driver ID was free, it's a big pain in the ass to get if you don't have ample state or federally issued photo ID to start with, and a bunch of those essential documents are themselves expensive and/or a pain in the ass to get.

IDGAS

IDGAS

Portland, ME
March 2004

SEP 15, 2012 11:01 AM

bluesmike said:
Try renting a car, flying, getting a library card, buying cold medicine, and on and on without an ID. It's not a big deal, and the government will pay for it. Get an ID and join the rest of society.


tomcatrider said:
An ID is only $5 in Iowa - I don't see the financial burden. And you keep saying that these initiatives are aimed at the poor. If they're poor, they're on the Federal Dole. If they're on the Dole, they have to have an ID to get the money. I'm honestly confused by your argument



Federal court rules against Texas voter ID law

In Thursday's decision, a separate three-judge panel focused on how a new photo identification rule would affect the tens of thousands of registered voters in Texas who are poor, do not drive and do not have cars in their households.

In the past, Texas voters who had registered in advance could bring to the polls voter cards sent to them by the state. The new law, passed last year, would instead require a current government-issued photo identification card, such as a driver's license, a U.S. passport, a U.S. military ID card or a license to carry a concealed handgun.

Texas' lawyers called this requirement a "minor inconvenience." The vast majority of Texans already had such cards in their wallets or purses, and with birth certificates and Social Security cards in hand, voters could obtain free photo ID cards at an office of the Texas Department of Public Safety, they said.

But the judges said that about a third of Texas counties did not have a Department of Public Safety office. And those offices are not open on weekends. Moreover, it costs about $22 to obtain a copy of a birth certificate, they said.

"Even the most committed citizen, we think, would agree that a 200- to 250-mile round trip — especially for would-be voters having no driver's license — constitutes a substantial burden on the right to vote," Judge David Tatel said in the unanimous opinion.

In January, Texas officials reported about 796,000 of its registered voters were not listed as having Department of Public Safety licenses. And according to the U.S. census, about 13% of the state's blacks, 7% of its Latinos and 3.8% of whites lived in households without motor vehicles.

"Poorer citizens, especially those working for hourly wages, will likely be less able to take time off work to travel to a DPS office," Tatel said. "A law that forces poorer citizens to choose between their wages and their franchise unquestionably denies or abridges the right to vote." emphasis added



TSA Contact Center Frequently Asked Questions

Q. Can I fly without ID?
A. Adult passengers, 18 and over, are required to show a valid U.S. Federal or State-issued photo ID that contains a name, date of birth, gender, expiration date and a tamper-resistant feature. A passenger that refuses to provide any ID and will not cooperate in the identity verification process will not be allowed to enter the screening checkpoint. If you lose your primary ID or it has expired, TSA may accept other forms of ID to help verify your identity.

Q. If I lose my ID during travel, what secondary forms of ID will be accepted?
A. Passengers who do not have a valid photo ID, such as State-issued driver’s license, should bring any ID or documents they have available to assist in verification of identity. Passengers need at least two alternate forms of identification, such as a social security card, birth certificate, marriage license, or credit card. The documents must bear the name of the passenger. Also, one of these documents must bear identification information containing one of the following: date of birth, gender, address, or photo. If TSA can confirm the passenger’s identity, they may enter the secured area


FUCK YOU CAN FLY WITHOUT GOVERNMENT ID

Getting a New York City Library Card.


SPOILERS! (Click to view)
Eligibility Requirements

When applying for a New York Public Library card in person, or providing proof of their identity to validate a card received in the mail, an applicant must show proof that he/she lives, works, attends school, or pays property taxes in New York State. To apply for a card:
Adults may provide only one piece of identification if it is 1 of the following valid New York State IDs:

Current driver's license
Current photo learner's permit
Current non-driver's identification

Young Adults (ages 12-18) can show the same ID as adults. Alternatively, young adults may present 1 of the following, provided name and address are included in the documentation:

Current school photo ID
Current report or program card
Working papers

If the above documentation is not available, any 2 of the following forms of identification are acceptable for adults and/or young adults, provided one shows a photo and name and/or signature and the other the applicant's current address:

Current college or university photo ID card
Current employee photo ID card
New York City welfare ID card
Current Armed Services ID card
Alien Registration photo ID card
Matricula Consular (Mexican CID)
Current passport
Medicare/Medicaid card
Social Security card
Birth certificate
Medicare/Medicaid card
New York State motor vehicle registration
Professional, vocational or union photo ID
Current rent bill or lease agreement
Tax bill or receipt*
Transit pass
Current photo ID with signature and expiration date issued by an embassy or consulate in New York
Statement from a homeless shelter*
Bank statement**
Cable, phone or utility bill**
Any piece of mail delivered by the US Post Office**





You two are each intellectually lazy and willing ignorant. A simple Google search will disprove most of your claims.

Don't post until you have done your homework.

mingol

mingol

Singapore
July 2005

SEP 15, 2012 12:13 PM

Stiles said:
We are agreeing. My overarching point was that even if the non driver ID was free, it's a big pain in the ass to get if you don't have ample state or federally issued photo ID to start with, and a bunch of those essential documents are themselves expensive and/or a pain in the ass to get.


