• commentary
  • FRIDAY JULY 8 2011 9:05 PM

Republican Presidential Candidate Michele Bachmann Signs Pledge Supporting Ban on Porn, Abortion, and Suggests Black Families Were More Functional During Slavery

by Damon Martin

Republican Presidential candidate Michele Bachmann doesn’t like porn, abortion, or promiscuity. She hates it so much, she's signed a pledge to prove it! The essence of the pledge is that the candidates who sign it must commit to upholding the oaths contained within should they make it to office, which means Bachmann is now 100% committed to ending both abortion and pornography (it'll be interesting to see how she'll legislate against promiscuity - will sex before marriage become a custodial offense?).


On Friday, Bachmann put her signature on 'The Marriage Vow - A Declaration of Dependence upon Marriage and Family' a two-page document authored by Iowa pastor Bob Vander Plaats.

Vander Plaats is actually trying to get all presidential candidates to sign his wacky pledge, which calls for a ban on pornography, and contains verbiage condemning gay marriage, while also suggesting that the African American family unit was better off during slavery.



Yes, you read that correctly. Here is the bullet point from the pledge that points to the success of the 'nuclear family' with mom and dad both present, which more African Americans had during slavery.



Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA’s first African-American president.



Nothing says love and compassion like comparing the family unit of today – which encompasses millions of strong, viable single parent-led households – to the rosy family unit of yesteryear in the good ol’ days of slavery.

Back to the pornography portion of the manifesto that Bachmann signed up for. It reads like an archaic text (not that unlike the Bible) with regards to how sexuality should be treated under conservative law.


Humane protection of women and the innocent fruit of conjugal intimacy -- our next generation of American children -- from human trafficking, sexual slavery, seduction into promiscuity, and all forms of pornography and prostitution, infanticide, abortion and other types of stolen innocence.



Stolen innocence? It's almost like Vander Plaats was reading directly from Bristol Palin's new book Not Afraid of Life. And the fact that “pornography” and “infanticide” sit together in the same sentence, without and level of distinction between the two, would be funny if it wasn’t so tragic (or maybe it’s the other way around). It also begs the question, what kind of porn have Plaats and Bachmann been watching?

One of the funniest parts of the pledge reads:


Fierce defense of the First Amendment's rights of religious liberty and freedom of speech, especially against the intolerance of any who would undermine law abiding American citizens and institutions of faith and conscience for their adherence to, and defense of faithful heterosexual monogamy.'



Let's just dissect that one for a moment.

The pledge wants the candidate to stand up in 'fierce defense' of the First Amendment with regards to free speech, yet virtually every case that has come in front of the Supreme Court regarding the curtailment of pornography has been overruled precisely because of our inalienable right to free speech.

The First Amendment protects everyone's rights to free speech and expression of ideas, whether they are popular or unpopular. It protects the religious right that wants to speak out against abortion and gay marriage the same way it protects the producers and distributors of pornography. The First Amendment doesn't discriminate, unlike the pledge that Bachmann just signed.

And just to throw out the point about the adherence and defense of 'faithful heterosexual monogamy,' I guess there's a reason fellow Republican candidate Newt Gingrich won't be signing Plaats' presidential promise.

By aligning herself with the pledge, Bachmann has once again stepped so far to the right that she's almost guaranteeing herself a Donald Trump like exit from the actual presidential race -- but, hey, it's amusing to watch it unfold.

As Bill Maher once said so eloquently about the candidate from Minnesota:


Michele Bachmann…for people who find Sarah Palin too intellectual.'

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 8

Next

Comments
motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

JUL 09, 2011 10:32 AM

People like Bachmann are absolutely infuriating. They completely deny the validity of any lifestyle besides their own, discarding those lifestyles as anything except a deliberate affront to their own. Gay people aren't gay because they're gay, they're gay because they want to tear down marriage. Porn isn't enjoyable for its own sake, it exists solely to 'steal innocence', whatever the hell that means. It is the political equivalent of wanting something your sibling has solely because they have it.

The irony, of course, is that they're hard at work converting their own lifestyle into an assault on everyone else's. Freedom doesn't mean freedom, it means that they get to do what they want and everybody else gets to conform.

mingol

mingol

Singapore
July 2005

JUL 09, 2011 11:02 AM

Rolling Stone recently ran a pretty interesting piece on Bachmann. It's worth a look.

Totem

Totem

I'm lost
December 2008

JUL 09, 2011 12:07 PM

Oh my.

Hecatian

Hecatian

France
July 2011

JUL 09, 2011 01:54 PM

In France, one of the front line political fight is legalization of homosexual wedding. Until this evening, I thought the opponents to these unions were too close-minded.
I notice we don't have the worst...

DarthDamien

DarthDamien

USA
July 2011

JUL 09, 2011 02:02 PM

Regions and the decisions based on them cause to sigh. Could be worse though, they could advocate strapping a bomb to their chest and sending them to the "smut peddlers"...I could also be on fire...

DarthDamien

DarthDamien

USA
July 2011

JUL 09, 2011 04:28 PM

Wow I need to sleep. That should be Religions...cause me to...please don't stone me.

D.

melx

melx

Saint Paul, MN
May 2010

JUL 09, 2011 09:10 PM

I don't know if this has been mentioned on the boards, but seeing Michelle Bachman's name made me think of it.

Hilarious tongue

PointBlank

PointBlank

New York, NY
November 2004

JUL 09, 2011 09:21 PM

This isn't about religion. This is purely a southern strategy nod to the racists in the tea party.

Notice that there is no mention of solutions or actual issues presented about supposed broken African American families, which might be just as distasteful, but at least it would represent a point of view and a political idea. The paragraph about slavery is a clear "The president is a black man. I'm not." statement. Nothing less. The fact that the mainstream press hasn't lambasted her (and anyone who signs the "pledge") over this is a real sign that the conservatives right now have not only won, they've destroyed the left in this country. We're so far right that John Boehner is a moderate.

Cassiel

Cassiel

Aurora, CO
September 2004

JUL 09, 2011 09:22 PM

Bachmann Batshit Overdrive

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

JUL 09, 2011 11:32 PM

Cassiel said:
Bachmann Batshit Overdrive


Allow me to submit: Bachmann Stomach-turner Overdrive

Clidna

Clidna

Canada
January 2005

JUL 10, 2011 01:51 AM

Wouldn't any kid be more likely to be part of a 2 parent family in 1860, regardless of colour? Divorce was pretty rare back then, and women less likely to have a child out of wedlock, what with them being property and all.

Comic_Guy

Comic_Guy

Dundalk, MD
May 2011

JUL 10, 2011 07:22 AM

Well there goes my excitement at her running. Unbelievable.

FreakPirate

FreakPirate

Canada
November 2002

JUL 10, 2011 07:25 AM

Charlie213 said:
Well there goes my excitement at her running. Unbelievable.



Wait... you were excited about her running? surreal

Comic_Guy

Comic_Guy

Dundalk, MD
May 2011

JUL 10, 2011 07:27 AM

I admit I didnt know much about her. Not excited anymore.

catflap

catflap

United Kingdom
October 2011

JUL 10, 2011 07:39 AM

When i saw the title off this thead a part of me thought it was a joke. Banning of porn? The fuck century is this women living in? I don't even want to read what she she said about slavery...

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 8

Next