• commentary
  • MONDAY NOVEMBER 19 2007 4:00 PM

Noticed Your Birth Control Costing More? Tell Congress



Remember this piece about birth control costs for college students going up because the Bush administration cut the funding that helps subsidize it?

Well, college students around the country, with the help of NARAL, organized petition drives on campus, and as a result of their work, there's a bill wending its way through Congress now--HR 4054, the Prevention Through Affordable Access Act--that does just what its title suggests: restores college and university access to low-cost birth control.

this fall, college women returned to campus to discover that the birth control that previously cost them $5–10 for a monthly supply now cost $40–50 per pack, making it far more difficult to afford. Due to a provision included in the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA), as of January 1, 2007, every college and university health center and hundreds of safety-net providers were unintentionally cut off from accessing low-cost birth control and passing on the low price to college women and low-income women. The result has been an increase in the average price of birth control on college campuses, often to 10 times the previous cost.

Rep. Crowley’s legislation, The Prevention Through Affordable Access Act, would bring down the soaring cost of birth control at college health clinics and safety-net providers and increase access to affordable birth control. This legislation will not cost the taxpayers a single dime, and would restore the voluntary benefit to college health clinics and safety-net providers. (My emphasis.)



Should be a no-brainer, but you can't count on that in a world where plenty of legislators think Plan B causes abortion (it doesn't) or that it's a-okay for pharmacists to refuse to fill prescriptions to women.

So take half a minute to click through and send a letter to your representative urging them to support HR 4054.

Bitch_PhD can't wait for a decent national health program that'll cover birth control for everyone.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 9

Next

Comments
MrOuijaAK

MrOuijaAK

Anchorage, AK
September 2005

NOV 19, 2007 08:33 PM


I have employees which have no diploma, they get health insurance after 6 months, and they make several dollars an hour over minimum wage.


That's great. Unfortunately, none of the corporations who employ the most impoverished Americans think the same way you do, and they see absolutely no reason why they should. Sorry.



I think you missed my point. The company I work for DOES employ impoverished Americans. And if they actually work hard and stick around, they can make more money. I have some employees that make $19/hour + full benefits, despite no high school diploma.

Basically if they haven't killed anyone and can pass a drug test, they get hired. And I work for one of the largest companies in the US. Yet you're telling me people can't find jobs which pay enough to raise their families, even if they're working multiple jobs?



Yes, I fucking am. I live in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, a city with one of the largest, poorest inner cities in the entire country, and have come into contact with these situations on a regular basis throughout my life. And our Welfare laws were overhauled recently, making welfare essentially only available to people with at least one job. And they still need more jobs to be able to afford essential goods and services, like fucking heat and fucking food and fucking health care. Go watch Bowling For Columbine.



Why is welfare not being available to the unemployed bad? IF anything, that's a good middle ground. "Well at least you're TRYING to support yourself, here's a helping hand."

The only exceptions to the rule, should be the disabled and (I think you mentioned before) the mentally ill. Situations that are not by choice. But there are programs designed for those situations, that make more sense.

I'll remember that the next time I see someone talking on their cellphone while using their Food Stamp card in line at the grocery store.


Because the actions of one person totally represent the mentality of millions of others. Way to use logic there.



If only it were just one person.

Formus

Formus

Milwaukee, WI
May 2007

NOV 19, 2007 08:38 PM

MrOuijaAK said:
I think you missed my point. The company I work for DOES employ impoverished Americans. And if they actually work hard and stick around, they can make more money. I have some employees that make $19/hour + full benefits, despite no high school diploma.


Again, so what? That's one company. There are thousands more than pay nine dollars an hour with no benefits whatsoever. Please tell me what you've proven.

Why is welfare not being available to the unemployed bad? IF anything, that's a good middle ground. "Well at least you're TRYING to support yourself, here's a helping hand."


Except that the welfare amount doled out is so low that they still have to search out extra income to support their families. And the system is a gigantic beaurocracy fraught to the teeth with fraud and mismanagement.

Because the actions of one person totally represent the mentality of millions of others. Way to use logic there.



If only it were just one person.


Okay then, five. Get off your horse. What you've spouted off on this board are a bunch of cliches, nothing more and nothing less. The issue is far more complex than any of what you've said would lead me to believe you acknowledge. I can attest to the fact that the vast, vast majority of people in poverty that I've met or encountered don't act in any way like the stereotypes you've named on this board.

MrOuijaAK

MrOuijaAK

Anchorage, AK
September 2005

NOV 19, 2007 08:42 PM

Formus said:

FreakPirate said:
Tell me something, and don't lie to me... People would elect this asshole wouldn't they?



