• commentary
  • FRIDAY JULY 8 2011 9:05 PM

Republican Presidential Candidate Michele Bachmann Signs Pledge Supporting Ban on Porn, Abortion, and Suggests Black Families Were More Functional During Slavery

by Damon Martin

Republican Presidential candidate Michele Bachmann doesn’t like porn, abortion, or promiscuity. She hates it so much, she's signed a pledge to prove it! The essence of the pledge is that the candidates who sign it must commit to upholding the oaths contained within should they make it to office, which means Bachmann is now 100% committed to ending both abortion and pornography (it'll be interesting to see how she'll legislate against promiscuity - will sex before marriage become a custodial offense?).


On Friday, Bachmann put her signature on 'The Marriage Vow - A Declaration of Dependence upon Marriage and Family' a two-page document authored by Iowa pastor Bob Vander Plaats.

Vander Plaats is actually trying to get all presidential candidates to sign his wacky pledge, which calls for a ban on pornography, and contains verbiage condemning gay marriage, while also suggesting that the African American family unit was better off during slavery.



Yes, you read that correctly. Here is the bullet point from the pledge that points to the success of the 'nuclear family' with mom and dad both present, which more African Americans had during slavery.



Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA’s first African-American president.



Nothing says love and compassion like comparing the family unit of today – which encompasses millions of strong, viable single parent-led households – to the rosy family unit of yesteryear in the good ol’ days of slavery.

Back to the pornography portion of the manifesto that Bachmann signed up for. It reads like an archaic text (not that unlike the Bible) with regards to how sexuality should be treated under conservative law.


Humane protection of women and the innocent fruit of conjugal intimacy -- our next generation of American children -- from human trafficking, sexual slavery, seduction into promiscuity, and all forms of pornography and prostitution, infanticide, abortion and other types of stolen innocence.



Stolen innocence? It's almost like Vander Plaats was reading directly from Bristol Palin's new book Not Afraid of Life. And the fact that “pornography” and “infanticide” sit together in the same sentence, without and level of distinction between the two, would be funny if it wasn’t so tragic (or maybe it’s the other way around). It also begs the question, what kind of porn have Plaats and Bachmann been watching?

One of the funniest parts of the pledge reads:


Fierce defense of the First Amendment's rights of religious liberty and freedom of speech, especially against the intolerance of any who would undermine law abiding American citizens and institutions of faith and conscience for their adherence to, and defense of faithful heterosexual monogamy.'



Let's just dissect that one for a moment.

The pledge wants the candidate to stand up in 'fierce defense' of the First Amendment with regards to free speech, yet virtually every case that has come in front of the Supreme Court regarding the curtailment of pornography has been overruled precisely because of our inalienable right to free speech.

The First Amendment protects everyone's rights to free speech and expression of ideas, whether they are popular or unpopular. It protects the religious right that wants to speak out against abortion and gay marriage the same way it protects the producers and distributors of pornography. The First Amendment doesn't discriminate, unlike the pledge that Bachmann just signed.

And just to throw out the point about the adherence and defense of 'faithful heterosexual monogamy,' I guess there's a reason fellow Republican candidate Newt Gingrich won't be signing Plaats' presidential promise.

By aligning herself with the pledge, Bachmann has once again stepped so far to the right that she's almost guaranteeing herself a Donald Trump like exit from the actual presidential race -- but, hey, it's amusing to watch it unfold.

As Bill Maher once said so eloquently about the candidate from Minnesota:


Michele Bachmann…for people who find Sarah Palin too intellectual.'

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 8

Next

Comments
CoyoteMike

CoyoteMike

Iowa City, IA
May 2006

JUL 10, 2011 07:49 AM

It is hilarious to watch the various talking heads on the tv machine try to talk about her as a serious candidate, while she pulls shit like this. It is like half (or more) of the GOP candidates have forgotten they need more than the deep-Right to win. Do they think, when the general election comes around, that we're going to forget the year-long attack on anyone who disagrees with their ideology?

wildswan

wildswan

I'm lost
June 2006

JUL 10, 2011 08:12 AM

PointBlank said:
This isn't about religion. This is purely a southern strategy nod to the racists in the tea party.

Notice that there is no mention of solutions or actual issues presented about supposed broken African American families, which might be just as distasteful, but at least it would represent a point of view and a political idea. The paragraph about slavery is a clear "The president is a black man. I'm not." statement. Nothing less. The fact that the mainstream press hasn't lambasted her (and anyone who signs the "pledge") over this is a real sign that the conservatives right now have not only won, they've destroyed the left in this country. We're so far right that John Boehner is a moderate.



Yes.

Son_of_None

Son_of_None

USA
December 2010

JUL 10, 2011 08:12 AM

That's all I needed to hear. I hope someone hits this ignorant bitch with a truck.

lil_tuffy

lil_tuffy

MODERATOR

San Francisco, CA

JUL 10, 2011 08:18 AM

Shema said:
That's all I needed to hear. I hope someone hits this ignorant bitch with a truck.



