• commentary
  • TUESDAY OCTOBER 9 2007 4:00 PM

Lorraine Rothman is Dead; Long Live Her Legacy



Lorraine Rothman died a couple of weeks ago, though the mainstream press is only now publishing obituaries.

Who was Lorraine Rothman?

In 1971, Rothman, a teacher and mother of four, founded with Carol Downer the Los Angeles Feminist Women's Health Center, which taught women how to perform their own cervical self-examinations and pregnancy tests.

They also popularized a procedure called menstrual extraction, which could be used as a method of early abortion.


Menstrual extraction was, and is, truly revolutionary. Using a simple device, which Rothman made with

parts she found in supermarkets, hardware stores, aquarium shops and her husband's biology lab,


women could perform early abortions on one another and on themselves. With simple training, the procedure was safe and effective, and it was used by women in the days before legal abortion in this country to help one another terminate unwanted pregnancies.

Rothman was also a pioneer of the movement, radical in the 1960s and 70s, to teach women to look at and be familiar with their own sexual and reproductive organs. With her friend Carol Downer, she established the Los Angeles Feminist Women's Health Center; later she wrote Menopause Myths & Facts, which argued--correctly, as it turned out--that "hormone replacement therapy" was unhealthy and unnecessary for women undergoing normal menopause.

Rothman's legacy is especially pertinent nowadays, for reasons that should be obvious. Witness, for example, what is happening now in Nicaragua, where abortion is now illegal, with no exceptions for a woman's health:

María de Jesús González was a practical woman. A very poor single mother, the 28-year-old's home was a shack on a mountain near the town of Ocotal in Nicaragua. She made the best of it. The shack was spotless, the children scrubbed. She earned money by washing clothes in the river and making and selling tortillas.

That nowast quite enough to feed her four young children and her elderly mother, so every few months González caught a bus to Managua, the capital, and slaved for a week washing and ironing clothes. The pay was three times better, about £2.60 a day, and by staying with two aunts she cut her costs. She would return to her hamlet with a little nest-egg in her purse. She bought herself one treat - a pair of red shoes - but she would leave them with her family in Managua, as they were no good on the mountain trails she had to go up to get home.

During a visit to Managua in February she felt unwell and visited a hospital. The news was devastating. She was pregnant - and it was ectopic, meaning the foetus was growing outside the womb and not viable. The longer González remained pregnant, the greater the risk of rupture, haemorrhaging and death.

What González did next was - when you understand what life in Nicaragua is like these days - utterly rational. She walked out of the hospital, past the obstetrics and gynaecological ward, past the clinics and pharmacies lining the avenues, packed her bag, kissed her aunts goodbye, and caught a bus back to her village. She summoned two neighbouring women - traditional healers - and requested that they terminate the pregnancy in her shack. Without anaesthetic or proper instruments it was more akin to mutilation than surgery, but González insisted. The haemhorraging was intense, and the agony can only be imagined. It was in vain. Maria died. "We heard there was a lot of blood, a lot of pain," says Esperanza Zeledon, 52, one of the Managua aunts.
....
Her children have been taken into care and her mother now lives alone. The only mementos of González's visits to her aunts in Managua are some clothes and the red shoes.


And of course González is not the only one.

No one knows how many other women have died, or are going to die, as a result of the law. The Pope seemed to acknowledge an increased risk to women's health but Nicaragua's government has made no formal study of the law's impact. Women's rights organisations say their 82 documented deaths are the tip of the iceberg. The Pan-American Health Organisation estimates one woman per day suffers from an ectopic pregnancy, and that every two days a woman suffers a miscarriage from a molar pregnancy. That adds up to hundreds of obstetric emergencies per year.

Human Rights Watch, in a recent report titled Over Their Dead Bodies, cited one woman who urgently needed medical help, but was left untreated at a public hospital for two days because the foetus was still alive and so a therapeutic abortion would be illegal. Eventually she expelled the foetus on her own. "By then she was already in septic shock and died five days later," said the doctor.

Another woman, named Mariana, said she obtained a clandestine abortion because her pregnancy aggravated a permanent health condition. "I was very afraid. It was very traumatic not to be able to talk about it, because it is a crime. The abortion saved both me and the two children I already have." The report said the potentially most harmful impact was that girls and women were afraid of seeking treatment for pregnancy-related complications, especially haemorrhaging, in case they were accused of having induced an abortion.
....
Inspector Martylee Ingram has the same, almost apologetic tone. She is discussing the harrowing case of an 11-year-old girl, Vera, who has been raped and is now 27 weeks pregnant. Asked if Vera should have the baby, she hesitates. The law says yes and her job is to enforce the law. The inspector shakes her head. "But me, as a woman and policewoman, I'd say no. I feel like she shouldn't have it. It's a baby having a baby. She might not survive."