Ron Paul 2008!



You know having a "conservative" view on welfare, doesn't automatically make someone a Republican. Pigeonholing people into a specific political stereotype based on an opinion on one topic is silly.

Formus

Formus

Milwaukee, WI
May 2007

NOV 19, 2007 08:44 PM

MrOuijaAK said:

Formus said:

FreakPirate said:
Tell me something, and don't lie to me... People would elect this asshole wouldn't they?



Ron Paul 2008!



You know having a "conservative" view on welfare, doesn't automatically make someone a Republican. Pigeonholing people into a specific political stereotype based on an opinion on one topic is silly.



But it's such an exaggerated, stereotypical opinion. You can't really blame me.

FreakPirate

FreakPirate

Calgary, AB
November 2002

NOV 19, 2007 08:48 PM

MrOuijaAK said:

You know having a "conservative" view on welfare, doesn't automatically make someone a Republican. Pigeonholing people into a specific political stereotype based on an opinion on one topic is silly.



Jokes. We has them.

Also, your comments in this thread have been so ridiculously pundit I couldn't help taking a shot at you.

BDeyeD

BDeyeD

Toronto, ON
January 2007

NOV 19, 2007 08:49 PM

MrOuijaAK said:
Pigeonholing people into a specific political stereotype based on an opinion on one topic is silly.



Pot, meet kettle.

MrOuijaAK

MrOuijaAK

Anchorage, AK
September 2005

NOV 19, 2007 08:52 PM


I think you missed my point. The company I work for DOES employ impoverished Americans. And if they actually work hard and stick around, they can make more money. I have some employees that make $19/hour + full benefits, despite no high school diploma.


Again, so what? That's one company. There are thousands more than pay nine dollars an hour with no benefits whatsoever. Please tell me what you've proven.



Well, I've always got openings. And the last meeting I went to in Bellevue, everyone was having trouble filling positions. Yet none of us came from areas with 100% employment.

Why is welfare not being available to the unemployed bad? IF anything, that's a good middle ground. "Well at least you're TRYING to support yourself, here's a helping hand."


Except that the welfare amount doled out is so low that they still have to search out extra income to support their families. And the system is a gigantic beaurocracy fraught to the teeth with fraud and mismanagement.



You know how we could get rid of that fraud and mismanagement? Get rid of the system. Let people work for a living.

Because the actions of one person totally represent the mentality of millions of others. Way to use logic there.



If only it were just one person.


Okay then, five. Get off your horse. What you've spouted off on this board are a bunch of cliches, nothing more and nothing less. The issue is far more complex than any of what you've said would lead me to believe you acknowledge. I can attest to the fact that the vast, vast majority of people in poverty that I've met or encountered don't act in any way like the stereotypes you've named on this board.



Well the vast, vast majority of people in poverty I've encountered act in this way. I deal with them everyday.

Formus

Formus

Milwaukee, WI
May 2007

NOV 19, 2007 08:58 PM

MrOuijaAK said:
You know how we could get rid of that fraud and mismanagement? Get rid of the system.


You mean the system that you just praised?

Honest to god.

Well the vast, vast majority of people in poverty I've encountered act in this way. I deal with them everyday.


That's bullshit. Total and complete bullshit. And I'm calling it at the top of my voice, because it's unreal and false, a filthy regurgitation of the stereotype that's been perpetuated by people like Bill O'Reilly and other loud-mouthed pundits that isn't situated in reality whatsoever.

MrOuijaAK

MrOuijaAK

Anchorage, AK
September 2005

NOV 19, 2007 09:00 PM

FreakPirate said:

MrOuijaAK said:

You know having a "conservative" view on welfare, doesn't automatically make someone a Republican. Pigeonholing people into a specific political stereotype based on an opinion on one topic is silly.



Jokes. We has them.

Also, your comments in this thread have been so ridiculously pundit I couldn't help taking a shot at you.



It's fine I have thick skin, I play devil's advocate too much not to.

Does my opinion that the highest paid employee of a company's salary should be limited by both the company's median salary and lowest salary (therefore forcing higher pay for lower class employees instead of grossly inflated CEO salaries and helping shift lower-middle class salaries up at the same time) prove that I have wild and crazy opinions that conflict with both sides of the line and get me unlumped from Ron Paul?

FreakPirate

FreakPirate

Calgary, AB
November 2002

NOV 19, 2007 09:05 PM

MrOuijaAK said:

It's fine I have thick skin, I play devil's advocate too much not to.