Way to take the high road (pun intended).

Son_of_None

Son_of_None

USA
December 2010

JUL 10, 2011 08:34 AM

lil_tuffy said:

Shema said:
That's all I needed to hear. I hope someone hits this ignorant bitch with a truck.



Way to take the high road (pun intended).



Man...after a lifetime of dealing with shit like this as a black man that's pretty much the only alternative left for people like that. And as a woman, she really ought to know better. What If someone got on T.V. and said life was better for women when they were forced to stay in the kitchen and sew all day? You can just as easily (and as ignorantly) say that the independent woman is as responsible for the break up of familes as black people. F.U.C.K .H.E.R.!

lil_tuffy

lil_tuffy

MODERATOR

San Francisco, CA

JUL 10, 2011 10:55 AM

You're right. She should be killed. whatever

Son_of_None

Son_of_None

USA
December 2010

JUL 10, 2011 11:01 AM

lil_tuffy said:
You're right. She should be killed. whatever



I didn't say kill her. I just said hit her with a truck. People can survive hit and runs..

wildswan

wildswan

I'm lost
June 2006

JUL 10, 2011 11:02 AM

lil_tuffy said:
You're right. She should be killed. whatever



And her remains should be killed, along with her family.


There is some serious irony in his post, given some of his comments in the past. I almost can not believe what I am reading from him.

wildswan

wildswan

I'm lost
June 2006

JUL 10, 2011 11:02 AM

Shema said:

lil_tuffy said:
You're right. She should be killed. whatever



I didn't say kill her. I just said hit her with a truck. People can survive hit and runs..



You kinda should just stop.

catflap

catflap

United Kingdom
October 2011

JUL 10, 2011 11:12 AM

c'mon guys
zoom image

IDGAS

IDGAS

Portland, ME
March 2004

JUL 10, 2011 11:59 AM

wildswan said:

lil_tuffy said:
You're right. She should be killed. whatever



And her remains should be killed, along with her family.


There is some serious irony in his post, given some of his comments in the past. I almost can not believe what I am reading from him.


I thought as a community we agreed that the worst we would wish upon another was that they step on Lego in their bare feet?

CoyoteMike

CoyoteMike

Iowa City, IA
May 2006

JUL 10, 2011 12:01 PM

IDGAS said:

wildswan said:

lil_tuffy said:
You're right. She should be killed. whatever



And her remains should be killed, along with her family.


There is some serious irony in his post, given some of his comments in the past. I almost can not believe what I am reading from him.


I thought as a community we agreed that the worst we would wish upon another was that they step on Lego in their bare feet?



Can it at least be one of the pointy Lego trees? Those hurt like a motherfucker!

nicole_powers

nicole_powers

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

JUL 10, 2011 12:33 PM

mingol said:
Rolling Stone recently ran a pretty interesting piece on Bachmann. It's worth a look.



Love this article - writer Matt Taibbi didn't mince his words:

"Bachmann's entire political career has followed this exact same pattern of God-speaks-directly-to-me fundamentalism mixed with pathological, relentless, conscienceless lying...She is at once the most entertaining and the most dangerous kind of liar, a turbocharged cross between a born bullshit artist and a religious fanatic, for whom lying to the infidel is a kind of holy duty."

LaceyK

LaceyK

Tarrytown, NY
October 2005

JUL 10, 2011 02:04 PM

Clidna said:
Wouldn't any kid be more likely to be part of a 2 parent family in 1860, regardless of colour? Divorce was pretty rare back then, and women less likely to have a child out of wedlock, what with them being property and all.



I think you hit hte nail on the head right here.

Heigai

Heigai

Columbus, OH
May 2004

JUL 10, 2011 02:56 PM

LaceyK said:

Clidna said:
Wouldn't any kid be more likely to be part of a 2 parent family in 1860, regardless of colour? Divorce was pretty rare back then, and women less likely to have a child out of wedlock, what with them being property and all.



I think you hit hte nail on the head right here.



I believe that she truly meant to hit the nail on the head, but, once again with Michele "Facts? What are facts?" Bachmann, something got ignored.

To wit, the fact that the chattel slave trade in the US (in 1860, which was the magical year that she picked for whatever reason, because it doesn't make a lot of difference to her analysis) routinely separated family members, including parents and children. The marriage of a slave to another slave was routinely ignored if it was extant prior to capture or re-capture, and the idea of slaves marrying one another was up to the discretion of the "owner" and was often frowned upon. New children born after capture or re-capture would routinely be sold off, as infant slaves were highly prized in the market. It's not as if we don't have tons of historical documentation because, if they were nothing else, slave traders were good bean counters.

Yes, Michele Bachmann ignored ugly facts about slavery to make a shitty half-point racist slam on the President. Attagirl.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 8

Next