Well, yeah. I was trying to echo your point, not dispute it.

Stiles

Stiles

Philadelphia, PA
November 2002

SEP 15, 2012 12:25 PM

Cool, thanks for the clarification/backup. smile

Ridley

Ridley

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

SEP 15, 2012 02:57 PM

I don't think the fees are the only problem when people think of financial burden. We've all been to the DMV, even when you have an appointment you have to wait for hours to get processed. I think what IDGAS pointed out is absolutely accurate. These people who work several jobs, or hourly wages have to take time off of work to go get their identification. They are losing a half or whole day of work for identification, and possibly hours to a half day of work to exercise their right to vote on November 20th. Then on top of that there is a potential fee for identification?

Not only that but taxation of polls is illegal. Any financial cost related to voting should be illegal.

suntaster

suntaster

USA
January 2012

SEP 18, 2012 03:07 PM

So i have to have an ID to buy cigarettes or alcohol....but not to vote? Not to offend anyone, but that really is pathetic. I've worked in construction for most of my life, and i know first hand how easy it is to "be someone else". Pull your heads out of your asses and look....really look...at the big picture. We have a president that apologizes to terrorists instead of telling them to go fuck themselves. This country is a laughing stock. All of you need to research history to see whats happening!

Mr_Matt_

Mr_Matt_

Pompano Beach, FL
July 2005

SEP 18, 2012 04:31 PM

^^ Nice bump, chump.



i know first hand how easy it is to "be someone else"



I'm glad you were able to get at the real root of the problem there.

malkav11

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN
July 2003

SEP 18, 2012 04:34 PM

suntaster said:
So i have to have an ID to buy cigarettes or alcohol....but not to vote? Not to offend anyone, but that really is pathetic



To address the only lucid portion of your argument: The constitution does not guarantee a fundamental right to use alcohol or tobacco that the government may not abridge. In fact, so far as I know the only thing it has to say on the subject at all is a since-repealed amendment forbidding alcohol. The constitution very much does guarantee the right to vote, and voter ID laws violate that guarantee.

lexxie

lexxie

Toronto, ON
October 2008

SEP 18, 2012 05:23 PM

suntaster said:
We have a president that apologizes to terrorists instead of telling them to go fuck themselves.



yeah. he can't even find probably the worst terrorist ever and have him assassinated or something.

i'm sorry, that is just really stupid. Obama manages to get rid of Bin Laden, something Bush never accomplished, and you're still going to complain about his relations with "terrorists". which terrorists are he apologizing to, exactly?

(before anyone says anything, i know there are a lot of people who disagreed with how that situation happened, i just think that's a ridiculous statement)

ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

SEP 18, 2012 06:04 PM

suntaster said:
So i have to have an ID to buy cigarettes or alcohol....but not to vote? Not to offend anyone, but that really is pathetic. I've worked in construction for most of my life, and i know first hand how easy it is to "be someone else". Pull your heads out of your asses and look....really look...at the big picture. We have a president that apologizes to terrorists instead of telling them to go fuck themselves. This country is a laughing stock. All of you need to research history to see whats happening!



People who don't know how to read entire threads, or, y'know... news, probably shouldn't be the first ones to tell others to "pull your head out of your ass".

PointBlank

PointBlank

New York, NY
November 2004

SEP 18, 2012 06:22 PM

suntaster said:
So i have to have an ID to buy cigarettes or alcohol...



err, I'll stop you right there. There is NO LAW that says you gave to have an ID to do either of those things.


suntaster

suntaster

USA
January 2012

SEP 19, 2012 10:39 AM

Alcohol and tobacco were simply examples....so these guys that i have worked with that were illegal, but were using someone elses social security number......can vote? Voting is guaranteed......but only to citizens. So, if the government enforces this, government issued identification should be free. Would that be fair? I think so

suntaster

suntaster

USA
January 2012

SEP 19, 2012 10:43 AM

Maybe you should do a little research on his apologies....which is hard to do with your head up your ass. The law provides that you must be a certain age to purchase alcohol or tobacco....so yeah, you kind of have to prove that, right? Lol

ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

SEP 19, 2012 10:45 AM

suntaster said:
Alcohol and tobacco were simply examples....so these guys that i have worked with that were illegal, but were using someone elses social security number......can vote? Voting is guaranteed......but only to citizens. So, if the government enforces this, government issued identification should be free. Would that be fair? I think so



Jesus christ. You know there's like entire studies done by think tanks and policy advisors, research centers at universities and colleges that show--over and over and over again--that in-person voter fraud is not a widespread or systemic problem, right?

You have to understand why, for instance, The Brennan Center for Justice carries more weight in a debate like this than five guys you worked a construction crew with, right? Or the W.-era DoJ that spent six years and millions of dollars to convict less than a hundred people they discovered examining ten years worth of elections, nationwide? I mean, you get that right?

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next