Last month an assembly vote on whether to uphold the law was an emotional and boisterous affair with dozens of girls and women in the public gallery chanting in protest. Separated by just a sheet of glass, the two sides were a study in contrasts. One comprised mostly elderly men in suits, some of whom opened their speeches by saying "I am a Catholic". The other comprised mostly young women in jeans and T-shirts. "Shame, shame, shame on you all," shouted one teenager. "Daniel Ortega is a rapist," shouted another, a reference to allegations the politican raped his stepdaughter. (He was acquitted of all charges.)

Among the police officers keeping an eye on the protesters was a twentysomething woman with a slight bump beneath her blue uniform. She was four months pregnant and anxious, it turned out, because she had been diagnosed with toxic plasmosis, a bacterium that enters the bloodstream during pregnancy and can gravely damage the foetus. She watched the votes stack up in favour of the blanket ban and shook her head, but said nothing.


As Echidne of the Snakes points out,

most . . . ideas about how to ban abortion in this country consist of something very similar to the Nicaraguan law which makes the physicians into criminals.


Criminalizing doctors for performing safe--and necessary--medical procedures creates an atmosphere of fear and reluctance around those same safe--and necessary--procedures; in such an atmosphere, women die. links to evidence that some anti-abortion activists will argue that

there is no such thing as an abortion to save the life of the mother,


which is clearly not true; aside from emergencies like ectopic pregnancies, there's the very real and ugly fact that women *will* do dangerous and even fatal things to abort unwanted pregnancies.

Which is why women like Lorraine Rothman were, and are, heroines.

Bitch_PhD thinks more people should know how to perform menstrual extraction.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

Comments
DownNeck

DownNeck

Jersey City, NJ
March 2006

OCT 09, 2007 04:39 PM


which is clearly not true; aside from emergencies like ectopic pregnancies, there's the very real and ugly fact that women *will* do dangerous and even fatal things to abort unwanted pregnancies



clearly! or...maybe someone choosing to engage in a dangerous and even potentially fatal activity doesn't constitute a medical emergency, no matter their (or your) reasoning for it.

i believe your heart's in the right place, and i agree that more should be done to help women who are willing to do dangerous things to terminate a pregnancy, but this sort of prevarication only helps destroy the credible arguments and ideas it accompanies.

Gringo

Gringo

Spokane, WA
May 2006

OCT 09, 2007 04:45 PM

parts she found in supermarkets, hardware stores, aquarium shops and her husband's biology lab,


MacGyver had nothing on her.

Formus

Formus

Milwaukee, WI
May 2007

OCT 09, 2007 05:13 PM

DownNeck said:


which is clearly not true; aside from emergencies like ectopic pregnancies, there's the very real and ugly fact that women *will* do dangerous and even fatal things to abort unwanted pregnancies



clearly! or...maybe someone choosing to engage in a dangerous and even potentially fatal activity doesn't constitute a medical emergency, no matter their (or your) reasoning for it.



Dude. Look up "ectopic pregnancy" before you open your fingers again. It constitutes a medical emergency.

Morgan

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

OCT 09, 2007 05:16 PM

DownNeck said:clearly! or...maybe someone choosing to engage in a dangerous and even potentially fatal activity doesn't constitute a medical emergency, no matter their (or your) reasoning for it.



So by this logic, we should just let people who are having an overdose or experiencing alcohol poisoning die, right?

DeadBilly

DeadBilly

Burnt Cabins, PA
February 2004

OCT 09, 2007 05:21 PM

Bitch_PhD thinks more people should know how to perform menstrual extraction.



But hopefully they'll only perform it if they have proper medical training. Right?

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

OCT 09, 2007 05:31 PM

DownNeck said:


which is clearly not true; aside from emergencies like ectopic pregnancies, there's the very real and ugly fact that women *will* do dangerous and even fatal things to abort unwanted pregnancies



clearly! or...maybe someone choosing to engage in a dangerous and even potentially fatal activity doesn't constitute a medical emergency, no matter their (or your) reasoning for it.

i believe your heart's in the right place, and i agree that more should be done to help women who are willing to do dangerous things to terminate a pregnancy, but this sort of prevarication only helps destroy the credible arguments and ideas it accompanies.



Beg to differ. It becomes a medical emergency when that person "chooses" to engage in that activity. You might observe that one of the examples cited is of a mother of four who "chose" to attempt to terminate a condition which would probably have killed her anyway.

