
Is it me, or is recalling massive amounts of E. coli-laced ground beef the new black? Back in September, Topps Meat Company issued the second largest meat recall in U.S. history: 27.1 million pounds of ground beef products. The economic impact on the company was so great that they were forced to file for bankruptcy and shut down operations. After 67 years of business, Topps closed its doors.
Now, just two months later, American Foods Group is voluntarily recalling "approximately 95,927 pounds of various coarse and fine ground beef products because they may be contaminated with E. coli."
The ground beef products subject to recall were produced on Oct. 10 and were distributed to retail establishments and distributors in Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Ohio, Tennessee, Wisconsin and Virginia.
The problem was discovered through an investigation into two illnesses that was initiated by the Illinois Department of Public Health. Anyone concerned about an illness should contact a physician.
Each shipping label bears the establishment number "Est. 18076" inside the USDA mark of inspection.
For those who don't know (or who just enjoy the morbidly scatological) E. coli infection often causes bloody diarrhea, dehydration, and occasionally even leads to kidney failure. Most cases are associated with eating undercooked, contaminated ground beef. With that in mind, the USDA allows that "presumptively positive ground beef and beef trimmings that have failed to be non-negative for E. coli O157:H7 be sent for further processingwhich includes cooking to the thermal death stage for all pathogens." Wait, what?
Therefore, permitting a company that suspects or, in fact, knows that a lot of ground beef or beef trimmings has or may contain E. coli O157:H7 to be able to sell it with appropriate security (at a significant discount) to a different segment of the industry that is under USDA inspection and scrutiny to properly process this product into a ready-to-eat product not only makes perfect sense microbiologically, but it has zero impact on the publics health.
Ohh, cool. So basically, the USDA is saying it's "A OK" to knowingly sell contaminated beef, because it'll probably be "processed" in such a way that renders it safe. Clearly that works like a charm.
It seems to me that leaving it up to processors and consumers to "cook the product thoroughly to 160oF minimally" is a cop out and a big risk--not only in regards to the health of customers, but in an economical sense. Perhaps if USDA restrictions had been tighter, Topps would have avoided the recall that did them in, and maybe even halted production of the year's worth of beef that went to waste.
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3
Comments
lefthandright
New Zealand
September 2006
NOV 29, 2007 03:25 AM
Tiger_Fodder
Braintree, MA
June 2007
NOV 29, 2007 04:00 AM
StarBelliedBoy
Philadelphia, PA
December 2003
NOV 29, 2007 04:58 AM
powergirl5000
I'm lost
November 2007
NOV 29, 2007 11:00 AM
grrowler
Sarasota, FL
October 2007
NOV 29, 2007 11:02 AM
Tallboy66
Chicago, IL
January 2005
NOV 29, 2007 11:09 AM
Eveyelle
I'm lost
November 2007
NOV 29, 2007 11:53 AM
Heigai
Columbus, OH
May 2004
NOV 29, 2007 12:28 PM
SirPsychoSexy
Ridgewood, NJ
January 2004
NOV 29, 2007 12:49 PM
Asia8989
Mount Vernon, IA
September 2007
NOV 29, 2007 03:45 PM
RudieCantFail
I'm lost
January 2006
NOV 29, 2007 03:52 PM
Jenamaria
I'm lost
November 2007
NOV 30, 2007 01:06 AM
StarBelliedBoy
Philadelphia, PA
December 2003
NOV 30, 2007 05:04 AM
_void_
USA
December 2006
NOV 30, 2007 06:49 AM
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3