Does my opinion that the highest paid employee of a company's salary should be limited by both the company's median salary and lowest salary (therefore forcing higher pay for lower class employees instead of grossly inflated CEO salaries and helping shift lower-middle class salaries up at the same time) prove that I have wild and crazy opinions that conflict with both sides of the line and get me unlumped from Ron Paul?



No, because that ruins the joke and I'm really only here to be funny.

MrOuijaAK

MrOuijaAK

Anchorage, AK
September 2005

NOV 19, 2007 09:13 PM


You know how we could get rid of that fraud and mismanagement? Get rid of the system.


You mean the system that you just praised?

Honest to god.



This is praise?

Why is welfare not being available to the unemployed bad? IF anything, that's a good middle ground. "Well at least you're TRYING to support yourself, here's a helping hand."



I meant get rid of the system, as in. There shouldn't be ANY system. As I've said from the beginning.

Well the vast, vast majority of people in poverty I've encountered act in this way. I deal with them everyday.


That's bullshit. Total and complete bullshit. And I'm calling it at the top of my voice, because it's unreal and false, a filthy regurgitation of the stereotype that's been perpetuated by people like Bill O'Reilly and other loud-mouthed pundits that isn't situated in reality whatsoever.



OK. I work backstage corporate for a large grocer chain. I spent a decade in the store-level. The last store I worked in was in the shitty part of town. These things occurred by the dozens:

Pays with Quest card (Food stamp card). Puts groceries into an Escalade with spinners.

Buys steak and king crab legs, with a Quest card.

Reeks of pot, definitely doesn't have glaucoma. Buys nothing but Doritos and Ice Cream. (I have no issue with pot. But if you can afford pot, you shouldn't be on welfare.)

Mother comes in with all her kids. She's utilizing WIC (a much better system than food stamps, it forces the person to get staples like milk, eggs, cheese, formula) and a Quest card. She doesn't get the 100% Juice on her WIC check. She uses her Quest card to purchase Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream, candy bars and soda.

Customer complains because they can't buy Red Bull on their Quest Card. Proceeds to pay for the Pina Colada mix with the Quest Card (it's considered a food item).

Customer purchase steaks with a Quest card. Walks outside, sells it for half price to a guy walking inside. Goes to the liquor store and buys a bottle of Jack Daniels.

These types of things happen constantly. These are not event's I saw on O'Reilly (I can't stand him actually.) These are things I've dealt with at work for over ten years.

Formus

Formus

Milwaukee, WI
May 2007

NOV 19, 2007 09:22 PM

Again, a bunch of blah blah blah. Things you cherrypicked to match what you believe while you stocked boxes and tsk tsked poor people. As for buying soda and candy bars, even people with money don't eat healthy. It means nothing.

MrOuijaAK

MrOuijaAK

Anchorage, AK
September 2005

NOV 19, 2007 09:27 PM

Formus said:
Again, a bunch of blah blah blah. Things you cherrypicked to match what you believe while you stocked boxes and tsk tsked poor people. As for buying soda and candy bars, even people with money don't eat healthy. It means nothing.



I wish it was cherry-picking. And I didn't choose it to match what I believe, it's one of the catalyst for what I believe.

Eating unhealthy on your own dime is fine. Buying expensive gourmet ice cream and mass quantities of candy bars instead of ingredients that could make a meal to feed your family for a night or two, while not even using your own money... that's what isn't fine.

Formus

Formus

Milwaukee, WI
May 2007

NOV 19, 2007 09:30 PM

MrOuijaAK said:
Eating unhealthy on your own dime is fine. Buying expensive gourmet ice cream and mass quantities of candy bars instead of ingredients that could make a meal to feed your family for a night or two, while not even using your own money... that's what isn't fine.


I see, so the key to making yourself rich is eating fruits & vegetables?

Clidna

Clidna

Canada
January 2005

NOV 19, 2007 09:33 PM

MrOuijaAK said:

FreakPirate said:

Cairo said:

Well, that didn't take long.



Well heck, let's just get this all over with shall we?

Birth control is a privilege, not a right!!


Condoms are cheap! Use them!


If you don't want to get knocked up you should be responsible enough not to be fucking!


I PAY FULL PRICE FOR MY BC, THE REST OF YOU SHOULD HAVE TO BECAUSE I SAID SO!!



Did I miss any of the stupid shit that's going to come up?



How is it stupid that I don't want to pay for other people's shit?



If you pay taxes, you pay for other people's shit every day, dumbass. You, as a taxpayer, don't get to pick and choose where you want your tax dollars to go.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 9

Next