I don't think that constitutes prevarication.

xazapdmytinu

xazapdmytinu

Fort Collins, CO
July 2007

OCT 09, 2007 05:31 PM

TheGringo said:

parts she found in supermarkets, hardware stores, aquarium shops and her husband's biology lab,


MacGyver had nothing on her.



That would have been a kick ass episode of MacGyver though. I mean there's probably ten episodes alone where he's in Nicaragua anyway, it wouldn't be much of a step.

In all honesty I can see why the mainstream press wouldn't want to to Champion her.

syndeusys

syndeusys

I'm lost
September 2005

OCT 09, 2007 05:32 PM

What exactly would an event have to consist of in order to be deemed a "medical emergency" cause I'm with everyone else ectopic pregnancy is not a choice but is definitely serious

Gringo

Gringo

Spokane, WA
May 2006

OCT 09, 2007 05:32 PM

Bitch_PhD said:

Criminalizing doctors for performing safe--and necessary--medical procedures creates an atmosphere of fear and reluctance around those same safe--and necessary--procedures; in such an atmosphere, women die. links to evidence that some anti-abortion activists will argue that


I completely agree. It still sickens me that people will impose their personal values on everyone else. To the point where they will bully, antagonize, or assault (and even murder) those who don't share those same values or who partake in legal activities (whether medical or not).

I would actually take it several steps further though and defend even the work of doctors such as Jack Kevorkian. Although unpopular, his heart and his work were in the right place in my opinion.

P.S. I expect many of you to flame me for the last paragraph. It's OK for us to disagree so...flame on. smile

xazapdmytinu

xazapdmytinu

Fort Collins, CO
July 2007

OCT 09, 2007 05:33 PM

Morgan said:

DownNeck said:clearly! or...maybe someone choosing to engage in a dangerous and even potentially fatal activity doesn't constitute a medical emergency, no matter their (or your) reasoning for it.



So by this logic, we should just let people who are having an overdose or experiencing alcohol poisoning die, right?



not to mention the fact that, like drug overdoses, if abortions were made illegal then you could face serious legal trouble if a botched self-abortion caused you to require hospitalization.

wink84

wink84

Fulton, MO
October 2007

OCT 09, 2007 05:41 PM

Thank you for that article. She was indeed a brave woman.

syndeusys

syndeusys

I'm lost
September 2005

OCT 09, 2007 05:48 PM

I know this isn't what we're talking about but overdosing on drugs and seeking medical treatment or being hospitalized for it is not illegal. Just a side note.

Tallboy66

Tallboy66

Chicago, IL
January 2005

OCT 09, 2007 05:52 PM



would actually take it several steps further though and defend even the work of doctors such as Jack Kevorkian. Although unpopular, his heart and his work were in the right place in my opinion.



No flame at all. I remember when Royal Oak wasn't all Starbucks and Lofts, the cops would sit a block or so and see who was going into his apt. they got a good case against him as we know.

If someone wants there life to end due to some terminal illness or bone cancer, I've heard the treatment of that is not worth the pain, I say do it.

With regards to a homemade abortion kit :eek

Formus

Formus

Milwaukee, WI
May 2007

OCT 09, 2007 06:51 PM

Tallboy66 said:
With regards to a homemade abortion kit :eek



Reminds me of Sarah Silverman looking lovingly at the vacuum and saying, "Hello, old friend."

JunkyardAngel

JunkyardAngel

San Gabriel, CA
February 2006

OCT 09, 2007 06:51 PM

TheGringo said:
I would actually take it several steps further though and defend even the work of doctors such as Jack Kevorkian. Although unpopular, his heart and his work were in the right place in my opinion.



I read a very interesting article about this just recently, and I cannot for the life of me remember where I read it. **Maybe** LA Times?? Ack...

Anyway. To cut to the chase: Dr. Kevorkian did not actually perform the life-ending drug admin. He discussed it with patients (an their families)--they whys the why-nots, and so on--he explained the ho-tos (of the drugs) and what would happen, and he left it up to the patients.

A surprising number of those who thought they wanted this DID NOT DO IT!!! But instead chose to die naturally.

I think this is a very very dangerous question: to legalize and allow people this choice. There is so much opportunity for wrong-doing and so on. . .

But life is dangerous, isn't it.

And in my opinion, when a person is at the end, in excruciating pain with no way out other than waiting for death, just waiting........... and if the person has thought about his or her end choices and made a thought-out decision, well, I really think this option should be up to them.

Is it really suicide if you are dying anyway??

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next