• news
  • SUNDAY DECEMBER 30 2007 4:00 AM

Bad News for People Who Love Animals



You check your soap, shampoo, and moisturizer to make sure it's not tested on animals. You carefully read the ingredients on your vitamins to make sure they're not derived from animal sources. You think you're doing your best to boycott companies that test on animals, and then you read something like this.

The trend for healthier eating has led to an increase of more than 300% in the number of laboratory experiments conducted on animals for food additives, sweeteners and health supplements over the past year.



Three hundred percent? That is insane. From 2005 to 2006, figures cited showed an increase from 862 to 4,038 experiments on lab animals. And for what? For shit like Teavigo. And what the fuck is Teavigo? It's a green tea supplement, marketed as an "ancient remedy for a modern sense of well being."

Dogs force-fed huge doses of Teavigo - which is marketed as “green tea in its purest form” and a choice for “health-conscious consumers” - died or had to be put down.

Gerhard Gans, director of regulatory affairs at DSM Nutritional Products, which produces Teavigo, said: “In some cases it is necessary to use dogs, they are in some aspects more similar to humans than rats . . . where it is possible to use alternative methods validated by the authorities we will use [them].”



I don't know about you, but the idea of dogs being force fed huge doses of this shit, and then either dying or being put down doesn't fill me with a sense of well being. The only thing it fills me with is the desire to force feed the people who produce Teavigo huge doses of their own crap ass supplement until they known the same kind of pain and horror these dogs experience.

This is just the kind of supplement that most consumers would assume is animal friendly. It promises to "help put your mind and body in balance" and get this tasty marketing nugget:

By introducing Teavigo® into your life, you will feel rewarded for doing something that’s good for you (Which is much better than doing nothing at all).



Gosh, thank you, Teavigo, for those wise words. I will take your advice and make sure not to do "nothing at all." I'll start by not doing "nothing at all" about the way you torture innocent animals. These animals were not (surprise!) put on this planet for you to make an opportunistic buck, and I will make sure to let all of my health-conscious friends, family, and acquaintances know to avoid your totally unnecessary, cruel supplement.

Gosh, I feel better already.

Teavigo, of course, is only one of many health food and supplement companies using animals such as guinea pigs, rabbits, rats, and dogs for lab testing.

Michelle Thew, chief executive of the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection, said: “The rise in testing of food on animals in the race to find the next lucrative ‘super-food’ is a hidden scandal. People are unaware of the animal suffering behind the headlines.”



If you prioritize animal welfare over the next passing heath craze, think twice and do some digging before coughing up your cash.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

Comments
PantherNesmith

PantherNesmith

Gloucester, VA
June 2006

DEC 31, 2007 09:46 PM

Luscious
there is a list of all companys that test on animals available in the SG rat group, and also tons and tons of pages of companys that don't.



There's a SG rat group? Where?

vashir

vashir

Dayton, OH
February 2006

JAN 01, 2008 03:03 AM

Luscious said:
Why don't they just test on death-row, murdering, child-rapists already?!!! FUCK.
Leave the poor ratties alone! frown puke skull



I agree with this as well, but there is this pesky clause about "no cruel and unusual punishment" in the Bill of Rights that might keep that from happening, as I'm sure every defense lawyer in the country would contend that drug testing on humans is both cruel and unusual.

Cos, y'know, humans are more important than aminals, even if they made some extremely dick moves to land themselves in the clink.

Neyrissa

Neyrissa

SUICIDEGIRL

United Kingdom

JAN 01, 2008 03:17 AM

Healthy food = fruit, veg, stuff from plants and the earth

Health food= overpriced, complete rubbish which no one needs and is doing more harm than good.

I've started off my new year angry now...*grr*

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

JAN 01, 2008 03:44 PM

vashir said:
Cos, y'know, humans are more important than aminals, even if they made some extremely dick moves to land themselves in the clink.



Are you sure? One of the very few things that humans can do that (other) animals can't is to have empathy outside their own species. Seems a shame not to exercise that.

mountebank

mountebank

United Kingdom
July 2005

JAN 01, 2008 05:12 PM

Dovanna said:
Testing on animals has saved millions of lives. Many medications use animal by-products. Take an insulin shot? What about the flu shot? Use an inhaler? All use animals products in some way, and some people would die without them.



Fair enough - but there's a material difference to the utility provided to the world between insulin / statins / monoclonal antibodies / etc. and essence of green tea / sundried organic tibetan goji berries / chesire blue knob cheese / etc.

And I'd avoid dihydrogen monoxide if you can - fish do terrible things in it. puke wink

Cye

Cye

SUICIDEGIRL

Oklahoma, USA

JAN 01, 2008 07:47 PM

thats probably the sickest thing I've read in a long time. how do those fuckers sleep at night?

hamburglar79

hamburglar79

Universal City, TX
May 2007

JAN 04, 2008 11:13 PM

yay finally the health industry does something right and test on animals... finally... but in all seriousness why cant we test on animals? why cant we eat em and rule over them like the sentient beings we are?

wastrel

wastrel

Orange, CA
October 2007

JAN 06, 2008 01:06 PM

Testing on them for health supplements I can agree with being bad. These health supplements aren't needed. When it comes to finding cures for shit, I have no problem then.

If any of you do, why aren't you stepping up to the plate to be the test subject instead of the animal?

Yah, its cruel. But sometimes necessary.

Arsnic

Arsnic

HOPEFUL

Morgan Hill, CA

JAN 14, 2008 07:28 PM

If it needs to be tested on anyone or thing it probably shouldn't be in your system, anyway.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next